Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/25 22:49:11
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot
|
So, the eldar rumors seems to be true.
Does this mean I should order a few of the old scorpions and other eldar models if I need to fill out an army in the same aestethic? Or will there be a final chance to buy?
|
Let the galaxy burn. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/25 22:54:21
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
triplegrim wrote:So, the eldar rumors seems to be true.
Does this mean I should order a few of the old scorpions and other eldar models if I need to fill out an army in the same aestethic? Or will there be a final chance to buy?
There will probably be a final chance to buy, but why wait?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/25 23:26:12
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
As I noted in the other thread (figure I'll post it here for any who catch this thread and not the other); in general when an army is set for an update, if there are any older plastic/resin/metal models that you are interested in - get them sooner rather than later.
GW won't keep everything that they are going to replace in production and will let stocks run down. This means that models can vanish from sale even before its announced that they are going to be replaced. This is especially true for overseas where everything comes in batches so a model might run out long before it vanishes from the UK webstore (as UK GW can still print stuff up much later because once its cast its instantly on the market as there's no need to ship it around etc...).
It's impossible to predict what GW might replace, so if you like any of the older stuff and an army is set for an update, grab the stuff you want now.
Eldar have had some rumours of a decent sized range update and the recent announcement only updates 2 models in the line; so chances are more of the line will get updates over the coming months. What will get updated and when; what gets replaced - that's all impossible to guess.
Heck Rangers got an update, but GW didn't update the ranger aspect warrior to get a plastic sculpt.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 00:11:09
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Ebay!!!!!!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 00:44:33
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
Dudley, UK
|
I mean, *finally* getting shot of finecast Troops has made my day... and I'd expect that trend to continue. I am nervous about my Storm Guardians but given I was using '90s chainswords (and discovered that way how they got the weird tilt to the resin basket hilts...) I could take that hit.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 05:16:19
Subject: Re:New Eldars
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Let's just say there are two things I don't see on the GW Website today: Eldar Rangers and Eldar Autark without Wings or on Skyrunner.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 08:09:14
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Well, I have enough Eldar models with Aspect warriors like Banshees, Scorpions, Fire Dragons and also Rangers mostly metal.
I'm more looking for the new models playable at the competitive level.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 09:04:29
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
What does everyone think of the new models? I think they look great but these some thing a little uninspired about them. It might be the way they are painted, I prefer to see elder in bright colours
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 11:13:03
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Mighty Vampire Count
|
mrFickle wrote:What does everyone think of the new models? I think they look great but these some thing a little uninspired about them. It might be the way they are painted, I prefer to see elder in bright colours
Really like the Eldar bike rangers but would prefer them to all - biker and rider to have cameoline style so hard to make out but different to the Holofields of the Harelquins but thats just a painting option.
|
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/528517.page
A Bloody Road - my Warhammer Fantasy Fiction |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 11:17:51
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
We hardly get disappointed with newly released GW models.
I'll base my new Eldar on my old models and replace models from time to time.
I'll be definitely interested in the new shroud runner jetbikes.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 12:50:06
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
The new Eldar models look ace. I really like how they've done the Ranger Jetbikes, and a return to multi-part/multi-option characters is what all armies should have.
Scared of that Chosen kit though. That's going to be a real dud.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 13:24:40
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
It looks like we're going to have a Death Eater rules set for Chosen. If you look at the models there's 1 each sword, axe and, mace.
I have to wonder about how useful that unit really is. One model is pure CC another is pure ranged. I hope that we can make a pure CC unit and have the option of more than one special weapon (why is it almost always plasma?).
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/26 15:21:18
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
I really like the Ranger Jetbikes, yet I guess the rules will be something boring like just being fast rangers
for the Rangers itself, well similar to the Artel W ones, but I think the plastic ones are less good as they are more of the same (2 guys standing, 2 guys observing, 1 shooting) and I fear we see the a similar price for them
|
Harry, bring this ring to Narnia or the Sith will take the Enterprise |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/28 02:17:00
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Terrifying Doombull
|
Leo_the_Rat wrote:It looks like we're going to have a Death Eater rules set for Chosen. If you look at the models there's 1 each sword, axe and, mace.
I have to wonder about how useful that unit really is. One model is pure CC another is pure ranged. I hope that we can make a pure CC unit and have the option of more than one special weapon (why is it almost always plasma?).
To go a bit further- its a chainaxe, not a power axe.
I also really think they're monopose with maybe an optional weapon swap. The stances, the way the armor is layered, the ribbing, the bent hoses on the LC guy's belly, it all says what you see is what there is.
There's some room for variation on sword and axe guy, and maybe the mace guy's bolter, but not much else beyond headswaps (and I don't think that would work with several either).
|
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/29 03:18:27
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
kodos wrote:I really like the Ranger Jetbikes, yet I guess the rules will be something boring like just being fast rangers
My suspicion is that they'll be troops. Reasoning: a ranger that pays extra points for the speed and durability of a bike is probably just less good than a normal ranger or windrider. Pre-8th edition armies show that some of us like the idea of jetbike troops. So snipers on bikes lets them sell bike troops to eldar players again while keeping said bike troop relatively non-lethal.
Otherwise, they'd have to give them some whacky special rule to make the unit desirable. How many extra points would any of us pay for a Move stat that makes our rangers less likely to hit and an extra wound that could just be an extra ranger instead? Looking forward to these models though. Love the look of them, and bike rangers seem pretty fluffy for my Iybraesil army.
for the Rangers itself, well similar to the Artel W ones, but I think the plastic ones are less good as they are more of the same (2 guys standing, 2 guys observing, 1 shooting) and I fear we see the a similar price for them
Yeah. The new sculpts look pretty, but they're all just sort of standing around. Especially next to the autarch who is also just sort of standing there. My pile of pewter rangers at least have some crouching guys. Don't hate the new rangers, but was definitely hoping for something a bit more interesting.
|
ATTENTION. Psychic tests are unfluffy. Your longing for AV is understandable but misguided. Your chapter doesn't need a separate codex. Doctrines should go away. Being a "troop" means nothing. This has been a cranky service announcement. You may now resume your regularly scheduled arguing.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/29 05:33:54
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
kodos wrote:I really like the Ranger Jetbikes, yet I guess the rules will be something boring like just being fast rangers...
Don't worry. They'll get a stratagem that'll make them strictly better than the foot Rangers, and then in next edition's book they'll swap roles so everyone who bought all the jetbikes will have to swap and buy a bunch of the foot rangers instead.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/29 08:53:36
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
While cool on a strict design point of view and certainly thematic for some forces like an Alaitoc detachment, I am concerned about what niche this sort of unit could fill out. It's basically a slightly up-gunned and probably stealthy jetbike. It won't be filling the same role as rangers which is to occupy a backfield objective in cover and take pot shots at the enemy while being annoying to remove so I am not very concerned for that. It will probably be too expansive and vulnerable to assault to zip close to enemy lines and try to smack something or thin out hordes like normal jetbikes do. I think they will be some sort of more mobile, but less powerful war-walker which is more designed at sniping characters than anything else.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/29 10:04:03
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
epronovost wrote:While cool on a strict design point of view and certainly thematic for some forces like an Alaitoc detachment, I am concerned about what niche this sort of unit could fill out. It's basically a slightly up-gunned and probably stealthy jetbike. It won't be filling the same role as rangers which is to occupy a backfield objective in cover and take pot shots at the enemy while being annoying to remove so I am not very concerned for that. It will probably be too expansive and vulnerable to assault to zip close to enemy lines and try to smack something or thin out hordes like normal jetbikes do. I think they will be some sort of more mobile, but less powerful war-walker which is more designed at sniping characters than anything else.
Well, I guess it will be a mobile sniper unit when compared with the pure Rangers.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/29 10:38:44
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
epronovost wrote:While cool on a strict design point of view and certainly thematic for some forces like an Alaitoc detachment, I am concerned about what niche this sort of unit could fill out. It's basically a slightly up-gunned and probably stealthy jetbike. It won't be filling the same role as rangers which is to occupy a backfield objective in cover and take pot shots at the enemy while being annoying to remove so I am not very concerned for that. It will probably be too expansive and vulnerable to assault to zip close to enemy lines and try to smack something or thin out hordes like normal jetbikes do. I think they will be some sort of more mobile, but less powerful war-walker which is more designed at sniping characters than anything else.
If gw can justify different roles for all the new marine units that are slight variations on each other, they can do it for new Eldar units.
I don't care if they work like normal jetbikes, give me more units and modelling opportunities so my Eldar army is a tenth as varied as my marine armies.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/29 21:19:01
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Hellebore wrote:If gw can justify different roles for all the new marine units that are slight variations on each other, they can do it for new Eldar units.
They did it for Space Marines thanks to the fact Old Marines are going the way of the dodo losing both in popularity and in use with time and through the incredible popularity of the Space Marines in general. Eldars aren't as popular and have long suffered from pretty big problems of internal balance due to their bloat when it comes to their model lines. Splitting further the Eldar codex in subfactions could provide some help on that point. Automatically Appended Next Post: wuestenfux wrote:
Well, I guess it will be a mobile sniper unit when compared with the pure Rangers.
I'm curious to see how the mounted ranger will interact, if at all, with the jetbike weapons and pilot itself. These could really define its role or, if weak or even absent, make this nice looking model and interesting concept very boring.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2021/12/29 21:21:42
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/29 22:36:25
Subject: New Eldars
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Hellebore wrote:If gw can justify different roles for all the new marine units that are slight variations on each other, they can do it for new Eldar units.
To be fair, they've kind of failed to justify having as many marine units as they do. Incursors don't seem to ever really get taken over infiltrators, and those two units could probably be rolled into a single datasheet. And infiltrators might be the reason scouts got booted out of the troop section. Tacticals and Intercessors could probably be rolled together. Ditto assault marines and vanguard vets. You could probably condense down sternguard and/or company vets in some fashion too. Centurions seem pretty kind of redundant with aggressors and heavy intercessors too.
I'm super glad we're finally getting new models and agree with you about the modeling opportunities, but I don't want marine levels of internal bloat. (And you can keep your hypothetical Codex Supplment: Alaitoc and Codex Supplement: Ulthwe too, thanks.)
Automatically Appended Next Post:
wuestenfux wrote:
Well, I guess it will be a mobile sniper unit when compared with the pure Rangers.
I'm curious to see how the mounted ranger will interact, if at all, with the jetbike weapons and pilot itself. These could really define its role or, if weak or even absent, make this nice looking model and interesting concept very boring.
Yeah, the unit on paper without any new special rules has a weird amount of anti-synergy, right? You don't want to use the normal auto-advance 6" jetbike rule because then you're not shooting the sniper. You don't want to pay extra points for an extra wound because you could just spend those points on more unmounted rangers (thus getting more offense while basically breaking even on defense). The concept of a kiting sniper dragoon unit makes sense in the lore, but not on 9th edition's tiny tables.
So do you give them a special rule that causes them to make sense, or do you give them a big points discount on their mismatched features so that they remain a desirable alternative to both rangers and windriders? Maybe they'll end up looking like those disc-riding tzaangor archer guys?
|
ATTENTION. Psychic tests are unfluffy. Your longing for AV is understandable but misguided. Your chapter doesn't need a separate codex. Doctrines should go away. Being a "troop" means nothing. This has been a cranky service announcement. You may now resume your regularly scheduled arguing.
|
|
 |
 |
|