Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Technically this should only affect Match Play such as ITC.

Yeah, I sure am glad that GW has saved us all from the Pay2Win tyranny of Null Rod oppression which we were obviously all very concerned about until now.

I'm sure it took a real big think to solve that problem.

I think if they'd phrased this process as a rotation rather than shifting everything without a model on the website into legends for good it might have gained a better response. It would allow for models in the future to be made with the same loadouts and let those with the older models use them and be happy to break out their older models again.

I think it's a good thing that they're doing this, but the way they've gone about it is perhaps not the best.

I'd rather they be honest, but really nothing about this stops them from making a new model using the gear, they're just finally being quite upfront about no longer supporting models from 10+ years ago.

Personally I'd kill to have rules for power swords on my acolytes, but they didn't go that far back in the minis catalog.

Nothing has actually really changed, all these units can still be used in all three ways to play, GW have just consolidated them into one place. If TOs want to ban things that’s up to them GW hasn’t binned anything at all. It’s all still legal.

As far as I can tell the core rules FAQ flowchart still applies for this edition.. Just saying.. A self-contradicting community article with some no effort PDF seems a bit. meh...

I can sort of understand entire units/models not being supported. As much as I love the idea of Bonesingers.. But wargear options?

Selective no model no rules mantra rearing its ugly head again. ARent relics basically random wargear ?
Apparently making up relics wholesale for some factions with no modeling representations requirement, and adverse rules consequences are fine but minor wargear options for others clearly need to be represented by model stuff...

"Isn't this cool guys!? This new space marines get a magic stone that gives everything an invuln save and it doesn't even need represnatation on models but if your warlord wants to charge without overwatch.. tut... tut... tut..."

 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
The Legion of the Damned will cross the primaris Rubicon mark my words. Legion of Primaris Damned, 2021

Given some of the empassioned response to primaris initially, would it not be more apt to call them Legion of the Damn Primaris?

 Rismonite wrote:
I'm missing something. Shouldn't the Big Mek entry for Ork legends include a KFF?

I have this Big Mek with KFF at home does he have rules?

Something strange is going on with the Big Mek - they took the KFF away from the Big Mek, while leaving it for the Big Mek on the bike. At the same time, Chapter Approved 2019 has a points entry for a datasheet called "Big Mek with Kustom Force Field". There is no such datasheet, as the KFF was included as an option on the standard Big Mek datasheet in the old Index, and the Mega Armour Big Mek is listed separately. So I can see two possibilities: 1) somebody at GW thought that there is a "Big Mek with Kustom Force Field" datasheet in the Codex when there isn't or 2) perhaps we can expect a new model and a new datasheet soon.

tneva82 wrote:
Ah yes focus on thos e10 point human on horses etc And I can focus on the non abusive ways to use more than 3 datasheets and detachments.

ah well. Arquing with dishonest arquer is waste of time.

Then point out what in Legends is a problem then. I'll wait.

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:

tneva82 wrote:
Ah yes focus on thos e10 point human on horses etc And I can focus on the non abusive ways to use more than 3 datasheets and detachments.

ah well. Arquing with dishonest arquer is waste of time.

Then point out what in Legends is a problem then. I'll wait.

I think you'll be waiting awhile, better settle in with a snack and a drink, maybe a good book or 10 ?

AngryAngel80 wrote:

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:

tneva82 wrote:
Ah yes focus on thos e10 point human on horses etc And I can focus on the non abusive ways to use more than 3 datasheets and detachments.

ah well. Arquing with dishonest arquer is waste of time.

Then point out what in Legends is a problem then. I'll wait.

I think you'll be waiting awhile, better settle in with a snack and a drink, maybe a good book or 10 ?

I'm a very advanced reader. Better make that 12.