Poll |
 |
Should Games Workshop introduce new races??? |
Yes |
 
|
49% |
[ 98 ] |
No |
 
|
51% |
[ 103 ] |
Total Votes : 201 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 01:00:23
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
To be honest GW really need to sort out the armies they have just... left... get their arses in gear and sort this big mess out, I mean space wolves and DE haven't had an update since god knows when and nothing seems to have happened with WH and DH, so before they even think of adding new races they ought to bring these older armies up to scratch
|
Death will come at the hands of the ancients, those who determined our fate aeons before we stood erect upon the holy ground of terra and gazed up into the starry night.
1500 pts
2000pts (Knights of blood) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 03:42:32
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
Georgia,just outside Atlanta
|
IMO the last thing GW needs to do is introduce ANY new races,they need to FOCUS on the races they have,and by that I mean LaTD as well as all the others.
GW needs to work on putting out balanced/interesting/flavorfull codices for ALL the races they already have in exsistance,not bring out a new race just to feth it up later...or sqaut it.
|
"I'll tell you one thing that every good soldier knows! The only thing that counts in the end is power! Naked merciless force!" .-Ursus.
 I am Red/Black Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>I am both selfish and chaotic. I value self-gratification and control; I want to have things my way, preferably now. At best, I'm entertaining and surprising; at worst, I'm hedonistic and violent. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 03:51:58
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
they need minis for DEATH KORPS OF KRIEG
|
PAINT FOR THE PAINT GOD MODELS FOR THE MODEL THRONE |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 04:07:41
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
Georgia,just outside Atlanta
|
orkylooter wrote:they need minis for DEATH KORPS OF KRIEG
New minis isn't the same thing as a "new race",sure DKOK minis would be cool,so would DE, LaTD & other already EXSISTING races  .
|
"I'll tell you one thing that every good soldier knows! The only thing that counts in the end is power! Naked merciless force!" .-Ursus.
 I am Red/Black Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>I am both selfish and chaotic. I value self-gratification and control; I want to have things my way, preferably now. At best, I'm entertaining and surprising; at worst, I'm hedonistic and violent. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 04:09:16
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Feasting on the souls of unworthy opponents
|
Fix what's broken before introducing more stuff!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 04:16:29
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
Definitly not.
I would prefer that they drop the official support for at least one of the current races ( DE or DemonHunters) and push more support into the others.
In fact, if they were more involved in creating recuring campaigns (like the FW Imperial Armor books) that would be even better.
Imagine if every quarter they released something similar to the Planet Strike box with terrain and special scenarios?
|
.. Black Forest .. Red Sea .. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 04:18:49
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Powerful Pegasus Knight
|
No they have enough to do already and they do not get that done in a timely manner why should they add more to what they already can not keep up with
|
"That for all the Emperor's love of his space marines, his ultimate creation - he was in fact nearly killed by one of them, only to be saved by a mere mortal with a 5+ save and a flashlight."
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 07:22:14
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Angry Chaos Agitator
|
Ashaman wrote:I think adding in a new human empire might be cool.
but like a lot of people have said, there is a lot of current codexes that need to be brought up to date (Or new ones that need to be brought back, i hate the way the new ones are organized. I mean like, come on. I have to flip to like 3 different pages to look at a unit's full stats. and they got rid of the armoury!).
and again, like stated above, GW doesn't have a great history with this kind of stuff
I toattly agree, man. BRING BACK THE ARMOURY!!! Automatically Appended Next Post: rubiksnoob wrote:Please, no squats.
I would like to see adeptus Mechanicus.
there is an adepyus mechanicus codex out there...even an official one!!!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/09 07:24:26
...nothing else matters...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 09:37:01
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Trigger-Happy Baal Predator Pilot
Toronto (GTA), Ontario
|
I misread the title as more models for existing races and voted yes =/
|
Dracos wrote:Codex does not override rulebook. Specific rules (generally those found in codex tend to be more specific) override general rules in case of conflict.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 10:50:03
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
Under no circumstances should any new races be released.
At the minute they have 6
Humans (IG, SM/all flavours, CSM, Inq, LatD, etc)
Eldar (craftworld, exodite, dark)
Orks (6 main clans, freebooterz, kult of speed)
Tau (inc Kroot, Vespid, Nicossar, Demiurg)
Necrons
Tyranids
and how much of the stuff in those 6 is either out of date, underdeveloped or just non-existent?
If they can't cope with what they've got what possible hope is there taht they could do anything else?
|
While you sleep, they'll be waiting...
Have you thought about the Axis of Evil pension scheme? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 10:55:35
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
|
I agree with the argument that they need to keep up with updating codexes for armies they already have before trying to start another one.
|
http://www.teun135miniaturewargaming.blogspot.com/ https://www.instagram.com/teun135/
Foxphoenix135: Successful Trades: 21
With: romulus571, hisdudeness, Old Man Ultramarine, JHall, carldooley, Kav122, chriachris, gmpoto, Jhall, Nurglitch, steamdragon, DispatchDave, Gavin Thorne, Shenra, RustyKnight, rodt777, DeathReaper, LittleCizur, fett14622, syypher, Maxstreel |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 11:31:54
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
yeah, update necrons and DE first....
|
40K 5th ed W/L/D
65/4/6, 10/2/1, 10/3/0, 2/0/1, 0/1/1
40K 6th ed W/L/D
1/0/0
WHFB 8th ed WHFB
Empire: 12/3/2, Lizardmen: 16/3/2 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 12:10:26
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Wrack Sufferer
|
When people ask for GW to squat something I cringe. If they squat something, it will be a Xenos codex. The last thing we need is GW squatting Xenos in favor of more marines. The entire galaxy would be marine on marine conflict, but if that happened I guess they could finally advance the story line a little bit to civil war for the emprah!
|
Once upon a time, I told myself it's better to be smart than lucky. Every day, the world proves me wrong a little more. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 12:15:00
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Australia (Recently ravaged by the Hive Fleet Ginger Overlord)
|
No.
Spin-off...mabye...
But new races? No...
|
Smacks wrote:
After the game, pack up all your miniatures, then slap the guy next to you on the ass and say.
"Good game guys, now lets hit the showers" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/09 12:41:12
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
Pat that askala, O-H-I hate this stupid state
|
I would like to see new races but it wont happen. First they still have to bring races up to speed (necron, tau, nids) and they really need to redo a couple (CSM and daemons). I mean come on the daemons LoS weaker than CSM that makes no sense. Not to mention there is only a handful of lists that are even remotely competitive from CSM. Second they really just need to expand on existing armies as stated above.
|
Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, its just a freight train coming your way!
Thousand Sons 10000
 Grey knights 3000
Sisters of battle 3000
I have 29 sucessful trades where others recommend me.
Be sure to use the Reputable traders list when successfully completing a trade found here:
Dakka's Reputable Traders List |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 00:30:17
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Painting Within the Lines
|
IF, and I do mean IF a new race was in the works, i'd like to see one based on just monsterous creatures. Like, if you had an army list of 1500pts you'd have 5 models of the board the size of double-decker landraiders.
That would be like the anti-hoard army. Tough to kill with plenty of wounds, but precious few units to sacrifice.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 01:12:14
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
New races AFTER the older armies have been updated.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 01:34:01
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Phloop wrote:IF, and I do mean IF a new race was in the works, i'd like to see one based on just monsterous creatures. Like, if you had an army list of 1500pts you'd have 5 models of the board the size of double-decker landraiders.
I thought we already had TMCs after the 3E rulebook WL spam. Did I miss something?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 01:54:30
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Drop Trooper with Demo Charge
|
no new races soon. If they're going to include a new one, it should have as much thought and time poured into it as the rest, and that'll take years.
|
... because that totally makes sense.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 02:32:46
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets
|
NO!!they do not need a new race,first they need to finish and fix the codexs and the lack of figures,i say this because...weres the dark eldar codex the necrons codex and the list gose on then lets make all these cool charecters and have no model for them or a fast attack chose that has no model for it,first they need to work on something besides SM,other wise if a new race is released,i would almost hate to see how much new SM stuff would pop us so,no,there is no need for a new race at all just improve were improvement is needed and pay atintion to the other races and when they are all revamped and all the figures made that are in the codexs then they can look into a new race
|
looted moonz 6000 pts and still growing and building |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 04:50:07
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Apprehensive Inquisitorial Apprentice
The darkest spot between galaxies, leading my armada.
|
I... think that GW should focus on currently existing races for now, but I think it would be cool if they introduced the Enslavers as a playable army. Automatically Appended Next Post: Orkeosaurus, I don't want to insult you, but I don't completely agree, I think 'Cronsare fine fluff wise, though their codex could use a revision.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/10 04:53:05
Irony, thy name is bitch- My greatest quote during Nazi Zombies. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 10:13:57
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Australia (Recently ravaged by the Hive Fleet Ginger Overlord)
|
By the time GW is through "touching up" on the other dexes, another dozen or so dexes will be demanding a remake. I don't think a new race is likely.
I do like Phloops idea of a monstrous creature army only though. Need more fluff/info about the Idea.
|
Smacks wrote:
After the game, pack up all your miniatures, then slap the guy next to you on the ass and say.
"Good game guys, now lets hit the showers" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 14:49:00
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
Lord of battles wrote:They can bring in new races after all codexs are brought to the same edition.
QFT.
Not sure what play style a new race could do though. Marines if nothing else, seem able to be tailored to any play style.
GW wants to sell minis and there are plenty of minis to sell now without making a new army/race.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 14:56:11
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
Either the Hrud or some new Tau ally (in model form, they probably have heaps in story form). But they really need to fix up the other armies first. Hopefully they do DE after they release SW in October.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 15:06:26
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Legendary Dogfighter
|
I voted no, like H.B.M.C. I would love to see a few more races and bits (especially Adeptus), however with GWs track record for looking after current races -noooooooooooo it would be a quick moeny earner for them to then forget about.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 15:10:17
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'm game with new races as variety in opponents makes things fun... jsut don't make more marines for god sake.
New races though should only be a thought once GW pulls their head out of their *** and gets on a sane update cycle for codexs. One update every 2-3 years is not too much to ask.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 15:30:22
Subject: SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
|
No. A good update cycle would be 4-5 years. Three or four Codices a year, plus the occasional second wave or expansion (Such as Planetstrike).
|
Q: What do you call a Dinosaur Handpuppet?
A: A Maniraptor |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/10 18:22:40
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
n0t_u wrote:Either the Hrud or some new Tau ally
In the Tau redo thread, I suggested Hrud as a Tau ally...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/11 02:04:51
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Angry Chaos Agitator
|
True,True but I still think another human empire...somethink toattly different to the Imperium would be pretty cool!
|
...nothing else matters...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/11 04:35:13
Subject: Re:SHOULD GW INTRODUCE NEW RACES???
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
No, humans have WAY more already then any of the others.
Id agree on the monstrous creature army idea. A small amount of REAL bad asses, that can just hulk smash other armies. That would be a pretty sweet change of pace. Im thinking like, a rhinoceros race, mixed with rock people lol
|
|
 |
 |
|