Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/12 01:02:49
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
For bad synapseless tyranids, I'd probably go with hormagaunts over rippers. They do more damage to themselves via instinctive behaviour (on average, just under half the unit will die each time they roll Cannibalistic Hunger), plus they aren't natively fearless, so might even fall back after killing themselves. Plus their upgrades are expensive. 10 points per gaunt is horrendous. Big units of 12 point termagants just walking backwards off the table on turn 1 is pretty funny too.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/11/12 01:06:19
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/12 01:38:17
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Wicked Warp Spider
|
I'll definately go for 1850 pts of synapseless Hormagaunts - as said, just sit back and watch how they eat themselves and leftovers fall back.
Fluff-wise, Eldar army of nine Avatars of Khaine will die to any single imperial hero...
One Eldar "troll concept" - go first, field an entire army of Swooping Hawks led by Baharroth, wait for your opponent to field his 185 servitors, and then Skyleap them all away in the first movement phase.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/11/12 02:02:05
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/12 20:07:31
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
troa wrote:Someone should try that drop-pod list and let us know how it goes. You'd have what, 52 drop pods? Or a few less if you took some missiles on them.
Only a madman owns over 50 drop pods. I could see it actually winning games with the new faq. Those things are huge chunks of impassable terrain you can cage your opponent in with. Every one that wrecks instead of exploding is going to be maddening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/12 20:10:38
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Damsel of the Lady
|
Ratius wrote:All Grots? No armor, slow, weak and terribad LD.
Although I'd put them up against that conscript list for fun
This... is the game that i was fated to play
Destiny
|
realism is a lie
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/12 20:15:57
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
A forest
|
I don't know how bad it is because I don't play yet, but I would imagine an army of nothing but plague zombies would be bad
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/12 21:22:55
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
TheLumberJack wrote:I don't know how bad it is because I don't play yet, but I would imagine an army of nothing but plague zombies would be bad
You could make a semi-functional joke list with them using the IA5 horde detachment (the only place you're allowed more than one unit). 3+ cover/4+ FNP on a Fearless 3pt model is actually fairly scary, even if they're slow and have very limited hitting power.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/11/12 21:23:16
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/13 01:50:35
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I made a mistake with my suggestion. All bloodbrides with max upgrades and unit size instead of normal Wyches
Gotta get that extra cost on garbage
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/13 03:57:16
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Realistically that you might see? Any fething special snowflake list that takes one of everything for supposed balance.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/13 05:45:57
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Realistically that you might see? Any fething special snowflake list that takes one of everything for supposed balance.
...This is an odd stance to be taking? Some armies a 'one of everything' list isn't actually legal since you can't make a CAD with one Troops choice, some armies a 'one of everything' list is more competitive than entire Codexes. Do you have a specific example in mind?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/13 13:20:21
Subject: Re:What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
Well, there's my entire Kroot Merc army that doesn't have modern rules, and even if they did, my carnivores suddenly turned from close combat monsters into shooters?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/11/13 13:20:57
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/13 14:34:24
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Missionary On A Mission
|
Pouncey wrote: Drk_Oblitr8r wrote: BBAP wrote:Codex: SPESS MEHRENS:
FA - Drop Pod
FA - Drop Pod
FA - Drop Pod
FA - Drop Pod
FA - Drop Pod
FA - Drop Pod
.... and suchforth. Auto-lose, and even if you houserule that away you still have an army of immobile Storm Bolter platforms.
Half would come in turn one, and can lock your opponent down while they try and bust through to any objectives you have under more drop pods.
"OUR DROP PODS WILL BLOT OUT THE SUN!"
"And then the Space Marines emerge and wipe out the survivors who were not crushed in the barrage?"
"N-no. It's just the drop pods. They're all empty."
"Is this that famed Space Marine cunning battle strategizing bewildering me as to some hidden aspect of the plan?"
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/13 16:11:07
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
The worst would be to charge with the shooters and to shoot with the cc units/models.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/13 16:54:31
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
AnomanderRake wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Realistically that you might see? Any fething special snowflake list that takes one of everything for supposed balance.
...This is an odd stance to be taking? Some armies a 'one of everything' list isn't actually legal since you can't make a CAD with one Troops choice, some armies a 'one of everything' list is more competitive than entire Codexes. Do you have a specific example in mind?
Some armies have multiple troop choices, but otherwise they'd maybe go for something like, in a SoB army, 3 squads of 10 sisters all with different special weapons, including the Storm Bolter. After that, instead of redundancy and threat saturation, you get one of each unit. So in the Heavy Support slot they'd pick 1 Exorcist, 1 Devastator equivalent (I forget the name) and one Engine.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/13 18:59:12
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
OK so using the following limitations army must include one non-vehicle unit.
Army cannot be an auto-lose army. In other words can't just use things that must start in reserve.
Adepta Sororitas (116 points)
Ministorum Priest (2x Shotgun, Melta Bomb, Warlord, Cloak of St Aspira)
2x Ministorum Priest (2x Shotgun, Melta Bomb)
Fortifications (1730 points)
Wall of Martyr Imperial Defense Network each consisting of:
- 3x Bunkers (Comms Relay, Escape Hatch, Magos Machine Spirit, 6x Tank Traps)
- 3x Imperial Defense Emplacements (6x Tank Traps)
- 4x imperial Defense Line (6x Tank Traps)
3 grizzled old men dual wielding shotguns sitting in front of a massive defense system.
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/13 20:00:52
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
That could be a mildly fun scenario. You could do a 2000-2500 point game with around 5 Chapter Masters and the second player buys nothing but Typhus and zombies.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/14 01:55:54
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Missionary On A Mission
|
Happyjew wrote:3 grizzled old men dual wielding shotguns sitting in front of a massive defense system.
Alternatively, three nutty religious survivalist Zealots sitting behind a massive defence system ready to fight off the gub'mint when they come to take their guns away.
I like it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/14 04:08:10
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote: AnomanderRake wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Realistically that you might see? Any fething special snowflake list that takes one of everything for supposed balance.
...This is an odd stance to be taking? Some armies a 'one of everything' list isn't actually legal since you can't make a CAD with one Troops choice, some armies a 'one of everything' list is more competitive than entire Codexes. Do you have a specific example in mind?
Some armies have multiple troop choices, but otherwise they'd maybe go for something like, in a SoB army, 3 squads of 10 sisters all with different special weapons, including the Storm Bolter. After that, instead of redundancy and threat saturation, you get one of each unit. So in the Heavy Support slot they'd pick 1 Exorcist, 1 Devastator equivalent (I forget the name) and one Engine.
Yeah, but I could take a fluffy special-snowflake Biel-Tan Great Court (one of each Aspect, an extra DA unit and a Phoenix Lord to be a legal detachment, and the Avatar) and end up with a fairly playable list that'd fail at being the worst army here by stomping other proposed lists. Some armies may be terrible at Highlander (the technical name for a no-duplicates format) but some armies can make workable lists out of it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/16 23:36:29
Subject: Re:What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Black Templar Dreadnought
|
Worst army?:
Squats.
It had to be said.
|
A revolution is an idea which has found its bayonets.
Napoleon Bonaparte |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/17 02:18:06
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Repentia Mistress
|
Had an apoc game year back I didn't really want to be a part of but couldn't get out of. I took an inquisitor and hid him up the back and the rest of my force was nothing but orbital barrages and lances- back in the days of the witch hunter dex. Think there was about 14 of those things.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/17 03:50:44
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade
|
Use csm in a csm army.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/18 18:07:48
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Anointed Dark Priest of Chaos
|
salix_fatuus wrote:Spam only flyers (any kind). You will lose turn one for not having any units on the table.
See also Deathwing...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/18 23:44:25
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Missionary On A Mission
|
Happyjew wrote:OK so using the following limitations army must include one non-vehicle unit.
Army cannot be an auto-lose army. In other words can't just use things that must start in reserve.
Adepta Sororitas (116 points)
Ministorum Priest (2x Shotgun, Melta Bomb, Warlord, Cloak of St Aspira)
2x Ministorum Priest (2x Shotgun, Melta Bomb)
Fortifications (1730 points)
Wall of Martyr Imperial Defense Network each consisting of:
- 3x Bunkers (Comms Relay, Escape Hatch, Magos Machine Spirit, 6x Tank Traps)
- 3x Imperial Defense Emplacements (6x Tank Traps)
- 4x imperial Defense Line (6x Tank Traps)
3 grizzled old men dual wielding shotguns sitting in front of a massive defense system.
This is truly awesome
|
Anvils Hammer wrote:
@MrFlutterPie - That's not currently a service we offer, but you can purchase quality miniatures from us..
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/19 00:26:32
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
For 30k (if we're allowing unbound), spam tactical support squads with plasma guns. Stupidly expensive and you'll probably kill half of your army on turn 1. And against the conscript spam list you couldn't put out enough wounds to kill them all after 50% decrease.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/19 02:57:16
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Pushing the 'stupidly overpriced' angle I can make Deathwatch Veterans 82pts each with no guns. How's a legal 1,500pt army consisting of sixteen footslogging Marines and one footslogging Captain with two thunderhammers each and no guns between them sound?
(I tried Ultras Fulmentarii, but they're not actually allowed the autocannon and the Cyclone launcher at the same time and they were just too good.)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/19 05:31:12
Subject: Re:What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Hellion Hitting and Running
|
If you take the farsight enclave you can get crisis suits as troops. An upgraded crisis suit with velocity tracker, shield generator and drone controller cost 83 points each. That is no guns and a ws2 I2. he does have S5 T4 A2 and sv3+ but very few minimum sized units will fail to kill him. You can have two ethereals as your HQ which actually award the opponent VPs for if they die.
Remember in the worst army any unit that has numbers is a potential killing machine. A huge unit of marker drones still has the ability to kill things in CC off their multiple ws2 s3 attacks.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/19 06:44:00
Subject: Re:What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
Nothing but bare bones guardsmen platoons.
With a CCS of course.
It would be a ton of dudes, but with nothing but lasguns.. besides infantry it couldn't hurt a fly.
|
Regiment: 91st Schrott Experimental Regiment
Regiment Planet: Schrott
Specialization: Salvaged, Heavily Modified, and/or Experimental Mechanized Units.
"SIR! Are you sure this will work!?"
"I HAVE NO IDEA, PULL THE TRIGGER!!!" 91st comms chatter. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/19 07:13:59
Subject: Re:What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
An army of just chaos furies, daemonic instability on every combat, your army will implode by turn 3
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/19 09:20:00
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
|
Happyjew wrote:OK so using the following limitations army must include one non-vehicle unit.
Army cannot be an auto-lose army. In other words can't just use things that must start in reserve.
Adepta Sororitas (116 points)
Ministorum Priest (2x Shotgun, Melta Bomb, Warlord, Cloak of St Aspira)
2x Ministorum Priest (2x Shotgun, Melta Bomb)
Fortifications (1730 points)
Wall of Martyr Imperial Defense Network each consisting of:
- 3x Bunkers (Comms Relay, Escape Hatch, Magos Machine Spirit, 6x Tank Traps)
- 3x Imperial Defense Emplacements (6x Tank Traps)
- 4x imperial Defense Line (6x Tank Traps)
3 grizzled old men dual wielding shotguns sitting in front of a massive defense system.
Can you even fit all that on a table?!
|
can neither confirm nor deny I lost track of what I've got right now. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/19 15:50:25
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Cackling Chaos Conscript
|
6 Chosen of Tzeentch, icon of flame, lascannon, 5x paired lightning claws, veterans - 315 pts
Take 5 such squads and a Daemon prince on foot with black legion relic which reduces toughness by 1.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/11/20 04:05:19
Subject: What is the worst army you can build for 40k?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
I've been having a lot of fun looking for expensive and limited units, even though it's not as easy as it used to be in the grand old days of Codex-wide armouries for every option. A rotor-cannon Veletarii-spam list could be funny, you may get Salvo 3/4 weapons on everybody but every single thing in your army other than krak grenades is S3. A Land Speeder is immune to your army.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|