Switch Theme:

(OLD THREAD - NO NEW INFO) Black Templar Rumours *updated Jan 20 2012*  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




I take no credit for this. Non of these are my rumours, just reading from other forums since I don't see anything on Dakka. Sorry for not updating earlier.

Wow, I am shocked, I don't see any Black Templar Rumours here on Dakka Dakka. Was on B&C and it directed me to Warseer for the BT rumouors. So since I don't go there very often and come here alost everyday, lets discuss about the BT here. If by any chance there is a BT rumour page and I missed it, can anyone direct me to it please since I don't see one.

http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=324214 link to Warseer.

Updated: 22-11-2011
Ghost has said that BT are due out before Tau, presumably the next codex. He also said

Originally Posted by ghost21
due to them sitting done for nearly 8 months?... n honestly sword brethren are nice
I believe therefore that the Black Templars should have their own rumor thread rather than cluttering up the other rumor threads. I invite Ghost, as well as any others with information to share to post it here.
First update (thank you for the advice Shabbadoo)
And thank you ghost21 for these rumors!


Originally Posted by ghost21
kits for sword brethren n nophytes(sp) as ive said im more of a xenos guy but ill provide what i know, vows are less restrictive

i also saw things for something called knights of the inner circle (or something along those lines).. they were named each came from a successor chapter, n the guy who lead them was a bt... it was interesting but as usual salt applies
More

Originally Posted by Mirbeau
Not as big! But more bizarre! (unless you play fantasy...). That's most of what I know about it. Speculating from that - big buffing thing with a howdah ?!

A bit more for now - in regards to the 'neophytes' (if they continue with that name), I heard they were finecast. Whilst it would leave room for another plastic kit, I hope this isn't true.

Dark Angels are not at all on my radar, doesn't mean they aren't happening anytime soon, but I haven't heard a thing, if ghost's heard anything it is likely to do with black templars.
Conflicting rumors here


Originally Posted by Lord Commissar Aquila
4. CSM will get one of the newest dexes in 6th, right after the Marine dex.

5. Tau and BT will get a release soon after CSM; other races updated in 5th will not be updated in 6th as their rules (at least from Guard onwards) are allready suited for 6th. Ward will probably do the BT and might do Tau as well. DA will probably not be updated anytime soon, because its not a popular army and GW does not want to waste money updating one or more armies that almost no one plays with a separate dex.
Old rumor from Jordankeeps at DakkaDakka
link http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum...60/361666.page

"Phill kelly is going to write the Bt codex, so that should be great oh and new units added for bt as well. by Jared van Kell
Quote

A little but nothing solid. What I have heard.

- Phil Kelly is writing the Codex.
- More emphasis on the horde aspect of the army with lots of large units of Initiates and Neophytes.
- Emperors Champion is more in line with the company champion of the Grey Knights but is still 2 wounds. Gains preferred enemy against independent characters and monstrous creatures.

I will let you know as I hear more.



by Jared van Kell
Quote

Some additional bits.

- I forgot to mention the Rightous Zeal rule could be changing to be more along the lines of the Rage USR. Something along the lines of if they fail a Ld test then they are subject to Rage and must advance towards the nearest enemy unit. As yet the details are sketchy.
- All the current special characters (ie: Helbrect and Grimaldius) will remain. Also I had heard of an mention of a special character who is like the greatest of all of the Emperor's Champions and the greatest warrior in the Black Templars. I had heard mention of a bike mounted special character with a lance like weapon but I cannot confirm this yet. "


Originally Posted by superdupermatt
Certain units to get Rage USR is one I've heard repeatedly. (foolishly didn't see the first post... oops!)
Sword Brethren are to get a special rule where when they are assaulted the enemy unit has to re-roll all* successful hits, at the expense of 1 attack. It's called "parry".
Land Raiders, when suffering a 5 or 6 on the damage chart* (so "wrecked" or "destroyed") gets one more turn where it rampage, think along the lines of the machine spirit going bezerk.
No horses as far as I am aware, bikes would be the direction (if any at all) for riding knights.
There is a named Emperor's Champion, he's meant to be the longest living EC in the Black Templars history, or somesuch.

*I'll seek clarification as it doesn't quite seem right in my head.

*edit* Dec 12 2011

From Stickymonky on Warseer. http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=327436

My sources are giving me the following general timelines of codex releases

2012
Q1/2 - tau (or flipped w BT)
Q2/3 - BT ( possible WD codex)
Q3 - 6 Ed
Q3/4 - eldar

2013 getting fuzzy
Q1 - SM
Q2/3 - chaos legions (new)
Q4 - ig or orks!

2014. So much could change...no order given
Daemons
Nids
DA?

This is a long way out, and a lot could change, but we know the studio has long lead times.

Cheers, Merry Christmas.

*edit* Dec 30/2011

Here is some more rumours I found at B&C. http://www.bolterandchainsword.com/index.php?showtopic=242736 from Th!rdeye. I believe most of them are reported, but too tired right now, to see what is and wasn't said. So I don't leave anything here is.


I figured this would be a good thread considering we are getting a good bunch of rumours coming in. So i will be collecting each rumour that springs up from Dakka, Warseer and the like and posting them here.


If you have ANY thing i missed i will gladly add it in, or if you have an anonymous rumor (unlikely) PM me and i'll put it up.

So here it is. Let me know if i missed something or you have another rumor.

ghost21 from Warseer

QUOTE

due to them sitting done for nearly 8 months?... n honestly sword brethren are nice


ghost21 from Warseer

QUOTE

kits for sword brethren n nophytes(sp) as ive said im more of a xenos guy but ill provide what i know, vows are less restrictive

i also saw things for something called knights of the inner circle (or something along those lines).. they were named each came from a successor chapter, n the guy who lead them was a bt... it was interesting but as usual salt applies


ghost21 from Warseer

QUOTE

relic dreadnaughts, like a mobile requiary bearer... is what i had heard


Mirbeau from Warseer, In response to someone saying our "big thing" might be a Thunderhawk...

QUOTE

Not as big! But more bizarre! (unless you play fantasy...). That's most of what I know about it. Speculating from that - big buffing thing with a howdah ?!

A bit more for now - in regards to the 'neophytes' (if they continue with that name), I heard they were finecast. Whilst it would leave room for another plastic kit, I hope this isn't true.

Dark Angels are not at all on my radar, doesn't mean they aren't happening anytime soon, but I haven't heard a thing, if ghost's heard anything it is likely to do with black templars.


From Warseer, in regards to someone hearing about a "giant tracked siege weapon" (Related to above quote?)

QUOTE

I mentioned it recently but it was a rumor posted some time ago from stickmonkey if i remember correctly although i could be wrong. It was in response to some comments about the dreadknight before the actual release of the GK codex and it mentions a dreadnought variant on tracks designed for siege purposes.


From DakkaDakka, original quote by Jared van Kell from Librarium Online

QUOTE

Phill kelly is going to write the Bt codex, so that should be great oh and new units added for bt as well. by Jared van Kell
Quote

A little but nothing solid. What I have heard.

- Phil Kelly is writing the Codex.
- More emphasis on the horde aspect of the army with lots of large units of Initiates and Neophytes.
- Emperors Champion is more in line with the company champion of the Grey Knights but is still 2 wounds. Gains preferred enemy against independent characters and monstrous creatures.

I will let you know as I hear more.



by Jared van Kell
Quote

Some additional bits.

- I forgot to mention the Rightous Zeal rule could be changing to be more along the lines of the Rage USR. Something along the lines of if they fail a Ld test then they are subject to Rage and must advance towards the nearest enemy unit. As yet the details are sketchy.
- All the current special characters (ie: Helbrect and Grimaldius) will remain. Also I had heard of an mention of a special character who is like the greatest of all of the Emperor's Champions and the greatest warrior in the Black Templars. I had heard mention of a bike mounted special character with a lance like weapon but I cannot confirm this yet.


From Warseer

QUOTE

Certain units to get Rage USR is one I've heard repeatedly. (foolishly didn't see the first post... oops!)
Sword Brethren are to get a special rule where when they are assaulted the enemy unit has to re-roll all* successful hits, at the expense of 1 attack. It's called "parry".
Land Raiders, when suffering a 5 or 6 on the damage chart* (so "wrecked" or "destroyed") gets one more turn where it rampage, think along the lines of the machine spirit going bezerk.
No horses as far as I am aware, bikes would be the direction (if any at all) for riding knights.
There is a named Emperor's Champion, he's meant to be the longest living EC in the Black Templars history, or somesuch.

*I'll seek clarification as it doesn't quite seem right in my head.



From JvK on Phil Kelly being our author

QUOTE

The Tau codex belongs to Cruddace, lets get that fact straight. That is all I am going to say on that issue.
Black Templars on the other hand was always going to be Phil Kelly's pet project. The only way Ward or Cruddace would ever get the Black Templars codex off him would be to prise the rough drafts out from his cold...dead...hands.


But later on Nov 28th in response to being asked who is writing

QUOTE

Mr Phil Kelly last time I heard. Though there was talk of moving it over to Mr Cruddace so Mr Kelly can work on something else.



From our own Marshal Laeroth (on various occasions)

QUOTE ( @ May 26 2011, 03:51 AM)

I cannot find the rumor threads stating it (there were several, but I don't have the time to search too deeply). HOWEVER, I do have a friend in the UK that actually met Phil and talked to him about that particular rumor. To which Phil confirmed. I was told that he sounded very enthusiastic about the project, but wouldn't go into details or timelines. Just that he was writing the book and the BT were coming (that could mean 2 years though).

Even without my friend giving me this information, there were those rumor threads (from reliable sources) around someplace. Just have to find them. :/


Rumours that conflict with stuff said about from Warseer

QUOTE

5. Tau and BT will get a release soon after CSM; other races updated in 5th will not be updated in 6th as their rules (at least from Guard onwards) are allready suited for 6th. Ward will probably do the BT and might do Tau as well. DA will probably not be updated anytime soon, because its not a popular army and GW does not want to waste money updating one or more armieS that almost no one plays with a separate dex.


From Librarium Online

QUOTE

i was down the local GW today, and found some interesting stuff on black templars. so far as the internet says, they're before/after chaos space marines (or legions), before or very shortly after 6th, given that they're current incarnation won't be suitable for 6th. Anyways, what i found out was the following:

there's going to be a named emperors champion, who's old by BT standards, and has been EC for a while. long enough to be better than the standard one.

initiates will be cheaper, around 11 points, and neotyphes around 6pts. still, expect some drawbacks to this.

there'll be a new named character on a bike with eternal warrior, and also eternal warrior killer.

and possibly some dreadnought/knight style thing that fits with the rest of the army, in line with the big stuff from GK and BA.

oh, last thing, possibly some upgrade that lets land raiders be destroyed by the enemy, but still 'live' for a turn. final shoot and move, the explode in a last ditch suicide run or someut.

I got most of this from a staff member, so take it with a pinch of salt, but this guy's usually pretty accurate with stuff like this....

still, something to think about, isn't it?


From our own Bloodcrusade

QUOTE ( @ Nov 29 2011, 12:17 AM)

From the rumors I've been hearing it's more of something along the lines of:

1)Helbrecht(Cheaper with rules to make Sword Brethren either Scoring or Troops)
2)Grimaldus(Rules update)
3)Special Champion
4)Draco(Will be making the transfer from White Dwarf to Codex with rule amendments)

These are the *guaranteed* Special Characters with rumors of:

1) Marshal/Castellan for drop pod armies(Reminiscent of one of our own's Custom Codex, believe it was Sigismund Himself?)
2)Terminator HQ(Allows for termies as scoring or as Troops for 'BlackWing')

Haven't heard anything of being allowed to bring Bikes as Troops if your 'Captain' rides one, which I'm thankful for. There's a Chapter for that and it's White Scars.

Special Units being brought to the Codex:

1)Chaplain Dreadnought(Same reroll hits on charge, probably fealess to all units with-in 6" like Grimaldus)
2)Durandal Dreadnought(Being brought from White Dwarf into the Codex, haven't heard the rules will change- maybe one more base attack?)
3)Assault Rhino Chassis(Been rumored/hoped for a long time, whether from the Rhino or a new vehicle on it's chassis)

Haven't heard about any special Bikes or Cavalry unit, which is unfortunate as I'm looking forward to a Cav unit myself. Allowing Luduldos to become a bring-able Special Character would be quite interesting as he would be taken in more of my lists than Helbrecht as he is a much more likely Character to allow Sword Brethren as Troops than Helbrecht.



From Librarium Online. This guy IIRC, is pretty good with his rumors.....

QUOTE ('Jared van Kell')

Possible release date of March 3rd if the source holds true


by ghost21 on Warseer

QUOTE

expect bt to be the landraider spam army


By Commissar Davis on Warseer

QUOTE

This is as much supposition as rumour. But from what I have gathered from dark places, the Black Templars as going to be very close to how they are in the FFG books. The Caestus will have an entry and there is the possibility that troops will be able to take bikes (and attack bikes) and jump packs if they don't take Neophytes.

Assault Marines and bikers get a few extra options that make them nasty.

Elites are points sinks, but very nice point sinks... lots of toys and adaptability.

Emperors Champion gets some buffs, but is not much more than he is now except he can target unit leaders, like good ol' Sarge.

Thats about it.

*Another user notes how that would leave the FA slots bare... to which Davis replied..*

From what I was able to take way from a few different dark corners, they wouldn't get all the upgrades. This could also be tosh.

Add salt... The guys are usually, mostly, on the ball (once they point out what they meant). Its generally in the guise of pointers and no straight answers, thus a fair bit of supposition on my part, and includes some guess work of their own.

If they said there was a custard dessert, it could be that its a tray with custard power with plastic cacti, or it could be a dessert with custard, or sometimes they are wrong and there is no custard at all but are right about there being dessert and visa versa.


By Mirbeau In Reply to the above quote


QUOTE

No Caestus coming. Doesn't mean you can't use the forge world miniature/rules though. Little to no empthasis on jump packs either afaik.

*then in another post commenting that Tau are the last 5th ed codex..*

Templars first! I do believe Tau to be the last, or one of the first books though. On my radar Templars, Tau, Chaos.

Eldar I'm not expecting (in book form) till 2013. I have no idea as to the contents of the september starter box, so I suppose there is a chance they could be in that, mind.


By Marshal Laeroth in regards to Assault Rhinos

QUOTE

That has been a rumor on my radar for some time (from my own sources), but it doesn't sound like its going to come to pass. Sounds like it got chopped in the playtesting stage.


On release date

QUOTE (Trignama @ Dec 18 2011, 02:28 AM)

So finally got to go to my local game store today, and had a talk with the manager. The discussion led to whether or not he knew of anything about the Templars. He told me
"From what I've been told the next marine book is out in Jan. But I don't know which Chapter, although it is probably Templars."

I dunno how viable information from him can be, but he sounded pretty confident about Jan. Having a release.... take it as you will.





Summary as of 12/5/11


•Phil Kelly as the author, only minor reports of Ward/Cruddace being it instead
•Sword Brethren and Neophytes kits or at least new models for them
•Possible new "siege" weapon. ala Dreadknight level of gimmickness
•Possbile new unit/vehicle that relates to "Fantasy" stuff..... (this is very vague, could allude to above rumour)
•Possible new Dreadnought, be it Chappy, Durandal, or Relic
•Cheaper points cost rumours and others lead to Horde focus of sorts
•Very likely it will be the next codex to be released, Rumored March-May
•Rage USR (or something similar) seems to make its way in with/for RZ
•Current characters will return, with new ones (pretty much a given nowadays)
•Special EC, greatest swordsman ever/oldest serving EC
•Possible new abilties for Land Raiders and Sword Brethren

*edit* Dec 31 2011

From Harry on Warseer: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5997529#post5997529

Originally Posted by Pa1adin111
Just want you guys to know that I'm still searching high and low for new BT rumors, the problem is that every site I go to seems to have a copy and paste of this thread. If any of the venerable rumor sources out there (ghost, mr pie, stickmonkey ect...) pick up anything new we'd love to hear from you
Well it is only a small thing but it is quite a big thing if it is accurate. I say 'If' as I heard it quite a long time ago (well over a year ago and I am a bit fuzzy on the details) But I think I picked up that Jes was working on Black Templars possibly with Juan Diaz or Seb Perbet?

Which are some nice names to throw around for any army. Wouldn't you agree?

*edit* January 20 2012

From Sasori on page 10. Thanks for the update Sasori.

Hmm, there is something interesting here

http://www.blacklibrary.com/Blog/In_the_grim_Darkness.html

May or may not have anything to do with the BT release.

This message was edited 6 times. Last update was at 2012/05/22 22:15:32


Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in us
Lord of the Fleet





Texas

So....spikey marines, then loyal crazy marines, AND THEN Tau if these rumors be true

Xenos never get a break huh?

But hordey marines sounds fun, love all the crazy shenanigans they pull off right now. Hope theres some decent vows to take

 
   
Made in us
Hard-Wired Sentinel Pilot





Florida

Its about time :-)

My Blog
Knights of Titan 500 points Primary Knights of Titan WIP Blog
Warp Angels 750 points Primary Warp Angels WIP Blog
The Eternal Crusade XXXX points Primary
DO:80s++G++M+++B++I+Pw40k10++D++A++++/fWD-R++T(D)DM+

 
   
Made in us
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade





I must say, that as a Templar player, I hope the part about them being more horde oriented is false. Then again, I've always preferred Crusader / Vindicator combos and drop pod Templar over foot slog Templar.
   
Made in us
RogueSangre





The Cockatrice Malediction

Davor wrote:Sword Brethren are to get a special rule where when they are assaulted the enemy unit has to re-roll all* successful hits, at the expense of 1 attack. It's called "parry".

This sounds like a fantastic and characterful special rule. Makes total sense for Sword Brethren to be the only unit in the game with the ability to "parry". I think they should have another special rule "dodge" that allows them to ignore successful hits on a 6. If you give them a storm shield then they can use their "block" special rule which gives a +1 bonus to their invulnerable save in close combat. They also have "tie shoelaces" which gives them +1 Initiative.
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Steelcity

It takes a lot of training to be able to parry with chainsaw swords!

Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500,  
   
Made in gb
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot





Wisbech

Wow, black Templars were the first Army I wanted to collect, I honestly can't wait for the new book, hopefully the rules will be better this time XD
   
Made in dk
Fresh-Faced New User




Abadabadoobaddon wrote:
Davor wrote:Sword Brethren are to get a special rule where when they are assaulted the enemy unit has to re-roll all* successful hits, at the expense of 1 attack. It's called "parry".

This sounds like a fantastic and characterful special rule. Makes total sense for Sword Brethren to be the only unit in the game with the ability to "parry". I think they should have another special rule "dodge" that allows them to ignore successful hits on a 6. If you give them a storm shield then they can use their "block" special rule which gives a +1 bonus to their invulnerable save in close combat. They also have "tie shoelaces" which gives them +1 Initiative.


Can't tell if serious.
   
Made in us
Lord of the Fleet





Texas

Abadabadoobaddon wrote:I think they should have another special rule "dodge" that allows them to ignore successful hits on a 6.


Wyches and Ragnar say hi

 
   
Made in gb
Perfect Shot Black Templar Predator Pilot






I hope they introduce a few more named characters and vows.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
and a plastic Sword Brethren and termie Sword Brethren kit (terminators with tabards would be awesome, as would plastic Sword Brethren with parts to make all the kit they can take, like lightning claws).

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/11/24 22:28:12


 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User





OMG YES I LOVE THIS POST
   
Made in us
Lord of the Fleet





Seneca Nation of Indians

Dear Emperor, I hope it's Kelly and not that Matt Ward (the son of a ).

There may be hope for those of us who Know No Spiritual Liege (I'd so make that a universal special rule for MEQ).


Fate is in heaven, armor is on the chest, accomplishment is in the feet. - Nagao Kagetora
 
   
Made in de
Decrepit Dakkanaut







tau-caste wrote:I was talking to one of my local gw's employees and he said the most common problem with BT is the fact that it cost close to double the cost of a regular marine army because of having to get the chapter upgrade separate! He said he wouldn't be surprised if they got the BT tactical squad like what they had when they were first released as well as stuff that has been mentioned such as plastic sword brethren etc. Although he didnt even know they had a BT tactical squad etc when they were initially released.
(...)
The guy i spoke to pretty much said they would be soon. he tried not to be too outward about it though. Just saying stuff like 'now that necrons are done, BT and Tau have to be done soon because they are fairly outdated (armoury system)'. And he said that BT players had it worst out of any army due to costs etc as every other marine army now has atleast one plastic box whereas BT have none (talking about actual squad boxes). He also seemed to favour that Tau wouldnt be next because he used the usual release schedule of having a marine army after other armies. He didnt seem to keen on it being Dark Angels soon, and these were his exact words, 'because DA players can use the normal Marine codex and play a fairly competitive list, but BT have trouble doing that'.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/11/26 12:09:00


Hive Fleet Ouroboros (my Tyranid blog): http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/286852.page
The Dusk-Wraiths of Szith Morcane (my Dark Eldar blog): http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/364786.page
Kroothawk's Malifaux Blog http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/455759.page
If you want to understand the concept of the "Greater Good", read this article, and you never again call Tau commies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





but BT have trouble doing that'.


WTF, Black templars can use the marine codex just as well as dark angels WTF is he talking about?

011000100111010101110100001000000110100 100100000011101000110010101101100011011 000010000001111001011011110111010100100 000011101110110010100100000011101110110 010101110010011001010010000001100111011 011110110010001110011001000000110111101 101110011000110110010100100000011000010 110111001100100001000000111011101100101 001000000111001101101000011000010110110 001101100001000000110001001100101001000 000110011101101111011001000111001100100 000011000010110011101100001011010010110 1110  
   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

He means that the Dark Angels' structure is very similar to that of a Codex Chapter, meaning that a DA player using the standard Marine 'Dex isn't that much of a stretch. The Templars on the other hand are very much a non-Codex Chapter, and thus attempting to 'Counts As' them with the standard Marine 'Dex really wouldn't capture what the army is about.

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in de
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander






germany,bavaria

gendoikari87 wrote:
but BT have trouble doing that'.


WTF, Black templars can use the marine codex just as well as dark angels WTF is he talking about?


Oh really?

The (ultra)marine codex portrays the codex astartes followers...
which the Templars are not.

BT and upgrade sprues isn't so expensive, look at the new 5 models = price of a squad box of 10.
As nice as the new kits are, you can't use them to build more than 5 models plus some spare bitz for later conversions.
A upgrade to alter the basic tac marine box OtoH could provide more bang for less buck.
New kits used for squads of 10 easily scratch the 60€ mark. A established kit plus 2 upgrade sprues at 30+15 € .....
2 boxes of 10 marines plus 1 upgrade grants enough diversity and 3x30 beats 4x30 € ( GW ).

Target locked,ready to fire



In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.

H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





The (ultra)marine codex portrays the codex astartes followers...


that's fluff reasons. The actual codex works just fine for portraying Black templars. Which is a lot more than Eldar, Tau, CSM, or daemons have. Err.... okay CSM have space wolves.... but you get my point.

011000100111010101110100001000000110100 100100000011101000110010101101100011011 000010000001111001011011110111010100100 000011101110110010100100000011101110110 010101110010011001010010000001100111011 011110110010001110011001000000110111101 101110011000110110010100100000011000010 110111001100100001000000111011101100101 001000000111001101101000011000010110110 001101100001000000110001001100101001000 000110011101101111011001000111001100100 000011000010110011101100001011010010110 1110  
   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

But that box comes with a bunch of templar Rhino/Land Raider doors, which were a bad idea to make in the first place (GW was trying to be Forge World, made an expensive plastic mould that didn't sell well, and then sensibly switched to big icons you can stick on the doors rather than making the doors themselves).

I love the Templar upgrade sprue, but it's going the way of the dodo when the next BT 'Dex hits. We're going to get a 5-man-for-price-of-10 box, or if we're lucky something that includes Scouts in the box as well as Marines.


[EDIT]: Read my post again gendoikari87. That's what was meant in Kroothawk's post.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/11/26 13:10:48


Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in de
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander






germany,bavaria

gendoikari87 wrote:
The (ultra)marine codex portrays the codex astartes followers...


that's fluff reasons. The actual codex works just fine for portraying Black templars. Which is a lot more than Eldar, Tau, CSM, or daemons have. Err.... okay CSM have space wolves.... but you get my point.


The background is all we have to base those heaps of plastic formed into creatures and vehicles on.
Without it, there is no 40k verse, no reason to have a war at all....

The codex blue marines, isn't able to do a good job on anything than sons of Gullyman.
BT don't follow the structure of this codex.

If you request Eldar and Tau to accept Gullyman as their spiritual liege, so be it.
But IMO those 2 are waiting for their own new dex...and both are rather small factions in 40k.

CSM, especially the renegades, are already space marines and those oathbreakers who come from G-mans geneseed, why don't they just get a set of different combat tatics ( in WD ) and use the codex ?





H.B.M.C. wrote:But that box comes with a bunch of templar Rhino/Land Raider doors, which were a bad idea to make in the first place (GW was trying to be Forge World, made an expensive plastic mould that didn't sell well, and then sensibly switched to big icons you can stick on the doors rather than making the doors themselves).
.


Agreed we may lose the upgrades and get more 5 models at the price of 10 kits.
I still don't see this as an option if they want a higher bodycount than usual for BT.
One of the greatest mistakes was to reduce IG from 20 man basic infantry in a box.


Target locked,ready to fire



In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.

H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





structure is irrelevant, i'm talking rules. How your force is organized into different chapters and how many chapters has no bearing on the table top, BT can use codex Marines just as well as Dark angels, in fact Black templar are BETTER AT USING THE STANDARD CODEX. Simply because the standard codex can't do deathwing. Other than the champion, and the running rule theres almost no difference in the standard marine book and the templars. Even neophytes can simply be scouts.

011000100111010101110100001000000110100 100100000011101000110010101101100011011 000010000001111001011011110111010100100 000011101110110010100100000011101110110 010101110010011001010010000001100111011 011110110010001110011001000000110111101 101110011000110110010100100000011000010 110111001100100001000000111011101100101 001000000111001101101000011000010110110 001101100001000000110001001100101001000 000110011101101111011001000111001100100 000011000010110011101100001011010010110 1110  
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka







gendoikari87 wrote:structure is irrelevant, i'm talking rules. How your force is organized into different chapters and how many chapters has no bearing on the table top, BT can use codex Marines just as well as Dark angels, in fact Black templar are BETTER AT USING THE STANDARD CODEX. Simply because the standard codex can't do deathwing. Other than the champion, and the running rule theres almost no difference in the standard marine book and the templars. Even neophytes can simply be scouts.


Excuse me if I'm missing something, but when did the SM book allow you to intermingle Scouts and Tactical Marines into one unit? Last I heard, that's a key "character" feature of the BT. IIRC (and I accept that I might not be, as it has been a while since I looked at the BT book), they don't do independent Neophyte units, with the possible exception of Bikers.

I agree that the SM book has issues with producing a Deathwing list - I would have included Ravenwing, though I might be wrong there - but your general DA army works as well (or better) from the SM book than a BT one would do.

2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG

My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...

Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.


 Kanluwen wrote:
This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.

Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...

tneva82 wrote:
You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... 
   
Made in de
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander






germany,bavaria

gendoikari87 wrote:structure is irrelevant, i'm talking rules. How your force is organized into different chapters and how many chapters has no bearing on the table top, BT can use codex Marines just as well as Dark angels, in fact Black templar are BETTER AT USING THE STANDARD CODEX. Simply because the standard codex can't do deathwing. Other than the champion, and the running rule theres almost no difference in the standard marine book and the templars. Even neophytes can simply be scouts.




Tell me, did you even browse the BT dex?

Rules are based on abilities imagined in-universe, thus without background there are zero rules...

On the tabletop, BT:
- crusader squads. up to 20 models. LRC option.
> built that from codex SM...
- termie command squad. LRC option.
> build this from codex SM...
- command squad of 10 marines. LRC option.
> build this from codex SM
- EC not part of the FOC but possible mandatory HQ. Alters the army.
> build this from codex SM
- may transport almost every unit in a dedicated transport LRC and fill the table with Land Raiders if the size of the game allows.

Seems you can't build the HQ squads and the basic troop choice from codex SM. Pretty much shows the weakness of your claims.

Non codex marines are the most viable choice for a standalone codex.
I don't need BT soon. But I am not going to have them squatted just because some can't stand the idea of the faction who is the main actor of the setup to have 50% of the codices.

Target locked,ready to fire



In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.

H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





-crusader squads. up to 20 models. LRC option.

1 tactical squad in a LRC
1 Scout squad

-termie command squad. LRC option.

honor guard squad or terminator squad with attached IC.

- command squad of 10 marines. LRC option.

Honor guard squad

- EC not part of the FOC but possible mandatory HQ. Alters the army.

Special characters.

- may transport almost every unit in a dedicated transport LRC and fill the table with Land Raiders if the size of the game allows.


irrelevant, normal marines can do this. If you get into games above 3 land raiders your already talking about apoc. And if the rumors are true with the standard dex you can take 4 anyway.


You sir, are splitting hairs.

Black templars can and should be rolled into the Space marine dex, along side dark angels so that the armies that are unique can have some time, and so new armies can come around. like an army that really deserves it, Admech.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/11/26 16:10:37


011000100111010101110100001000000110100 100100000011101000110010101101100011011 000010000001111001011011110111010100100 000011101110110010100100000011101110110 010101110010011001010010000001100111011 011110110010001110011001000000110111101 101110011000110110010100100000011000010 110111001100100001000000111011101100101 001000000111001101101000011000010110110 001101100001000000110001001100101001000 000110011101101111011001000111001100100 000011000010110011101100001011010010110 1110  
   
Made in de
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander






germany,bavaria

gendoikari87 wrote:
-crusader squads. up to 20 models. LRC option.

1 tactical squad in a LRC
1 Scout squad


2 x Troops isn't the same as 1 combined squad.

gendoikari87 wrote:
-termie command squad. LRC option.

honor guard squad or terminator squad with attached IC.


Still different wargear and/or less members. No LRC and TDA in case of honor guard..

gendoikari87 wrote:
- command squad of 10 marines. LRC option.

Honor guard squad


Do you spot the options of the command squad or a LRC there?

gendoikari87 wrote:
- EC not part of the FOC but possible mandatory HQ. Alters the army.

Special characters.


Oh great, please tell who is it?

gendoikari87 wrote:
- may transport almost every unit in a dedicated transport LRC and fill the table with Land Raiders if the size of the game allows.


irrelevant, normal marines can do this. If you get into games above 3 land raiders your already talking about apoc. And if the rumors are true with the standard dex you can take 4 anyway.


4 is too few.


gendoikari87 wrote:
You sir, are splitting hairs.

Black templars can and should be rolled into the Space marine dex, along side dark angels so that the armies that are unique can have some time, and so new armies can come around. like an army that really deserves it, Admech.


You sir, should stop these futile evasive maneuvers to get away with your idea.
Its not a secret why codices are as they are, and the choice is not yours to be made.
You have proven nothing, except the fact its most likely always the same questionable claims that this or that could "easily" be rolled into one dex. I've challenged the posters who think its possible to do so before and I offer you the same.
Provide us with a basic layout of this 'all-encompassing' codex in Proposed Rules, but make sure it includes everything the armies had before.
My guess is, you end up either telling me you don't have the time or failing at it. Underestimating the effort to write and plan such a book
is forgivable. But the nonsense of the lack of uniqueness is tiresome. No army is based on that "uniqueness". 40k is a copy of fantasy in space and thats where those armies come from.
GW may focus on WHFB or LotR whenever they feel like it and it doens't matter which 40k codex isn't done as they may just do another non-40k release instead. So this crap of codices replacing each other in the schedule of GW, isn't true.
New armies are said to come after everything is on the same page, thus far away.
If this is still correct.

I for one, am content to wait for BT. I don't want them at the end of a edition, nor do I have any interest in the actual trend of taking themes to far. They can stay in "reserve" to deepstrike at YOUR oh so deserving , oh so unique army, in his name!

Target locked,ready to fire



In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.

H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
 
   
Made in us
Crushing Black Templar Crusader Pilot





Minnesota

So I read a rumor on failcast neophytes. It coudl be in OP, I didn't read it that closely. That would be dumb for GW to do... its called a scout box with some black paint.

And for the upgrade box, I hope they keep it. I got the boxes to stretch out pretty far. Every single marine of my current list has at least 1 BT bit on it.

   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





1hadhq wrote:
gendoikari87 wrote:
-crusader squads. up to 20 models. LRC option.

1 tactical squad in a LRC
1 Scout squad


2 x Troops isn't the same as 1 combined squad.

gendoikari87 wrote:
-termie command squad. LRC option.

honor guard squad or terminator squad with attached IC.


Still different wargear and/or less members. No LRC and TDA in case of honor guard..

gendoikari87 wrote:
- command squad of 10 marines. LRC option.

Honor guard squad


Do you spot the options of the command squad or a LRC there?

gendoikari87 wrote:
- EC not part of the FOC but possible mandatory HQ. Alters the army.

Special characters.


Oh great, please tell who is it?

gendoikari87 wrote:
- may transport almost every unit in a dedicated transport LRC and fill the table with Land Raiders if the size of the game allows.


irrelevant, normal marines can do this. If you get into games above 3 land raiders your already talking about apoc. And if the rumors are true with the standard dex you can take 4 anyway.


4 is too few.


gendoikari87 wrote:
You sir, are splitting hairs.

Black templars can and should be rolled into the Space marine dex, along side dark angels so that the armies that are unique can have some time, and so new armies can come around. like an army that really deserves it, Admech.


You sir, should stop these futile evasive maneuvers to get away with your idea.
Its not a secret why codices are as they are, and the choice is not yours to be made.
You have proven nothing, except the fact its most likely always the same questionable claims that this or that could "easily" be rolled into one dex. I've challenged the posters who think its possible to do so before and I offer you the same.
Provide us with a basic layout of this 'all-encompassing' codex in Proposed Rules, but make sure it includes everything the armies had before.
My guess is, you end up either telling me you don't have the time or failing at it. Underestimating the effort to write and plan such a book
is forgivable. But the nonsense of the lack of uniqueness is tiresome. No army is based on that "uniqueness". 40k is a copy of fantasy in space and thats where those armies come from.
GW may focus on WHFB or LotR whenever they feel like it and it doens't matter which 40k codex isn't done as they may just do another non-40k release instead. So this crap of codices replacing each other in the schedule of GW, isn't true.
New armies are said to come after everything is on the same page, thus far away.
If this is still correct.

I for one, am content to wait for BT. I don't want them at the end of a edition, nor do I have any interest in the actual trend of taking themes to far. They can stay in "reserve" to deepstrike at YOUR oh so deserving , oh so unique army, in his name!


If you look splitting hairs up in the dictionary this post will be there.

011000100111010101110100001000000110100 100100000011101000110010101101100011011 000010000001111001011011110111010100100 000011101110110010100100000011101110110 010101110010011001010010000001100111011 011110110010001110011001000000110111101 101110011000110110010100100000011000010 110111001100100001000000111011101100101 001000000111001101101000011000010110110 001101100001000000110001001100101001000 000110011101101111011001000111001100100 000011000010110011101100001011010010110 1110  
   
Made in ca
Evasive Pleasureseeker



Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto

You do know that Crusader squads can swap bolters for pistols/ccw's right?!
Sorry but Templars & Dark Angels (you know, the first fething Legion!) are more than divergent enough to warrent their own books.

If you want your admech so badly, codex: smurfs does them adequitely enough too!
HQ: master of the forge
Elites: dreads = preatorian serivtors. techmarines + servitor retinues.
Troops: scouts = skittari
Fast: ??? scout bikers = skittari bikes? land speeders.
Heavy: more dreads, predators, devies = heavy gun servitors, land raiders.

Guard also works as a good list for admech armies, or so can newcrons too... Now please show me outside of their actual 'dexes how the hell you're supposed to build 'actual' crusader squads and 'actual' deathwing squads?!! (answer = you can't! )

Admech don't need a codex and there's no room on store shelves for it either!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/11/26 18:35:23


 
   
Made in us
Boosting Black Templar Biker




California

Experiment 626 wrote:You do know that Crusader squads can swap bolters for pistols/ccw's right?!
This. Try doing 6 squads of Bolt Pistol/CC marines with melta and powerfist led by an emperors champion who gives army wide Preferred Enemy with the vanilla marine dex.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





A) splitting hairs
B) Space wolves/blood angels

Admech don't need a codex and there's no room on store shelves for it either!


Sure there is we can drop Black templars all together. OR blood angels. Or hell dark angels. Admech is VASTLY different from Codex smurfs than Black templars. All you need to do to Codex smurfs is paint your smurfs black. No so with admech. Not that it can't be done, but it's a lot less intuitive. I personally use the grey knights codex. So even something as vastly different as admech can be done with codex smurfs, Admech is much more divergent from smurfs than Black templars. Therefore blacktemplars are not the one that deserve a codex drop them.

so you're agument can actually be used against you.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2011/11/26 20:41:51


011000100111010101110100001000000110100 100100000011101000110010101101100011011 000010000001111001011011110111010100100 000011101110110010100100000011101110110 010101110010011001010010000001100111011 011110110010001110011001000000110111101 101110011000110110010100100000011000010 110111001100100001000000111011101100101 001000000111001101101000011000010110110 001101100001000000110001001100101001000 000110011101101111011001000111001100100 000011000010110011101100001011010010110 1110  
   
Made in us
Haemonculi Flesh Apprentice






I can't wait for the Templar and I don't even play them. I just want to see them pay full points for typhoons and have cyclones reduced to 1 per 5 terminators without tank hunter.... LOL, I think they are going to lose out upon the rewrite, enjoy the glory days while they last boys....

Also, if these guys get space knights with lances on bikes I think I will cry laughing, I mean they already have wolves riding wolves and space vamps with angel wings.... omg...

   
 
Forum Index » News & Rumors
Go to: