Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 10:53:58
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
@Bodazoka: Not with pages that small, no.
The samples of art work are nice, though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 11:12:13
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord
Inside Yvraine
|
The Farsight Enclaves is the gold standard for digital releases, imo.
Granted, its gameplay mechanics didn't help the meta at all- made it worse in fact- but the amount of actual content in the book is very decent. 100+ pages of fluff, with numerous short-stories and blurbs that flesh out the Tau, good artwork, and some solid (if not overpowered) game mechanics to supplement the army.
Not every release can have that much content if GW really wants to have a weekly release schedule, but one can dream that every army would get at least one digital release that match's the FE's value.
Instead, some get stuck with half-assed 10 page "data-slates"... ah well.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 12:13:12
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
To a point. If it's 91 pages of fluff and then 3 pages of rules, I'd rather have the 3 pages of rules in the damn Codex and if I want the fluff later I'll get it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 12:25:24
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Ambitious Acothyst With Agonizer
|
The lictors have preferred enemy (characters and independent characters).
|
I'm currently taking commissions.
Phil's Minis.
Contact me at my site.
Phil's Minis
Use coupon code NWSTRT5 for 5% off EVERYTHING! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 13:29:35
Subject: Re:THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
UK
|
Azazelx wrote: With this being released in the same month as the Codex, it seems much more like content that was removed from the codex in order to sell as DLC.
Ah, this old chestnut. Gets discussed in video gaming circles a lot. The short version of that debate is that it's just as likely that the book has been finished for a long time and this is more stuff they thought up since they finished it than that they deliberately hamstrung a flagship product so they could parcel up the removed content as extra premium micro-content. You aren't likely to find out the truth of it and either scenario is equally plausible.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/01/18 13:30:14
Dead account, no takesy-backsies |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 13:37:35
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Grizzled Space Wolves Great Wolf
|
bodazoka wrote:so its more like a mini imperial armour detailing probably the most well known Tyranid invasions?
91 - 113 pages!! surely that discounts some of the neg?
I pre ordered cant wait!!
113 tiny little e-reader pages. I bought the digital Tyranid codex because it was cheap... that was a bit of a mistake. The formatting is terrible. But yeah, the digital codex is 368 pages compared to the printed codex which is 104.
So 91-113 pages is more like 26 to 32 pages. And I assume a lot of those pages are copy/paste of previous materials and pictures freely available online.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/01/18 13:40:08
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 13:39:12
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Sheffield, City of University and Northern-ness
|
The thing is, if it's like the other dataslates then it's stuff that hasn't previously been in codices (not as in units/characters, but as in codices have never had formations or similar in them), so it would have been weird if they were in the codex in the first place.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 13:39:34
Subject: Re:THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Grizzled Space Wolves Great Wolf
|
Bull0 wrote: Azazelx wrote:
With this being released in the same month as the Codex, it seems much more like content that was removed from the codex in order to sell as DLC.
Ah, this old chestnut. Gets discussed in video gaming circles a lot. The short version of that debate is that it's just as likely that the book has been finished for a long time and this is more stuff they thought up since they finished it than that they deliberately hamstrung a flagship product so they could parcel up the removed content as extra premium micro-content. You aren't likely to find out the truth of it and either scenario is equally plausible.
I think based on past experience with GW, most people are going to assume either malice or incompetence rather than them being thoughtful by coming up with extra content above and beyond the codex. With the way GW roll these days, I'm really not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt so much anymore.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 14:10:55
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
UK
|
I wouldn't call it "thoughtful" or "above and beyond the codex" given that they're charging for it, but otherwise, yeah, I do understand the negativity.
|
Dead account, no takesy-backsies |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 14:21:39
Subject: Re:THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord
Inside Yvraine
|
Bull0 wrote: Azazelx wrote: With this being released in the same month as the Codex, it seems much more like content that was removed from the codex in order to sell as DLC.
Ah, this old chestnut. Gets discussed in video gaming circles a lot. The short version of that debate is that it's just as likely that the book has been finished for a long time and this is more stuff they thought up since they finished it than that they deliberately hamstrung a flagship product so they could parcel up the removed content as extra premium micro-content. You aren't likely to find out the truth of it and either scenario is equally plausible. Well, the rumors are that certain units that were in the 5E codex but not in the 6th edition codex (like Ymgarl genestealers) will be making an appearence in at least one of the dataslates. If those rumors are true (and, to be fair, there is every chance they may not be), then there's no way your theory holds up. GW couldn't have just "not thought" to put the Doom, or spores, or Ymgarls or the Parasite into the new 'dex... because they already exist. The only possible reason for them to not be in the 6E Tyranids is because GW made a conscious decision to not include them. Regarding video games, there's nothing to debate really. It's not a "myth" that publishers go into completed games and cherry-pick content to be taken out and sold later as DLC. The practice has been straight-up confirmed in articles and interviews by not just developers, but even the publishers themselves. It is a very real thing.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/01/18 14:23:14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 14:49:01
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
UK
|
Yeah, some publishers do it, for sure, I didn't mean to suggest that they don't, but that doesn't mean that they all do. So "there's nothing to debate" is totally wrong. You're probably right when you talk about it in terms of those specifics, things that were removed from the 5E codex that are rumoured to be coming back as dataslates. I'm not a nid player so I don't know the details. It's very sad if true. But "given that it's been released in the same month, it's more likely they took stuff out of the book to sell later" was the line I didn't like, and still don't.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/01/18 14:50:59
Dead account, no takesy-backsies |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 15:18:54
Subject: Re:THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 15:27:20
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
UK
|
It's conditionally true. Do I need to repeat that bit
|
Dead account, no takesy-backsies |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 15:31:55
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
airmang wrote:The lictors have preferred enemy (characters and independent characters).
Wait, just in the Dataslate? Is this a guess or did I miss something?
And that's why most events won't allow Dataslates... keeping track of what units were included that way, and thus have Tank Hunter / Preferred Enemy / etc, would simply be a nightmare from a rules perspective.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 15:45:15
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
Update from their digital page:
Argos Rex As a proud owner of the new tyranid dex (one of the few, apparently) I have to ask; Will i somehow be able to include multiple dataslates in my list, since we get no allies?
Like · Reply · 2 · 13 minutes ago
Games Workshop: Digital Editions Hey Argos,
You sure will, and by the time the third Dataslate comes out, Tyranids will have more datasheet formations to choose from than all other armies combined!
Bull0 wrote:It's conditionally true. Do I need to repeat that bit
You doubtless will!
Personally, I'm only 50 per cent cynical about GW, so I was fairly relaxed about the dataslates; I doubt this specific release will be a massive profits centre for them, what they're doing is using us as a kind of testbed for launching dataslates in parallel with codexes, something that will give more choice and customisation - and in time, as the market gets bigger, definitely make them lots more £££. However, when I saw the price - £8.99 for the eBook, so I guess £9.99 for the iBooks version, I became 75% cynical. This is definitely the time to start looking out discount iTunes vouchers.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/01/18 15:53:11
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 16:00:13
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
CthuluIsSpy wrote:
Heh, called it.
This is exactly a Kirby/ Upper Management thing to do.
Drop the thing that everyone likes from the main dex, have them pay extra to use it again through DLC.
Dito. This is a good move for the company. Sucks for us customers especially Nids, Orks, IG, DE, SW, BA, GK etc)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/01/18 16:01:46
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 16:20:53
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
This is the thing: People need to realize that releasing this DLC that may be necessary for the army to function/be playable is nothing more than a functional increase in the price of the army book/codex. It is disguised as "DLC", but in essence it's just a price increase for content that, in previous editions, would have been available in the main codex.
People may respond (along with GW) that players are getting "enhanced experience" by purchasing DLC, and that might be true if people are getting additional units above and beyond what they would have gotten in previous editions if they bought the stand-alone codex. However (I am not a nid player, so take this with a grain of salt), it seems like GW purposefully removed content that in previous editions was available (important to note, as people would have models for those units standing around doing nothing), as well as kind of neutering the power of existing units in the new codex such that if nid players want a reasonably competitive army, they will need to buy the DLC. So, for the same price as previous edition army codexes, players get a reduced experience that can be put up to par with previous editions through the purchase of DLC.
In essence, it's just a price increase of the codex, so people should look at it like that. People's objections to the DLC seem to be that it's a "Sneaky" way to increase the price for a product that have bought in the past. And it is. But fundamentally this is just a price increase.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 16:21:46
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Brainy Zoanthrope
|
Is there any way to view these data slates with a computer? I don't have an e-reader, and an I-pod is the only I-anything I own.
|
8000pts.
7000pts.
5000pts.
on the way. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 16:22:31
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
BallinWitStalin wrote:This is the thing: People need to realize that releasing this DLC that may be necessary for the army to function/be playable is nothing more than a functional increase in the price of the army book/codex. It is disguised as "DLC", but in essence it's just a price increase for content that, in previous editions, would have been available in the main codex.
The army is playable. Right now it is nothing more than assumption that this is cut material and/or that it will make the Tyranids more powerful.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 16:31:24
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
ChainswordHeretic wrote:Is there any way to view these data slates with a computer? I don't have an e-reader, and an I-pod is the only I-anything I own.
You can buy the .mobi version and read it with Kindle's eReader program (which is free). One warning, having compared the two? The non iPad version of these books gets about 10 seconds of attention. I say this as a non i-anything owner. I could make a better looking set of files in paint or HTML 2.0.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 16:37:45
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
streamdragon wrote: ChainswordHeretic wrote:Is there any way to view these data slates with a computer? I don't have an e-reader, and an I-pod is the only I-anything I own.
You can buy the .mobi version and read it with Kindle's eReader program (which is free). One warning, having compared the two? The non iPad version of these books gets about 10 seconds of attention. I say this as a non i-anything owner. I could make a better looking set of files in paint or HTML 2.0.
There's also a free epud reader that firefox has. And I agree, the non-apple versions are pathetic.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 17:49:25
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Ambitious Acothyst With Agonizer
|
RiTides wrote: airmang wrote:The lictors have preferred enemy (characters and independent characters).
Wait, just in the Dataslate? Is this a guess or did I miss something?
And that's why most events won't allow Dataslates... keeping track of what units were included that way, and thus have Tank Hunter / Preferred Enemy / etc, would simply be a nightmare from a rules perspective.
You can see it as one of the rules on the iBooks version. They also have an "paranoia and ill-disciplined" rule.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/01/18 17:50:40
I'm currently taking commissions.
Phil's Minis.
Contact me at my site.
Phil's Minis
Use coupon code NWSTRT5 for 5% off EVERYTHING! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 17:52:02
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Is that from the Tyranid codex?
|
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-C.S. Lewis |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 17:54:15
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Ambitious Acothyst With Agonizer
|
No it's a special rule in the formation.
Edit: sorry I updated the post to the correct wording of the rule.
Also, the 5 Lictor broods have to be broods of one.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/01/18 17:55:26
I'm currently taking commissions.
Phil's Minis.
Contact me at my site.
Phil's Minis
Use coupon code NWSTRT5 for 5% off EVERYTHING! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/18 20:59:25
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
And I thought you were talking about GW HQ in Nottingham
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/19 01:24:23
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
In case any'a y'all were having great problems defeating the excellent and game-breakingly powerful new Tyranid Codex, GW just put up some handy suggestions on how to further punish the game's current best army.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/19 01:37:44
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Boosting Space Marine Biker
|
I don't think a picture and a paragraph constitutes a 'page' really. If you're thinking of it in proper pages as a book (such as a codex), it's more like 30. Regardless, this is something that should have really been part of a larger supplement or the codex itself, in my humble opinion.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/19 02:52:57
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Long-Range Land Speeder Pilot
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:In case any'a y'all were having great problems defeating the excellent and game-breakingly powerful new Tyranid Codex, GW just put up some handy suggestions on how to further punish the game's current best army.
What about an assault cannon/heavy flamer dreadnought?
|
Space Marines, Orks, Imperial Guard, Chaos, Tau, Necrons, Germans (LW), Protectorate of Menoth
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/19 03:04:13
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Ambitious Acothyst With Agonizer
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:In case any'a y'all were having great problems defeating the excellent and game-breakingly powerful new Tyranid Codex, GW just put up some handy suggestions on how to further punish the game's current best army.
LMFAO! So basically models in other armies are capable of killing Tyranids. I would've never thought of that.
|
I'm currently taking commissions.
Phil's Minis.
Contact me at my site.
Phil's Minis
Use coupon code NWSTRT5 for 5% off EVERYTHING! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/19 03:49:53
Subject: THREE Tyranid dataslates confirmed
|
 |
Huge Bone Giant
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:In case any'a y'all were having great problems defeating the excellent and game-breakingly powerful new Tyranid Codex, GW just put up some handy suggestions on how to further punish the game's current best army.
I may be mis-reading again, but this sort of thing does happen with every release right?
|
"It is not the bullet with your name on it that should worry you, it's the one labeled "To whom it may concern. . ."
DQ:70S++G+++MB+I+Pwhfb06+D++A+++/aWD-R++++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
|