Lanrak wrote:Kaldor.
You do realise you can play 'games of 40k' with other rule sets?
But it's not the
same. I know
40K is complicated without being complex, and clunky where it should be streamlined, but I
like it anyway,
lol! Almost the entire attraction of a 'new' game for me is that I can slip into a different background, like Warmachine or Flames of War, and enjoy it. What's the point of just using my existing model collection? I already have a game to use those models in, and it's going to better represent those models than any other proxy.
sennacherib wrote:I think that Kaldors attitude is reallly puzzling though. Even if it was the greatest game in the universe he wouldnt try it.
I know you do, and the fact that you do is part of the reason your friend wouldn't try Firestorm Armada with you.
I'm not at all interested in some games. ESPECIALLY games that are similar to ones I already play. If I'm not interested in a game, then it doesn't matter HOW good the game is. It could, like I said, be the best game in the universe, and I still won't play it, because it doesn't interest me. For example:
I like battlefleet gothic. If I'm going to play a space battle, then it's probably going to be
BFG.
I would almost never try firestorm armada or full thrust, because they don't appeal to me.
But I might try a star wars games system, because how freaking cool would that be?
You see, some games interest me, and some don't. And that interest has almost nothing to do with the mechanics of the game or the level of support it has, or who makes it. I have to be drawn in by the models and the background. If I'm not, then I'll never enjoy playing that game and trying it out would be a waste of my time.