Melissia wrote:GrapeApe wrote:I wonder about all this.
GW's marketing campaign is fixed on having the Primarch "save the Imperium"
And the problem is that
this is just kind of boring and cliche.
Oh look some relic from the past is coming along thinking he can solve all of our problems which he knows next to nothing about. How droll.
The idea that "the heroes of the past" are better than the heroes that are acting RIGHT NOW is as cliche as it gets in fiction, and
it's one cliche I resoundingly reject.
Oh i'm in agreement with your assessment.
Except... what's the ultimate limiting factor when assessing
40K lore - in terms of what
GW will do?
Does this change to the Setting - will it Sell Models?
An intellectual property like Star Trek or Star Wars - figurines, games, etc are derivative merchandising connected to a story told either in books or movies.
Books/Movies/Stories come First, the rest is extra.
An intellectual property like
40K, the sales of Models and the Game come First. Fluff and story take a back seat to that focus.
The perfect example that springs to mind in this regard is what happened to Warhammer Fantasy and the Age of Sigmar.
I loved Warhammer Fantasy for its low-fantasy feel, but i've seen the figures in terms of
AoS sales. I'm obviously in the minority.
When you step away from all the story elements for a second and just look at the Return of the Primarch thing from a business standpoint:
1.)
SM sell. I've always wanted to see stats in terms of how much
SM sells in comparison to the rest of the
40K pie. I've got a gnawing feeling that if group collectively,
SM probably take up the lion's share.
2.) Ultramarines sell. They are often billed as your Basic Starter Chapter. So i'm assuming (and if i'm wrong, someone please show me some stats!) that Ultramarines Sales > Space Wolves or Dark Angels, or Blood Angels, etc.
So yeah - makes sense bringing back the Ultramarine Primarch to go fight [Insert Evil Thing].....even if it is Cliche.