Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/23 16:35:04
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It sounds like everyone has too much time. OK I made a mistake, who wants to call the police?
|
"Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Only with Minatures, does size matter...
"Only the living collect a pension"Johannes VII
"If the ork codex and 5th were developed near the same time, any possible nerf will be pre-planned."-malfred
"I'd do it but the GW Website makes my eyes hurt. "Gwar
"That would be page 7 and a half. You find it by turning your rulebook on its side and slamming your head against it..." insaniak
MeanGreenStompa - The only chatbot I ever tried talking to insisted I take a stress pill and kept referring to me as Dave, despite my protestations.
insaniak "So, by 'serious question' you actually meant something entirely different? "
Frazzled[Mod] On Rule #1- No it literally means: be polite. If we wanted less work there would be no OT section.
Chowderhead - God no. If I said Pirates Honor, I would have had to kill him whether he won or lost. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/23 17:33:50
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Nobody cares if you make a mistake.
But if you've been gaming for 20 years as you claim, you're old enough to not behave like a petulant child when someone points it out...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/23 17:48:59
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Give it up mate, its a dead issue.
Who is really being silly here?
|
"Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Only with Minatures, does size matter...
"Only the living collect a pension"Johannes VII
"If the ork codex and 5th were developed near the same time, any possible nerf will be pre-planned."-malfred
"I'd do it but the GW Website makes my eyes hurt. "Gwar
"That would be page 7 and a half. You find it by turning your rulebook on its side and slamming your head against it..." insaniak
MeanGreenStompa - The only chatbot I ever tried talking to insisted I take a stress pill and kept referring to me as Dave, despite my protestations.
insaniak "So, by 'serious question' you actually meant something entirely different? "
Frazzled[Mod] On Rule #1- No it literally means: be polite. If we wanted less work there would be no OT section.
Chowderhead - God no. If I said Pirates Honor, I would have had to kill him whether he won or lost. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/23 18:23:10
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
Mom, Dad, stop it! I hate when you fight! ... Wha? I dozed off there, what happened?
|
New Career Time? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/23 20:03:16
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
When I think about the word "snigger", characters the likes of Wormtongue and Renfield come to mind. Malefic, pathetic, debased and scorned. But thats just me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/23 23:04:56
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Novice Knight Errant Pilot
|
Ummm, Mods, could we please get this thread back on track re Reecius's brilliant info re the Apocalypse rulebook, and forthcoming releases / rules? I actually WAS enjoying it, before one member decided to try and antagonise everyone who was trying to help him. Cheers, Padre^.
|
"All GW will gain is my increased contempt for their business practices." - AesSedai
"Its terrible the way that conversion kit is causing him to buy 2 GW kits... " - Mad4Minis
"GW are hard to parody, as they are sometimes so stupid that the best in comedy couldn't beat them at their own game..." - Paradigm
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 02:36:00
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
NoVA
|
I have a rules question regarding Apocalypse. For special character use (or special unit use): 1) Does the player ignore the "must be in a XXX army of 1500 points" or do you need that 1500 points to use him? 2) Can you take two or more of him? I understand Apoc ignores FoC, and I simply assumed (and will continue to do so) that it ignores special character requirements as well. My assumption is that any entry (unit or character) is an island unto itself, and available for Apocalypse. Ignoring all FoC consideration and/or army special rules for deployment. I just wanted confirmation on that
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 03:33:32
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
It would be nice if you could get a chapter specific Battle Company, but I'm guessing that's not in the cards? In any event, the $450 price appears to perfectly cover the infantry in the set, leaving you with 8 "free" Rhinos and a "free" Razorback. Not a bad deal given it's GW, but seeing as how I already have enough Marines to field two Battle Companies already...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 03:59:48
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Phanobi
|
dieneske: The only restriction on Apocalypse is that the games are 3000 points. If you wanted a 3000 point army of Abaddons, you could take it. Actually, that sounds like kind of fun....
Ozymandias, King of Kings
|
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings. Look on My works, Ye Mighty, and despair.
Chris Gohlinghorst wrote:Holy Space Marine on a Stick.
This conversation has even begun to boggle my internet-hardened mind.
A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 04:18:17
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
Posted By Ozymandias on 08/24/2007 8:59 AM dieneske: The only restriction on Apocalypse is that the games are 3000 points. If you wanted a 3000 point army of Abaddons, you could take it. Actually, that sounds like kind of fun.... Ozymandias, King of Kings I have a bone of contention with that. From what I have seen from people who have held this tome in their hands, the 0-1 restriction is lifted, but not the 1 restriction. As in, "You may only ever have have one of X in your army" type of thing. Although, who knows until we have book in hand. But even I who sees vast potential in apocalypse has to admit that numerous clones of special characters is kinda stretching the limits of logical credibility, even for GW standards.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 04:29:47
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Awesome Autarch
|
the book says the only real rule for force org is that you must obey rules for a squad.
for example
the squad must be the correct size and have only the option allowed in the codex, ie. no 10 man termie squad with all assault cannons, or 6 special weapon sm squad, etc.
other than that, you can put down whatever you like.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 04:44:15
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
NoVA
|
Hellfury, My desire wasn't for multiple special characters. As you have noticed, I have a soft spot for Shrike's Wing. I want to know if I could have two. I don't want 5 Abaddons or 3 Living Saints (though mult. Living Saints might be fun and fluffy...what says Apocalypse more than multiple Greater Avatars of the Emperor Hisself).
As Reecius states, the Unit itself is inviolate (so much for my 5 assault cannon Termie unit being official, though it would be officially awesome). That makes sense, and still allows plenty of flexibility.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 06:17:58
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Phanobi
|
Phil Kelly mentioned having multiples of the same special character at LA GD so I am going off of what he said there. He also said that it wouldn't make sense.
Note, you wouldn't actually be using 10 Abaddons, you would be using 10 uber-Chaos Lords who all happen to have the same stats and equipment as Abaddon. That's how I would justify it from a fluff perspective (not that I'd ever take 10 Abaddons...).
Ozymandias, King of Kings
|
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings. Look on My works, Ye Mighty, and despair.
Chris Gohlinghorst wrote:Holy Space Marine on a Stick.
This conversation has even begun to boggle my internet-hardened mind.
A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 08:00:59
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Posted By Reecius on 08/24/2007 9:29 AM the book says the only real rule for force org is that you must obey rules for a squad. for example the squad must be the correct size and have only the option allowed in the codex, ie. no 10 man termie squad with all assault cannons, or 6 special weapon sm squad, etc. other than that, you can put down whatever you like. Hmmm... would that apply to units like Armored Fists? For example, would you still need to field 1 Infantry Platoon per Armored Fist platoon?
|
- Craftworld Kai-Thaine
- Task Force Defiance 36
- Sunwolves Great Company
- 4th Company Imperial Fists
- Hive Fleet Scylla - In progress
If the man doesn't believe as we do, we say he is a crank, and that settles it. I mean, it does nowadays, because now we can't burn him. - M. Twain
The world owes you nothing. It was here first. - M. Twain
DR:70+S++G+++MB-I--Pw40k03+D++A+++/rWD-R+T(R)DM++
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 11:00:42
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Awesome Autarch
|
Nope. But each armored fist platoon would have to have 10 men, 1 chimera and only one special and one heavy weapon, etc.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 14:27:06
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
The drinking halls of Fenris or South London as its sometimes called
|
Posted By Padre on 08/23/2007 6:14 PM Also, going back a couple of pages, I'm pretty sure that Forgeworld have confirmed / commented that a Reaver Titan will be released sometime towards the end of 2007 Padre^. anybody verify this? Link etc
|
R.I.P Amy Winehouse
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/24 20:18:39
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Novice Knight Errant Pilot
|
Hi Beef, From memory, I actually read that rumour in a post here at Dakka which was a round up of FW rumours from a Games Day, but can't for the life remember which one. I did a bit of research - Here's a link to a 40K Online thread which discusses the Reaver in connection with the Adeptus Mechanicus IA Book (about halfway down the page. http://www.40konline.com/mos/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=861&?topic=139878.msg1743575;topicseen Hope this helps, interested to see if you can find any further confirmation (I love my Armorcast Reaver, but FW is nice stuff...shame it's exorbitant.) EDIT - here's another link: http://www.tv.com/users/TheEmpsChamp/profile.php?action=show_blog&entry=m-100-24986203 Cheers, Padre^.
|
"All GW will gain is my increased contempt for their business practices." - AesSedai
"Its terrible the way that conversion kit is causing him to buy 2 GW kits... " - Mad4Minis
"GW are hard to parody, as they are sometimes so stupid that the best in comedy couldn't beat them at their own game..." - Paradigm
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/26 06:57:51
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I have a question regarding the Necron Army. Have they been given anything new in the Apocolypse Codex besides the crazy special rule regarding the monolith phalanx?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/26 14:03:25
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Phanobi
|
They get a Pylon as well. Plus, every army gets new background material.
Ozymandias, King of Kings
|
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings. Look on My works, Ye Mighty, and despair.
Chris Gohlinghorst wrote:Holy Space Marine on a Stick.
This conversation has even begun to boggle my internet-hardened mind.
A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/27 15:03:36
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
So,
|
"Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Only with Minatures, does size matter...
"Only the living collect a pension"Johannes VII
"If the ork codex and 5th were developed near the same time, any possible nerf will be pre-planned."-malfred
"I'd do it but the GW Website makes my eyes hurt. "Gwar
"That would be page 7 and a half. You find it by turning your rulebook on its side and slamming your head against it..." insaniak
MeanGreenStompa - The only chatbot I ever tried talking to insisted I take a stress pill and kept referring to me as Dave, despite my protestations.
insaniak "So, by 'serious question' you actually meant something entirely different? "
Frazzled[Mod] On Rule #1- No it literally means: be polite. If we wanted less work there would be no OT section.
Chowderhead - God no. If I said Pirates Honor, I would have had to kill him whether he won or lost. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/27 15:04:12
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
So,
|
"Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Only with Minatures, does size matter...
"Only the living collect a pension"Johannes VII
"If the ork codex and 5th were developed near the same time, any possible nerf will be pre-planned."-malfred
"I'd do it but the GW Website makes my eyes hurt. "Gwar
"That would be page 7 and a half. You find it by turning your rulebook on its side and slamming your head against it..." insaniak
MeanGreenStompa - The only chatbot I ever tried talking to insisted I take a stress pill and kept referring to me as Dave, despite my protestations.
insaniak "So, by 'serious question' you actually meant something entirely different? "
Frazzled[Mod] On Rule #1- No it literally means: be polite. If we wanted less work there would be no OT section.
Chowderhead - God no. If I said Pirates Honor, I would have had to kill him whether he won or lost. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/27 15:04:40
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
So, Does anyone have confirmation of which Titans are supported in Apocolypse?
From the various posts I think: Ork Stompa, Warlord and Warhound?(I haven't heard anything about Eldar) Does the Necron Pylon sort of count as thier Titan thingie?
|
"Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Only with Minatures, does size matter...
"Only the living collect a pension"Johannes VII
"If the ork codex and 5th were developed near the same time, any possible nerf will be pre-planned."-malfred
"I'd do it but the GW Website makes my eyes hurt. "Gwar
"That would be page 7 and a half. You find it by turning your rulebook on its side and slamming your head against it..." insaniak
MeanGreenStompa - The only chatbot I ever tried talking to insisted I take a stress pill and kept referring to me as Dave, despite my protestations.
insaniak "So, by 'serious question' you actually meant something entirely different? "
Frazzled[Mod] On Rule #1- No it literally means: be polite. If we wanted less work there would be no OT section.
Chowderhead - God no. If I said Pirates Honor, I would have had to kill him whether he won or lost. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/27 15:23:20
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Hey Reecius, did you happen to glance at the Strategic Assets section? I'm looking over the leaked Datafax for the Battle Company and can't figure out what the "Careful Planning" rule does. Any ideas?
|
Bell of Lost Souls www.belloflostsouls.blogspot.com Warhammer 40,000 Minis, News, Tactics, and Opinion |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/28 04:01:08
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Awesome Autarch
|
Yeah, there were rules for the warhound, warlord, two types of stompas, one normal one for a big mek, and the eldar reveneant (with pulsars or sonic lances). There was also the tyranid hirodule and Heirophant.
and Bigred, i honestly can't remember what the careful planning strategic asset did, i will check though next time i am in the store. There were a ton of strategic assets, i couldn't remember them all unfortunately.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/28 22:59:11
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
The drinking halls of Fenris or South London as its sometimes called
|
thanks for the link padre
|
R.I.P Amy Winehouse
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/28 23:10:12
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Novice Knight Errant Pilot
|
Beef, Anytime - just hope the rumours turn out to be true. Argggh, what am I talking about ? ...can't justify buying a Forgeworld Warhound, let alone their no-doubt-impressively-expensive version of a Reaver... Just a question though...can anybody out there tell me anything about the Warlord Titan datasheet in Apocalypse? (Apart from the fact it's big...) Cheers, Padre^.
|
"All GW will gain is my increased contempt for their business practices." - AesSedai
"Its terrible the way that conversion kit is causing him to buy 2 GW kits... " - Mad4Minis
"GW are hard to parody, as they are sometimes so stupid that the best in comedy couldn't beat them at their own game..." - Paradigm
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/29 03:40:46
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Awesome Autarch
|
9 structure points, 6 void shields, 2500 points, two torso weapons, two arm weapons and some deffensive weapons two IIRC.
the thing was slowed powerful.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/29 03:53:41
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Abhorrent Grotesque Aberration
|
I really need to start the "buy Toreador a reveneant fund". I have always wanted one, and now I have yet another reason to get one. Sigh.... I hear they kick butt in apoc too.
It just makes a lot of the things I want to do with Forgeworld items so much more tempting.
|
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/29 04:21:45
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
I used to have an Armorcast revenant, a shame now that I ebayed it a while back Honestly, I'd be scared to use a FW titan in a game.. with my luck it'll get knocked off the table and shatter into a million pieces.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/08/29 07:29:47
Subject: RE: I read the Apocolypse rule book today.
|
 |
Abhorrent Grotesque Aberration
|
The way my luck goes though, I would be the one knocking it off the table. If I am going to be knocking it off a table, I just as well be playing with it rather than just destroying a display.
|
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die. |
|
 |
 |
|