Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/06 17:24:23
Subject: Chapter Approved 2019
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Galef wrote:Anyone with the book in hand yet? I can't officially buy mine until tomorrow, even though my LGS has them now but can't sell them yet
I'd be interesting to see a list of clear errors in the book. I never purchased CA'17 or CA'18, but with all points and some decent rules, I'm getting CA'19
I know of one of the biggest errors being the DW Vet squad uses the points values in the models-per-unit column. Essentially making it look like you can take 31 Terminators in the unit
-
Which is kind of irrelevant as the number of models you can take isn't on a per model type basis but defined by the Vet squad itself's unit size cap.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/06 17:25:32
Subject: Chapter Approved 2019
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Agreed, that was just the only glaring error I've heard of so far. Wanted to know if there are others I need to look for and correct with a marker -
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/12/06 17:25:46
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/06 19:25:50
Subject: Chapter Approved 2019
|
 |
Walking Dead Wraithlord
|
Galef wrote:Anyone with the book in hand yet? I can't officially buy mine until tomorrow, even though my LGS has them now but can't sell them yet
I'd be interesting to see a list of clear errors in the book. I never purchased CA'17 or CA'18, but with all points and some decent rules, I'm getting CA'19
I know of one of the biggest errors being the DW Vet squad uses the points values in the models-per-unit column. Essentially making it look like you can take 31 Terminators in the unit
-
Im picking mine up tomorrow. I assume its same for everyone unless you have early copy.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/06 20:05:18
Subject: Chapter Approved 2019
|
 |
Lethal Lhamean
Birmingham
|
Galef wrote:Anyone with the book in hand yet? I can't officially buy mine until tomorrow, even though my LGS has them now but can't sell them yet
I'd be interesting to see a list of clear errors in the book. I never purchased CA'17 or CA'18, but with all points and some decent rules, I'm getting CA'19
I know of one of the biggest errors being the DW Vet squad uses the points values in the models-per-unit column. Essentially making it look like you can take 31 Terminators in the unit
-
From what I gather it's completely omitted the Drukhari Vehicle Equipment list. Granted, nobody ever takes anything off that list but still...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/12/06 22:13:27
Subject: Chapter Approved 2019
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Imateria wrote: Galef wrote:Anyone with the book in hand yet? I can't officially buy mine until tomorrow, even though my LGS has them now but can't sell them yet
I'd be interesting to see a list of clear errors in the book. I never purchased CA'17 or CA'18, but with all points and some decent rules, I'm getting CA'19
I know of one of the biggest errors being the DW Vet squad uses the points values in the models-per-unit column. Essentially making it look like you can take 31 Terminators in the unit
-
From what I gather it's completely omitted the Drukhari Vehicle Equipment list. Granted, nobody ever takes anything off that list but still...
GW has been doing a lot of retro callbacks, so a lack of DE vehicle wargear is fitting...
The new method for using tactical objectives is quite interesting,m and hopefully will see them used more often. More interesting than ITC missions all the time.
|
|
 |
 |
|