Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2022/05/27 07:12:56
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Master Engineer with a Brace of Pistols
|
Which is why i love playing hells horse,
"The Clan lives by the motto that "man comes before machine," a philosophy which values the individual soldier over whichever tool of warfare he uses."-Sarna
|
GAMES-DUST1947/infinity/B5 wars/epic 40K/5th ed 40K/victory at sea/warmachine/battle tactics/monpoc/battletech/battlefleet gothic/castles in the sky,/heavy gear |
|
|
|
2022/05/27 14:29:38
Subject: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
chaos0xomega wrote:It just says pairs from what I see, I don't see where it says "two pairs of two" - that was a question asked by one of the posters but the response was just "they will be in pairs" which could mean 1 pair, 2 pairs, 4 pairs, whatever.
In any case, inner sphere lance boxes are fairly small, and based on the size of the vee prototypes if its two pairs in a box then it should fill out the box nicely.
The 'how many pairs in a force pack' would be covered in the 'Can't say anything more at this point' statement from Adrian Gideon. If they're not sold in multiple pairs you'd have the price of a pair of 20-ton Skulkers being the same as a pair of 80-ton Demolishers and that's unrealistic IMHO.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/05/27 14:30:33
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/05/27 15:26:28
Subject: Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Building some Outland Models to create a cityscape for BattleTech:
|
|
|
|
|
2022/05/27 15:46:44
Subject: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Ragin' Ork Dreadnought
Monarchy of TBD
|
Ghaz wrote:chaos0xomega wrote:It just says pairs from what I see, I don't see where it says "two pairs of two" - that was a question asked by one of the posters but the response was just "they will be in pairs" which could mean 1 pair, 2 pairs, 4 pairs, whatever.
In any case, inner sphere lance boxes are fairly small, and based on the size of the vee prototypes if its two pairs in a box then it should fill out the box nicely.
The 'how many pairs in a force pack' would be covered in the 'Can't say anything more at this point' statement from Adrian Gideon. If they're not sold in multiple pairs you'd have the price of a pair of 20-ton Skulkers being the same as a pair of 80-ton Demolishers and that's unrealistic IMHO.
I'm not really certain about that- think of the Inner Sphere Striker Lance- 3 lights and a medium.
It's the same price as the Inner Sphere Direct Fire Lance- which is 2 Assaults and 2 Heavies.
I don't think they're likely to try to balance it out by weight or combat power, going by the existing Force packs.
|
Klawz-Ramming is a subset of citrus fruit?
Gwar- "And everyone wants a bigger Spleen!"
Mercurial wrote:
I admire your aplomb and instate you as Baron of the Seas and Lord Marshall of Privateers.
Orkeosaurus wrote:Star Trek also said we'd have X-Wings by now. We all see how that prediction turned out.
Orkeosaurus, on homophobia, the nature of homosexuality, and the greatness of George Takei.
English doesn't borrow from other languages. It follows them down dark alleyways and mugs them for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|
2022/05/27 15:51:50
Subject: Re: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
3D render of the Firefly, prototype was seen in the KerenskyCon pics...
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/05/30 01:03:46
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
so apparently the "no torso twist" quirk is getting removed with the next BMM update
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
|
2022/05/30 01:09:31
Subject: Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Why would they remove that?
|
|
|
|
|
2022/05/30 01:12:53
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Master Engineer with a Brace of Pistols
|
So things didn't go quite as planned.
i got the water table set up. but both the opposing players forgot to choose and or print out the sheets for their capture transports.
So we went ahead with some quick replacements.
This was not designed to be an easy mission, each side brought 1 transport to try and board and capture the primary boat in 8 turns. they were also fighting each other.
Funny enough both sides blew their MASC rolls on a mech and took out hip actuators.
the comstar side had a hovercraft but it died to a motive crit from the other sides WIGE so it became a race to disable the WIGE
On the final turn the WIGE attempted a boarding action and failed by 2. leaving the objective boat alive and running.
The table-
Some of the battle-
|
GAMES-DUST1947/infinity/B5 wars/epic 40K/5th ed 40K/victory at sea/warmachine/battle tactics/monpoc/battletech/battlefleet gothic/castles in the sky,/heavy gear |
|
|
|
2022/05/30 01:44:26
Subject: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Because as the 'mechs get new artwork, the 'mechs which previously didn't have a torso are being given one (e.g., the Nova found in the Clan Invasion box now has a torso)
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/05/30 03:07:23
Subject: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Second Story Man
|
Ghaz wrote:
Because as the 'mechs get new artwork, the 'mechs which previously didn't have a torso are being given one (e.g., the Nova found in the Clan Invasion box now has a torso)
The Thug, too, I noticed. The model even has the torso slightly twisted.
I wonder if they'll get rid of it for the Black Hawk-KU...
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
|
|
2022/05/30 05:46:00
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Per Xotl on the Battletech forums, the trait is being outright removed from the BMM.
presumably as the art is updated mechs with NTT will be addressed. with what we know is in the new KS, I think the number of mechs without torso twisting art is going to be umm.. the artic fox (based off the Uller)a and the falconer
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
|
2022/05/30 14:41:51
Subject: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Charistoph wrote: Ghaz wrote:
Because as the 'mechs get new artwork, the 'mechs which previously didn't have a torso are being given one (e.g., the Nova found in the Clan Invasion box now has a torso)
The Thug, too, I noticed. The model even has the torso slightly twisted.
I wonder if they'll get rid of it for the Black Hawk-KU...
Probably, but since there's no Inner Sphere OmniMechs in the Kickstarter it won't be for a while.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/05/31 02:12:28
Subject: Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Real shame that. Some plastic 1st Generation Omnis (Sunder!) would'a been great.
|
|
|
|
|
2022/05/31 13:39:36
Subject: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Group shot of all of the upcoming 'mech variants and reposes. Definitely looking forward to the CPLT-K2 Catapult for my Crater Cobras
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/05/31 17:17:46
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Yu Jing Martial Arts Ninja
North Wales
|
I think that I might be ill or something...
I scrutinized that lineup and thought "You know what? I think that I have enough Mechs".
I'm sure that it'll pass, or I could get some medication for the condition, I suppose.
|
|
|
|
2022/05/31 17:30:04
Subject: Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Shadowy Grot Kommittee Memba
The Great State of New Jersey
|
Its probably because they are all variants or reposes - those don't trigger new shiny syndrome the same way that 100% new sculpts do.
|
|
|
|
|
2022/05/31 18:14:35
Subject: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Here's the breakdown on the minis shown:
Fire Moth D
Locust LCT-3M
Wasp WSP-3W
Blackjack BJ-3
Hatchetman HCT-6D
Enforcer ENF-5D
Griffin GRF-3M
Catapult CPLT-K2K
Thunderbolt TDR-5SE
Crusader CRD-5M
Archer ARC-5R
Grasshopper GHR-5J
Warhammer WHM-7S
Gargoyle C
Warhawk C
Cyclops CP-11-A
Shadow Hawk SHD-7H
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/05/31 18:21:36
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/05/31 23:16:26
Subject: Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Well I've got 7 Catapults already, two of which are K2s. Why not make it an even 8.
|
|
|
|
|
2022/06/01 00:24:11
Subject: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
I'm really glad that I decided to focus on my Diamond Shark trinary (and Snow Raven, Wolf and Jade Falcon stars) this year and left my Crater Cobras for next year as I would have been waiting for so many miniatures from the Mercenaries Kickstarter for them.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/06/01 01:54:21
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Second Story Man
|
Chillreaper wrote:I think that I might be ill or something...
I scrutinized that lineup and thought "You know what? I think that I have enough Mechs".
I'm sure that it'll pass, or I could get some medication for the condition, I suppose.
I kind of understand that, there are only two there I don't already have a variant of, and only the Highlander is one I actually miss. The Gargoyle has never really be one I liked.
That being said, as a Thunderbolt fan, I have a desire to have my hands on that Eridani model. I just wonder if I can get my hands on a Götterdämmerung before that boxset comes out.
BrianDavion wrote:Per Xotl on the Battletech forums, the trait is being outright removed from the BMM.
presumably as the art is updated mechs with NTT will be addressed. with what we know is in the new KS, I think the number of mechs without torso twisting art is going to be umm.. the artic fox (based off the Uller)a and the falconer
Do you have a link for that, or at least which post that was in?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/06/01 02:04:34
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
|
|
2022/06/01 05:21:48
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Charistoph wrote:Chillreaper wrote:I think that I might be ill or something...
I scrutinized that lineup and thought "You know what? I think that I have enough Mechs".
I'm sure that it'll pass, or I could get some medication for the condition, I suppose.
I kind of understand that, there are only two there I don't already have a variant of, and only the Highlander is one I actually miss. The Gargoyle has never really be one I liked.
That being said, as a Thunderbolt fan, I have a desire to have my hands on that Eridani model. I just wonder if I can get my hands on a Götterdämmerung before that boxset comes out.
BrianDavion wrote:Per Xotl on the Battletech forums, the trait is being outright removed from the BMM.
presumably as the art is updated mechs with NTT will be addressed. with what we know is in the new KS, I think the number of mechs without torso twisting art is going to be umm.. the artic fox (based off the Uller)a and the falconer
Do you have a link for that, or at least which post that was in?
https://bg.battletech.com/forums/rules-questions/why-does-the-thug-have-the-no-torso-twist-design-quirk-when-the-tro-shows-it/msg1838381/#msg1838381
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
|
2022/06/01 18:52:01
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Second Story Man
|
Thank you, sir!
While our weekly group doesn't use Quirks, we do have a campaign I'm in that does. We have a Cicada 3C that will be most grateful when that goes on line.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
|
|
2022/06/01 19:09:03
Subject: BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Charistoph wrote:
Thank you, sir!
While our weekly group doesn't use Quirks, we do have a campaign I'm in that does. We have a Cicada 3C that will be most grateful when that goes on line.
Yep. The new Cicada will have a waist...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/06/01 19:10:01
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/06/02 05:38:30
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Charistoph wrote:
Thank you, sir!
While our weekly group doesn't use Quirks, we do have a campaign I'm in that does. We have a Cicada 3C that will be most grateful when that goes on line.
yeah it'll open up a bunch of mechs I'd otherwise not touch
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
|
2022/06/03 17:26:28
Subject: Re:BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Anthony Scroggins has posted a concept sketch for Inner Sphere Battle Armor on his Patreon. I'm not a patron so I can't say how it looks, but it does give us hope that it may show up in the Mercenaries Kickstarter (or in another Force Pack).
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/06/03 18:09:35
Subject: Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
[MOD]
Solahma
|
That would be a fantastic inclusion for the KS but I’d rather the focus stay in vees in the not-mech category.
|
|
|
|
|
2022/06/03 18:18:56
Subject: Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Second Story Man
|
Manchu wrote:That would be a fantastic inclusion for the KS but I’d rather the focus stay in vees in the not-mech category.
Yeah, but not everyone wants to use Elementals to represent their Inner Sphere Battle Armor.
Hopefully by the time they're ready to do Inner Sphere Omnimechs, they'll include the Inner Sphere Standard.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
|
|
2022/06/03 23:35:19
Subject: Re:BattleTech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Look what I found on the interwebz...
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2022/06/04 02:57:42
Subject: Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Guess IS Standard will be one of the "surprises" in the upcoming KS.
|
|
|
|
|
2022/06/04 05:33:41
Subject: Re:Classic Battletech Is Awesome: the Thread!
|
|
Master Engineer with a Brace of Pistols
|
nothing is stopping you from getting all the various BA from IWM. i have kanazuchis, raidens, toads, and gnomes.
|
GAMES-DUST1947/infinity/B5 wars/epic 40K/5th ed 40K/victory at sea/warmachine/battle tactics/monpoc/battletech/battlefleet gothic/castles in the sky,/heavy gear |
|
|
|
|