Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 05:22:04
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
What codex do people think will get FAQ'd next? They have been chugging through the Space Marine codexes, my guess is probably Blood Angels.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 05:56:19
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
casvalremdeikun wrote:What codex do people think will get FAQ'd next? They have been chugging through the Space Marine codexes, my guess is probably Blood Angels.
I wouldn't doubt it, since the dreadnought ruling mentions them.
It seems they are doing the FAQs for the 7th ed codexes first. I'm not sure what they are going to do with the yet-to-be released dexes. They probably have giant howlers that will need to be FAQ'd once they get released...but until then nobody knows what they will be. GW hasn't shown much ability to fix things before releasing.
Which is weird...will they re-issue the call for questions on the new dexes? Is the reason they are considering doing the FAQs now is because there is going to be a significant delay before another dex is released? Are the new dexes actually good, with few FAQs needed???
If they are doing the 7th ed dexes first, that means Orkies are coming soon...hopefully before July ends. I am hoping they FAQ the Green Tide back into existence in a more formal way than their flippant "take anything you want! Just ask your opponent first..." drivel.
Plus mob rule 7 & 8. Hoping they become "test passed!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 07:20:21
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
how are people playing that now?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 07:40:49
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Slaanesh Chosen Marine Riding a Fiend
Maine
|
JimOnMars wrote: casvalremdeikun wrote:What codex do people think will get FAQ'd next? They have been chugging through the Space Marine codexes, my guess is probably Blood Angels.
I wouldn't doubt it, since the dreadnought ruling mentions them.
It seems they are doing the FAQs for the 7th ed codexes first. I'm not sure what they are going to do with the yet-to-be released dexes. They probably have giant howlers that will need to be FAQ'd once they get released...but until then nobody knows what they will be. GW hasn't shown much ability to fix things before releasing.
Which is weird...will they re-issue the call for questions on the new dexes? Is the reason they are considering doing the FAQs now is because there is going to be a significant delay before another dex is released? Are the new dexes actually good, with few FAQs needed???
If they are doing the 7th ed dexes first, that means Orkies are coming soon...hopefully before July ends. I am hoping they FAQ the Green Tide back into existence in a more formal way than their flippant "take anything you want! Just ask your opponent first..." drivel.
Plus mob rule 7 & 8. Hoping they become "test passed!"
They already did FAQ Green Tide back into existence when they FAQ'd 'out of print' formations and datasheets like Void Shields and the like, if I'm not mistaken.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 08:29:24
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
casvalremdeikun wrote:What codex do people think will get FAQ'd next? They have been chugging through the Space Marine codexes, my guess is probably Blood Angels.
That probably depends on whether Blood Angels are bigger than Dark Angels as a faction.
For what it's worth, I recall Dark Angels having a mini- faq at the start of the year before they asked for questions so I think Blood Angels will be next.
|
YMDC = nightmare |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 08:31:04
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Flashy Flashgitz
|
Before CotW I would have said that there are no 7 and 8 on the Mob rule, but now there is a small possibility. I personaly think the next FAQ wil be for BA, since they realy need it with their BS/WS 3 Scouts and no Grav Canons. Plus there should be a clarification that any Adeptus Astartes army counts as having "Chapter Tactics" so no switching White Scars for Dark Angels.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 08:36:59
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
hordrak wrote:Before CotW I would have said that there are no 7 and 8 on the Mob rule, but now there is a small possibility. I personaly think the next FAQ wil be for BA, since they realy need it with their BS/ WS 3 Scouts and no Grav Canons. Plus there should be a clarification that any Adeptus Astartes army counts as having "Chapter Tactics" so no switching White Scars for Dark Angels.
Didn't they already clarify that in the SM FAQ?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 08:45:10
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
No they didn't. That FaQ only made it so Vanilla SM models lose their bonuses (as only the benefits of Chapter Tactics is lost). ThunderDome lists with Tunderwolves and Ravenwing still work the exact same.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 11:53:53
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
casvalremdeikun wrote:What codex do people think will get FAQ'd next? They have been chugging through the Space Marine codexes, my guess is probably Blood Angels.
Has any non 7.5th edition codex got an FAQ draft yet? My guess could be Necrons or Orks. Not sure if Orks are a 7.5 army or not.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 12:20:16
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
Davor wrote: casvalremdeikun wrote:What codex do people think will get FAQ'd next? They have been chugging through the Space Marine codexes, my guess is probably Blood Angels.
Has any non 7.5th edition codex got an FAQ draft yet? My guess could be Necrons or Orks. Not sure if Orks are a 7.5 army or not.
Orks are definitely not a 7.5ed army.
My bet is that Tyranids, Orks & CSM's will be the last, and come in that order.
Daemons will just end up forgotten about entirely!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 13:24:24
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Well now if we can just get them to make dreadnoughts MC we would be in good shape.
Hopefully 7.5/8th edition will just make everything that isn't a tank or Titan a MC so it's more of an even playing field.
I mean my gawd they gave shipping containers T7! Why take dreads when you can take ARMORED BAWKES!
|
SickSix's Silver Skull WIP thread
My Youtube Channel
JSF wrote:... this is really quite an audacious move by GW, throwing out any pretext that this is a game and that its customers exist to do anything other than buy their overpriced products for the sake of it. The naked arrogance, greed and contempt for their audience is shocking. = Epic First Post.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 13:25:20
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Davor wrote: casvalremdeikun wrote:What codex do people think will get FAQ'd next? They have been chugging through the Space Marine codexes, my guess is probably Blood Angels.
Has any non 7.5th edition codex got an FAQ draft yet? My guess could be Necrons or Orks. Not sure if Orks are a 7.5 army or not.
Space Wolves are not a 7.5E codex. Neither are Militarum Tempestus, SoB, Assassin's, or Inquisition.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 14:29:16
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 14:34:20
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
beat me to it!
This settles my favorite rules argument about Deep Striking Strike Force Deathwing Land Raiders: they start in normal Reserves and drive on. Ezekiel can do the same in that Detachment.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 14:38:39
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Mighty Vampire Count
|
Another confirmation on relics for all factions.
One Model - one relic.
|
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/528517.page
A Bloody Road - my Warhammer Fantasy Fiction |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 14:41:32
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Things that strike me outright:
-Grim Resolve means that Dark Angels shoot Invisible units better in Overwatch than they do in Shooting
-Ravenwing can choose rerollable Jink over armor, which is statistically better
-Clear up Land Raiders and ICs in Deathwing detachments
-Flyers force Ravenwing detachment to start in reserve
-Yes, you auto lose if you take Deathwing detachments or start your Ravenwing detachment in reserve (duh)
I like this one. Clear, concise, to the point.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 14:41:42
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p32 Dreadnought news
|
 |
Skillful Swordmaster
The Shadowlands of Nagarythe
|
Copy paste for the workbound Unforgiven, please?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 14:42:33
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Mr Morden wrote:Another confirmation on relics for all factions.
One Model - one relic.
And yet, Tau players will blindly ignore it until their own FAQ drops.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 14:50:11
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
Requizen wrote: Mr Morden wrote:Another confirmation on relics for all factions.
One Model - one relic.
And yet, Tau players will blindly ignore it until their own FAQ drops.
The Tau book specifically says they make take only 1 of each signature system per army. If it was meant to be 1 signature system per army then it would say only 1 signature system per army and not each signature system.
|
"Hold my shoota, I'm goin in"
Armies (7th edition points)
7000+ Points Death Skullz
4000 Points
+ + 3000 Points "The Fiery Heart of the Emperor"
3500 Points "Void Kraken" Space Marines
3000 Points "Bard's Booze Cruise" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 15:03:59
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
Requizen wrote: Yes, you auto lose if you take Deathwing detachments or start your Ravenwing detachment in reserve But it's not auto lose if they are using deathwing assault as half of them have to come in turn one, correct? So you can still play a pure deathwing/terminator army, but need to have something come on the table turn 1. And glad to see they clarified the stacking benefits of ravenwing and darkshroud. Didn't make any sense for your opponent to see the chapel speeder of darkness... Of course I don't have my ravenwing anymore...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/22 15:05:43
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 15:05:54
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Requizen wrote: Mr Morden wrote:Another confirmation on relics for all factions.
One Model - one relic.
And yet, Tau players will blindly ignore it until their own FAQ drops.
Signature Systems aren't Relics.
Tau are not Space Marines.
You're setting yourself up for disappointment.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 15:07:38
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
Wow, that was pretty....uninspiring. Nothing really changed.
|
~1.5k
Successful Trades: Ashrog (1), Iron35 (1), Rathryan (3), Leth (1), Eshm (1), Zeke48 (1), Gorkamorka12345 (1),
Melevolence (2), Ascalam (1), Swanny318, (1) ScootyPuffJunior, (1) LValx (1), Jim Solo (1), xSoulgrinderx (1), Reese (1), Pretre (1) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 15:09:23
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
That sucks that you can't take Masters or Interregators in the demi-company.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/22 15:11:49
SickSix's Silver Skull WIP thread
My Youtube Channel
JSF wrote:... this is really quite an audacious move by GW, throwing out any pretext that this is a game and that its customers exist to do anything other than buy their overpriced products for the sake of it. The naked arrogance, greed and contempt for their audience is shocking. = Epic First Post.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 15:21:19
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
SickSix wrote:That sucks that you can't take Masters ... in the demi-company.
Ummm...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 15:31:39
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
Let's try and stick to the topic and make posts with real content, eh?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 15:42:20
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
Grim Resolve vs Invisibility--so much for the "opposite rules cancel each other out" shtick.
Grim Resolve wins.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 16:26:50
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
JimOnMars wrote:Grim Resolve vs Invisibility--so much for the "opposite rules cancel each other out" shtick.
Grim Resolve wins.
Cuz Dark Angels are so awesome!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 16:30:16
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
Overall I like the Dark Angels FAQ. It clarifies a lot of issues, such as flyers in the RWSF making the whole thing be in reserves. I guess if you want to run flyers with your Ravenwing you need to take 3 in the Silence Squadron formation (I plan to do just this at some point). I don't much care for allowing the Hatred: Chaos Marines to apply to all of the Khorne Daemonkin Chaos Marine units. To me that is a bit of a nerf to Daemonkin, which already struggles in competitive play. A small nerf, admittedly, but still...
I do love the idea of running a Lion's Blade detachment and being able to shoot full BS overwatch into an invisible unit. Invisible units need to be taken down a notch.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 16:38:10
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Well, if they hate Chaos Marines, and your units are rolling with Chaos Marines...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/06/22 16:44:08
Subject: Warhammer 40,000 FAQ Draft p36 Dark Angels
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Uriels_Flame wrote:Requizen wrote: Yes, you auto lose if you take Deathwing detachments or start your Ravenwing detachment in reserve
But it's not auto lose if they are using deathwing assault as half of them have to come in turn one, correct?
So you can still play a pure deathwing/terminator army, but need to have something come on the table turn 1.
Only if you start. In 7e, you lose if you don't have any models on the table at the end of ANY game turn.
|
|
 |
 |
|