Poll |
|
Should Games Workshop introduce new races??? |
Yes |
|
49% |
[ 98 ] |
No |
|
51% |
[ 103 ] |
Total Votes : 201 |
|
|
Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2009/07/08 07:59:40
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Angry Chaos Agitator
|
I think GW should introduce the Squats again, alongside other human empires(other than the Imperium). Also a few more "Tyranid" like xenos races would be sweet!!! . What do you guys think???
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/08 09:27:59
...nothing else matters...
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 08:01:44
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
You see a few other races would be good... but i just REALLY dislike your post so im going to say no.
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 08:07:22
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Angry Chaos Agitator
|
whats wrong with the post man>???
|
...nothing else matters...
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 08:10:36
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
|
Firstly, the title is in caps. and secondly a good poll doesn't usually have just yes-no options.
|
*Ex Username: Gutteridge*
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 08:12:13
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
Squats. That's what they were.
I want them to bring back the Zoats.
|
Tombworld El'Lahaun 2500pts
Hive Fleet Vestis 5000pts
Disciples of Caliban 2000pts
Crimson Fist 2000pts
World Eaters 1850pts
Angels Encarmine 1850pts
Iron Hospitalers 1850 pts (Black Templar Successor)
Sons of Medusa 1850pts
Tartarus IXth Renegade Legion 2500pts
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 08:19:48
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
the_emperors_renegade wrote:I'm serious what about space dwarfs like the old...what was their name again???Shates or something
RxGhost wrote:Squats. That's what they were.
I want them to bring back the Zoats.
I believe it was a joke RxGhost, shate means the same thing a gak or gak and i dont really need to point out the link between that and squatting
the_emperors_renegade wrote:whats wrong with the post man>???
it was badly written, the poll should have listed a few races people could vote for an what should be introduced, it read (like i said in another thread) like it was written by a hyperactive child and you started with I'm serious.
we know your serious... you made no indication this was a joke so why would you be anything other than serious?
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 08:22:31
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Hmm... I'm not sure. On one hand, there are factions within 40K that I think need representation with Codices and full model releases - specifically Lost & the Damned (including Traitor Guard), the Ordos Xenos (and their Chamber Militant, the Deathwatch) and the Adeptus Mechanicus. I also think Exodite Eldar would be another great one, especially with all the monsters they could create. And some of the more shoe-horned and boring races need to be expanded upon - Chaos for a start, plus Tau and Necrons need a bit of oomph! behind them. Keeping that in mind though, GW's track record with looking after the races they current have is pretty fething terrible. They've got two armies that have Codices that are over a decade old (Woofs and DE), they have two Codices that they seem to be going out of their way to pretend don't exist (WH & DH), they switch Codex styles (formatting, layout, and actual rules design) mid-way between editions at the whim of whatever idiot is currently running the studio, and they've proven vastly incapable of writing interesting Codices with any sembalance of balance. So should there be new races? Yes. Should GW be writing new races? Not until they get their current ones right first. And honestly, at this point, I'd rather they cut some armies completely than keep pussy-footing around because they haven't a clue what to do with them (Daemonhunters and Witch Hunters, I'm looking at you).
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2009/07/08 08:25:55
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 08:27:30
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Da Head Honcho Boss Grot
|
I can't think of any really good concepts for a new race. Most of the big archetypes have been done already.
I'd rather see Lost and the Damned done, and Necrons redone fluff-wise.
|
The Emperor doesn't seem to do much for you but you sure are expected to be mutilated, suffer, and die to make him happy. And is he dead or what? If he's entombed that would mean he's dead as a doornail, right? So, how can he be happy about anything you do, or even give orders to anyone? Are you worshipping the dead now? Is that something you'd really want to do? Because it sounds freaking creepy to me. |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 09:25:51
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Angry Chaos Agitator
|
corpsesarefun wrote:the_emperors_renegade wrote:I'm serious what about space dwarfs like the old...what was their name again???Shates or something
RxGhost wrote:Squats. That's what they were.
I want them to bring back the Zoats.
I believe it was a joke RxGhost, shate means the same thing a gak or gak and i dont really need to point out the link between that and squatting
the_emperors_renegade wrote:whats wrong with the post man>???
it was badly written, the poll should have listed a few races people could vote for an what should be introduced, it read (like i said in another thread) like it was written by a hyperactive child and you started with I'm serious.
we know your serious... you made no indication this was a joke so why would you be anything other than serious?
no corpsy i couldn't remember the name and that "shate" thing wasn't supposed to mean gak. If you think I type like a hyperactive 10 year old...fair enough thats ur op.
|
...nothing else matters...
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 12:54:25
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
|
Not MORE armies to drain my wallet, noooooo!
|
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 14:30:04
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
Bradford, Yorkshire, England
|
Nope - GW have plenty of 'old' armies to bring up to scratch first. After that then there are lots of existing armies that could be expanded - eg craftworld Eldar, non-generic chaos, IG regiments etc
|
Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you fight with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord, and it makes you miss him. |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 14:31:54
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
Romania
|
SQUATS ..BRING THEM BACK!
|
BRINGG BACK THE SQUATS!!!! WARHAMMER 40K - SPACE DWARFSSS |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 14:36:29
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Poxed Plague Monk
|
Honestly, I don't see it necessary, expecially when we have some armies that have gone unupdated for YEARS. I voted yes though, because I'll forever hold a place in my heart for space skaven~...
|
!
Check out my artz :
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/274459.page
---
Looking for DnD, Warhammer or whatever character art or portraits? I'm open for commissions!
2win-1tie-1loss |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 14:36:56
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Manhunter
Eastern PA
|
i think GW has enough on its plate before the introduce some noew race, that being saud, i think GW will prolly push other things to the back back back burner to get their hands in fresh wallets.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 14:38:27
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader
In the chaotic wastes also known as Canada
|
They can bring in new races after all codexs are brought to the same edition.
|
DOOMFART's Drunken Rugby Player FOR DOOMFART! FOR GES! FOR DAKKA!!!!Kanluwen wrote:Cadian Blood and Soul Hunter?
They're like kidnapping someone, and forcefeeding them heroin until they're hooked. |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 14:39:06
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Umber Guard
|
I really think GW needs to get their current races taken care of first. There are current armies with codex older than five years. 40K has gone through, what?, two editions in the span of time that the DE and SW codex have been out? Between their aversion to updating their FAQ and errata and the lack of timeliness of current armies codex there really doesn't need another army added to compound those problems.
|
Your side is always the "will of the people" the other side is always fundamentalist, extremist, hatemongers, racists, anti- semitic nazies with questionable education and more questionable hygiene. American politics 101.
-SGT Scruffy
~10,000 pts (Retired)
Protectorate of Menoth 75pts (and Growing) |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 15:43:31
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
If there is a new race please let it not be Squats thats a slowed idea. Let it be like Adep Mech or Rebel Guard (thatd be fun like Pirates and stuff) or another Machine race or give my kroot a real codex!!!! Anything cool just not squats.
|
2000 |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 15:55:22
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
UGGH! I hate Squats. I honestly want to just fly to where ever people live that say "bring them back bring them back!" and shoot them in the damn leg. THEY SUCKED AND WERE STUPID!!!! MIDGETS?!??!KILLING THINGS?!?!?! SERIOUSLY?!?!?!?!?
ok now that, thats out of the way. Your ideas for new races just wouldnt make sence. I already stated how I feel on Squats, other human armies? That is the Imperium man, there isnt any outside of those guys that help the tau, or Chaos cultists (didnt they get rid of them now?) so that wouldnt make sence. Nids type? That is NIDS! Any other Nids type of army wouldnt make sence, because they have the nids already.
Im with HBMC on this one. Sure a new race could be cool and all, I remember when they were SLOWLY leaking out Necrons, and when the Tau first hit the scene, it was cool. But GW needs to stop having sever ADHD and get their gak in a row. Seriously I feel like they are being run by a bunch of 12 y/os that havnt taken their meds in a month. They need to get everthing they tokep,updaed before doig anything new.
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 16:02:02
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Boosting Black Templar Biker
|
Update the gak out of the older 'dexes. Does anyone care enough about Dark Eldar? I'd see more utility in Chaos IG, myself.
|
Humans were put on this earth to fart around, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
-Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
-7k - 10k |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 16:50:57
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Xeno-Hating Inquisitorial Excruciator
Manchester
|
It would be good to see a new race
but not until theyve updates some more codexs
ABH
|
I'm always looking for new players for system-less one on one RPG's via MSN and Email PM me if your interested!
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 17:57:28
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Ultramarine Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
NO! There's plenty already. If anything they need to ditch one or two. I don't care to remember any more stats and special rules or have the game subjected to even more 'rules exceptions'.
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 17:58:34
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Huge Hierodule
|
There are some races that could use a codex, but they should not be done until all Codices are updated.
|
Q: What do you call a Dinosaur Handpuppet?
A: A Maniraptor |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 18:02:40
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Instead of spreading development effort GW needs to bring all the current races up to 5th Edition.
Get what you've got right, then expand.
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 18:21:04
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
The Green Git wrote:Instead of spreading development effort GW needs to bring all the current races up to 5th Edition.
Get what you've got right, then expand.
HERETIC!!!
|
2000 |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 21:43:48
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Pauper with Promise
|
I think adding in a new human empire might be cool.
but like a lot of people have said, there is a lot of current codexes that need to be brought up to date (Or new ones that need to be brought back, i hate the way the new ones are organized. I mean like, come on. I have to flip to like 3 different pages to look at a unit's full stats. and they got rid of the armoury!).
and again, like stated above, GW doesn't have a great history with this kind of stuff
|
"You are not free whose liberty is won by the rigor of other, more honorable men. You are merely protected… Your Freedom is parasitic, you suck the honorable man dry and offer him nothing in return.” – Inquisitor Czevak
Imperial Fist- 4,500 pts
Cadian- 2,000 pts
Daemonhunters- 1,500 pts
Iron Warriors- 2,000 pts
Pre Heresy Luna Wolves- 5,000 pts |
|
|
|
2009/07/08 21:46:21
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
YES GW SHOULD INTRODUCE NEW RACES!!!
(but they should not be playable; it'll be a new mechanic... NPC models that just watch the battle)
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 21:50:04
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Please, no squats.
I would like to see adeptus Mechanicus.
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 22:10:54
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Don't we have enough Space Marines already?
|
|
|
|
|
2009/07/08 22:18:11
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Mounted Kroot Tracker
|
Space marine equivalent armies are cool, except for the fact that everyone has them. if no one had thought of the idea before, I would be fine with more marines, but with the number of armies out there that look exactly like marines, we don't really need any more. It seems that GW is onto a good thing and they just want to maximize their profits by makng really cheap guys rather than the nicely expendable races like orks and nids! why can't we have a toughness 1, strength 1 army that really really sucks but you get a billion of them? Like uber-grots or something?
|
Night Watch SM
Kroot Mercenaries W 2 - D 3 - L 1
Manchu wrote: This is simply a self-fulfilling prophecy. Everyone says, "it won't change so why should I bother to try?" and then it doesn't change so people feel validated in their bad behavior.
Nightwatch's Kroot Blog
DQ:90-S++G++M-B++I+Pw40k08#+D+A--/cWD-R+T(S)DM+
|
|
|
|
2009/07/09 00:35:11
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
|
Raging Ravener
Daemon infested warp gate
|
They do need more races but the have many things to do first.
|
TheCyben: Seriously though, I'm not advocating GW to model any Boosh characters. If they have to pick one, it would have to be Tony Harrisson... but that would be an outrage.
|
|
|
|
|