Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2014/10/22 16:25:38
Subject: Some new GW FAQs - Oct 22nd
|
|
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
http://www.blacklibrary.com/faqs-and-errata.html
time of writing rulebook, wood elf and End times.
From the rulebook FAQ
Page 134 – Lords
Replace both paragraphs with: “You can spend up to 50% of
your points on Lords. Lords are the most powerful characters
in your army, individuals possessed of fearsome martial or
magical might.”
Page 134 – Heroes
Replace both paragraphs with: “You can spend up to 50%
of your points on Heroes. Heroes are lesser characters, not
as intrinsically deadly as Lords, but still worth a score of
ordinary warriors.”
Page 135 – Army Selection Summary Table
Replace “Lords – Up to 25%” with “Lords – Up to 50%”
Replace “Heroes – Up to 25%” with “Heroes – Up to 50%”
Page 162 – Spell Generation
At the end of the second paragraph, add:
“The Lore of Undeath is available to any Wizard.”
(see Warhammer Battle Magic: Lore of Undeath or
Warhammer: Nagash, available in digital format at
www.games-workshop.com)
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Space wolf and Tau ones too ......
Automatically Appended Next Post:
super heavy walker Dts fixed too !
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2014/10/22 20:40:41
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 16:46:38
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
That's not an FAQ, that's a MASSIVE change in one of the fundamental rules of 8th edition...
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 16:50:13
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Guarded Grey Knight Terminator
|
Now that's interesting, they errataed the bloodletter crew on Blood Thrones and Skull Cannons to be able to smack people in 40k.
|
One unbreakable shield against the coming darkness, One last blade forged in defiance of fate.
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 16:51:00
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Courageous Grand Master
-
|
RoninXiC wrote:That's not an FAQ, that's a MASSIVE change in one of the fundamental rules of 8th edition...
Agreed. This rule is sending the game back to the days of Herohammer.
|
"Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky. But is it true?" - Tom Kirby, CEO, Games Workshop Ltd |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 16:51:58
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Imperial Knight
|
About time they fixed the Dangerous Terrain tests for super-heavy walkers!
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 16:55:29
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
5th God of Chaos! (Ho-hum)
Curb stomping in the Eye of Terror!
|
BrookM wrote:About time they fixed the Dangerous Terrain tests for super-heavy walkers!
Totally!
|
Live Ork, Be Ork. or D'Ork!
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 16:59:38
Subject: Re:New FAQs
|
|
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
.. if anyone from GW is reading this could you fix the Dark Eldar FAQ ? ta.
|
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 17:03:53
Subject: Re:New FAQs
|
|
Sslimey Sslyth
|
reds8n wrote:
.. if anyone from GW is reading this could you fix the Dark Eldar FAQ ? ta.
Or, go back and actually release a decent FAQ for WHFB DoC from 18 months ago?
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 17:04:49
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:RoninXiC wrote:That's not an FAQ, that's a MASSIVE change in one of the fundamental rules of 8th edition...
Agreed. This rule is sending the game back to the days of Herohammer.
As long as rules like Steadfast & Step-up stay as they are, it's not nearly as bad the days of 5th edition.
Old school Herohammer was so craptastic because those killer characters easily wiped out any chances of reprisal attacks, and no Steadfast meant that even a million or so ranks would lose their gak and leg it home...
50% + 50% may be annoying to those of us who remembered the worst of the worst times, but between the more modern rules to keep infantry viable and the general drop in power of most magic items, I don't quite see this as the outright nuking of the game itself just yet.
|
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 17:06:06
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
The Battle Barge Buffet Line
|
Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:RoninXiC wrote:That's not an FAQ, that's a MASSIVE change in one of the fundamental rules of 8th edition... Agreed. This rule is sending the game back to the days of Herohammer. Yet another desperate bid to sell models at the expense of long term game health following on the heels of 6th and 7th cash-in editions especially the "unbound is the standard game" 7th edition.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/10/22 17:14:44
We Munch for Macragge! FOR THE EMPRUH! Cheesesticks and Humus! |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 17:10:58
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:RoninXiC wrote:That's not an FAQ, that's a MASSIVE change in one of the fundamental rules of 8th edition...
Agreed. This rule is sending the game back to the days of Herohammer.
+1
While I think big kits are cool and I'm glad to see the community responding favorably to the End Times stuff I don't like the monster arms race that it's creating. I haven't played WHFB in a long time (and it may never happen again if my Brets get Squatted) but it seems to me that selling lots of kits like Nagash, Mortarchs, Glotkin, and Maggoths is good for sales it doesn't strike me as good for game balance.
|
Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 17:13:09
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Tzeentch Aspiring Sorcerer Riding a Disc
|
They don't even list it as FAQ, but rather errata. Puts the arguests to bed, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 17:16:44
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
Sounds like Herohammer (which I actually remember hey!) but didn't End Times already do that? Assuming it's the 50% Lords/Heroes thing. I thought End Times already said that you could take 50% characters.
|
- Wayne
Formerly WayneTheGame |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 17:18:01
Subject: Re:New FAQs
|
|
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
.. wonder then if we might see a repackaged starter set just with the new rules ?
It's what they did for 40k right ?
|
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 17:19:52
Subject: Re:New FAQs
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
The Battle Barge Buffet Line
|
reds8n wrote:.. wonder then if we might see a repackaged starter set just with the new rules ?
It's what they did for 40k right ?
Pretty much as long as you include "borrowing" magic from WHFB.
|
We Munch for Macragge! FOR THE EMPRUH! Cheesesticks and Humus! |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 18:03:40
Subject: Re:New FAQs
|
|
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
reds8n wrote:
.. if anyone from GW is reading this could you fix the Dark Eldar FAQ ? ta.
http://www.blacklibrary.com/Downloads/Product/PDF/Warhammer-40k/7th-faq/Dark_Eldar_v1.0_Oct14.pdf
They just forgot the .pdf at the end.
|
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 18:07:07
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Missionary On A Mission
|
GreyHamster wrote:Now that's interesting, they errataed the bloodletter crew on Blood Thrones and Skull Cannons to be able to smack people in 40k.
They should do this for Seeker Chariots as they have crew as well as a rider.
|
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 18:22:11
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
[DCM]
Savage Minotaur
Baltimore, Maryland
|
WayneTheGame wrote:Sounds like Herohammer (which I actually remember hey!) but didn't End Times already do that? Assuming it's the 50% Lords/Heroes thing. I thought End Times already said that you could take 50% characters.
There was a needless and pedantic debate as to whether the 50% Lords applied to "normal" games of Warhammer or just End Times games, as if it was a separate campaign. Now they are silenced !!!
Also, a whole lot more fundamental rules would have to change to turn 8th edition into Herohammer.
I'd also add that this is a good thing, as it lowers the model count and allow folks to get an army on the table a lot faster. Probably won't win any tournaments with such an army, but its still playable.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/10/22 18:25:09
"Sometimes the only victory possible is to keep your opponent from winning." - The Emperor, from The Outcast Dead.
"Tell your gods we are coming for them, and that their realms will burn as ours did." -Thostos Bladestorm
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 19:05:26
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Omnipotent Lord of Change
|
Experiment 626 wrote:As long as rules like Steadfast & Step-up stay as they are, it's not nearly as bad the days of 5th edition. Old school Herohammer was so craptastic because those killer characters easily wiped out any chances of reprisal attacks, and no Steadfast meant that even a million or so ranks would lose their gak and leg it home... 50% + 50% may be annoying to those of us who remembered the worst of the worst times, but between the more modern rules to keep infantry viable and the general drop in power of most magic items, I don't quite see this as the outright nuking of the game itself just yet.
Exactly. This rule really just lets the biggest of the special characters take part in 2400/2500 points, I'm not sure it will have too huge of an impact on many games. Cannons still insta-gib greater daemons, the magic phase still has random power dice that max out (Death magic continues to present a problem of course), Monstrous Cav are still better killers of units for their points, step-up still means units with any size to them can club heroes to death, etc.* I am trying to think of armies that benefit overly much from this change, and I'm thinking it's armies that already spammed heroes or characters on monsters - Lizards for example, with stegadon-riders and skarvet spam. And what do tournaments comp the most often? Spamming Obviously Good Things. - Salvage *But change some of these meta-defining rules and yes, we'll have some issues. Cannons now do D3 wounds? Bloodthirster / Lord of Change Tagteam FTW! Ridden monsters now combine they stats with their rider? Double Dragons, gooooo! Casting dice now based on wizards and their levels? 3+ L4 mages for great justice!
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/10/22 19:15:07
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 19:13:47
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:RoninXiC wrote:That's not an FAQ, that's a MASSIVE change in one of the fundamental rules of 8th edition...
Agreed. This rule is sending the game back to the days of Herohammer.
I thought all of the characters were being killed in the End of times.
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 19:19:25
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Omnipotent Lord of Change
|
Thinking about it, I am most disappointed that it opens another avenue for Minhammer, where you take the bare bones of a legal army (characters + 3 units) and dare to call it an engaging game with anything close to tactics involved. All the rules benefiting deathstars already started this movement; the End Times errata just makes those deathstars bloatier and more top-heavy. Well, I suppose here's to the lowly sabretusk and his drinking buddies, the pack of warhounds - Salvage
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/10/22 19:20:06
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 19:23:28
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Mighty Vampire Count
|
spaceelf wrote: Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:RoninXiC wrote:That's not an FAQ, that's a MASSIVE change in one of the fundamental rules of 8th edition...
Agreed. This rule is sending the game back to the days of Herohammer.
I thought all of the characters were being killed in the End of times.
Death is only the begining - several are not staying dead
|
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/528517.page
A Bloody Road - my Warhammer Fantasy Fiction |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 19:57:42
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
Agreed, giant 12" walker moving only at most 6 inches in terrain was bull
|
3000
4000 |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 20:51:29
Subject: Re:Some new GW FAQs - Oct 22nd
|
|
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Too bad all official non-iDevice sources of the Lore of Undeath are out of print already.
|
11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die. ++
Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless. |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 21:00:43
Subject: Re:Some new GW FAQs - Oct 22nd
|
|
Monstrous Master Moulder
Space Cowboy Cruising Around Olympus Mons
|
Maelstrom808 wrote:Too bad all official non-iDevice sources of the Lore of Undeath are out of print already.
Can you buy just the lore of undeath spells for iPad? Because it said find it on the gw website and I see it not lol you can probably find someone online who posted the spells just typed out (I remember reading them somewhere)
As for the 50% lords and 50% heroes I garuntee that my hobby store won't use it. At least not for a while until he informs everyone of the update.
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 21:08:22
Subject: Some new GW FAQs - Oct 22nd
|
|
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
|
This WILL be house ruled amongst the shops here. It wont be downright outlawed but most of us will stick to 25%
|
RoperPG wrote:Blimey, it's very salty in here...
Any more vegans want to put forth their opinions on bacon? |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 21:09:47
Subject: New FAQs
|
|
Powerful Chaos Warrior
|
RoninXiC wrote:That's not an FAQ, that's a MASSIVE change in one of the fundamental rules of 8th edition...
Exactly!
|
Alex 'Salior' Wheatley
- Warriors of Chaos / Savage Ogres
- Most VP - Eatbats 2014
- 2nd - Bunker Brawl 2014
- 3rd - Blood on the Sands 2013
'A proper Imperial Guard regiment should have enough men to build a starport from corpses, if need be.'
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 21:26:10
Subject: Some new GW FAQs - Oct 22nd
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Lovely. Now people will want to use Nagash at 2000 points all the time.
|
CHAOS! PANIC! DISORDER!
My job here is done. |
|
|
|
2014/10/22 21:32:46
Subject: Some new GW FAQs - Oct 22nd
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Vulcan wrote:Lovely. Now people will want to use Nagash at 2000 points all the time.
It's almost like that was GW's plan when they gave him that absurd points cost.
|
|
|
|
|
2014/10/22 21:48:43
Subject: Re:Some new GW FAQs - Oct 22nd
|
|
Imperial Guard Landspeeder Pilot
On moon miranda.
|
They devoted what, a whole 30 seconds, upload time included, to these? At least on the 40k end?
Really disappointed with how sparse these are.
As for Fantasy...I guess they *REALLY* wanted to sell Nagash kits. The change to Lords and Heroes is *massive* after being the way it was for 4 years...
|
IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT.
New Heavy Gear Log! Also...Grey Knights!
The correct pronunciation is Imperial Guard and Stormtroopers, "Astra Militarum" and "Tempestus Scions" are something you'll find at Hogwarts. |
|
|
|
|