Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 10:15:19
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Anyone else noticed that other than the SM and IG codex, all the other 5th edition codexes have been able to let you create a completely non scoring army?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/15 10:21:52
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 10:18:24
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
What about tyranids, you could take ripper swarms which arn't scoring because of swarm.
Edit: and all the troops choices in the space marine codex are scoring, the closest you get to that is the blood angels where you have to take a special charater to make a completly non-scoring army.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/15 10:19:44
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 10:21:43
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
wizard12 wrote:What about tyranids, you could take ripper swarms which arn't scoring because of swarm.
Yeah, but not every army could do it. Now we have Chaos Dæmons, Space Wolves, Blood angels and Tyranids out of the 5th ed codexes who could do it. Probably means nothing, just something that caught my eye. wizard12 wrote:Edit: and all the troops choices in the space marine codex are scoring, the closest you get to that is the blood angels where you have to take a special charater to make a completly non-scoring army.
I did say in my OP that "other than SM and IG"... Dæmons do it with Nurglings SM Can't do it IG Can't do it. SW can do it with Canis and Wolves Nids can do it with Rippers BA Can do it with Death Company and DC Dreadnoughts, even without the character.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/04/15 10:23:30
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 10:45:37
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Whoops, thought you said you couldn't make a completly scoring army with 5th ed codexes execpt SM and IG. Sorry.
I just looked at the BA codex and saw that death company dreads don't have the black rage special rule so they are scoring. Hmm, extra deadly.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/15 10:47:52
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 10:54:01
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Wicked Warp Spider
|
No, vehicles of any type aren't scoring units, it's in the main rulebook.
To the OP, I don't think it's an intentional design decision. Just many armies have some units which are berserk/swarms/animals etc.
|
Eldar Corsairs: 4000 pts
Imperial Guard: 4000 pts
Corregidor 700 pts
Acontecimento 400 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 11:18:47
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
wizard12 wrote:Whoops, thought you said you couldn't make a completly scoring army with 5th ed codexes execpt SM and IG. Sorry.
I just looked at the BA codex and saw that death company dreads don't have the black rage special rule so they are scoring. Hmm, extra deadly.
Vehicles are never scoring, even if Troops.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 12:29:12
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
|
Orks (a 4.5e codex) can do it, too.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 14:37:59
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
Gwar! wrote:wizard12 wrote:Whoops, thought you said you couldn't make a completly scoring army with 5th ed codexes execpt SM and IG. Sorry.
I just looked at the BA codex and saw that death company dreads don't have the black rage special rule so they are scoring. Hmm, extra deadly.
Vehicles are never scoring, even if Troops.
Are they able capture an objective if they're a transport with a Troop choice capable of capturing objectives inside them?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 14:51:10
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Monstrous Master Moulder
Sacramento, CA
|
n0t_u wrote:Are they able capture an objective if they're a transport with a Troop choice capable of capturing objectives inside them?
In that case it is still not the vehicle that is claiming the objective, it is the embarked unit.
|
Agitator noster fulminis percussus est |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 14:51:41
Subject: Re:Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
yes.
it's an interesting idea GWAR.
perhaps GW is going to lessen the number of objective based missions in 8th Ed or they will redefine scoring units.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 17:48:49
Subject: Re:Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
|
Grey Templar wrote:yes.
it's an interesting idea GWAR.
perhaps GW is going to lessen the number of objective based missions in 8th Ed or they will redefine scoring units.
8th ed? What about 6th or 7th?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 17:52:51
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Gwar! wrote:Anyone else noticed that other than the SM and IG codex, all the other 5th edition codexes have been able to let you create a completely non scoring army?
And why does this matter? Players could always build bad armies.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 19:19:23
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Slaanesh Chosen Marine Riding a Fiend
Inside a pretty, pretty pain cave... won't you come inside?
|
It's an interesting thought. I realize GW doesn't always create the most thorough and air-tight rules (shock of shocks), but they must realize they create opportunities where non-scoring armies are possible or else the rules allowing them to do so wouldn't exist. Perhaps those are there for just Apocalypse, Battle Mission, or friendly games where scoring doesn't matter? But if so, do they really expect someone to collect, say, 11 BA dreadnoughts?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 20:06:13
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
|
Skarboy wrote: But if so, do they really expect someone to collect, say, 11 BA dreadnoughts?
YES.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 20:34:49
Subject: Re:Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Little lord Fauntleroy wrote:Grey Templar wrote:yes.
it's an interesting idea GWAR.
perhaps GW is going to lessen the number of objective based missions in 8th Ed or they will redefine scoring units.
8th ed? What about 6th or 7th?
ooops
i play fantasy too so i got mixed up.
yes i meant 6th
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 20:38:36
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
JohnHwangDD wrote:Gwar! wrote:Anyone else noticed that other than the SM and IG codex, all the other 5th edition codexes have been able to let you create a completely non scoring army?
And why does this matter? Players could always build bad armies.
Enough said.
|
Hail to the creeeeeeeeeeeeeeed!baby Ask not the moot a question,for he will give you three answers,all of which will result in a public humiliation.
My DIY chapter Fire Wraiths http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/264338.page
3 things that Ivan likes:
Food Sex Machines
Tactical Genius of DakkaDakka
Colonel Miles Quaritch is my hero
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 20:41:17
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Unless the new Battle Missions supplement has creatively changed the gameplay so everything doesn't boil down to a Meat Grinder, I've never been concerned with scoring units in a game. Sadly, it's one of the reasons I get bored with playing 40k.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 20:48:19
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Skarboy wrote:It's an interesting thought. I realize GW doesn't always create the most thorough and air-tight rules (shock of shocks), but they must realize they create opportunities where non-scoring armies are possible or else the rules allowing them to do so wouldn't exist. Perhaps those are there for just Apocalypse, Battle Mission, or friendly games where scoring doesn't matter? But if so, do they really expect someone to collect, say, 11 BA dreadnoughts?
Apoc doesn't use Force Orgs, so that's not relevant(you could always make non-scoring armies in Apoc, as you don't have any mandatories to take). That opportunity also exists within the BGB itself, as Annihilation doesn't need Scoring Units. Also, I believe you're right and I think there are a bunch of Battle Missions that don't require them either.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 21:03:50
Subject: Re:Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Revving Ravenwing Biker
|
Vehicles are never scoring, even if Troops.
Ravenwing Land Speeders beg to differ
|
-Any terrain containing Sly Marbo is dangerous terrain.
-Sly Marbo once played an objective mission just to see what it was like to not meet every victory condition on his own.
-Sly Marbo bought a third edition rulebook just to play meat grinder as the attacker.
-Marbo doesn't need an Eldar farseer as an ally; his enemies are already doomed
-Sly Marbo was originally armed with a power weapon, but he dropped it while assaulting a space marine command squad just so his enemies could feel pain
-Sly Marbo still attacks the front armor value in assault, for pity's sake. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 22:08:00
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I am not sure why you would ever want to do it though. You gimp yourself in missions obviously and Rippers for instance are really terrible now for Tyranids.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 22:28:15
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
Would someone mind elaborating how this works? Why can't these units score?
|
Just because anyone agrees with anyone, doesn't mean they are correct. Beware the thin line between what is "Correct" and what is "Popular." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 22:36:32
Subject: Re:Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
Minnesota, land of 10,000 Lakes and 10,000,000,000 Mosquitos
|
I haven't read the Daemon codex so I'm assuming it has something that says it can't score, but...
SW - Fenrisian Wolves as troops; they cannot score (as they are wolves and do not possess the higher tactical intelligence to do so)
Nids - Rippers as troops; same reason as above (though they are rippers, obviously, not wolves)
Blood Angels - Death Company are too angry to focus on scoring, and vehicles never count as a scoring unit
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/15 22:47:02
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Feasting on the souls of unworthy opponents
|
Skinnattittar wrote:Would someone mind elaborating how this works? Why can't these units score?
You can give a troops choice special rules (like BA Death Guard) That make them extra killy, but no longer a scoring unit. IE, a troops choice that is not a scoring unit.
Another example would be an Ork list:
2x HQs that are Big Meks.
2x Troop choices that are Deff Dreads
Whatever elites, heavy support, fast attack you want.
You fufill the 1HQ, two troop requirement, but there are no scoring units in the list.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/16 16:20:31
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Dæmons have Nurglings, who are Swarms, who cannot score.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/16 17:10:34
Subject: Re:Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Volkov wrote:Vehicles are never scoring, even if Troops.
Ravenwing Land Speeders beg to differ
Where in the DA codex does it say they are scoring?
|
.Only a fool believes there is such a thing as price gouging. Things have value determined by the creator or merchant. If you don't agree with that value, you are free not to purchase. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/16 19:26:34
Subject: Re:Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
General Hobbs wrote:Volkov wrote:Vehicles are never scoring, even if Troops.
Ravenwing Land Speeders beg to differ
Where in the DA codex does it say they are scoring?
Under the Rules for RW Attack Squads Combat Squading.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/16 19:26:54
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
WHen taken with RAS they "always count as seperate scoring units"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/16 20:33:10
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
Skarboy wrote:It's an interesting thought. I realize GW doesn't always create the most thorough and air-tight rules (shock of shocks), but they must realize they create opportunities where non-scoring armies are possible or else the rules allowing them to do so wouldn't exist. Perhaps those are there for just Apocalypse, Battle Mission, or friendly games where scoring doesn't matter? But if so, do they really expect someone to collect, say, 11 BA dreadnoughts?
I have 4 right now, and I am sure I will get more as i buy other required models.
|
On Dakka he was Eldanar. In our area, he was Lee. R.I.P., Lee Guthrie. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 10:02:23
Subject: Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Perfect Shot Dark Angels Predator Pilot
|
Of the codexes I have Eldar can't do it, Dark Angels can't, Space Wolves can, Imperial Guard can't. Then demonhunters and necrons which aren't current as such and aren't covered under the criteria of the first post.
|
2,200 (18% Painted)
4,000 (94% Painted)
1,000 (74% Painted)
800 (7% painted)
222 Painted 147 Incomplete |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 13:50:00
Subject: Re:Interesting Trend from GW I noticed
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
|
DE only have one troops choice in the first place...
Okay, 2 if you count cult, but that is just switching a troop and an elite around. Still only one troop choice at a time. For some reason your single troop choice tends to be scoring...
|
|
|
 |
 |
|