Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 12:50:49
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Ancient Space Wolves Venerable Dreadnought
|
xttz wrote:Considering how long Catachans have been kept around with old kits, I'm sure the plan is to give them the KT -> new range treatment eventually. It's just a question of how much longer.
That’ll be interesting. I hope they get some actual jungle terrain with that set too. What would they be fighting though? Lictors is the classic matchup.
(Give them rotor cannon as man-portable heavy weapons dammit!)
|
"Three months? I'm going to go crazy …and I'm taking you with me!"
— Vala Mal Doran |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 12:53:10
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Dudeface wrote:chaos0xomega wrote: Overread wrote:chaos0xomega wrote:On some level I understand the frustration of having generic infantry squads removed, but... seriously, does it matter that now instead of fielding your Elysians/Steel Legion/Vostroyans/Praetorians/Mordians/Tallarn/Tanith/Savlarans/Harkoni/Valhallans/Ventrillians/Baranites/whathaveyou as "Infantry Squad" they might, on paper, now be referred to as "Cadian Infantry Squad" or "Catachan Infantry Squad", etc?
I think the thing is that for decades the Imperial Guard has been more or less generic at its very core (even if they were all cadian models for the most part). So it was really easy to run your custom themed army either just calling it what you liked or using one of the sub-army rules if present in the codex for that edition. Formally calling everything Cadian etc.... Means that bit of flavour is fully lost.
It would be a bit like going to Tyrainds and saying "ok ALL Tyranids are now Hive Fleet Kraken, except for Carnifex which are Behemoth.
Its a bit of a narrative blow; especially as whilst we have Krieg and Cadian - its less likely that GW will give IG multiple different themed regiments like they did in the past in metal. Who knows perhaps they will and they've plans to take the IG in the same direction as Marines.
I can see why this isn't a popular choice for Guard players even if its purely a name at the top of a unit profile card
I guess im not seeing what changes or what flavor is being lost as a result of what is basically a change in administrative bookkeeping. My custom regiment is still my custom regiment, all the flavor and lore is atill there. The only thing that changed is what my units are referred to as on the piece of paper or my phone screen i hand my opponent before the game starts. After that, my infantet squads are infa try squads, command squads are command squads, etc.
Complaining that flavor is being lost because the units are specifically named is as nonsensical as doing the same if all the units were renamed to "unit 1", "unit 2", "unit 3". Its actually wholly irrelevant.
Now, loss of HWTs in infantry squads and loss of option flexibility? Yeah, thats a valid complaint.
It's more there's an onus and effort on you to delineate that which of your infantry squads are which type of infantry squad. Be it converting them, repainting them, rebasing them or use of a token etc.
Which sucks if you have a fully painted army or a metal one etc.
Unless you just pick one of the three you feel best represents your regiment and use that consistently.
It’s mainly because of NMNR ludicrously restricting the options of each one that it’s a problem.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 14:23:11
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
Lord Zarkov wrote:Dudeface wrote:chaos0xomega wrote: Overread wrote:chaos0xomega wrote:On some level I understand the frustration of having generic infantry squads removed, but... seriously, does it matter that now instead of fielding your Elysians/Steel Legion/Vostroyans/Praetorians/Mordians/Tallarn/Tanith/Savlarans/Harkoni/Valhallans/Ventrillians/Baranites/whathaveyou as "Infantry Squad" they might, on paper, now be referred to as "Cadian Infantry Squad" or "Catachan Infantry Squad", etc?
I think the thing is that for decades the Imperial Guard has been more or less generic at its very core (even if they were all cadian models for the most part). So it was really easy to run your custom themed army either just calling it what you liked or using one of the sub-army rules if present in the codex for that edition. Formally calling everything Cadian etc.... Means that bit of flavour is fully lost.
It would be a bit like going to Tyrainds and saying "ok ALL Tyranids are now Hive Fleet Kraken, except for Carnifex which are Behemoth.
Its a bit of a narrative blow; especially as whilst we have Krieg and Cadian - its less likely that GW will give IG multiple different themed regiments like they did in the past in metal. Who knows perhaps they will and they've plans to take the IG in the same direction as Marines.
I can see why this isn't a popular choice for Guard players even if its purely a name at the top of a unit profile card
I guess im not seeing what changes or what flavor is being lost as a result of what is basically a change in administrative bookkeeping. My custom regiment is still my custom regiment, all the flavor and lore is atill there. The only thing that changed is what my units are referred to as on the piece of paper or my phone screen i hand my opponent before the game starts. After that, my infantet squads are infa try squads, command squads are command squads, etc.
Complaining that flavor is being lost because the units are specifically named is as nonsensical as doing the same if all the units were renamed to "unit 1", "unit 2", "unit 3". Its actually wholly irrelevant.
Now, loss of HWTs in infantry squads and loss of option flexibility? Yeah, thats a valid complaint.
It's more there's an onus and effort on you to delineate that which of your infantry squads are which type of infantry squad. Be it converting them, repainting them, rebasing them or use of a token etc.
Which sucks if you have a fully painted army or a metal one etc.
Unless you just pick one of the three you feel best represents your regiment and use that consistently.
It’s mainly because of NMNR ludicrously restricting the options of each one that it’s a problem.
Pretty much, but there's no requirement to do so.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 15:43:41
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Master Engineer with a Brace of Pistols
|
Take a look at the new detachment rules. They seem designed around that want by players to have their own unique regiment and their own play styles. They actually seem good. Yet it butts up against removing generic units. It shows that lack of internal communication within GW teams working on releases.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 16:41:47
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Member of the Ethereal Council
|
these are all things i was expecting to change TBH.
Better for making each regiment different, allowing krieg rules to stand out vs cadian
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 17:46:49
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Dudeface wrote:Which sucks if you have a fully painted army or a metal one etc.
If an economic unit has an already completed army, they need to be CHURNED. Either get on the treadmill or GTFO is corporation's ethos.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2025/01/08 17:47:09
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 18:51:15
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
|
Mr_Rose wrote: xttz wrote:Considering how long Catachans have been kept around with old kits, I'm sure the plan is to give them the KT -> new range treatment eventually. It's just a question of how much longer.
That’ll be interesting. I hope they get some actual jungle terrain with that set too. What would they be fighting though? Lictors is the classic matchup.
(Give them rotor cannon as man-portable heavy weapons dammit!)
They could fight Exodites! Always look for a reason to include exodites.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 18:53:09
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Posts with Authority
|
Looking at the recent WHC guard articles, I cannot see a single FW vehicle in any of the DKoK illustrations. I highly suspect Malcadors, Crassus et al going to legends with the new codex.
Was just reading the meltdown at B&C over the loss of the generic guard unit. over ten pages of agony over there! Time will tell if the "these Krieg are actually catachans, and those Krieg are Cadian, but this Cadian unit is Krieg" woes will turn out to be show-stopping..
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2025/01/08 18:53:54
"The larger point though, is that as players, we have more control over what the game looks and feels like than most of us are willing to use in order to solve our own problems" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 19:04:03
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Fayric wrote: Mr_Rose wrote: xttz wrote:Considering how long Catachans have been kept around with old kits, I'm sure the plan is to give them the KT -> new range treatment eventually. It's just a question of how much longer.
That’ll be interesting. I hope they get some actual jungle terrain with that set too. What would they be fighting though? Lictors is the classic matchup.
(Give them rotor cannon as man-portable heavy weapons dammit!)
They could fight Exodites! Always look for a reason to include exodites.
One day GW will actually make an Exodites model!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 19:05:33
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
Overread wrote: Fayric wrote: Mr_Rose wrote: xttz wrote:Considering how long Catachans have been kept around with old kits, I'm sure the plan is to give them the KT -> new range treatment eventually. It's just a question of how much longer.
That’ll be interesting. I hope they get some actual jungle terrain with that set too. What would they be fighting though? Lictors is the classic matchup.
(Give them rotor cannon as man-portable heavy weapons dammit!)
They could fight Exodites! Always look for a reason to include exodites.
One day GW will actually make an Exodites model!
Will this be before or after the infinite Space Marine lieutenants?
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 19:09:00
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
tauist wrote:Looking at the recent WHC guard articles, I cannot see a single FW vehicle in any of the DKoK illustrations. I highly suspect Malcadors, Crassus et al going to legends with the new codex.
Was just reading the meltdown at B&C over the loss of the generic guard unit. over ten pages of agony over there! Time will tell if the "these Krieg are actually catachans, and those Krieg are Cadian, but this Cadian unit is Krieg" woes will turn out to be show-stopping..
Probably not show stopping but I do foresee extra TO comments or rules about it for formal events and some people will be more impacted than others.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 19:09:55
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Deadshot Weapon Moderati
MI
|
Neither, it will be a Space Marine lieutenant standing over a dead Exodite.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 19:30:53
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
ikeulhu wrote:
Neither, it will be a Space Marine lieutenant standing over a dead Exodite.
Don't speak these things into existence. There are already 13 unique Space Marine Primaris Lieutenants roaming around.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 19:43:03
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Lathe Biosas wrote: ikeulhu wrote:
Neither, it will be a Space Marine lieutenant standing over a dead Exodite.
Don't speak these things into existence. There are already 13 unique Space Marine Primaris Lieutenants roaming around.
Heck when GW teased the new lictors the first sight we got was an Imperial Guard warrior standing over a dead one and she was a special character model release too .
But yeah I bet if GW ever do an Exodites it will be like the Animation - a warrior rather than anything mounted
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 19:52:18
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
London
|
Well 'guard for me was my last chance to play this edition. As I don't fancy repainting squads (replacing heavy weapon teams in squads) I am out for this edition.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 21:17:05
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Lord Damocles wrote:Dudeface wrote:Which sucks if you have a fully painted army or a metal one etc.
If an economic unit has an already completed army, they need to be CHURNED. Either get on the treadmill or GTFO is corporation's ethos.
Because customer loyalty is worthless, amiright? As a general rule, adding new things would encourage collectors to add more; removing things just pisses them off.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 21:44:45
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Aus
|
There it is, the best thing I've ever read on this forum.
Interesting people are upset now about the changes in Guard rules/feel, I already thought they had some ridiculous rules going on flavourwise. The whole army gets Lethal Hits because... I dunno? We couldn't stand just having them being average joes who have to win through numbers and variety? Shame SMs never attended that course.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 22:46:34
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
A garden grove on Citadel Station
|
I guess all my infantry squad heavy weapons are now heavy weapons squads? And there are now three data sheets for heavy weapons squads?
So all the lascannoneers in the Imperium will basically be catachans for the foreseeable future?
|
ph34r's Forgeworld Phobos blog, current WIP: Iron Warriors and Skaven Tau
+From Iron Cometh Strength+ +From Strength Cometh Will+ +From Will Cometh Faith+ +From Faith Cometh Honor+ +From Honor Cometh Iron+
The Polito form is dead, insect. Are you afraid? What is it you fear? The end of your trivial existence?
When the history of my glory is written, your species shall only be a footnote to my magnificence. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/08 23:14:41
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Lathe Biosas wrote: ikeulhu wrote:
Neither, it will be a Space Marine lieutenant standing over a dead Exodite.
Don't speak these things into existence. There are already 13 unique Space Marine Primaris Lieutenants roaming around.
Overblown joke at this point. How many SM Librarians, Chaplains, or especially captains over the years? And now Death Korps Commissars have racked up a decent number.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2025/01/08 23:18:14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 01:32:02
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
MajorWesJanson wrote: Lathe Biosas wrote: ikeulhu wrote:
Neither, it will be a Space Marine lieutenant standing over a dead Exodite.
Don't speak these things into existence. There are already 13 unique Space Marine Primaris Lieutenants roaming around.
Overblown joke at this point. How many SM Librarians, Chaplains, or especially captains over the years? And now Death Korps Commissars have racked up a decent number.
Not really blown out of proportion, when you see 13 of these guys released, and other models that are wanted/needed never come out.
Every Warhammer 40k Space Marine Primaris Lieutenant - Wargamer
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 03:06:30
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Over a period of 3 editions. Yeah, its a bit much, but it's still a worn out joke. Space Marine characters have always been over-represented. There are 10 different generic Astartes Captains/Marshall on the webstore right now.
Back on actual topic, we know from the roadmap that Kreig are next with a major wave, Eldar are after with a major wave, and Imperial Knights are coming with rumors of 1 kit. Chaos Knights ought to be coming around the same time as those two share a lot of models, and Chaos knights got a couple model releases for their last book vs IIRC no new ones for Imperials last round. It would make some sense for them to rebox the cerastus hulls in 40K packaging as an easy addition to both though. After that, we are getting previews of Emperor's Children, which would make a nice contrast to the Eldar. Likely a model range around the same size as World Eaters got- Fulgrim, Lucius, Infantry, Elite infantry, Chaff unit, Generic Lord (possibly mounted)
After that, if Slaanesh gets ported into the EC book fully, the other 3 god books and generic CSM may follow pretty quickly to speed the transition. Death Guard have the leaked character model, so maybe a single model release (they also have the largest existing range of the 4 gods). Thousand Sons and World Eaters could use more characters and units, but could also see just single kit releases as well. Generic Chaos Marines have a codex, but could see a few model editions- Night Lords just got a kill team, so other generic CSM legions may show up via kill team- say an Alpha Legion infiltration band or Iron Warriors siege crew
Besides Chaos, there is Grey Knights, Votaan, Dark Eldar, Space Wolves, and Black Templars. Deathwatch seems like it was left out and then walked back, so probably doesnt have a book planned soon.
Grey Knights only have 3 unique kits plus 2 named plastic characters. A full scale revamp would take less resources than Kreig are getting, and have room for new kits left over.
Votaan are very infantry heavy right now- they could use a bit more in the way of vehicles or artillery, maybe a mounted hernkyn character leader
Dark Eldar have a lot of good kits, but have had so much removed that besides Court of the Archon, Beastmaster menageries, and Grotesques, anything would be new. There is no named Archon character in the book anymore.
Space Wolves- primaris versions of specific units.
Black Templars- Mostly share with generic marines, but possibly could use say a terminator Sword Brethren unit with swords and shields?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 06:02:28
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I'll feel very sorry for anyone who started World Eaters and Votann if they end up with single character releases this edition - WE definitely need more than that.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 06:20:15
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Dysartes wrote:I'll feel very sorry for anyone who started World Eaters and Votann if they end up with single character releases this edition - WE definitely need more than that.
Agreed, but I see the Emperor's children sucking up a lot of the model bandwith for chaos. Maybe a unit instead of a character? Berzerker Juggernaught Cav seems like a logical one- if Daemons get merged in they already have Juggernaughts, but that didn't stop AoS from doing both Daemons and warrior versions. Also I could see the Slaughterbrute being put into the book since Thousand Sons have the Tzeentchy version of that kit.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 06:38:37
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Dudeface wrote: parakuribo wrote:Best case is to go the Barnes & Noble Route and make Space Hulk into an AoS game. Sadly, I doubt they'd go with it since it is bigger than both Lost Patrol and Bloodchosen combined. There's also a problem in making the Sigmarines similar to termies(Skaven would be a no brainer: make Genestealers into Stormvermin).
Polite reminder the Barnes and Noble releases aren't available worldwide.
B&N doesn't do international shipping?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 07:12:23
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
ccs wrote:Dudeface wrote: parakuribo wrote:Best case is to go the Barnes & Noble Route and make Space Hulk into an AoS game. Sadly, I doubt they'd go with it since it is bigger than both Lost Patrol and Bloodchosen combined. There's also a problem in making the Sigmarines similar to termies(Skaven would be a no brainer: make Genestealers into Stormvermin).
Polite reminder the Barnes and Noble releases aren't available worldwide.
B&N doesn't do international shipping?
I mean they do, but it its not exactly cheap and convenient compared to simply selling it domestically. If someone has a B&N box to hand I'd be curious where it was manufactured as well.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 12:18:21
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
ccs wrote:Dudeface wrote: parakuribo wrote:Best case is to go the Barnes & Noble Route and make Space Hulk into an AoS game. Sadly, I doubt they'd go with it since it is bigger than both Lost Patrol and Bloodchosen combined. There's also a problem in making the Sigmarines similar to termies(Skaven would be a no brainer: make Genestealers into Stormvermin).
Polite reminder the Barnes and Noble releases aren't available worldwide.
B&N doesn't do international shipping?
They don't do international shipping to the UK and EU, no.
https://help.barnesandnoble.com/hc/en-us/articles/5334789599771-International-Shipping
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 12:59:47
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Gore-Drenched Khorne Chaos Lord
|
I didn't go that far down the page tbh, but good spot.
Who knows anyway, when we become the 53rd state at president Musks behest, we might get them then.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2025/01/09 13:00:41
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 13:52:37
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
MajorWesJanson wrote:
Over a period of 3 editions. Yeah, its a bit much, but it's still a worn out joke. Space Marine characters have always been over-represented. There are 10 different generic Astartes Captains/Marshall on the webstore right now.
Back on actual topic, we know from the roadmap that Kreig are next with a major wave, Eldar are after with a major wave, and Imperial Knights are coming with rumors of 1 kit. Chaos Knights ought to be coming around the same time as those two share a lot of models, and Chaos knights got a couple model releases for their last book vs IIRC no new ones for Imperials last round. It would make some sense for them to rebox the cerastus hulls in 40K packaging as an easy addition to both though. After that, we are getting previews of Emperor's Children, which would make a nice contrast to the Eldar. Likely a model range around the same size as World Eaters got- Fulgrim, Lucius, Infantry, Elite infantry, Chaff unit, Generic Lord (possibly mounted)
After that, if Slaanesh gets ported into the EC book fully, the other 3 god books and generic CSM may follow pretty quickly to speed the transition. Death Guard have the leaked character model, so maybe a single model release (they also have the largest existing range of the 4 gods). Thousand Sons and World Eaters could use more characters and units, but could also see just single kit releases as well. Generic Chaos Marines have a codex, but could see a few model editions- Night Lords just got a kill team, so other generic CSM legions may show up via kill team- say an Alpha Legion infiltration band or Iron Warriors siege crew
Besides Chaos, there is Grey Knights, Votaan, Dark Eldar, Space Wolves, and Black Templars. Deathwatch seems like it was left out and then walked back, so probably doesnt have a book planned soon.
Grey Knights only have 3 unique kits plus 2 named plastic characters. A full scale revamp would take less resources than Kreig are getting, and have room for new kits left over.
Votaan are very infantry heavy right now- they could use a bit more in the way of vehicles or artillery, maybe a mounted hernkyn character leader
Dark Eldar have a lot of good kits, but have had so much removed that besides Court of the Archon, Beastmaster menageries, and Grotesques, anything would be new. There is no named Archon character in the book anymore.
Space Wolves- primaris versions of specific units.
Black Templars- Mostly share with generic marines, but possibly could use say a terminator Sword Brethren unit with swords and shields?
I think one of the recent Valrak rumours has the 4 God aligned chaos books coming out in short succession at the same time, with some rumours coming to him that (other than Emperor's Children) they will each get a mortal and daemon release.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 14:01:37
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Posts with Authority
|
Another Krieg article - the HQ model apparently comes back to the board on a 2+ after dying for the first time.
Again, the lack of any Malcadors et al in the mentioned army list is concerning. I will forever picture Krieg as how they were in Siege Of Vraks, they dont use those dinky cadian vehicles goddammit! Looks all wrong IMO
Couldn't GW like, you know, create another SKU for those HH tanks, swap out the transfer sheet and just slap a 40K logo on the boxes? This is too dumb
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2025/01/09 14:03:51
"The larger point though, is that as players, we have more control over what the game looks and feels like than most of us are willing to use in order to solve our own problems" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/09 14:05:23
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours. Store Anniversary mini 2025 revealed.p.132.
|
 |
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
MajorWesJanson wrote:
Over a period of 3 editions. Yeah, its a bit much, but it's still a worn out joke. Space Marine characters have always been over-represented. There are 10 different generic Astartes Captains/Marshall on the webstore right now.
Back on actual topic, we know from the roadmap that Kreig are next with a major wave, Eldar are after with a major wave, and Imperial Knights are coming with rumors of 1 kit. Chaos Knights ought to be coming around the same time as those two share a lot of models, and Chaos knights got a couple model releases for their last book vs IIRC no new ones for Imperials last round. It would make some sense for them to rebox the cerastus hulls in 40K packaging as an easy addition to both though. After that, we are getting previews of Emperor's Children, which would make a nice contrast to the Eldar. Likely a model range around the same size as World Eaters got- Fulgrim, Lucius, Infantry, Elite infantry, Chaff unit, Generic Lord (possibly mounted)
After that, if Slaanesh gets ported into the EC book fully, the other 3 god books and generic CSM may follow pretty quickly to speed the transition. Death Guard have the leaked character model, so maybe a single model release (they also have the largest existing range of the 4 gods). Thousand Sons and World Eaters could use more characters and units, but could also see just single kit releases as well. Generic Chaos Marines have a codex, but could see a few model editions- Night Lords just got a kill team, so other generic CSM legions may show up via kill team- say an Alpha Legion infiltration band or Iron Warriors siege crew
Besides Chaos, there is Grey Knights, Votaan, Dark Eldar, Space Wolves, and Black Templars. Deathwatch seems like it was left out and then walked back, so probably doesnt have a book planned soon.
Grey Knights only have 3 unique kits plus 2 named plastic characters. A full scale revamp would take less resources than Kreig are getting, and have room for new kits left over.
Votaan are very infantry heavy right now- they could use a bit more in the way of vehicles or artillery, maybe a mounted hernkyn character leader
Dark Eldar have a lot of good kits, but have had so much removed that besides Court of the Archon, Beastmaster menageries, and Grotesques, anything would be new. There is no named Archon character in the book anymore.
Space Wolves- primaris versions of specific units.
Black Templars- Mostly share with generic marines, but possibly could use say a terminator Sword Brethren unit with swords and shields?
The Black Templars release would be a good opportunity to release updated Assault Terminators in the same scale as the Leviathan ones. It's a notable omission from the current SM range.
I expect Votann to get a unit of jump infantry to match the one in their Kill Team.
|
|
 |
 |
|