Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2024/01/06 13:16:03
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Chief Librarian Mephiston wrote: …it looks like the timeline will eventually advance to the Great War against Chaos. That’s 100 years from where The Old World is starting out at.
The Great War Against Chaos is in 2301-2304. the game setting starts in 2276. It's 25 years apart.
2024/01/06 13:36:36
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
They're not published yet.
I believe the quote was 'shortly after release' so that could mean anything from hours to months.
WarOne wrote:
At the very peak of his power, Mat Ward stood at the top echelons of the GW hierarchy, second only to Satan in terms of personal power within the company.
2024/01/06 13:39:04
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
kodos wrote: units do not block line of sight, models do
That sounds complicated, surely it makes more sense to have units block LOS and then have different unit classes to decide what blocks what? Having models block LOS makes more sense in a video game where the engine handles the hit boxes.
2024/01/06 13:46:27
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Chief Librarian Mephiston wrote: …it looks like the timeline will eventually advance to the Great War against Chaos. That’s 100 years from where The Old World is starting out at.
The Great War Against Chaos is in 2301-2304. the game setting starts in 2276. It's 25 years apart.
Yes. But also no. As was explained in one of this week's interviews, they are not going linearly forward towards the Great War, and do plan on hopping backwards, as far back as 2201.
CoALabaer wrote: Wargamers hate two things: the state of the game and change.
2024/01/06 14:11:33
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
kodos wrote: units do not block line of sight, models do
That sounds complicated, surely it makes more sense to have units block LOS and then have different unit classes to decide what blocks what? Having models block LOS makes more sense in a video game where the engine handles the hit boxes.
it is still Warhammer, not Kings of War, you also check for each individual model if it has line of sight to the target to decide if it can shoot or not. Almost everything in GW games is model based, not unit based
Harry, bring this ring to Narnia or the Sith will take the Enterprise
2024/01/06 14:11:38
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Well, that GMG review is confirmation that you can't Army of Infamy your way into a Tomb Kings army that doesnt require you to use the old kits. Was really hoping one of them would let you fill out your core using Tomb Guard or one of the newer kits but no such luck.
CoALabaer wrote: Wargamers hate two things: the state of the game and change.
2024/01/06 14:19:31
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Wow! Confirmation that we are getting Forsaken back is awesome. There are so many old kits I regret not picking up before their demise and I am glad to have another shot beyond scouring eBay.
2024/01/06 14:26:19
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Chief Librarian Mephiston wrote: …it looks like the timeline will eventually advance to the Great War against Chaos. That’s 100 years from where The Old World is starting out at.
The Great War Against Chaos is in 2301-2304. the game setting starts in 2276. It's 25 years apart.
Come on GW. Advance the narrative you cowards!
2024/01/06 14:46:44
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
kodos wrote: you can always just buy the tomb guard and use bits from the skeletons to turn them into core infantry (as suggest multiple times on reddit)
That just makes skeletons twice as expensive while still being mediocre
CoALabaer wrote: Wargamers hate two things: the state of the game and change.
1024/08/19 02:50:35
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
AllSeeingSkink wrote: [
I would never expect it to sell more than 40k, but at its peak Warhammer was quite popular in Australia, and we're talking its first edition in almost 14 years, I'd be hoping it to sell reasonably well. It's not like Epic/Legions Imperialis that was only ever a niche within a niche.
That will be the last BL book I bother to order. Been sick of the way they deal with new released for a long time now and spending an hour in a virtual queue for books once ever few months is still more time than I'm willing. I was too far into collecting the SoT series at the point it got to much.
Well I'm sure whole stock sold to scalpers instead of queue would be so much better
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2024/01/06 15:10:28
2024 painted/bought: 109/109
2024/01/06 15:48:11
Subject: Re:Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
I've got my preorder in with my usual US online supplier for the basics at a discount (Bret box, books, and pegasus standard). Now I've got an alarm set to start checking the GW online store a half hour before launch time, depending on when the queue system turns on. Or do y'all think I should start checking it earlier than that? To this day, selling off my Bretonnians years ago is among my very few gaming regrets, as they were also the original release Bretonnians. Still have all my Dwarves, though.
"Through the darkness of future past, the magician longs to see.
One chants out between two worlds: Fire, walk with me." - Twin Peaks
"You listen to me. While I will admit to a certain cynicism, the fact is that I am a naysayer and hatchetman in the fight against violence. I pride myself in taking a punch and I'll gladly take another because I choose to live my life in the company of Gandhi and King. My concerns are global. I reject absolutely revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method... is love. I love you Sheriff Truman." - Twin Peaks
2024/01/06 15:49:29
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Considering the price of tin (major ingredient in pewter) has more or less tripled from 30 years ago I consider GW prices on metal to not be that out of line on one hand, whereas on the other I don't see why they are still producing in metal at all if the cost has gone up so much.
Tannhauser42 wrote: I've got my preorder in with my usual US online supplier for the basics at a discount (Bret box, books, and pegasus standard). Now I've got an alarm set to start checking the GW online store a half hour before launch time, depending on when the queue system turns on. Or do y'all think I should start checking it earlier than that? To this day, selling off my Bretonnians years ago is among my very few gaming regrets, as they were also the original release Bretonnians. Still have all my Dwarves, though.
I feel you there. I had a 3,000 point army in 5th Ed. Bret models. Now that I'm back to 6th I have to start every army over except for the 4 armies I didn't sell.
NinthMusketeer wrote: Considering the price of tin (major ingredient in pewter) has more or less tripled from 30 years ago I consider GW prices on metal to not be that out of line on one hand, whereas on the other I don't see why they are still producing in metal at all if the cost has gone up so much.
Not sure would it be much cheaper to go for whatever resin the FW use?
2024 painted/bought: 109/109
2024/01/06 16:13:49
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Looking at Bretonnia specifically, you could pretty easily kitbash most of the metal kits anyway.
Do Grail Knights look all that different than the plastic ones? Stick some fancy gubbins on them and paint them a bit differently.
Heck, in TW: WH the big difference is the Grail Knights have shiny magic lances because you can't actually tell them apart otherwise.
The only real issue I can see is Yeoman Cavalry.
Tomb Kings obviously Ushabti aren't exactly something you can make so that sucks.
2024/01/06 16:20:35
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Gert wrote: Tomb Kings obviously Ushabti aren't exactly something you can make so that sucks.
One skeleton riding piggyback on another, either with a skeleton archer's equipment or use the spear shaft combined with a random weapon to make a great weapon. When challenged on it, respond that models will become reasonable when prices become reasonable.
2024/01/06 16:24:48
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Holy gak I just saw the rules for gyrocopters. 60pts/model and can be taken in units of 6! They fly (9) and have a steam gun (breath template that does S3 AP-1). Imagine placing 6 templates over a unit!!
2024/01/06 16:33:12
Subject: Warhammer - The Old World news and rumors
Shadow Walker wrote: Judging solely from that one pic, it looks like there are only regular gobbos, which could mean night ones are AoS only.
Not gonna lie i'll be happy to finally get a box of plain ole vanilla gobbos Dang things never ever seemed to pop up on ebay and if they did they'd be stupidly expensive lol.