Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2025/07/02 05:19:56
Subject: Warhammer Underworlds - Embergard new edition. p.151
lost_lilliputian wrote: Should I say that not since having seen the Turd of Nineties Nagash in metal have my eyes been this hurt?!
You take that slander of metal Nagash back! He remains a far easier to transport model, and a more-usable-on-the-table model that the silly plastic version.
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote: This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote: You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something...
2025/07/02 07:08:51
Subject: Warhammer Underworlds - Embergard new edition. p.151
lost_lilliputian wrote: Should I say that not since having seen the Turd of Nineties Nagash in metal have my eyes been this hurt?!
You take that slander of metal Nagash back! He remains a far easier to transport model, and a more-usable-on-the-table model that the silly plastic version.
Hehe you're right of course metal Nagash would be easier to transport than the plastic one. More solid too for carrying in a sock to swing at any would be mugger. Just with his oversized deformed skull I always thought they could fit another skull inside his, inside another skull. Triple skulls?!
2025/07/03 07:35:37
Subject: Warhammer Underworlds - Embergard new edition. p.151
While I think the paintjob and "Not up to their usual standards" sculpting isn't helping, for me the main problem is their mouths.
Even with the enbiggening minis have been having over the years, they're still not at a scale where you can do individual teeth without it looking really weird.
2025/07/04 18:06:16
Subject: Warhammer Underworlds - Embergard new edition. p.151
The paintjob is part of the issue, but I'm not sure a paintjob exists that can save those mouths. They don't like they're deformed or mutated, they just look like they cut their lips off and called it a day.
She/Her
"There are no problems that cannot be solved with cannons." - Chief Engineer Boris Krauss of Nuln
Kid_Kyoto wrote:"Don't be a dick" and "This is a family wargame" are good rules of thumb.
Like i thought, grittier overall look and heavy gore around the mouth helps them incredibly. Still a weak look warband all round, but they are servicable.
2025/07/05 09:24:25
Subject: Warhammer Underworlds - Embergard new edition. p.151
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote: This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote: You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something...
2025/07/18 19:07:23
Subject: Re:Warhammer Underworlds - Embergard new edition. p.151
I would not object if they got the Darkoath treatment and got a unit, cavalry, couple of hero's and monster and got added to the Sylvaneth as a sub-faction.
2025/07/18 20:38:30
Subject: Warhammer Underworlds - Embergard new edition. p.151
Inquisitor Gideon wrote: I would not object if they got the Darkoath treatment and got a unit, cavalry, couple of hero's and monster and got added to the Sylvaneth as a sub-faction.
That would be neat indeed.
2025/07/18 21:00:35
Subject: Re:Warhammer Underworlds - Embergard new edition. p.151