Switch Theme:

In 8th Edition, do model's points cost include the cost of stock weapons?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

Iron Mike wrote:
Spoiler:
 AndrewGPaul wrote:
 Ensis Ferrae wrote:
Himmelweiss wrote:

It's just annoying that the points of characters in the GW Indexes always include the wargear.
But in the FW Indexes they are not.



Like who?? I am looking at/through my e-book version of the Astartes index, and literally all the characters that have named/special weapons, those weapons are listed as 0 points.


His point is that some characters have a listed points value under the heading "(includes wargear), and some have a points value under the heading (Does not include wargear), but the points cost of their wargear is 0. I don't see any confusion there, myself - the rules are perfectly clear.

However, the premise that all the special characters in GW Indexes are listed including wargear and the ones in Forge World Indexes are not is false, as inspection of Index: Imperium 2 will show; Inquisitors Coteaz, Greyfax and Karamazov are all listed without wargear (although they're the only ones like that in that book).

The rule is quite simple; if a model is listed in the (Does not include wargear) table and has an item of wargear that's got a points value, then you pay that points value for the wargear. Doesn't matter if it comes with it as standard or if it's an option.


So Pedro Kantor is actually 190pts? His "Does Not Include Wargear" model in the Named Character section is listed at 170pts, yet he must always take a mandatory, non-interchangeable Power Fist as well (+20pts).
If this is indeed the case, then having a 170pts "model" cost for a Named Character with unalterable wargear is laughably fething stupid.

Where are you seeing that the 'Points Per Model' column for Named Characters says "(Does not include wargear)"?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/03 03:08:36


'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in ca
Fresh-Faced New User





 Ghaz wrote:
Iron Mike wrote:
Spoiler:
 AndrewGPaul wrote:
 Ensis Ferrae wrote:
Himmelweiss wrote:

It's just annoying that the points of characters in the GW Indexes always include the wargear.
But in the FW Indexes they are not.



Like who?? I am looking at/through my e-book version of the Astartes index, and literally all the characters that have named/special weapons, those weapons are listed as 0 points.


His point is that some characters have a listed points value under the heading "(includes wargear), and some have a points value under the heading (Does not include wargear), but the points cost of their wargear is 0. I don't see any confusion there, myself - the rules are perfectly clear.

However, the premise that all the special characters in GW Indexes are listed including wargear and the ones in Forge World Indexes are not is false, as inspection of Index: Imperium 2 will show; Inquisitors Coteaz, Greyfax and Karamazov are all listed without wargear (although they're the only ones like that in that book).

The rule is quite simple; if a model is listed in the (Does not include wargear) table and has an item of wargear that's got a points value, then you pay that points value for the wargear. Doesn't matter if it comes with it as standard or if it's an option.


So Pedro Kantor is actually 190pts? His "Does Not Include Wargear" model in the Named Character section is listed at 170pts, yet he must always take a mandatory, non-interchangeable Power Fist as well (+20pts).
If this is indeed the case, then having a 170pts "model" cost for a Named Character with unalterable wargear is laughably fething stupid.

Where are you seeing that the 'Points Per Model' column for Named Characters says "(Does not include wargear)"?


pg. 350
of the Digital Enhanced Edition. The new FAQ/errata didn't address it, and I'm hoping this just may be a typo in the *ahem* "Enhanced" digital version of the Index.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Iron Mike wrote:

So Pedro Kantor is actually 190pts? His "Does Not Include Wargear" model in the Named Character section is listed at 170pts, yet he must always take a mandatory, non-interchangeable Power Fist as well (+20pts).
If this is indeed the case, then having a 170pts "model" cost for a Named Character with unalterable wargear is laughably [MOD EDIT - Do NOT circumvent the expletive filter - Alpharius] stupid.



Look at his entry. His wargear section reads: He's armed with Dorn's Arrow, A power fist. . . blah blah blah.

If he had a special named powerfist, then it'd probably be 0 points. But, because its generic, why wouldn't you have to pay for a generic item?


Edit: looking at the points page, he is under the named character box, and the entry does read "Includes all wargear" so even though it's a generic power glove, he's still just the points listed in the book.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/03 04:01:25


 
   
Made in ca
Fresh-Faced New User





 Ensis Ferrae wrote:
Iron Mike wrote:

So Pedro Kantor is actually 190pts? His "Does Not Include Wargear" model in the Named Character section is listed at 170pts, yet he must always take a mandatory, non-interchangeable Power Fist as well (+20pts).
If this is indeed the case, then having a 170pts "model" cost for a Named Character with unalterable wargear is laughably [MOD EDIT - Do NOT circumvent the expletive filter - Alpharius] stupid.



Look at his entry. His wargear section reads: He's armed with Dorn's Arrow, A power fist. . . blah blah blah.

If he had a special named powerfist, then it'd probably be 0 points. But, because its generic, why wouldn't you have to pay for a generic item?


Edit: looking at the points page, he is under the named character box, and the entry does read "Includes all wargear" so even though it's a generic power glove, he's still just the points listed in the book.


Thanks for clarifying. Now I'm just worried how many other typos/mistakes are in the (ironically named) Digital Enhanced Edition, as opposed to the physical copy...
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






Iron Mike wrote:
So Pedro Kantor is actually 190pts? His "Does Not Include Wargear" model in the Named Character section is listed at 170pts, yet he must always take a mandatory, non-interchangeable Power Fist as well (+20pts).
If this is indeed the case, then having a 170pts "model" cost for a Named Character with unalterable wargear is laughably [MOD EDIT - Do NOT circumvent the expletive filter - Alpharius] stupid.
I don't know what book you have, but my book clearly lists him in the "Named Characters" section which states the PPM is "Including Wargear". http://prntscr.com/fqyqlo

The Enhanced Edition is riddled with errors, don't use it. Find a PDF of the normal Epub for personal use.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/03 07:41:53


 
   
Made in gb
Regular Dakkanaut




Q: Is the cost of the combat shield included in the Company
Champion and Company Champion on Bike’s points?
A: No. This (and all similar ‘other wargear’ found in the
points values section must be paid for in the same way as
a model’s weapons.


It would seem things just got a lot more awkward.

Going off this wording it would seen Autarchs DO have to pay for Forceshields. Even though they technically cannot even take them.

Abilities that are named the same as Wargear have to be paid for.

God help us with Psychic Hoods then..

As a Rune Priest can take them and it says "a model equipped with..." but for Libs it's just "This model..."

The exact same wording as Storm Shield for a Company Champion is "This model has.."

Really really bizarre FAQ...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/03 11:22:43


 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Jacob29 wrote:
Q: Is the cost of the combat shield included in the Company
Champion and Company Champion on Bike’s points?
A: No. This (and all similar ‘other wargear’ found in the
points values section must be paid for in the same way as
a model’s weapons.


It would seem things just got a lot more awkward.

Going off this wording it would seen Autarchs DO have to pay for Forceshields. Even though they technically cannot even take them.

Abilities that are named the same as Wargear have to be paid for.

God help us with Psychic Hoods then..

As a Rune Priest can take them and it says "a model equipped with..." but for Libs it's just "This model..."

The exact same wording as Storm Shield for a Company Champion is "This model has.."

Really really bizarre FAQ...


At least in my store, the "items" in the abilities section do not get paid for. . . If you notice, the standard librarian is approximately the cost of a psychic hood more expensive than a Rune Priest. So for our store anyway, they are included in the costs, the same as the autarch mentioned above.

Viewing it this way, the points aren't that awkward at all. But, I guess that means we're just ignoring that particular FAQ question.
   
Made in gb
Gavin Thorpe




My personal favourite is the Thunderfire Cannon, which come stock with the following pieces of kit:
  • Thunderfire Chassis

  • Techmarine gunner

  • Plasma Pistol

  • Flamer

  • Bolter

  • 2 Servo Arms

  • Thunderfire Cannon


  • None of which are optional or have any alternatives. The gun is exactly the same every time.
    Even better, the chassis, gunner and Cannon are never repeated anywhere else in the book.
    But the total cost still comes out to a tally of 7 different factors for something that is totally immutable.
    Even if it's just addition, it is frustrating and you can guarantee that someone is going to miscount, either willfully or accidentally.

    The second criticism is that a weapon's value will vary with the model wielding it. Even in the simplest terms, a BS2+ gun is going to do more than a BS5+ gun, but that is not reflected. You cannot balance an overperforming model-gun combination without overcompensating some part of it and subsequently ruining everyone else using that gun, or every other iteration of that model.

    This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/03 16:55:28


    WarOne wrote:
    At the very peak of his power, Mat Ward stood at the top echelons of the GW hierarchy, second only to Satan in terms of personal power within the company.
     
       
    Made in gb
    Norn Queen






    Mozzamanx wrote:
    The second criticism is that a weapon's value will vary with the model wielding it. Even in the simplest terms, a BS2+ gun is going to do more than a BS5+ gun, but that is not reflected. You cannot balance an overperforming model-gun combination without overcompensating some part of it and subsequently ruining everyone else using that gun, or every other iteration of that model.
    In this case they just make points costs different for certain units, like they already do for Thunder Hammers and all the tyranid upgrades.
       
     
    Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
    Go to: