Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 15:34:38
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
GW can "claim" to own the Sun too but it doesn't make it true. The Chapter House lawsuits and the Spots the Space Marine debacle really slapped GW down a peg or twenty.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/01/09 15:34:51
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 15:44:46
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Karol wrote: Stux wrote:Everything creative is inspired by, borrowed from, or based on other things to one degree or another. It's mostly about how these elements are combined or recreated in new ways.
It's not about where those individual elements came from reqlly, it's more about the whole. And that I feel is pretty unique and original in 40k.
But doesn't GW claim that they have the sole ownership of words, or stuff like swords and not just specific designes, but all swords made for models of the scale etc?
You could make the comparison more easily with you pictures if mabey it was FLAT not a round snake, and also if it broadened out at the bottom instead of just one width
But isn't the look like that just because it would have been to hard or costly to cast the models that way?
It's a world set in the future yet we can all pretty much imagine exactly how things from that world would look in ours today
Well that is because the copied actually existing political systems and just put them in space. They even left some names the same, so we have commisars in IG etc.
Well theres plenty of rounded with detail on things like sword handles etc to see that theres no way they did it for molding costs. Its not like its just a flat crapy surface, its a nicely detailed helmet design, just as nice as the simlpe snakes......
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 15:53:26
Subject: Re:How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
40k is pretty much the greatest example of if you commit plagiarism from enough sources, you end up with something unique. Most individual factions and characters are based on previous media or real life examples but GW threw enough of that together to make something new.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 15:54:46
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
But all fantasy got its ideas from some thing that came from some one else right??? technically speaking.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/01/09 15:54:56
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 15:55:59
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
Karol wrote: Stux wrote:Everything creative is inspired by, borrowed from, or based on other things to one degree or another. It's mostly about how these elements are combined or recreated in new ways.
It's not about where those individual elements came from reqlly, it's more about the whole. And that I feel is pretty unique and original in 40k.
But doesn't GW claim that they have the sole ownership of words, or stuff like swords and not just specific designes, but all swords made for models of the scale etc?
I don't really see what your point is... Yes, they have protected words and other intellectual property. That doesn't mean they shoot down, or even legally could if they wanted to, everything that is inspired by their property.
In the same way they took ideas from Dune, but there's no Fremen or Spice Melange mentioned in 40k.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 16:02:48
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Stux wrote:Karol wrote: Stux wrote:Everything creative is inspired by, borrowed from, or based on other things to one degree or another. It's mostly about how these elements are combined or recreated in new ways.
It's not about where those individual elements came from reqlly, it's more about the whole. And that I feel is pretty unique and original in 40k.
But doesn't GW claim that they have the sole ownership of words, or stuff like swords and not just specific designes, but all swords made for models of the scale etc?
I don't really see what your point is... Yes, they have protected words and other intellectual property. That doesn't mean they shoot down, or even legally could if they wanted to, everything that is inspired by their property.
In the same way they took ideas from Dune, but there's no Fremen or Spice Melange mentioned in 40k.
What have you never seen or your self had an idea and then found out it already exists
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 16:04:09
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
|
Stormatious wrote:But all fantasy got its ideas from some thing that came from some one else right??? technically speaking.
Mostly yes, e.g. Tolkien didn't invent orcs or elves or dwarves, they were already a part of folklore, but he made his own versions that were somewhat different. GW did something similar and made a derivative work from earlier works. But they didn't outright copy (much); and in the early days much of it was (arguably) in parody, which is also protected in its own right.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 16:20:53
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
Stormatious wrote: Stux wrote:Karol wrote: Stux wrote:Everything creative is inspired by, borrowed from, or based on other things to one degree or another. It's mostly about how these elements are combined or recreated in new ways.
It's not about where those individual elements came from reqlly, it's more about the whole. And that I feel is pretty unique and original in 40k.
But doesn't GW claim that they have the sole ownership of words, or stuff like swords and not just specific designes, but all swords made for models of the scale etc?
I don't really see what your point is... Yes, they have protected words and other intellectual property. That doesn't mean they shoot down, or even legally could if they wanted to, everything that is inspired by their property.
In the same way they took ideas from Dune, but there's no Fremen or Spice Melange mentioned in 40k.
What have you never seen or your self had an idea and then found out it already exists
It happens all the time to everybody! I think sometimes people underestimate just how many ideas that overlap billions of people will have :p
That said, 40k is definitely and explicitly inspired by many pre existing properties. Inspiration isn't infringement.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 16:57:01
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
It's also inspired by a wider range of things than most people think - the benefits of a higher art education. 40k is inspired as much by medieval art, religion, Victorian literature and the like as it is by more modern things like Tolkien and Dune.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 17:09:47
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
Arcanis161 wrote:I guess in summary, 40k hardly has any original ideas, but instead finds a way to blend a bunch of different ideas together into a (ok not really) cohesive story and universe.
Huron black heart wrote:Practically everything within 40k has been based on an idea from somewhere else, or at the very least, heavily influenced by it. The overall universe however feels like a unique entity of it's own, the sum of all the parts equalling more than the total (think I got that quote slightly wrong but you get the idea)
These guys, along with many others, get it. Warcraft is no different. The basic ideas aren't original, it's how you weave them together that matters.
Jaxler wrote:At what point does inspiration become theft?
That's what copyright lawyers are for.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 17:26:03
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Inspiring SDF-1 Bridge Officer
|
Daemons and Chaos are heavily based on Micheal Moorcock’s Elric of Melinbone, which GW had the rights for to produce a Stormbringer game for a while (of which I have a copy).
|
It never ends well |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 17:40:44
Subject: Re:How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Chaos is definitely inspired by Moorcock more than anything else - right down to the eight-pointed star.
You can see Lovecraft's influence most in the genestealer cults (basically Shadow Over Innsmouth with a xenomorph aesthetic) and also in the old lore for the C'Tan, when they were spooky unknowable all-knowing entities completely unsuited to being tabletop miniatures.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 19:12:32
Subject: Re:How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dreadnought
|
Joseph Campbell would be proud.
There are no new ideas, just modifications/changing perspective/innovative uses of existing ones.
Tolkien was equally influenced by Aurthurian/Druidian folklore as he was his own horrific experiences in WWI.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 19:20:29
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
The Admech were lifted from Asimov's Foundation series.
The Church of Science
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 19:50:33
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Inspiring SDF-1 Bridge Officer
|
I thought “A Canticle for Leobwitz” (sp?) was the inspiration for Admech.
|
It never ends well |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 20:44:10
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Karol wrote: Stux wrote:Everything creative is inspired by, borrowed from, or based on other things to one degree or another. It's mostly about how these elements are combined or recreated in new ways.
It's not about where those individual elements came from reqlly, it's more about the whole. And that I feel is pretty unique and original in 40k.
But doesn't GW claim that they have the sole ownership of words, or stuff like swords and not just specific designes, but all swords made for models of the scale etc?
You could make the comparison more easily with you pictures if mabey it was FLAT not a round snake, and also if it broadened out at the bottom instead of just one width
But isn't the look like that just because it would have been to hard or costly to cast the models that way?
It's a world set in the future yet we can all pretty much imagine exactly how things from that world would look in ours today
Well that is because the copied actually existing political systems and just put them in space. They even left some names the same, so we have commisars in IG etc.
If you are going to vilify GW for protecting their IP when copyright law is just one big mess, which forces them to be idiots to protect their work, I feel like you'd be better off directing your complaints to copyright laws instead of GW.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 21:28:27
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle
|
40k is WFB in space; WFB is D&D, the wargame; D&D is LotR in RPG form; LotR is modern high fantasy based on European folklore.
Throw in some Judge Dredd and Dune to give the Imperium of Man a dash of character and you have the basis of 40k.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 21:50:02
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Inquisitorial Keeper of the Xenobanks
|
One of the best things about early gw was that it was a sort of clearinghouse of common tropes from scifi and fantasy. I mean everything from Moorcock to Aliens to Starship Troopers to Tolkein.
The game and hobby have suffered since gw put up its ip walls and started pretending it had no connection with the rest. Increasingly what is unique IP is senseless mumbojumbo trademark idiocy.
So yes. It is increasingly original but increasingly bad and increasingly derivative at the same time.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2019/01/09 21:55:14
. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/09 23:55:16
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
I don't recall the Foundation's Church of Science having the iron replacing flesh, nor the leaders of such knowing it was a bunch of hogwash.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/10 00:08:05
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
The Daemon Possessing Fulgrim's Body
|
jeff white wrote:One of the best things about early gw was that it was a sort of clearinghouse of common tropes from scifi and fantasy. I mean everything from Moorcock to Aliens to Starship Troopers to Tolkein.
The game and hobby have suffered since gw put up its ip walls and started pretending it had no connection with the rest. Increasingly what is unique IP is senseless mumbojumbo trademark idiocy.
So yes. It is increasingly original but increasingly bad and increasingly derivative at the same time.
Careful, lest Attornus Lawyerson unleashes the power of Litigus from his mighty power weapon Briefcasius and reduces you to a pile of smoking asch™ for suggesting that anything GW produces is anything less than 100% their own work.
|
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. - Frank Howard Clark
The wise man doubts often, and changes his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubts not; he knows all things but his own ignorance.
The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially, that opinion can be roundly ignored and even made fun of, particularly if it is demonstrably nonsense!” Professor Brian Cox
Ask me about
Barnstaple Slayers Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/10 00:31:48
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Aspirant Tech-Adept
|
Charistoph wrote:Arcanis161 wrote:I guess in summary, 40k hardly has any original ideas, but instead finds a way to blend a bunch of different ideas together into a (ok not really) cohesive story and universe.
Huron black heart wrote:Practically everything within 40k has been based on an idea from somewhere else, or at the very least, heavily influenced by it. The overall universe however feels like a unique entity of it's own, the sum of all the parts equalling more than the total (think I got that quote slightly wrong but you get the idea)
These guys, along with many others, get it. Warcraft is no different. The basic ideas aren't original, it's how you weave them together that matters.
Jaxler wrote:At what point does inspiration become theft?
That's what copyright lawyers are for.
No. Copyright lawyers and for fertilizing crop land with. Automatically Appended Next Post: Charistoph wrote:
I don't recall the Foundation's Church of Science having the iron replacing flesh, nor the leaders of such knowing it was a bunch of hogwash.
THEY TOOK Asimov's idea and added some steampunk/cyber fusion to it. Also they ripped off H. R. Giger too, the very original 40k art was heavily inspired by Giger.
See the first illustration of the emperor:
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/01/10 00:37:17
"I learned the hard way that if you take a stand on any issue, no matter how insignificant, people will line up around the block to kick your ass over it." Jesse "the mind" Ventura. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/10 23:36:22
Subject: Re:How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Mutating Changebringer
|
40K is a mountain of rip-offs. This is well and widely known.
As far as Khorne berzerker helmets...
100% taken from Conan there is a very good video on YouTube about it. Side by side comparisons through out.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/11 00:01:51
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I remember going in to GW in the late 80’s and I don’t remember anything about like what they produced on the Sci-Fi front.
After decades of fleshing out there lore, numerous publications, massive design & character input as well as instantly recognisable figures from their quality, I think it would be fair to say they have done enough to lay claim to their universe.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/01/11 00:02:20
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/11 01:43:20
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Chimaera wrote:I remember going in to GW in the late 80’s and I don’t remember anything about like what they produced on the Sci-Fi front.
After decades of fleshing out there lore, numerous publications, massive design & character input as well as instantly recognisable figures from their quality, I think it would be fair to say they have done enough to lay claim to their universe.
I agree with you, i have not seen any thing that has ever made me think, omg thats so GW. So yeah you're right,.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/13 18:30:50
Subject: Re:How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
The original inspiration for the Imperial Guard is/was pretty clearly the Red Army.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/13 18:41:11
Subject: Re:How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
In addition to the Wehrmacht and British WW1 armies.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/13 18:54:08
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
The insane mishmash of all of 40k's various inspirations is what makes it original and great.
|
--- |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/13 21:03:23
Subject: Re:How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
Along with a half dozen other dystopian/sci-fi/historical armies, depending on which brand you're looking at.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/13 21:14:55
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Charistoph wrote:
I don't recall the Foundation's Church of Science having the iron replacing flesh, nor the leaders of such knowing it was a bunch of hogwash.
The leaders of the Church were the heads of the Foundation itself, they were well aware that the religious trappings were hogwash. They taught technology use by rote, rather than actual scientific knowledge. They didn't engage in heavy augmentation like the admech it's true, but Foundation was written in 1951...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/01/13 21:29:28
Subject: How orginal is 40k's universe?
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
Torquar wrote: Charistoph wrote:
I don't recall the Foundation's Church of Science having the iron replacing flesh, nor the leaders of such knowing it was a bunch of hogwash.
The leaders of the Church were the heads of the Foundation itself, they were well aware that the religious trappings were hogwash. They taught technology use by rote, rather than actual scientific knowledge. They didn't engage in heavy augmentation like the admech it's true, but Foundation was written in 1951...
Sorry, I meant to reverse that second part, the AdMech leadership don't consider their religion a bunch of hogwash like the Foundation's Church of Science leadership does.
Foundation was first written earlier than that with the first story being written in 1941, it just wasn't bound as a book till 1951.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
 |
 |
|