Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Yes, athletic women are sexier than either.

I prefer the weightlifter. She has the ass, and the ass always wins.

Fancying chicks with six-packs is as gay as Christmas Day. Also, I'd be interested to find out how many virgins there are in this thread.

Albatross wrote:
Fancying chicks with six-packs is as gay as Christmas Day.

What exactly does this mean? Sometimes it's hard to decipher your guys' Britspeak.

It means he's misogynistic. Let's talk about something else, like pretty girls in underwear or athletes or something.

I think the pole vaulters in that post were pretty attractive, myself. The weightlifter less so, the hair bothers me.

I wonder if Kanluwen has found the article on attractiveness of men yet.

While I have not read all the posts here, I have never seen anyone in other forums on this thread post it. Notice how all the models on the top pic are the same height give or take about a half an inch?

I prefer variety in my life, so the Dove Girls anyday over the Victoria Girls.

Can't say I like all the ones in the bottom picture, but that's better than the twig women of the top one.

Then again, there needs to be a third picture of anime girls. Yes... Yes... then this poll would be much more accurate.

Melissia wrote:It means he's misogynistic. Let's talk about something else, like pretty girls in underwear or athletes or something.

I think the pole vaulters in that post were pretty attractive, myself. The weightlifter less so, the hair bothers me.

Indeed, that hair is just sickening.

I wonder if Kanluwen has found the article on attractiveness of men yet.

No, and I've stopped looking.

My Google history has become far, far, far too disturbing just looking for one.

I like her hair, it's cute...

I pick option 4. The Weightlifter.

Now if I have to pick between picture one and two, one. While there are only two-three girls in picture 2 I do not like (Not a fan of Tattoos on anyone. Piercings are ok. No tats.), I find the girls in picture one more attractive.

I have a thing for girls with short hair so it's the weightlifter for me.

The middle athlete is the one for me. Phwoar.

Pole vaulter from this page, hard choice on the first one. I have someone I think will be an all around favourite in terms of sporty girls. Shes an Australian hurdler. Here is a picture and heres a video of her warm up dance http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3SLvZ2AVL0

I would venture to say that 100 years ago those girls in the VS ad would not be considered all that skinny. America has gotten so out of shape that what the average human looks like is been distorted. 164lbs or whatever the average just got raised to is not a healthy weight. I'm sorry but when 25% of America falls in the obese category, thats not a fault of the BMI. Thats too much protein, too much fat, and too little exercise.

That being said, 100 years ago the thicker girls would probably have been more attractive. But thats because food was scarcer.

Skinny women FTW.

Corpsesarefun wrote:I have a thing for girls with short hair so it's the weightlifter for me.

I think short hair works better with darker hair, myself. A boy-cut blonde hair doesn't really look good on either guys OR girls... but then again, I cordially dislike blonde hair to begin with.

*saves picture of powerlifter*

anyone got her name?...for educational purposes.

Blonde hair isn't that bad

It's a step above orange hair.

But just a step.

on a side note, a warning:

do not do a google search for "sexy powerlifter"

*washes eyes out*

Too many muscular women in this thread.

Here's a picture of Christina Hendricks

DutchKillsRambo wrote:I would venture to say that 100 years ago those girls in the VS ad would not be considered all that skinny.

And you would be wrong. The second picture would be closer to the idea of beauty in the days of yore.

Need some cushion for the pushin.

I vote for Stacey Dash
Makes every other woman look like a Walrus.

Ahtman wrote:So we have supermodel thin and normal to plus size to choose from, but what about athletic? Won't someone think of the athletic women?

For some reason butch chicks and girls without curves don't do it for me.

Melissia wrote:It's a step above orange hair.

But just a step.

No Hayley Williams love?




Automatically Appended Next Post:

Melissia wrote:]Wait, how are they plus sized?

They look normal and healthy...

Plus sized doesn't necessarily mean fat.

Robyn Lawley is 6'2, 36D-32-42, and I would guess 160-170. That's squarely in plus-size territory.

Ahtman wrote:

DutchKillsRambo wrote:I would venture to say that 100 years ago those girls in the VS ad would not be considered all that skinny.

And you would be wrong. The second picture would be closer to the idea of beauty in the days of yore.


Hence why I said this if you would have bothered to read. Dunno how to quote well.




That being said, 100 years ago the thicker girls would probably have been more attractive.

Spoiler:

You said those [VS girls] wouldn't be considered skinny, and the problem with that is that would have been considered skinny.

Eh. I like slim girls. Sue me.

Fafnir wrote:Eh. I like slim girls. Sue me.

There is nothing wrong with that, why should we turn this over to lawyers?

I guess I never really answered the question. I don't prefer either because I prefer women in general. No one in either picture is sickly skinny (though maybe pushing it a bit) or horribly overweight. I, like Benjamin Franklin, like women in general. Curvy, skinny, athletic, Asian, Latino, Black, White, ect ect. If I had to pic, I would choose the bottom picture because there are more women in it.

I like slim girls too, but many high fashion models in fact look like aliens. That's the only reason there is debate, because you are looking at the extremes of the spectrum.

If you put Jessica Alba, Kate Beckinsdale, Kim Kardashian, Brooklyn Decker, Kate Upton and Sofia Vergara up against the Dove ladies, no one would be like " No thanks, I'll take the bushpigs."

Albatross wrote:I prefer the weightlifter. She has the ass, and the ass always wins.

Tits & asses are nice, but it's hips and legs that make a real beauty (well, lips and eyes too... Hot-bod/fugly faces are such sad things)

Fancying chicks with six-packs is as gay as Christmas Day.

Never had a sporty chick burst in screams after a good 30 minutes of going downtown? That's what the 6-pack is all about.

Also, I'd be interested to find out how many virgins there are in this thread.

Probably less than commonly assumed. Most wargamers I know are in their late 20s and have outgrown the 'akward' phase...