Switch Theme:

Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Tzeentch Veteran Marine with Psychic Potential





So maybe I am a moron, but I went to buy the "new" chaos codex based on the GW flow chart that made me think all the new Chaos stuff would be in it. It is NOT. The renegade traits, special detachments etc, are not in the "new" CSM Codex. Again, maybe I was wrong from my reading of the GW flow chart, but I wanted to put it out there so everyone is clear.

Removed all-caps title, we need to budget those! - BrookM

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/30 19:09:08


 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




I don't think the new Vigilus is even out yet. Is it?

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in us
Tzeentch Veteran Marine with Psychic Potential





It is. I am looking at it right now
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






Because the "new" chaos codex was printed before Vigilus Ablaze was.
   
Made in gb
Horrific Hive Tyrant





They said on Facebook it wouldn't include Specialist Detachments.
   
Made in us
Clousseau





East Bay, Ca, US

This ruleset needs unification so badly.

 Galas wrote:
I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you

Bharring wrote:
He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic.
 
   
Made in us
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant






Didn't they say if you own the first codex you just buy Vigilus ablaze, because it has the new datasheets and the detachments?
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

 fraser1191 wrote:
Didn't they say if you own the first codex you just buy Vigilus ablaze, because it has the new datasheets and the detachments?

Yes they did. However they never said that the updated codex had all of the rules from Vigilus Ablaze.

Spoiler:

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in gb
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord




Fun fact vigilus doesn't have any of the shadowspear entries in, nor is the cultists unit entry replaced unless you take renegades or black legion.

They made a right mess of what should be a really simple situation.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/30 23:16:14


 
   
Made in in
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche






Hyderabad, India

 Marmatag wrote:
This ruleset needs unification so badly.


To no one's surprise. Churn has been part of GW's business plan since the start.

If the rules weren't scattered in WD, Codexes, Suplaments, Limited Edition Trading Cards and scribbled on napkins at Bugman's you wouldn't need to buy all of those.

 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut







So Chaos is in chaos?

Seems fitting...

2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG

My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...

Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.


 Kanluwen wrote:
This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.

Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...

tneva82 wrote:
You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Well, thanks for the heads up. I was planning on just getting the Vigilus book, so it sounds like that's still the plan.
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

Dudeface wrote:
Fun fact vigilus doesn't have any of the shadowspear entries in,...

You mean these Daemonkin Datasheets that you can download from Warhammer Community for free?

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in gb
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel






Even I thought it would, although thy never said it was th3y made it seem like it did. If you didn't follow GW posts like half the peeps here do I'm sure you'd think it had all the updated stuff... this begs the question, why would you want the new chaos codex unless you're a new player? In addition, if you want everything chaos had to offer you're looking at a £70+ price tage just for rules.
   
Made in us
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps






 Ghaz wrote:
 fraser1191 wrote:
Didn't they say if you own the first codex you just buy Vigilus ablaze, because it has the new datasheets and the detachments?

Yes they did. However they never said that the updated codex had all of the rules from Vigilus Ablaze.

Spoiler:


That chart heavily implies it though, at least to me. It's presented as a this OR this choice, and it says the codex contains "all the datasheets" you need. That to me implies I don't need the Vigilus book to get the chaos stuff in it. It's very deceptive and misleading.
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

No. It makes no implication that the new codex would have the specialist detachments. The new codex has "... all the datasheets you need to play..." and the specialist detachments, artefacts, etc. are not datasheets.

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in us
The Hammer of Witches





A new day, a new time zone.

 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
 Marmatag wrote:
This ruleset needs unification so badly.


To no one's surprise. Churn has been part of GW's business plan since the start.

If the rules weren't scattered in WD, Codexes, Suplaments, Limited Edition Trading Cards and scribbled on napkins at Bugman's you wouldn't need to buy all of those.

Well now I guess I gotta buy some napkins.

"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..."
Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut







 lolman1c wrote:
Even I thought it would, although thy never said it was th3y made it seem like it did. If you didn't follow GW posts like half the peeps here do I'm sure you'd think it had all the updated stuff... this begs the question, why would you want the new chaos codex unless you're a new player? In addition, if you want everything chaos had to offer you're looking at a £70+ price tage just for rules.


I mean, that's no different than the position many factions were in after Vigilus1, really. None of these factions have a codex which now featureds the specialist detachment material, and I'd be very surprised if any do get it added if they get a V2 release down the line.

2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG

My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...

Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.


 Kanluwen wrote:
This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.

Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...

tneva82 wrote:
You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... 
   
Made in gb
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord




 Ghaz wrote:
Dudeface wrote:
Fun fact vigilus doesn't have any of the shadowspear entries in,...

You mean these Daemonkin Datasheets that you can download from Warhammer Community for free?


Those same ones that don't have points costs, warlord traits or relics from the daemonkin pamphlet. They could have been included with no effort and importantly they are in codex v2.
   
Made in de
Longtime Dakkanaut




 Horst wrote:


That chart heavily implies it though, at least to me. It's presented as a this OR this choice, and it says the codex contains "all the datasheets" you need. That to me implies I don't need the Vigilus book to get the chaos stuff in it. It's very deceptive and misleading.


The chart implies nothing. They literally tell you ... if you have the old Codex, DON'T buy Codex 2.0. Just get Vigilus and a few downloads and you have a complete ruleset. That's the entire point of the graphic and it does communicate it as such.
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut







Sunny Side Up wrote:
 Horst wrote:


That chart heavily implies it though, at least to me. It's presented as a this OR this choice, and it says the codex contains "all the datasheets" you need. That to me implies I don't need the Vigilus book to get the chaos stuff in it. It's very deceptive and misleading.


The chart implies nothing. They literally tell you ... if you have the old Codex, DON'T buy Codex 2.0. Just get Vigilus and a few downloads and you have a complete ruleset. That's the entire point of the graphic and it does communicate it as such.

Though if the PDF is missing points, is it truly complete?

2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG

My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...

Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.


 Kanluwen wrote:
This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.

Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...

tneva82 wrote:
You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... 
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

It says “all the datasheets you need to play”.

Not “all the extra rules from this other book we want to sell you too”.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




 JohnnyHell wrote:
It says “all the datasheets you need to play”.

Not “all the extra rules from this other book we want to sell you too”.


Honestly a bit disappointed about that, had hoped the revised codexes would also include the formations and such just because... well I'm hauling vigilus around for two fething pages. That's not a small book to haul around for two pages.
   
Made in gb
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel






 JohnnyHell wrote:
It says “all the datasheets you need to play”.

Not “all the extra rules from this other book we want to sell you too”.

The fact many of us thought that though implies bad advertising on GWs part and was probably what they wanted anyway. I geuss we were fools for even thinking GW was offering real options for once or doing something in favour of the customers.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/31 11:46:48


 
   
Made in gb
Fresh-Faced New User




Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





YeOldSaltPotato wrote:
 JohnnyHell wrote:
It says “all the datasheets you need to play”.

Not “all the extra rules from this other book we want to sell you too”.


Honestly a bit disappointed about that, had hoped the revised codexes would also include the formations and such just because... well I'm hauling vigilus around for two fething pages. That's not a small book to haul around for two pages.


If you own the models you have the points from the box.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
DecadentOne wrote:
Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.


I can confirm that they do not get any trait.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/31 13:17:36


 
   
Made in gb
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord




DecadentOne wrote:
Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.


I'd imagine it'll be faqd in a couple of weeks, but for now enjoy legion cultists as long as you're not black legion or renegades since that's what your valid literature states is the case.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





I think the most important thing to note is that the chaos codex doesn't have any renegade chapters.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Dudeface wrote:
DecadentOne wrote:
Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.


I'd imagine it'll be faqd in a couple of weeks, but for now enjoy legion cultists as long as you're not black legion or renegades since that's what your valid literature states is the case.


There is no loop hole. Cultists do not get traits in any book.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/31 13:24:51


 
   
Made in gb
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord




 Daedalus81 wrote:
I think the most important thing to note is that the chaos codex doesn't have any renegade chapters.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Dudeface wrote:
DecadentOne wrote:
Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.


I'd imagine it'll be faqd in a couple of weeks, but for now enjoy legion cultists as long as you're not black legion or renegades since that's what your valid literature states is the case.


There is no loop hole. Cultists do not get traits in any book.


Nope, my vigilus book has no amended profile for cultists, the mere mortals rule is listed under renegade chapters and black legion. Ergo if I take world eaters the cultists retain their traits.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/31 13:49:49


 
   
Made in gb
Horrific Hive Tyrant





Dudeface wrote:
 Daedalus81 wrote:
I think the most important thing to note is that the chaos codex doesn't have any renegade chapters.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Dudeface wrote:
DecadentOne wrote:
Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.


I'd imagine it'll be faqd in a couple of weeks, but for now enjoy legion cultists as long as you're not black legion or renegades since that's what your valid literature states is the case.


There is no loop hole. Cultists do not get traits in any book.


Nope, my vigilus book has no amended profile for cultists, the mere mortals rule is listed under renegade chapters and black legion. Ergo if I take world eaters the cultists retain their traits.


Have fun with that briefly until it's 'fixed' in the upcoming FAQ
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: