Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Another vote for B. Really like how they look.

Tried to pull up the rules at mechafront.com, but the version 1.7 link is not working . Also are there tokens for this game? Because I think RItides needs some more ideas for tokens for his MODcubes.

B looks better. I would imagine energy weapons with a higher heat signature would come close to reaching the structural failing point of the material used in the weapon so additional cooling makes sense in the way of heat sinks. At least that's what I'm telling myself the extra greebles are

There are lots of reasons why you wouldn't necessarily want to scale things up directly. The square-cube law is probably the best, and would require all sorts of additional detail (surface area) to achieve the same effects. So, B is the best because of science and stuff.

 paulson games wrote:
Bob thank you for those scale pics People have asked how they scale vs a bunch of different lines and I don't have much in the way of minis outside of GW and battletech if anyone can do a shot of them vs the current heavy gear models it'd be appreciated.

I don't have any Heavy Gear, but I do have some Dropzone Commander and Robotech Tactics, as well as a lot of other stuff, so if you would like scale pics with another range, please let me know.

I fixed the broken links, files should download correctly now.

No specific tokens for the game unless you want to mark damage related penalties or edge.

 paulson games wrote:
I fixed the broken links, files should download correctly now.

No specific tokens for the game unless you want to mark damage related penalties or edge.

Thanks ,

Also not sure if I like "B" more because of the detail on the gun or because of the lack of details on the model. The renders are at two different stages and I think that might be throwing some of the appeal towards or away from it. The "b" is missing details like the cockpit and leg details that might alter final decisions.

Hope that makes sense.