Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 17:51:19
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Tzeentch Veteran Marine with Psychic Potential
|
So maybe I am a moron, but I went to buy the "new" chaos codex based on the GW flow chart that made me think all the new Chaos stuff would be in it. It is NOT. The renegade traits, special detachments etc, are not in the "new" CSM Codex. Again, maybe I was wrong from my reading of the GW flow chart, but I wanted to put it out there so everyone is clear.
Removed all-caps title, we need to budget those! - BrookM
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/30 19:09:08
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 17:57:20
Subject: BE WARNED....NEW CHAOS CODEX DOES NOT CONTAIN VIGILUS ABLAZE MATERIAL
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I don't think the new Vigilus is even out yet. Is it?
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 18:29:07
Subject: Re:BE WARNED....NEW CHAOS CODEX DOES NOT CONTAIN VIGILUS ABLAZE MATERIAL
|
 |
Tzeentch Veteran Marine with Psychic Potential
|
It is. I am looking at it right now
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 18:39:56
Subject: Re:BE WARNED....NEW CHAOS CODEX DOES NOT CONTAIN VIGILUS ABLAZE MATERIAL
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
Because the "new" chaos codex was printed before Vigilus Ablaze was.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 19:00:49
Subject: BE WARNED....NEW CHAOS CODEX DOES NOT CONTAIN VIGILUS ABLAZE MATERIAL
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
They said on Facebook it wouldn't include Specialist Detachments.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 19:03:31
Subject: BE WARNED....NEW CHAOS CODEX DOES NOT CONTAIN VIGILUS ABLAZE MATERIAL
|
 |
Clousseau
|
This ruleset needs unification so badly.
|
Galas wrote:I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you 
Bharring wrote:He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 19:11:14
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant
|
Didn't they say if you own the first codex you just buy Vigilus ablaze, because it has the new datasheets and the detachments?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 20:31:46
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
fraser1191 wrote:Didn't they say if you own the first codex you just buy Vigilus ablaze, because it has the new datasheets and the detachments?
Yes they did. However they never said that the updated codex had all of the rules from Vigilus Ablaze.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 23:15:25
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
Fun fact vigilus doesn't have any of the shadowspear entries in, nor is the cultists unit entry replaced unless you take renegades or black legion.
They made a right mess of what should be a really simple situation.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/30 23:16:14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/30 23:18:23
Subject: BE WARNED....NEW CHAOS CODEX DOES NOT CONTAIN VIGILUS ABLAZE MATERIAL
|
 |
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
To no one's surprise. Churn has been part of GW's business plan since the start.
If the rules weren't scattered in WD, Codexes, Suplaments, Limited Edition Trading Cards and scribbled on napkins at Bugman's you wouldn't need to buy all of those.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 00:16:05
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
So Chaos is in chaos?
Seems fitting...
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 00:22:02
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Well, thanks for the heads up. I was planning on just getting the Vigilus book, so it sounds like that's still the plan.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 00:46:58
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Dudeface wrote:Fun fact vigilus doesn't have any of the shadowspear entries in,...
You mean these Daemonkin Datasheets that you can download from Warhammer Community for free?
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 01:48:41
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
Even I thought it would, although thy never said it was th3y made it seem like it did. If you didn't follow GW posts like half the peeps here do I'm sure you'd think it had all the updated stuff... this begs the question, why would you want the new chaos codex unless you're a new player? In addition, if you want everything chaos had to offer you're looking at a £70+ price tage just for rules.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 01:54:09
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Ghaz wrote: fraser1191 wrote:Didn't they say if you own the first codex you just buy Vigilus ablaze, because it has the new datasheets and the detachments?
Yes they did. However they never said that the updated codex had all of the rules from Vigilus Ablaze.
That chart heavily implies it though, at least to me. It's presented as a this OR this choice, and it says the codex contains "all the datasheets" you need. That to me implies I don't need the Vigilus book to get the chaos stuff in it. It's very deceptive and misleading.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 02:21:50
Subject: Re:Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
No. It makes no implication that the new codex would have the specialist detachments. The new codex has "... all the datasheets you need to play..." and the specialist detachments, artefacts, etc. are not datasheets.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 02:32:05
Subject: BE WARNED....NEW CHAOS CODEX DOES NOT CONTAIN VIGILUS ABLAZE MATERIAL
|
 |
The Hammer of Witches
A new day, a new time zone.
|
Kid_Kyoto wrote:
To no one's surprise. Churn has been part of GW's business plan since the start.
If the rules weren't scattered in WD, Codexes, Suplaments, Limited Edition Trading Cards and scribbled on napkins at Bugman's you wouldn't need to buy all of those.
Well now I guess I gotta buy some napkins.
|
"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..." Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 07:52:53
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
lolman1c wrote:Even I thought it would, although thy never said it was th3y made it seem like it did. If you didn't follow GW posts like half the peeps here do I'm sure you'd think it had all the updated stuff... this begs the question, why would you want the new chaos codex unless you're a new player? In addition, if you want everything chaos had to offer you're looking at a £70+ price tage just for rules.
I mean, that's no different than the position many factions were in after Vigilus1, really. None of these factions have a codex which now featureds the specialist detachment material, and I'd be very surprised if any do get it added if they get a V2 release down the line.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 08:37:38
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
Those same ones that don't have points costs, warlord traits or relics from the daemonkin pamphlet. They could have been included with no effort and importantly they are in codex v2.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 09:25:42
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Horst wrote:
That chart heavily implies it though, at least to me. It's presented as a this OR this choice, and it says the codex contains "all the datasheets" you need. That to me implies I don't need the Vigilus book to get the chaos stuff in it. It's very deceptive and misleading.
The chart implies nothing. They literally tell you ... if you have the old Codex, DON'T buy Codex 2.0. Just get Vigilus and a few downloads and you have a complete ruleset. That's the entire point of the graphic and it does communicate it as such.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 10:02:31
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Sunny Side Up wrote: Horst wrote:
That chart heavily implies it though, at least to me. It's presented as a this OR this choice, and it says the codex contains "all the datasheets" you need. That to me implies I don't need the Vigilus book to get the chaos stuff in it. It's very deceptive and misleading.
The chart implies nothing. They literally tell you ... if you have the old Codex, DON'T buy Codex 2.0. Just get Vigilus and a few downloads and you have a complete ruleset. That's the entire point of the graphic and it does communicate it as such.
Though if the PDF is missing points, is it truly complete?
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 10:07:23
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
It says “all the datasheets you need to play”.
Not “all the extra rules from this other book we want to sell you too”.
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 10:40:31
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
JohnnyHell wrote:It says “all the datasheets you need to play”.
Not “all the extra rules from this other book we want to sell you too”.
Honestly a bit disappointed about that, had hoped the revised codexes would also include the formations and such just because... well I'm hauling vigilus around for two fething pages. That's not a small book to haul around for two pages.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 11:42:55
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
JohnnyHell wrote:It says “all the datasheets you need to play”.
Not “all the extra rules from this other book we want to sell you too”.
The fact many of us thought that though implies bad advertising on GWs part and was probably what they wanted anyway. I geuss we were fools for even thinking GW was offering real options for once or doing something in favour of the customers.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/31 11:46:48
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 12:54:39
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 13:01:43
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
YeOldSaltPotato wrote: JohnnyHell wrote:It says “all the datasheets you need to play”.
Not “all the extra rules from this other book we want to sell you too”.
Honestly a bit disappointed about that, had hoped the revised codexes would also include the formations and such just because... well I'm hauling vigilus around for two fething pages. That's not a small book to haul around for two pages.
If you own the models you have the points from the box. Automatically Appended Next Post: DecadentOne wrote:Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.
I can confirm that they do not get any trait.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/31 13:17:36
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 13:21:00
Subject: Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
DecadentOne wrote:Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.
I'd imagine it'll be faqd in a couple of weeks, but for now enjoy legion cultists as long as you're not black legion or renegades since that's what your valid literature states is the case.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 13:24:08
Subject: Re:Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I think the most important thing to note is that the chaos codex doesn't have any renegade chapters. Automatically Appended Next Post: Dudeface wrote:DecadentOne wrote:Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.
I'd imagine it'll be faqd in a couple of weeks, but for now enjoy legion cultists as long as you're not black legion or renegades since that's what your valid literature states is the case.
There is no loop hole. Cultists do not get traits in any book.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/31 13:24:51
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 13:49:21
Subject: Re:Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
Daedalus81 wrote:I think the most important thing to note is that the chaos codex doesn't have any renegade chapters.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Dudeface wrote:DecadentOne wrote:Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.
I'd imagine it'll be faqd in a couple of weeks, but for now enjoy legion cultists as long as you're not black legion or renegades since that's what your valid literature states is the case.
There is no loop hole. Cultists do not get traits in any book.
Nope, my vigilus book has no amended profile for cultists, the mere mortals rule is listed under renegade chapters and black legion. Ergo if I take world eaters the cultists retain their traits.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/03/31 13:49:49
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/03/31 13:51:05
Subject: Re:Be warned....New Chaos Codex does not contain Vigilus Ablaze material
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
Dudeface wrote: Daedalus81 wrote:I think the most important thing to note is that the chaos codex doesn't have any renegade chapters.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Dudeface wrote:DecadentOne wrote:Does the updated codex entry for cultists prohibit all Legion traits? I only own the original codex and Vigilus Ablaze, which only seems to affect Black Legion and Renegades. As far as I can see, my Word Bearer cultists still get Profane Zeal.
I'd imagine it'll be faqd in a couple of weeks, but for now enjoy legion cultists as long as you're not black legion or renegades since that's what your valid literature states is the case.
There is no loop hole. Cultists do not get traits in any book.
Nope, my vigilus book has no amended profile for cultists, the mere mortals rule is listed under renegade chapters and black legion. Ergo if I take world eaters the cultists retain their traits.
Have fun with that briefly until it's 'fixed' in the upcoming FAQ
|
|
 |
 |
|