Switch Theme:

Person claims her experiences with Wyrd (and tabletop gaming) amount to terrorism  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch




I have two points to make one in LARP there is a large number of women in it almost even to men why is that different from the rest of geek culture. My hypothesis is LARPing is more so about interacting with others and playing a part.

My other point is as far as the "creep" label is used a big part of it is dose the woman who's the target find the man attractive. A short fat balding man dressed poorly will be labeled a creep for as little as a quick look yet a tall built man dressed in a suit can give a woman the death stare and have her respond with a smile.

2000 6000 with Reaver Titan guard 2k
2500 (imperial force)
2500 (trimming down in 8th)
TS 30k at 5k points
Yes I have a problem
 
   
Made in us
Sergeant





 Chongara wrote:

...and? The definition of harassment, being creepy or whatever you want to call it is that it's unwanted attention.


My post there was largely a joke (though there is some truth in it). Since you replied seriously to it, I will be serious as well.

You're missing a key word from your definition of harassment. Continued. Harassment is continued unwanted attention. It is not incumbent on anyone to be able to read anyone else's mind to find out if their initial attention is unwanted. Unwanted is not enough, it has to be continued unwanted attention.

Also, it is not "harassment, being creepy or whatever." Harassment is a real thing with real legal and psychological ramifications. Being creepy is someone's opinion of another person and nothing more.

We have a huge list of rights in public spaces and a huge list of expectations that don't exist in public spaces. We should not take away a person's right to look at another or talk to another just because of a perceived shortfall in their physical appearance (the ones most likely to be targeted/bullied with labels of being creepy).

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2016/04/12 17:44:23


 
   
Made in gb
Lord of the Fleet






Oldmike wrote:
My other point is as far as the "creep" label is used a big part of it is dose the woman who's the target find the man attractive. A short fat balding man dressed poorly will be labeled a creep for as little as a quick look yet a tall built man dressed in a suit can give a woman the death stare and have her respond with a smile.

50 shades would be an episode of criminal minds if the guy made minimum wage and lived in a trailer...
   
Made in ca
Longtime Dakkanaut




Building a blood in water scent

50 shades would be a criminal matter if you tried that in real life and the woman complained, regardless of social standing. Mr. Rich Guy can just afford a better lawyer....

We were once so close to heaven, St. Peter came out and gave us medals; declaring us "The nicest of the damned".

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'” 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






San Jose, CA

I think we're done here.

Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? 
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: