Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Rippers
Sky-Slashers
Blood Angel captains

Harpies
Venomthropes
Shrikes
Naming of Units such as "Psybacks" or "Psyflemen"

Target wrote:
Harpies
Venomthropes
Shrikes
Naming of Units such as "Psybacks" or "Psyflemen"

I refuse to add the last one. I'm still very proud of originating those names.

YES, HATERS, IT WAS MEEEEEEE

The Tyranid codex psychic powers.

World of Warcraft, force you nerds to actually exercise.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Eldercaveman wrote:
The Tyranid codex psychic powers.

I actually use the terv ones once in a blue moon, ban the hive tyrant ones.

Here's my suggestion - ban those exorbitant tournament entry fees. This way you will encourage more people to come and not bring the stuff on your Ban lists.

Well crap, guess I can't play anymore

MVBrandt wrote:

NaterdaySaint wrote:
Why dont i see Mandrakes on this list?

YOU'RE RIGHT! HOW DID WE MISS IT? Edited.

I get the joke, but are you suggesting nothing should be done about these new releases? Do you really want to see an inquisotor, 6 henchmen with 18 broadsides and 3 riptides? I agree lets let the dust settle, but I know my plans on trying to compete at any tourney are on hold till i hear if it will just go to another 2++ reroll army (like your friend Toni or Allen bringing it to a "fluffy" da boyz tourney ruining any attempt they had at making it a different tourney).

ForgeMarine wrote:

MVBrandt wrote:

NaterdaySaint wrote:
Why dont i see Mandrakes on this list?

YOU'RE RIGHT! HOW DID WE MISS IT? Edited.

I get the joke, but are you suggesting nothing should be done about these new releases? Do you really want to see an inquisotor, 6 henchmen with 18 broadsides and 3 riptides? I agree lets let the dust settle, but I know my plans on trying to compete at any tourney are on hold till i hear if it will just go to another 2++ reroll army (like your friend Toni or Allen bringing it to a "fluffy" da boyz tourney ruining any attempt they had at making it a different tourney).

If we really have to pause the jokes, no I'm not saying nothign should be done. I'm saying people should lighten up and wait a tick for the Dataslatecember and Tyranid releases to happen. I also freakin' personally hate 2+ re-rolls and jetcouncil and such. I'm hoping Nids / Shadows fix it naturally. If they don't we'll cross that bridge when we come to it (and I'm suggesting the patience b/c we're ABOUT TO COME TO THAT BRIDGE).

BUT SERIOUSLY CAN WE NOT DO THIS AGAIN IN YET ANOTHER THREAD?

Your penance is you must list your own suggested bans for the OP.

@ForgeMarine: Don't bring drama into a fun thread.

ForgeMarine wrote:

MVBrandt wrote:

NaterdaySaint wrote:
Why dont i see Mandrakes on this list?

YOU'RE RIGHT! HOW DID WE MISS IT? Edited.

I get the joke, but are you suggesting nothing should be done about these new releases? Do you really want to see an inquisotor, 6 henchmen with 18 broadsides and 3 riptides? I agree lets let the dust settle, but I know my plans on trying to compete at any tourney are on hold till i hear if it will just go to another 2++ reroll army (like your friend Toni or Allen bringing it to a "fluffy" da boyz tourney ruining any attempt they had at making it a different tourney).

Ban this guy

 krootman. wrote:

ForgeMarine wrote:

MVBrandt wrote:

NaterdaySaint wrote:
Why dont i see Mandrakes on this list?

YOU'RE RIGHT! HOW DID WE MISS IT? Edited.

I get the joke, but are you suggesting nothing should be done about these new releases? Do you really want to see an inquisotor, 6 henchmen with 18 broadsides and 3 riptides? I agree lets let the dust settle, but I know my plans on trying to compete at any tourney are on hold till i hear if it will just go to another 2++ reroll army (like your friend Toni or Allen bringing it to a "fluffy" da boyz tourney ruining any attempt they had at making it a different tourney).

Ban this guy

I've added your suggested ban verbatim but I'm not sure what people will make of it.

MVBrandt wrote:

ForgeMarine wrote:

MVBrandt wrote:

NaterdaySaint wrote:
Why dont i see Mandrakes on this list?

YOU'RE RIGHT! HOW DID WE MISS IT? Edited.

I get the joke, but are you suggesting nothing should be done about these new releases? Do you really want to see an inquisotor, 6 henchmen with 18 broadsides and 3 riptides? I agree lets let the dust settle, but I know my plans on trying to compete at any tourney are on hold till i hear if it will just go to another 2++ reroll army (like your friend Toni or Allen bringing it to a "fluffy" da boyz tourney ruining any attempt they had at making it a different tourney).

If we really have to pause the jokes, no I'm not saying nothign should be done. I'm saying people should lighten up and wait a tick for the Dataslatecember and Tyranid releases to happen. I also freakin' personally hate 2+ re-rolls and jetcouncil and such. I'm hoping Nids / Shadows fix it naturally. If they don't we'll cross that bridge when we come to it (and I'm suggesting the patience b/c we're ABOUT TO COME TO THAT BRIDGE).

BUT SERIOUSLY CAN WE NOT DO THIS AGAIN IN YET ANOTHER THREAD?

Your penance is you must list your own suggested bans for the OP.

One more serious post, and you are banned

ForgeMarine wrote:

MVBrandt wrote:

NaterdaySaint wrote:
Why dont i see Mandrakes on this list?

YOU'RE RIGHT! HOW DID WE MISS IT? Edited.

I get the joke, but are you suggesting nothing should be done about these new releases? Do you really want to see an inquisotor, 6 henchmen with 18 broadsides and 3 riptides? I agree lets let the dust settle, but I know my plans on trying to compete at any tourney are on hold till i hear if it will just go to another 2++ reroll army (like your friend Toni or Allen bringing it to a "fluffy" da boyz tourney ruining any attempt they had at making it a different tourney).

Such armies are completely balanced, fluffy, and forge-a-narrtiveable. This is a thread for overpowered units/wargear like all boltgun devastator squads or Ministorum Priests.

MVBrandt wrote:

 krootman. wrote:

ForgeMarine wrote:

MVBrandt wrote:

NaterdaySaint wrote:
Why dont i see Mandrakes on this list?

YOU'RE RIGHT! HOW DID WE MISS IT? Edited.

I get the joke, but are you suggesting nothing should be done about these new releases? Do you really want to see an inquisotor, 6 henchmen with 18 broadsides and 3 riptides? I agree lets let the dust settle, but I know my plans on trying to compete at any tourney are on hold till i hear if it will just go to another 2++ reroll army (like your friend Toni or Allen bringing it to a "fluffy" da boyz tourney ruining any attempt they had at making it a different tourney).

Ban this guy

I've added your suggested ban verbatim but I'm not sure what people will make of it.

Who's Toni, and when can I hit on her? Is that nicks girl? Cause I remember him having an experience with someone of a similar name once.

Im not trying to bring in drama, continue onward. Simply wanted to make my point, now moving on.

ForgeMarine wrote:
Im not trying to bring in drama, continue onward. Simply wanted to make my point, now moving on.

And I hope you get that I like totally agreed with your point! BUT LET'S WAIT AND SEE IF THEY FIX BOLTER DEVASTATORS first.

MVBrandt wrote:

ForgeMarine wrote:
Im not trying to bring in drama, continue onward. Simply wanted to make my point, now moving on.

And I hope you get that I like totally agreed with your point! BUT LET'S WAIT AND SEE IF THEY FIX BOLTER DEVASTATORS first.

But...but...in big guns they are actually good!!!!!!

Oh, another suggestion, ban Forging A Narrative.

I don't want the opponent to be writing a fanfic while we play. This game is for men not authors.

Slow day at the office Michael?

-Mike

 TheCustomLime wrote:
Oh, another suggestion, ban Forging A Narrative.

I don't want the opponent to be writing a fanfic while we play. This game is for men not authors.

This is pure win

 TheCustomLime wrote:
Oh, another suggestion, ban Forging A Narrative.

I don't want the opponent to be writing a fanfic while we play. This game is for men not authors.

I was impressed by your insightful suggestion. I've now playtested it in one thousand games and added it as the very first player suggested ban.

Would banning any list with more than 2 troop/scoring units be okay?? All those troop units mess me up.

Saint Omerville wrote:
Slow day at the office Michael?

-Mike

MORE LIKE SNOW DAY AT THE OFFICE, oh head 40k TO of NOVA (that's actually true guys, pick on him, do it)

MVBrandt wrote:

ForgeMarine wrote:
Im not trying to bring in drama, continue onward. Simply wanted to make my point, now moving on.

And I hope you get that I like totally agreed with your point! BUT LET'S WAIT AND SEE IF THEY FIX BOLTER DEVASTATORS first.

Ha, won me over (and I figured your on top of it)!

This is crap! Comp sux!11!11 /ragequit


Also, I would like to ban: "Stuff that I lose to". I find this terribly OP and frankly ruins my GT fun.

ngilstrap wrote:
This is crap! Comp sux!11!11 /ragequit


Also, I would like to ban: "Stuff that I lose to". I find this terribly OP and frankly ruins my GT fun.

We just playtested your suggestion with ten thousand test games and came to the conclusion we could not ban all that.

MVBrandt wrote:

ngilstrap wrote:
This is crap! Comp sux!11!11 /ragequit


Also, I would like to ban: "Stuff that I lose to". I find this terribly OP and frankly ruins my GT fun.

We just playtested your suggestion with ten thousand test games and came to the conclusion we could not ban all that.

cold blooded, lol!

Wow, was your opponent fielding Pyrovores? 'Cause you just got BURNED!

 pretre wrote:
Wow, was your opponent fielding Pyrovores? 'Cause you just got BURNED!

he was and that's why I lost :(