| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2012/07/10 19:42:48
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Stormin' Stompa
|
Wrakkar wrote:Grey Templar wrote:Wrakkar wrote:'Nids been nerfedhammer. 
You obvious have your head under a rock. Nids got a boost. Not a huge one, but they arn't complete suck anymore.
I was referring to the allies table 
No friends there, bugz.
Foreveralonehammer
|
Ask yourself: have you rated a gallery image today? |
|
|
 |
|
2012/07/10 20:24:11
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Crazed Spirit of the Defiler
|
Mr Nobody wrote:Wrakkar wrote:Grey Templar wrote:Wrakkar wrote:'Nids been nerfedhammer.
You obvious have your head under a rock. Nids got a boost. Not a huge one, but they arn't complete suck anymore.
I was referring to the allies table
No friends there, bugz.
Foreveralonehammer
Forever swarming against the broken imperial armies hammer.
|
If you see slaanesh, just look away. 
"I can't look away!!!" 
 |
|
|
|
|
2012/07/10 20:26:14
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
BaronIveagh wrote:htj wrote:
Since Rogue Trader?
He's mixing them up with beastmen, IIRC. Which are a separate thing now.
Yes but it's not like they were that separate until now, you had all sorts of odd Beast + Human races within the beastmen types.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/10 20:30:42
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Crazed Spirit of the Defiler
|
ZebioLizard2 wrote:BaronIveagh wrote:htj wrote:
Since Rogue Trader?
He's mixing them up with beastmen, IIRC. Which are a separate thing now.
Yes but it's not like they were that separate until now, you had all sorts of odd Beast + Human races within the beastmen types.
Even wunz fwom da futcha! [/end furry]
|
If you see slaanesh, just look away.
"I can't look away!!!"
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/10 20:32:47
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
People-always-find-something-wrong-hammer?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/10 20:33:02
Pretre: OOOOHHHHH snap. That's like driving away from hitting a pedestrian.
Pacific:First person to Photoshop a GW store into the streets of Kabul wins the thread.
Selym: "Be true to thyself, play Chaos" - Jesus, Daemon Prince of Cegorach.
H.B.M.C: You can't lobotomise someone twice. |
|
|
|
|
2012/07/10 20:36:24
Subject: Re:So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Twisted Trueborn with Blaster
|
BYOB.
Big YellOw Book
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/10 20:39:53
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
It's a little early to pidgeon hole 6th edition 40k, isn't it?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/10 20:40:00
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
 |
|
|
|
|
2012/07/10 20:45:07
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Crazed Spirit of the Defiler
|
kronk wrote:It's a little early to pidgeon hole 6th edition 40k, isn't it?
Why-are-people-questioning-the-supposedly-justified-6th-edition-complaints-hammer(?).
|
If you see slaanesh, just look away.
"I can't look away!!!"
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/10 20:46:30
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
It shall be iamtheemperorofmankindthatsitsonagianttoiletwatchingxenosheriticsanddaemonseatmyimperiumofmanhammer or bob
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/10 20:48:12
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/11 05:35:25
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
HIDING IN THE METAL BAWKSES!!
|
Fantasy IN SPACE! hammer
TEQhammer
WTBAAhammer
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/11 07:30:03
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Joined the Military for Authentic Experience
On an Express Elevator to Hell!!
|
JbR of the Endless Spire wrote:How about The-second-coming-of-second-edition-hammer?
I like this one..
Halfpast_Yellow wrote:Wardhammer
And this one!
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/11 12:24:40
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Crazed Spirit of the Defiler
|
Lol-wut-hammer.
|
If you see slaanesh, just look away.
"I can't look away!!!"
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/13 02:47:15
Subject: Re:So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Vaktathi wrote:Personally?
Warhammer 40,000 Michael Bay edition
"woah, that was some super cool flashy explody thing, what? why did it happen? who knows, I don't know why that tank fell apart under bolter fire either but it sure made those Space Marines look epic!"
This is the one if only we assume that in the supposed Bay movie chaos marines want nothing but to Look Out for their Sir when being shot at.
I mean, is he (Michael Bay) that stupid?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/13 02:48:54
From the initial Age of Sigmar news thread, when its "feature" list was first confirmed:
Kid_Kyoto wrote:
It's like a train wreck. But one made from two circus trains colliding.
A collosal, terrible, flaming, hysterical train wreck with burning clowns running around spraying it with seltzer bottles while ring masters cry out how everything is fine and we should all come in while the dancing elephants lurch around leaving trails of blood behind them.
How could I look away?
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/13 03:30:48
Subject: Re:So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Wardhammer is pretty good.
Gunhammer. To exalt the ascendency of the gunzors.
Or my personal favorite: *hammer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/13 05:17:10
Subject: Re:So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
I kind of like "Glancehammer".
|
       
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
|
|
|
2012/07/13 05:33:53
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Cold-Blooded Saurus Warrior
The Great White North
|
I kinda like BrokeHammer.
You can take it to mean broke as in game mechanics or simply broke as im money due to needing to spend tons on allies, 2nd FOC and flyers =]
|
 +  + = 
+ = Big Lame Mat Ward Lovefest  |
|
|
|
|
2012/07/13 05:41:43
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot
|
All-night-to-play-a-game-hammer
Good effing god the games take forever now. Premeasure makes me want to kill myself as my opponent takes 3 months to move his one GD M-effing unit.
|
Victory is not the most important outcome. Enjoyment and excitement is the best outcome, victory is sweeter when it was fun. |
|
|
|
|
2012/07/13 11:36:50
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard
|
THAT game. Played by THOSE people.
Said in the same tone I use for all of those CCGs and their players.
Not the hushed reverence I use for games I actually want to play.
|
I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.
That is not dead which can eternal lie ...
... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/15 02:49:06
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Ambitious Space Wolves Initiate
Some tyranid infested space hulk, shooting the crap out of some hormagaunts!
|
Frank!
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 07:33:49
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Blood-Drenched Death Company Marine
|
Flyhammer?
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 07:57:52
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
|
Orks-are-screwed-but-meganobz-are-now-worth-taking-hammer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 07:59:09
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Leaping Dog Warrior
|
Having-to-learn-new-rules-makes-me-angry hammer
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 08:35:58
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Defending Guardian Defender
|
Bikehammer, or at least I'm hoping it will.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 09:28:50
Subject: Re:So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Scuttling Genestealer
|
pk1 wrote:Torsoaril wrote:flamingwalnut wrote:Steve.
lmao this!!! seriously I vote for naming it Steve
I'll second that!
Third'd.
|
GENERATION 7: The first time you see this, copy and paste it into your sig and add 1 to the number after generation. Consider it a social experiment.
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 10:46:02
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
TEQhammer
Fasttankshammer
Allyhammer
|
Pretre: OOOOHHHHH snap. That's like driving away from hitting a pedestrian.
Pacific:First person to Photoshop a GW store into the streets of Kabul wins the thread.
Selym: "Be true to thyself, play Chaos" - Jesus, Daemon Prince of Cegorach.
H.B.M.C: You can't lobotomise someone twice. |
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 17:56:04
Subject: Re:So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Smokin' Skorcha Driver
Canada
|
I think Dakkahammer sounds about right.
|
tgjensen wrote:labmouse42 wrote:Another problem is the abject masculinity of the game. Nearly every character I've read about has the emotional range of a turnip. Hate, Anger, Fear, Loyalty, and Worship. That's about it.
Christ, where do you buy your turnips?
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 18:13:32
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
Somewhere dark, cold and scary (A.K.A my mind)
|
WAAAGGHHhammer
|
May your rolls be high and your victories countless 
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 18:53:17
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Battleship Captain
|
How on earth has noone come up with this? There's a box every other page for it.
"Narrative-hammer 40k"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 20:44:50
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Grey Knight Psionic Stormraven Pilot
|
Call it diexenoscumbecauseiamaspacemarinehammer
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012/07/27 21:00:41
Subject: So what are we calling this version of warhammer 40k?
|
|
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
*bursts though room with axe* HEEEAAARRRS JHONNY!!!
|
Ok so what can I remember what people have said and what to think of...
MAHRINEZZZZHAMMER!!!
Warmahammer
Wardhammer
Although I love Bayhammer that has been said...That one makes sense and is catchy 
|
 Night Lords (40k): 3500pts
 Klan Zaw Klan: 4000pts
Whatever you use.. It's Cheesy, broken and OP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angels of Excess Slaanesh PLOG 