BrianDavion wrote:Karol wrote:I don't know, I have seen some really good Russian, Polish and China models of w40k models, and they have more detail and are more crisp then what
GW achives with their stuff. Now I don't play for decades, but in athe time I did, I have never heard someone say 3ed party rasin models, came in looking bad, bendy or with holes. While
GW stuff I have seen with pen sized holes in them and air bubbles 0,75cm in diameter.
we're not talking finecast though we're talking plastic. and
GW's plastic models are pretty good, also BCB is refering to design insomuch as anything else. and all those russian, polish and chinese models are, eaither recasts or "stuff that just apes actual
GW product. which means they don't need to be creative and come up with their own stuff
They looks better then most stuff
GW makes, helmets, weapons, tank kits.
GW ones look horrible comparing to the ones done by kromlech for example.
GW either over does it with stuff thrown on models, often ruining a model that maybe have been nice without them or they make something like the repulsor.
As creative stuff goes, am not very good at this. But to me
GW stuff seems to be just more stuff added on top of art and models they did for 30 or more years. When Grishnak made his sisters they looked better then the
GW metal ones, which were not bad looking models in the first place, and they sure look look better then the new plastic ones.