Switch Theme:

Why WYSIWYG when GW does not support it?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




THe stores are what gets the next generation of modellers playing and buying. That is why they run them.

If they closed the stores all the model companies would suffer.

Franchises are unlikely to want to spend as much time and space as GW do on intro games, club nights, painting and modelling lessons, etc.
   
Made in au
Sneaky Sniper Drone





New Zealand

Fair points all, with regard the bits service. I grew through the metal bits era, so very much carry that mentality of easily created spare parts. Back in 1999, I had opportunity to visit and browse in the foundry at the newly minted Nottingham HQ, a short while before they closed the bits dept. I had the opportunity to dictate what molds to spin up for parts I wanted at the time (posted to me after). There was very little wastage as most seemed to be the "accessory mold" and the others were the "body" molds. Curious how this mentality of design has not carried over into the much more straight forward digital lay up era.

In a sense, engineering a sprue that is sure to be the popular "bits" sprue to buy separately at a premium for the hobbyist modellers (eg.Vehicle Command Sprue). A lot of boutique/garage model companies do this, in preparation for a demand on the accessories over the core kit and often for modellers interested in using the parts elsewhere.

Well, GW won't change any time soon. This whole bits market has always left me a little curious as to why, even after some solid points by the Dakka folks.

I find it similar to the whole third party accessory industry that pops up around popular gadgets. This lucrative third-party market currently has the gadget producers being even more bullish with official "accessory" items than before, having largely ignored it initially.

- Tael.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/10/25 11:48:39


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: