Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2017/05/16 16:02:40
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
12000 ADDITIONAL troops, and all the regiments of the IG, and all of the existing space marine chapters, and all of the sisters detachments, and all of the inquisition resources, so on and so forth.
People who stopped buying GW but wont stop bitching about it are the vegans of warhammer
flakpanzer wrote:So I reread the Primaris FAQ this morning, and it stated this:
"I have an <insert favourite Chapter> army. Can I field Primaris Space Marines?
Any of the galaxy’s many hundreds of Codex Chapters can use Primaris Space Marines, along with many of the less Codex-compliant ones like Dark Angels, Blood Angels and Space Wolves."
If the Blood Angels are on the other side of that Warp Rift from Terra/Mars, how are they going to get Primaris reinforcements?
Exactly!
To me, it's clear as day that GW intends on phasing out the Space Marines line in favor of the new hotness; Primaris Space Marines. All we have to do is read between the lines; look past their carefully crafted words. It's all right there in the FAQ.
...you’ve seen the Intercessors, ..., but there are plenty more on the way. And ...vehicles too ...some Chapters, ..., now have entire companies of these new warriors. Others have incorporated squads of Primaris Space Marines into existing Battle Companies. ...entirely new Chapters out of these new Space Marines. Any ... Chapters can use Primaris Space Marines...
I believe it's foolish to assume that GW intends on continuing with the existing Space Marines line. I fully believe that we'll only see new releases for the Primaris Space Marines from here on out - Space Marines will be left to languish.
We've even now seen a larger Nurgle Chaos Space Marine. The writing is on the wall.
I don't mind change, but damn... As has been mentioned this isn't simply scale creep. This is a full on undermining of the narrative, a full on subversion of hobbyists entire model collections.
Can you tell I'm a little upset? I think I finally have a full understanding and appreciation for what the WFB players went through with the whole AoS change.
2017/05/16 16:07:19
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
Kirasu wrote: Awesome, more incompatible fluff from writers unfamiliar with the backstory of the original great crusade. A dozen whole chapters? Wow 12000 marines are going to bring freedom to the Galaxy.
The great crusade had over 2 MILLION space marines with 18 primarch + The Emperor and countless imperial Navy and army troops that took over 200 years.
Guilliman himself led 250,000 marines and yet now using 5% of that is some kind of grand plan? Ugh.
It's not as if there is a large reserve of Space Marines. The galaxy went to hell, Guilliman is doing with what he has, and he doesn't have 2 million Space Marines.
Huh? Games workshop invented this absurd fluff with guilliman and cawl. They could have certainly made it more believable. He has exactly how many marines the gw writer puts on the paper...
The point, which was missed, is that there is no way in hell that guilliman should be able to accomplish the same task with LESS than 1% the troops. Hence internal consistency
"Roboute Guilliman gathered his new armada. Along with elements of the Adeptus Custodes, a small contingent of the Silent Sisterhood, and a vast war host of Primaris Space Marines from many newly founded Chapters, the Primarch set a winding course. Strike forces from over a dozen pre-existing Chapters of Space Marines, led by the Imperial Fists, joined the fleet."
Not just 12, 000 marines.
Where does it say anything about achieving exactly the same as the great crusade anyway?
2017/05/16 16:08:56
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
Kirasu wrote: Awesome, more incompatible fluff from writers unfamiliar with the backstory of the original great crusade. A dozen whole chapters? Wow 12000 marines are going to bring freedom to the Galaxy.
The great crusade had over 2 MILLION space marines with 18 primarch + The Emperor and countless imperial Navy and army troops that took over 200 years.
Guilliman himself led 250,000 marines and yet now using 5% of that is some kind of grand plan? Ugh.
It's not as if there is a large reserve of Space Marines. The galaxy went to hell, Guilliman is doing with what he has, and he doesn't have 2 million Space Marines.
Huh? Games workshop invented this absurd fluff with guilliman and cawl. They could have certainly made it more believable. He has exactly how many marines the gw writer puts on the paper...
The point, which was missed, is that there is no way in hell that guilliman should be able to accomplish the same task with LESS than 1% the troops. Hence internal consistency
Aa but they are NU-marines. Mere marines weep at theip awesomess.
2024 painted/bought: 109/109
2017/05/16 16:08:56
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
Kirasu wrote: Awesome, more incompatible fluff from writers unfamiliar with the backstory of the original great crusade. A dozen whole chapters? Wow 12000 marines are going to bring freedom to the Galaxy.
The great crusade had over 2 MILLION space marines with 18 primarch + The Emperor and countless imperial Navy and army troops that took over 200 years.
Guilliman himself led 250,000 marines and yet now using 5% of that is some kind of grand plan? Ugh.
It's not as if there is a large reserve of Space Marines. The galaxy went to hell, Guilliman is doing with what he has, and he doesn't have 2 million Space Marines.
Huh? Games workshop invented this absurd fluff with guilliman and cawl. They could have certainly made it more believable. He has exactly how many marines the gw writer puts on the paper...
The point, which was missed, is that there is no way in hell that guilliman should be able to accomplish the same task with LESS than 1% the troops. Hence internal consistency
It's not the same task. The Great Crusade was to conquer the galaxy, the Indomitus Crusade is to reinforce already existing warzones.
2017/05/16 16:09:24
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
Kirasu wrote: Awesome, more incompatible fluff from writers unfamiliar with the backstory of the original great crusade. A dozen whole chapters? Wow 12000 marines are going to bring freedom to the Galaxy.
The great crusade had over 2 MILLION space marines with 18 primarch + The Emperor and countless imperial Navy and army troops that took over 200 years.
Guilliman himself led 250,000 marines and yet now using 5% of that is some kind of grand plan? Ugh.
It's not as if there is a large reserve of Space Marines. The galaxy went to hell, Guilliman is doing with what he has, and he doesn't have 2 million Space Marines.
Silly sphess mehreens, 12000 super duper mehreens is all it takes to do what it 2million of you lesser mehreens failed to even finish.
2017/05/16 16:09:26
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
So, just re-reading the Warhammer Community site when I realised the article name that introduced the Primaris Marines is 'A New Breed of Hero'.
Are these........ Howard the Duck Marines???
I will give many internets to the first person to model Captain Howardus and his Anatidae Guard in their ceremonial white armour with yellow beakies and orange feet...
While you sleep, they'll be waiting...
Have you thought about the Axis of Evil pension scheme?
2017/05/16 16:10:55
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
Leth wrote: 12000 ADDITIONAL troops, and all the regiments of the IG, and all of the existing space marine chapters, and all of the sisters detachments, and all of the inquisition resources, so on and so forth.
Which are pittances when wars involve billions
2024 painted/bought: 109/109
2017/05/16 16:11:28
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
YeOldSaltPotato wrote: I love the image of Guilliman walking in and saying "I need two million marines to save the imperirum" and getting "I can get you 12,000" from Cawl.
Sorry if this seems like dragging something up to attack you, Unusual Suspect. I had this in a separate tab and I forgot to reply with it yesterday and think it's actually an important bit to discuss.
Edit: also, the presumption that the explicit wording that Fly grants the ability to fall back and shoot is just the article writer expressing himself poorly is hilarious.
Considering that when he did the CSM article people were saying that it was poorly written/expressed...it's not that bad of a presumption.
Also, again, "Fly" actually has something for us to compare it to with AoS.
Does AoS have a similar "retreat from combat" mechanic?
Indeed it does. The "retreat from combat" part for AoS, like we've had discussed for 40k from GW itself, takes place not during the Combat phase itself but during the Movement phase.
Warhammer Community "Movement" Article wrote:If you’re in combat at the start of your turn, you can Fall Back by moving away from the enemy. You’ll lose the ability to advance, shoot or charge that turn, and crucially, enemies will be able to shoot at you! This does, however, open up a vast range of tactical options for armies like the Astra Militarum, who will now be able to effectively deploy in firing lines, with each row falling back from any assaults in good order (if they survived) while the unit behind them fires at the attackers. It goes both ways though – if you have a dedicated assault unit that specializes in killing infantry (like Warp Talons) your opponent will find it much harder to pin them down in combat with heavily armoured units for the entire game.
The way that Retreating works for Age of Sigmar?
Age of Sigmar's rules wrote:
Units starting the movement phase within 3" of an enemy unit can either remain stationary or retreat. If you choose to retreat, the unit must end its move more than 3" away from all enemy units. If a unit retreats, then it can't shoot or charge later that turn.
The special rule for "Fly" has the following to say there:
Age of Sigmar's rules wrote:
If the warscroll for a model says that the model can fly, it can pass across models and scenery as if they were not there. It still may not finish the move within 3" of an enemy in the movement phase, and if it is already within 3" of an enemy it can only retreat or remain stationary.
If not, what could we possibly learn from AoS regarding that particular rules interaction?
The "retreat from combat" for Age of Sigmar can happen two ways:
1) Retreating during the movement phase.
2) Bespoke rules like the Gryph-Hound's "Darting Attacks" or the Skink "Wary Fighters" rule.
Darting Attacks wrote:Gryph-Hounds attack in a series of darting strikes. Immediately after this unit attacks in the combat phase, roll a dice and move each model in the unit up to that many inches.
Wary Fighters wrote:When it is this unit's turn to pile in and attack, it can withdraw instead. Move each model in the unit up to 8", so that each one ends up at least 3" from the enemy.
The reason why I said that I think there's something missing is that it would be super surprising if "Fly", a generic keyword, did something as powerful as allowing you to leave a combat and then act normally...and it only gets mentioned in passing tied to Crisis Suits, a unit that can take the "Bonding Knife Ritual" which currently grants "Heroic Morale" to a unit even without an IC.
I mean, if "Fly" lets you flee from a Combat with no penalties? I would think that would have merited a mention during the "Movement" article or could have been brought up during the Eldar faction focus or the woefully inadequate Chaos Space Marines faction focus.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/16 16:16:06
2017/05/16 16:16:26
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
On the far side of the galaxy-spanning warp storm, things have quite literally gone to hell.
Me confused. What side are they talking about? I.e. what segmentums?
Spoiler:
Warhammer Community wrote:The Great Rift is a tear in reality that essentially divides the Imperium in half. Its emergence was a literal galaxy-shattering event, which threw the Imperium into chaos and ushered in new wars across nearly every world in the Imperium. So powerful and far was this storm that the very laws of physics fray at the edges as the inconsistencies of time fluctuations, once largely localised to larger storms such as the Eye of Terror, spread across the galaxy. Some worlds felt centuries go by in an instant while others were all but frozen in time, and still others have suffered constant temporal shifts.
None fully understand the origins of the rift – though there are many theories: the breach of the Cadian Gate, the sorcery of a Daemon Primarch, catastrophe in the Webway, mass bloodshed and fire in the Damocles Gulf – all may have caused or contributed to it. The rift is variously known by the cultures of the galaxy as the Crimson Path, the Mouth of Ruin, the Warpscar, the Dathedian, Gork’s Grin and a thousand other names besides. To the Imperium it is the Cicatrix Maledictum, or just the Great Rift. To those on the Terran side, it is a tainted scar across the sky. To those unfortunates on the far side, it is far worse…
I would assume they're talking about the non-Terran side, so Segmentum Obscurus and Ultima.
2017/05/16 16:22:39
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
To me, it's clear as day that GW intends on phasing out the Space Marines line in favor of the new hotness; Primaris Space Marines. All we have to do is read between the lines; look past their carefully crafted words. It's all right there in the FAQ.
...you’ve seen the Intercessors, ..., but there are plenty more on the way. And ...vehicles too ...some Chapters, ..., now have entire companies of these new warriors. Others have incorporated squads of Primaris Space Marines into existing Battle Companies. ...entirely new Chapters out of these new Space Marines. Any ... Chapters can use Primaris Space Marines...
I believe it's foolish to assume that GW intends on continuing with the existing Space Marines line. I fully believe that we'll only see new releases for the Primaris Space Marines from here on out - Space Marines will be left to languish.
We've even now seen a larger Nurgle Chaos Space Marine. The writing is on the wall.
I don't mind change, but damn... As has been mentioned this isn't simply scale creep. This is a full on undermining of the narrative, a full on subversion of hobbyists entire model collections.
Can you tell I'm a little upset? I think I finally have a full understanding and appreciation for what the WFB players went through with the whole AoS change.
I would say most of us are quite aware of what is happening.
They aren't terminating the molds. They haven't written the old out. It doesn't subvert the collection. People will indicate their interest with their wallets and numarines will likely be the winner. Then 6-8 years from now they'll fade them out in the story and very few people will care, because most everyone will have newer models.
Do you still see tons of metal models on the table? Where are those complaints?
2017/05/16 16:29:33
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
Did someone take seriously the numbers that 40k gives in their fluff?
Like the "Theres only 250.000 sisters of battle in the whole galaxy", when in a medieval battle you could have 200k soldiers in just one side, and normally, 40K battles are absurdly large.
The "Theres 1000 chapters of 1000 marines" is pretty absurd. Theres basically less marines than Imperial Planets.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/05/16 16:30:14
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote: Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
2017/05/16 16:30:55
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
I really don't see how people can be angry or upset about how they are going about phasing in the new marines. I think they have managed to tick all boxes. Nothing is being invalidated, it makes perfect sense for their to be marines of different sizes and marks on the battlefield within the same army, it is the continuation of well established fluff.
I sometimes think there are those who want everything to stay the exact same and never change. 30 years and they are improving the marines by explaining it well in the fluff, setting up lots of potential future conflict and interesting story lines. How can people say stupid things like "they are just invalidating peoples entire collections" erm... no they are not.
The first rule of unarmed combat is: don’t be unarmed.
2017/05/16 16:34:12
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
flakpanzer wrote:So I reread the Primaris FAQ this morning, and it stated this:
I believe it's foolish to assume that GW intends on continuing with the existing Space Marines line. I fully believe that we'll only see new releases for the Primaris Space Marines from here on out - Space Marines will be left to languish.
We've even now seen a larger Nurgle Chaos Space Marine. The writing is on the wall.
I don't mind change, but damn... As has been mentioned this isn't simply scale creep. This is a full on undermining of the narrative, a full on subversion of hobbyists entire model collections.
Can you tell I'm a little upset? I think I finally have a full understanding and appreciation for what the WFB players went through with the whole AoS change.
So...just use your prexisting Marines...I mean. No one will care. I wont care....am I alone in not caring if my opponent fields his already painted army and doesn't use the nu-marines. i feel that no one will care. Am I wrong?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/16 16:38:23
Age Quod Agis
2017/05/16 16:39:22
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
Galas wrote: Did someone take seriously the numbers that 40k gives in their fluff?
Like the "Theres only 250.000 sisters of battle in the whole galaxy", when in a medieval battle you could have 200k soldiers in just one side, and normally, 40K battles are absurdly large.
The "Theres 1000 chapters of 1000 marines" is pretty absurd. Theres basically less marines than Imperial Planets.
Actually there ARE less marines than imperial worlds, probably sisters and maybe Skitarii too. But the forces of the Imperial Guard are nearly unending.
It's also pretty silly to take writers numbers at face value either way. Even with 2,000,000 space marines conquering the whole galaxy is absurd. The Milky Way has over 100,000,000,000 planets, even if a tenth of a percent of them were ones worth conquering your 2,000,000 marines would be hopelessly undermanned, no matter how awesome they were.
2017/05/16 16:43:58
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
To me, it's clear as day that GW intends on phasing out the Space Marines line in favor of the new hotness; Primaris Space Marines. All we have to do is read between the lines; look past their carefully crafted words. It's all right there in the FAQ.
...you’ve seen the Intercessors, ..., but there are plenty more on the way. And ...vehicles too ...some Chapters, ..., now have entire companies of these new warriors. Others have incorporated squads of Primaris Space Marines into existing Battle Companies. ...entirely new Chapters out of these new Space Marines. Any ... Chapters can use Primaris Space Marines...
I believe it's foolish to assume that GW intends on continuing with the existing Space Marines line. I fully believe that we'll only see new releases for the Primaris Space Marines from here on out - Space Marines will be left to languish.
We've even now seen a larger Nurgle Chaos Space Marine. The writing is on the wall.
I don't mind change, but damn... As has been mentioned this isn't simply scale creep. This is a full on undermining of the narrative, a full on subversion of hobbyists entire model collections.
Can you tell I'm a little upset? I think I finally have a full understanding and appreciation for what the WFB players went through with the whole AoS change.
I would say most of us are quite aware of what is happening.
They aren't terminating the molds. They haven't written the old out. It doesn't subvert the collection. People will indicate their interest with their wallets and numarines will likely be the winner. Then 6-8 years from now they'll fade them out in the story and very few people will care, because most everyone will have newer models.
Do you still see tons of metal models on the table? Where are those complaints?
I agree with most of your point but the part I placed in bold. There is a massive difference between technology allowing for models to hold high detail in a more convenient medium, and suddenly altering the scale and lore of a line.
Further more, I saw the righting on the wall and didn't mind much at first. After all scale has been creeping in for years, just look at rogue trader beakies. But, since they decided to make newer marines with altered in game stats, suddenly in 6-8 years when the lines are updated, I can't really use my old marine army in good faith since suddenly they have 2 wounds etc etc.
I can easily see why folks are frustrated, I mean heck I have 300 power armor bodies at least across several armies. NO WAY am I ever purchasing so many marines of any type again. I'll model a new army eventually, in my favorite faction and call it quits this time rather then recreating several factions I love. For the amount of gaming I can get in it simply isn't worth the risk of one day not being able to play an army. I'd rather focus on my Imperial Guard and xenos this edition since they are much safer from the creep (though I am sure it will catch everything).
Q: So...would the blood angels be getting a big fly swatter to deal with this bug menace?
A: New Dreadnought combat weapon confirmed.
Q: nothing wrong with new scale marines, just don't bend fluff for it. Here bigger marines, now change collection or have smaller ones and it's fine, why that ... with cawl smarter than emperor. guilman should be called heretic for his 30k believes by 40k terra
A: Can we just agree that everyone is a Heretic and move on?
Q: God damn it. My beloved Sons of Sanguinius are on the way to squat town. Thanks GW. Looks like its snakes and ladders again for me
A: Hey David,
No one is going to Squat Town.
No need for Snakes and ladders, when you can play Leviathans and Jump packs.
Q: Dear Games Workshop Community manager, i know you certainly won't answer my question. But as i see the Lord of the XIIIth coming back and leading the armies of our God-Emperor, i want to ask, are other sons of the Emperor coming back too ? In these dark times, the sons of the First Legion really need their Primarch to guide them in theses ages of Darkness. And i'm not speaking only for the Ist Legion, are other still alive Primarchs planned to be brought back ?
A: Hey Steven,
Thanks for your question.
All we know at the moment, is that Guilliman is a the head of a new Crusade, and Magnus is once more out and about in the Galaxy.
Will we see any more primarchs return? Maybe, there are certainly some that are "lost" rather than confirmed dead, but we don't have any news on their return at the moment.
Q: Greeting GW PR team,
This has been the best PR campaigns in wargaming I have ever seen so well done. It does have a downside as we only see small elements at a time and it is a very hard system balance of point, counter point to keep everyone happy with what articles are released and what concerns are alleviated.
So far between the factions focuses and preview articles the game is feeling even more weighted in favor of shooting than what we have seen in 6th and 7th. We have had the Fight Phase preview but that article really just let us know it will play similar to AoS giving the community a more strategic improvement to the close combat phase. Between the PR replies and the article we keep getting the "get excited because close combat is great" reply. Unfortunately we have not gotten a solid preview how this is true.
The example that was used is Guardsman vs Khorne Berserkers but most of the time the Guardsman win this fight in the last few editions. This was due to three game elements Area of Influence, Combat Effectiveness and pointing of models being made without taking into account of the last two elements.
Area of Influence - the area that takes into account the mobility and weapon's range of engagement. This is obviously in favor of fast units and ranged focused units.
Combat Effectiveness - This is the threshold of a unit to still make a meaningful impact related to combat on the battlefield. It takes into account many factors including Area of Influence. Again ranged units normally maintain combat effectiveness longer than non deathstar close combat specialist.
Non deathstar units normally take damage on their approach as well as in the close combat phase. Leaving a unit like Khorne Berserkers at reduced strength by the time they are able the are able to engage an enemy. If the close combat specialist win their combat now they repeat this process but generally reach the threshold of combat ineffective at a faster rate then most ranged units.
The community would really like to see a some articles on how close combat has improved. Try to cover these items and more if possible.
- The Pistol information was nice but do they still offer a plus 1 attack in close combat, as I'm not sure if that was covered?
- The moral check system is going to be very rough for close combat units taking tests on the way in and most likely from close combat. Is there a rule that helps protect the victor of close combat from taking a moral test? YAY we just won this fight but Bob died so more of us get to die.
- How fast can units get into combat from reserves and disembarking transports? PS: Please include this info in tomorrow's post.
- A more extensive look at weapons and abilities close combat specialist have to help turn the tide of battle.
- Give us some detailed examples on match ups example Guardsman vs Khorne Berserkers. How have things changed for close combat specialist and are Guardsman and their equivalent now hitting in melee on something like a 5+?
- Has there been anything done to help out melee infantry advancing across the battlefield? Currently it is better to take units that will fit inside transports over running a 20 man Khorne Berserkers or Crusader squads. Cheap horde units are nice looking at you Ork boys but in games that are time bound horde armies are not reasonable. I do miss my 230 model green tide but it just takes to long to play.
Thanks for your hard work and the community would love to know why and how close combat had improved with 8th.
A: Hey Matthew,
We'll certainly get you some nice juicy rules on Combat very soon covering some, if not all the things you mentioned.
Q: Blasphemy !! Baal will never fall !
Baal will become the new guiding light of the" Dark Imperium" with Sanguinius acting as the Astronomicon of Imperium Nihilus just as the Emperor is the Astronomicon on Terra for the rest of the Imperium....
I repeat Baal can not and Will not FALL !
Js..
A: That the spirit.
Q: I dont actually expect a response here but...could we just get on with it?
Ive played 40k for 17 years. Ive seen every rules evolution since 3rd ed. Ive never seen so much hype with no release date.
It really does seem like the game could be brought back to my glory day standards from 3rd and 4th, but this is just dragging out too long.
Take my money!!! Just get every damn thing rolling already!!!!!
A: You don't HAVE to read the articles.
We just thought you'd like to know stuff ahead of time.
Q: My Iron Warriors are certainly not happy to hear about Imperial Fists running around, but this does mean more opportunity to get trophies from killing our most hated foes!
A: We bet it does.
Q: So what's happened to the Dark Angels and their 'successors' *cough* Legion *cough* whilst this has been going on , will Cypher's friends slowly vanish off to the Rock, or will they tag on to the Crusade(s)?
A: We don't know yet, Tom.
Cypher and his buddies have proven pretty hard to catch in the past...
Q: Dear @Warhammer 40,000 I'm wondering... with all this Daemonic Prescence... Where are the Grey Knights?... as a one purpose made Chapter... I don't see them in this lore.
A: The Grey Knights are very much still around.
They do their own thing though, and don't even answer to a Primarch.
Q: Wouldnt Primaris space marines look down on the original space marines? true, they are of the same gene seed, on the same side, brothers and all that, but the original version had a part of them fall to chaos (went traitor) while the new version didnt - unspoiled versus the ones that got eventually spoiled, even a part of them (they had defects).
A: Or would the older ones look down on the untested recruits?
Q: So suddenly Cawl is smarter then the Emperor? It is so dumb I can't find words for it. Just stop changing and retconing old fluff.
A: Well, it took him 10,000 years to "improve" on a Marine with all the resources of Mars, where the Emperor made them from scratch in a few years in his basement.
Q: Hello GW ! All of this is very cool (specially your pre launch news each days) Can we have some news about the grey knights soon ?
A: We'll see what we can do.
Q: Oh. I get it. No need to replace Dante with a primaris when you can just kill all the top brass and then replace them after contact is reestablished! Ha!
A: He's survived 1,000 years of battle. This is just another day in the office right?
Q: So does this mean chapters on the far side, like the Blood Angels don't have Primaris Marines? Kinda sad for Blood Angel players.
A: Hey David,
Guilliman will certainly be trying to get his new reinforcements to Baal, and we're sure Dante will be glad of the help if they can make it.
Q: Newmarines have skitarii pattern galvanic rifles, sans precision shot? Cawl's giving away all our cool stuff!
A: We bet he saved Mars some good stuff too.
Q: will we be getting any more details soon about the blood angels/baal/tyranids?p.s....BRING BACK CORAX!! (please)
A: Nevermore.
Q: So will blood angels have access to Primaris marines? They don't have access to the imperium anymore.
A: If any can reach them in time, we bet they'd happily paint them red and throw them into the jaws of the devourer.
Q: Why the blopd angels always looking like a damsel in distress? Theres a big change coming for them
A: A damsel with a power sword who hunts dragons!
Q: can i join the crusade whit my old marines?, i have many bolter rounds to "gift" to heretics and xenos alike
A: You totally can.
Many non Primaris Marines are on the Crusade too.
Q: first you killed my brets. now you will kill off my angels......why gw why?
A: The angels aren't dead yet, Brad.
Q: The black Templars better have a crusade or I will crusade into your HQ myself
A: We don't think we could stop them crusading if we tried.
Q: Can we possibly have some news of the grey knight ?
A: We'll get you a faction focus article soon, don't worry.
2017/05/16 16:47:49
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
Until I'm told old marines are gone... and I can't believe that will ever happen... the NuMarines are just Chosen for the Chapters that can be MSU Troops. No biggy. Haopy to have them... great for holding down a vital objective
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+ Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2 One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners
2017/05/16 16:52:29
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
I think most of it depends on how much effort and time you put into modeling/painting your army. I have been in the hobby for almost 30 years and I have a SW army that extends back almost that whole time. Do I want to buy new marines and replace those that are painted to a higher quality than most- no way. The fact that I paint so slowly and am getting up there in age makes it more difficult (and frustrating) for me to see GW most likely replace all my models with bigger ones. First its the marines, then its the terminators, etc. I have played in lots of hobby stores and tourneys over the years, against folks with primed models/ half painted models etc. Honestly I woudl think those folks dont care. They will ebay off their models and start over as they truly never finish an army. In the end if I buy the new marines, I would just have to buy everything else as that one unit would look out of place, so then my termies look out of place and the new dread makes my existing dread look small etc.
Although again it goes back to AoS. Alot of folks said GW wouldnt AoS40k and that's exactly what we are getting. The AoS has a larger aesthetic and that is what 40k has been moving to. If I had to guess, soon most battles will always have a primarch on the table and come down to big guy vs big guy. yet that seems to be what the new generation wants. I just am hoping 30k stays as it is, make it the old timers game.
I wonder if they would have answered the question- Hey GW, will you ever be creating a new marine kit for the existing marine scale?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/16 16:56:21
2017/05/16 16:53:51
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 16 May 2017: Leaked Death Guard (starter set?)(All info in OP)
I agree with most of your point but the part I placed in bold. There is a massive difference between technology allowing for models to hold high detail in a more convenient medium, and suddenly altering the scale and lore of a line.
Further more, I saw the righting on the wall and didn't mind much at first. After all scale has been creeping in for years, just look at rogue trader beakies. But, since they decided to make newer marines with altered in game stats, suddenly in 6-8 years when the lines are updated, I can't really use my old marine army in good faith since suddenly they have 2 wounds etc etc.
I can easily see why folks are frustrated, I mean heck I have 300 power armor bodies at least across several armies. NO WAY am I ever purchasing so many marines of any type again. I'll model a new army eventually, in my favorite faction and call it quits this time rather then recreating several factions I love. For the amount of gaming I can get in it simply isn't worth the risk of one day not being able to play an army. I'd rather focus on my Imperial Guard and xenos this edition since they are much safer from the creep (though I am sure it will catch everything).
The overall point on metal was that people, including myself, still have tons of old metal models that don't see the table.
I look at my old Rubrics and laugh at how terrible they look and how poorly I painted back then. The new ones are a chance for me to start over with a faction that I simply adore.
I'll never toss my old models, but they'll never see the table again either.
Although again it goes back to AoS. Alot of folks said GW wouldnt AoS40k and that's exactly what we are getting. The AoS has a larger aesthetic and that is what 40k has been moving to. If I had to guess, soon most battles will always have a primarch on the table and come down to big guy vs big guy. yet that seems to be what the new generation wants. I just am hoping 30k stays as it is, make it the old timers game.
You're vastly over estimating how strong those big guys are. In fact very few top tournament tables are rolling large models right now.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/16 16:55:49