Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2018/01/11 13:16:33
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
MadCowCrazy wrote: necrontyrOG wrote:I trust Natfka rumors about as much as I trust the sushi at the gas station.
You do know Natfka never has and never will be any rumors source? He finds or is sent stuff and posts what he thinks might be credible or of interest.
That's like me saying I don't trust you if you posted a rumor you found and reposted here on Dakka.
Assuming some of those "anonymous sources" just aren't them making up for good clickbait to get moa $$$.
In any case all RELIABLE rumours you can get elsewhere and faster as well. There's literally no need to go through that site with made up junk with few copied elsewhere rumours. Just go for the original source.
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
|
|
2018/01/11 13:20:51
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Lethal Lhamean
Birmingham
|
cyphertheory wrote:A boxed game I have heard of, which may link into a summer 40k event/campaign is a "warhammer quest" style/based 40k game based in a necron tomb (note this could be a tomb world, tomb ship or necron tech, it was not clear) and apparently leads to a race to reclaim a relic between abaddon and guilliman and is a progression of the narrative.
Details were light, but was said to have some great references to rogue trader and earlier days of 40k lore.
This sounds legitimate, set a campaign in a Necron tomb/ship and then make it all about Imperium and Chaos.
I am not being sarcastic here.
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 13:24:30
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I would only say that the main narrative of 40k is imperium vs chaos so it's not straying from the core "plot" of the new dark imperium
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 13:45:07
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Courageous Beastmaster
|
As GW has been hammering since 8th came out.
|
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 14:13:17
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
cyphertheory wrote:A boxed game I have heard of, which may link into a summer 40k event/campaign is a "warhammer quest" style/based 40k game based in a necron tomb (note this could be a tomb world, tomb ship or necron tech, it was not clear) and apparently leads to a race to reclaim a relic between abaddon and guilliman and is a progression of the narrative.
Details were light, but was said to have some great references to rogue trader and earlier days of 40k lore.
That sounds like a fantastic take on the WQ system - if such a game amped up the ranged combat mechanics it would be exactly what I have been hoping for since the days of Gorkamorka (I always thought that style of game involving the Diggas, Muties, and Orc tribes in competition would be great fun)
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 14:48:38
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
cyphertheory wrote:A boxed game I have heard of, which may link into a 40k event/campaign is a "warhammer quest" style/based 40k game based in a necron tomb (note this could be a tomb world, tomb ship or necron tech, it was not clear) and apparently leads to a race to reclaim a relic between abaddon and guilliman and is a progression of the narrative.
Details were light, but was said to have some great references to rogue trader and earlier days of 40k lore.
How can I put this lightly? I would play the absolute gak out of that game! Though I could see it that it would be subordinates of Guilliman and Abaddon doing things.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
|
|
2018/01/11 14:53:40
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
It was inferred it was a narrative "race" as a backdrop, just for clarity
One other tidbit was "Genestealers, but not as we have seen them before" I have no idea what that was to be, when it was to be out etc, and I don't think it has a direct connection to the other stuff. I really don't stand behind it as something I am confidant is a solid rumour, just putting it out there. One to keep in the back of your mind I guess.
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 15:10:17
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
cyphertheory wrote:A boxed game I have heard of, which may link into a 40k event/campaign is a "warhammer quest" style/based 40k game based in a necron tomb (note this could be a tomb world, tomb ship or necron tech, it was not clear) and apparently leads to a race to reclaim a relic between abaddon and guilliman and is a progression of the narrative.
Details were light, but was said to have some great references to rogue trader and earlier days of 40k lore.
As a HUGE fan of WHQ, and a Necron player, I'm intrigued . . .
cyphertheory wrote:It was inferred it was a narrative "race" as a backdrop, just for clarity
One other tidbit was "Genestealers, but not as we have seen them before" I have no idea what that was to be, when it was to be out etc, and I don't think it has a direct connection to the other stuff. I really don't stand behind it as something I am confidant is a solid rumour, just putting it out there. One to keep in the back of your mind I guess.
Possibly non-human Genestealers? Orkstealers? Taustealers?
|
2000 Khorne Bloodbound (Skullfiend Tribe- Aqshy)
1000 Tzeentch Arcanites (Pyrofane Cult - Hysh) in progress
2000 Slaves to Darkness (Ravagers)
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 15:12:19
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Sorry, I really wish I had a tiny bit more to flesh that out but I don't. I know nothing more that that post
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 15:19:39
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
MajorWesJanson wrote:
Unless they get another new kit of some sort to expand their range, imperial knights would be best served by being rolled into a forces of the Imperium book with the other mini imperial factions to make a new Imperial agents book. No real need for a third codex based around a single kit.
I really wish they'd consolidate the different knights down to one. All they are are different weapon configurations which are even sometimes changeable as is. The current buckets support every configuration except one for some reason.
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 16:01:28
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
tneva82 wrote: MadCowCrazy wrote: necrontyrOG wrote:I trust Natfka rumors about as much as I trust the sushi at the gas station. You do know Natfka never has and never will be any rumors source? He finds or is sent stuff and posts what he thinks might be credible or of interest. That's like me saying I don't trust you if you posted a rumor you found and reposted here on Dakka. Assuming some of those "anonymous sources" just aren't them making up for good clickbait to get moa $$$. In any case all RELIABLE rumours you can get elsewhere and faster as well. There's literally no need to go through that site with made up junk with few copied elsewhere rumours. Just go for the original source. Well, he does aggregate. But that being said, there is functionally no difference between making up your own rumors and posting rumors on your site that have not been posted anywhere else with a source of 'anonymous'. Also, if Natfka doesn't post the non-credible stuff, I would be amazed.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/01/11 16:01:51
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 16:10:03
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Missionary On A Mission
|
tneva82 wrote: MadCowCrazy wrote: necrontyrOG wrote:I trust Natfka rumors about as much as I trust the sushi at the gas station.
You do know Natfka never has and never will be any rumors source? He finds or is sent stuff and posts what he thinks might be credible or of interest.
That's like me saying I don't trust you if you posted a rumor you found and reposted here on Dakka.
Assuming some of those "anonymous sources" just aren't them making up for good clickbait to get moa $$$.
In any case all RELIABLE rumours you can get elsewhere and faster as well. There's literally no need to go through that site with made up junk with few copied elsewhere rumours. Just go for the original source.
Can you please post links to the original source for all reliable rumors posted in the last 3 months. I don't know where to go, I'd prefer if there was a site that posted all of them but there are no such sites that are reliable.
So can you provide links to all the reliable rumors source so I know where to look?
I'm being serious
|
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 16:18:58
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Dakka had Pretre's magical rumour tracker,
so when BobtheTroll posts a detailed list of what's in the upcoming Cthulhu elves battletome we can check to see if he's
a reliable source (cool start planning your tactics),
a serial nonsense poster (ignore the info it's junk)
or a totally new rumour monger (the magic 8 ball suggest this is nonsense, but maybe something they've said might convince you it's good)
places that only attribute rumours to 'anonymous' it's all guesswork (since we can't gague how reliable the source is), and since more nonsense than genuine info is sent to you'd be better off ignoring them
|
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 16:25:38
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
MadCowCrazy wrote:Can you please post links to the original source for all reliable rumors posted in the last 3 months. I don't know where to go, I'd prefer if there was a site that posted all of them but there are no such sites that are reliable.
So can you provide links to all the reliable rumors source so I know where to look?
I'm being serious
Link in my signature.
|
|
|
|
|
2018/01/11 20:13:00
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Calm Celestian
|
So of the one's that are not on the rumored release scheduled the possible remaining ones are...
-Adeptus Ministorum (priests + sob)
-Inquisition
-Assasins
-Imperial Knights
-Renegade Knights
-Deathwatch
-Genestealer cults
-Sisters of Silence
Though if we are following the trends for CSM releases we still have
-World Eaters
-Emperors Children
How GWS is going to release the remaining books is anyone's guess, but one's that are probably going to be separate books may be.
-World Eaters
-Emperors Children (much like the TS and DG they are single chaos god dedicated and would seam reasonable that the will get their own separate releases)
-Genestealer Cults
-Deathwatch
The remaining ones are could be anyone's guess and would be more so wish listing than anything. The Sob, Ministorum, Inquisition, Assasins, Imperial Knights, and SoS could be combined into one book of "Imperial Agents" similar to what we had at the tail end of the 7th edition which leave the question of where Renegade Knights are going to fit in (Dark Mechanicus ???? maybe ????).
-Adeptus Ministorum (priests + sob)
-Inquisition
-Assasins
-Imperial Knights
-Sisters of Silence
-Renegade Knights
My wish list would look something like this. I don't know where Renegade Knights would fit in because they are much like Imperial Knights, they have a handful or so of unit entries each.
Adeptus Ministorum ( Sob + Priests + one entry for an Ordo Heritic inquisitor with henchmen )
Imperial Agents ( Inquisition, Assasins, Knights, Sisters of Silence )
I will say if GW releases the Sisters of Silence as their own separate book (like custodes) and dose a whole "we're releasing plastic sisters" and the reveal ends up being the Sisters of Silence. They will piss off so many people.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/01/11 20:16:25
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 01:59:35
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Looking at what I saw left, there are 10 codexes to go assuming we divide the left over imperial stuff into Adeptus ministorum and imperial agents.
The end of February will see 13 codexes having been released in 7 months, with 4 of them getting major model support, so we will probably get through all the remaining codexes before the autumn.
I think the rumoured release scheduled look very plausible. It has been heavily rumoured that orks will be getting new buggies etc and the still unsolved rumour pic of the wheel would seem to corroborate this, so it makes sense to leave them to near the end.
I would love to see new dark Eldar minis but I doubt we will get much model support for them or the Tau and Necrons so having them come out at the same time as some major AOS releases makes sense.
We know that James Hewitt has designed a stand alone bond game for GW so the May release could well be that. A 40k spin on the warhammmer quest game he designed also sounds plausible. The only question is whether it will be a game using old models like gangs of commoragh, or a way of introducing some new stuff like Deathwatch overkill.
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 05:46:25
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Resourceful Gutterscum
Brighton MA
|
Commissar Benny wrote: LunarSol wrote:The rumor I saw also lists Orks in June along with a campaign book and boxed set.
If GW has any business sense at all, it will be the 4th war for Armageddon. IG/Orks boxed set. No way they are going to release more marines after they just released primaris boxed set. A Steel Legion/Ork campaign box would literally print money.
I thought I saw a rumor a few months ago hinting at something like this? At least for new figures. I think it'd make a fine box set. Two of my favorites I'm waiting on new things for anyways!
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 05:54:26
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Pious Palatine
|
Dagstyrr wrote: Commissar Benny wrote: LunarSol wrote:The rumor I saw also lists Orks in June along with a campaign book and boxed set.
If GW has any business sense at all, it will be the 4th war for Armageddon. IG/Orks boxed set. No way they are going to release more marines after they just released primaris boxed set. A Steel Legion/Ork campaign box would literally print money.
I thought I saw a rumor a few months ago hinting at something like this? At least for new figures. I think it'd make a fine box set. Two of my favorites I'm waiting on new things for anyways!
But...but...according to Dakka's armchair business experts, any faction that isn't already getting releases is a super poor seller with no market appeal!
Could...could armchair experts like that englishman guy be...wrong?!?!?
|
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 08:28:08
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yup, he very well could be.
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 08:35:35
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
Dagstyrr wrote: Commissar Benny wrote: LunarSol wrote:The rumor I saw also lists Orks in June along with a campaign book and boxed set.
If GW has any business sense at all, it will be the 4th war for Armageddon. IG/Orks boxed set. No way they are going to release more marines after they just released primaris boxed set. A Steel Legion/Ork campaign box would literally print money.
I thought I saw a rumor a few months ago hinting at something like this? At least for new figures. I think it'd make a fine box set. Two of my favorites I'm waiting on new things for anyways!
Would be nice box but problem is it's unlikely. It depends on GW doing something they have never done before. Black templars vs orks would be LOT more likely.
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
|
|
2018/01/12 08:50:56
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
tneva82 wrote: Dagstyrr wrote: Commissar Benny wrote: LunarSol wrote:The rumor I saw also lists Orks in June along with a campaign book and boxed set.
If GW has any business sense at all, it will be the 4th war for Armageddon. IG/Orks boxed set. No way they are going to release more marines after they just released primaris boxed set. A Steel Legion/Ork campaign box would literally print money.
I thought I saw a rumor a few months ago hinting at something like this? At least for new figures. I think it'd make a fine box set. Two of my favorites I'm waiting on new things for anyways!
Would be nice box but problem is it's unlikely. It depends on GW doing something they have never done before. Black templars vs orks would be LOT more likely.
For a starter, agreed. It would let them put in a lot of things that need plastic, like a Crusader Squad and Emperor's Champion, while on the Ork side they could do Kommandos or Tankbustas, plus the usual Nobz/Boyz.
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 08:58:35
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Well, the previous (7th Ed.) Campaign boxes were always only old models with just one new character sculpt per side/faction (i.e. 2 per box).
If that's the format they'll revive for 8th, it wouldn't be new models for troop choices, etc..
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 09:14:03
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
MajorWesJanson wrote:tneva82 wrote: Dagstyrr wrote: Commissar Benny wrote: LunarSol wrote:The rumor I saw also lists Orks in June along with a campaign book and boxed set.
If GW has any business sense at all, it will be the 4th war for Armageddon. IG/Orks boxed set. No way they are going to release more marines after they just released primaris boxed set. A Steel Legion/Ork campaign box would literally print money.
I thought I saw a rumor a few months ago hinting at something like this? At least for new figures. I think it'd make a fine box set. Two of my favorites I'm waiting on new things for anyways!
Would be nice box but problem is it's unlikely. It depends on GW doing something they have never done before. Black templars vs orks would be LOT more likely.
For a starter, agreed. It would let them put in a lot of things that need plastic, like a Crusader Squad and Emperor's Champion, while on the Ork side they could do Kommandos or Tankbustas, plus the usual Nobz/Boyz.
Isn't a crusader squad just a mixed tatical squad and scout squad though?
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
|
2018/01/12 09:22:44
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Unshakeable Grey Knight Land Raider Pilot
|
ERJAK wrote:
But...but...according to Dakka's armchair business experts, any faction that isn't already getting releases is a super poor seller with no market appeal!
Could...could armchair experts like that englishman guy be...wrong?!?!?
No need to listen to the armchair experts, GW is making a killing doing exactly what theyre doing.
Everyone on dakka seems to have some great idea which would sell heaps, revolutionise 40k and make the whole community happy, without considering "Hmmm, GWs profits have just tripled, perhaps they do know what theyre doing..."
You dont get you customers spending money like that if they arent happy.
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 09:39:18
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta
|
ERJAK wrote:But...but...according to Dakka's armchair business experts, any faction that isn't already getting releases is a super poor seller with no market appeal!
Could...could armchair experts like that englishman guy be...wrong?!?!?
Could you not lie about what I say please ERJAK, it's pretty pathetic. To misconstrue what I have repeated ten or more times now is pretty special, even for you.,
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 10:24:24
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Lit By the Flames of Prospero
|
So. In regards to the chaos gods What I've noticed it:
AoS Nurgle Mortals and deamons got a good size release during Warhammer End Times, they then got a good sized on again just now. The Death Guard Releases took care of 40k nurgle mortals really well.
Tzeetch Deamons and AoS Mortals got a good sized release, and we got a 40k mortals release that has been well padded with AoS tzeentch mortals.
Khorn is in a wired spot. Khorn Deamons have been well represented with a slow trickle of releases over time, and AoS Khorn mortals got a big launch with AoS and the Stormcast. But.... Khorn 40k mortals have strangely been neglected? The 'zerker kit is painfully out of date.
Slaanesh is abysmal. 2 lords and 1 wired cavalry unit for AoS mortals, half the demons in finecast or in a plastics the many players didn't like, and a Finecast Conversion kit for 40k with all the heroes long OOP. Slaanesh almost needs a overhaul across the board to consolidate the aesthetic.I feel like fan reaction of the Diaz Deamonette reprint threw made to order made GW take notice.
Hopeful that was not to off topic, but something me and a friend were talking about tonight well shooting the gak.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/01/12 10:26:26
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 10:47:40
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant
|
MajorWesJanson wrote:For a starter, agreed. It would let them put in a lot of things that need plastic, like a Crusader Squad and Emperor's Champion, while on the Ork side they could do Kommandos or Tankbustas, plus the usual Nobz/Boyz.
With the increase in the size of normal infantry for both the new Death Guard Marines and Primaris, I could see any new Orks in the boxset being supersized as well, so either they will just increase the size of existing units or it'll be some new squads of Orks. I wouldn't be surprised for any loyalist Marine boxset to have at least one set of Primaris marines in the box for the same reason. It'd increase sales of the boxset to people who already have a ton of models for that faction, which is the primary reason for Primaris' existence.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/01/12 10:48:07
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 12:04:02
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Flashy Flashgitz
|
Funny no? January WD loaded with Orks, and no Codex soon?
Then again, this is all rumors. I'll take it with a grain of salt. Automatically Appended Next Post: Looky Likey wrote: MajorWesJanson wrote:For a starter, agreed. It would let them put in a lot of things that need plastic, like a Crusader Squad and Emperor's Champion, while on the Ork side they could do Kommandos or Tankbustas, plus the usual Nobz/Boyz.
With the increase in the size of normal infantry for both the new Death Guard Marines and Primaris, I could see any new Orks in the boxset being supersized as well, so either they will just increase the size of existing units or it'll be some new squads of Orks. I wouldn't be surprised for any loyalist Marine boxset to have at least one set of Primaris marines in the box for the same reason. It'd increase sales of the boxset to people who already have a ton of models for that faction, which is the primary reason for Primaris' existence.
Did someone say Super Sized Orks? I just about messed me pants!
But, yes. Agree with you mate. This game will soon have bigger models. I think it is due to both, sales/knock offs. Have you seen China's reprints? I REFUSE to buy them myself, infact.100% of all my Army's is GW. Btjm.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/01/12 12:12:42
Waaaaaaaaaaaagh! Pass me my Grog!. |
|
|
|
2018/01/12 12:43:09
Subject: Re:40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch
Manchester, England
|
Lockark wrote:So. In regards to the chaos gods What I've noticed it:
AoS Nurgle Mortals and deamons got a good size release during Warhammer End Times, they then got a good sized on again just now. The Death Guard Releases took care of 40k nurgle mortals really well.
Tzeetch Deamons and AoS Mortals got a good sized release, and we got a 40k mortals release that has been well padded with AoS tzeentch mortals.
Khorn is in a wired spot. Khorn Deamons have been well represented with a slow trickle of releases over time, and AoS Khorn mortals got a big launch with AoS and the Stormcast. But.... Khorn 40k mortals have strangely been neglected? The 'zerker kit is painfully out of date.
Slaanesh is abysmal. 2 lords and 1 wired cavalry unit for AoS mortals, half the demons in finecast or in a plastics the many players didn't like, and a Finecast Conversion kit for 40k with all the heroes long OOP. Slaanesh almost needs a overhaul across the board to consolidate the aesthetic.I feel like fan reaction of the Diaz Deamonette reprint threw made to order made GW take notice.
Hopeful that was not to off topic, but something me and a friend were talking about tonight well shooting the gak.
40k Khorne and Slaanesh both need new releases on the scale of at least the Thousand Sons, and at best, the recent 40k Death Guard.
Khorne isn't doing THAT badly, comparatively; Plastic hounds are needed on the daemons side, but Khorne Daemons aren't doing too badly aside from that (with a named character Bloodthirster, no less). On the 40k side you have the Lord of Skulls, Kharn... and that's it, isn't it? They would need a troops box, an elites box and possibly a vehicle/walker. Maybe even a unique cultist replacement like the Tzaangors, either 40k'ed up Beastmen (or leave it generic 40k so it might be adopted by other armies) or something else.
But you're right, Slaanesh 40k is pretty dire. Off the top of my head they absolutely require:
Daemons:
Keeper of Secrets
Fiends
Mortals:
Noise Marine troops
An elites box
A character or two
Vehicle or walker
Possible Primarch at some point
The Primarchs, I think, are the key to these releases, though. It would seem unfair at best for these armies to have a large release without their primarchs accompanying, since Nurgle and Thousand Sons got theirs. So until you start hearing solid rumours of Angron and Fulgrim coming back I wouldn't get your hopes up.
I feel like Fulgrim is likely before Angron, however, if only for the fact that his conflict with Guilliman would serve up a great narrative for his return.
|
|
|
|
2018/01/12 13:04:10
Subject: 40k codex release schedule rumor
|
|
Ferocious Black Templar Castellan
|
BrianDavion wrote: MajorWesJanson wrote:tneva82 wrote: Dagstyrr wrote: Commissar Benny wrote: LunarSol wrote:The rumor I saw also lists Orks in June along with a campaign book and boxed set.
If GW has any business sense at all, it will be the 4th war for Armageddon. IG/Orks boxed set. No way they are going to release more marines after they just released primaris boxed set. A Steel Legion/Ork campaign box would literally print money.
I thought I saw a rumor a few months ago hinting at something like this? At least for new figures. I think it'd make a fine box set. Two of my favorites I'm waiting on new things for anyways!
Would be nice box but problem is it's unlikely. It depends on GW doing something they have never done before. Black templars vs orks would be LOT more likely.
For a starter, agreed. It would let them put in a lot of things that need plastic, like a Crusader Squad and Emperor's Champion, while on the Ork side they could do Kommandos or Tankbustas, plus the usual Nobz/Boyz.
Isn't a crusader squad just a mixed tatical squad and scout squad though?
Not if you want melee options. It's expensive (in £$€) to make just a basic 10-man squad with Chainswords without having them covered in blood drops or wolf pelts or eight-pointed stars.
|
For thirteen years I had a dog with fur the darkest black. For thirteen years he was my friend, oh how I want him back. |
|
|
|
|