Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 02:23:34
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Confirmed by GW Digital Exclusive
|
 |
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
Azazelx wrote:
I imagine with the new emphasis on smaller "DLC" type expansions - and with the amount of additional background and such fleshed out in the FFG RPG books, that Deathwatch could be their own standalone supplement, with tacticals, devastators, techmarines, psykers - the lot.
My friend and I debate this all the time, but I fully believe that deathwatch can be (almost) perfectly represented with the marine codex as-is. Sternguard or Vanguard are basically elite kill teams. Pedro makes Sternguard scoring and gives you preferred enemy (orks). You don't often hear about Deathwatch deploying in force, so pedro+sternguard+stormraven and a sniper scout squad gives a pretty good allied Deathwatch detachment for your Inquisition army. It's really not a bad stopgap.
But yeah I could see a Deathwatch supplement in the future. Preferred enemy (xenos), some good anti-monster Relics, scouts with battle brother stat-lines, and access to special issue ammo for all bolter weapons would do the trick in my opinion.
|
Battlefleet Gothic ships and markers at my store, GrimDarkBits:
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 05:12:05
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Confirmed by GW Digital Exclusive
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
pretre wrote:
Any computing device.
"personal computers, e-book readers, mobile phones, portable hard drives, USB flash drives, CDs or DVDs"
Not to drudge this back up but... Item 3 under the purchase agreement for C: AS lets you print a copy.
Edit: Nevermind, saw that this was resolved. Oops!
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/11/01 05:30:21
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 05:33:18
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
This smells like an update for the inquisition stuff that was in the 3rd edition witch hunters book. And another digital only release for the inquisition? This really screams to me that when the grey knights are up for release we might actually get print versions of this and the sisters of battle in the form of a combined inquisition codex. I'll sign for that. Maybe they can actually throw out those plastic sisters that have suppossedly been done for ages now for that codex release then. I mean there isnt much plastic that could go with a new GK codex unless we get a bunch of new units. but if sisters are in the new book that would make a lot of sense. And give a reason why a codex would be digital only... for now!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 07:17:38
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Confirmed by GW Digital Exclusive
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
Down Under
|
Azazelx wrote:I imagine with the new emphasis on smaller "DLC" type expansions - and with the amount of additional background and such fleshed out in the FFG RPG books, that Deathwatch could be their own standalone supplement, with tacticals, devastators, techmarines, psykers - the lot.
Oh, you mean C: SM?
It could happen as you say, but I will be incredibly saddened if there are no Sternguard style Marines occupying an Elite slot in the upcoming =][= codex.
|
Glory is fleeting. Obscurity is forever.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 07:22:55
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
So...any word on rumored rules yet?
I'm tentatively excited about this.
As a side note, how is this going to interact with the Grey Knights codex? Will you no longer be able to take the Inquisitors and their Retinues in there? Or are these going to just be DIFFERENT Inquisitors?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 08:28:50
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Grey Knight Purgator firing around corners
|
Jimsolo wrote:So...any word on rumored rules yet?
I'm tentatively excited about this.
As a side note, how is this going to interact with the Grey Knights codex? Will you no longer be able to take the Inquisitors and their Retinues in there? Or are these going to just be DIFFERENT Inquisitors?
According to replies by GW digital edition, Codex =][= will not affect Grey Knights, but it will "just" let us use Inquisition forces into any imperial army; and there will be no new models (yet?). So what I get is: GK codex stays the same, but you can use inquisitors and their forces, maybe reorganized, with IG, SM (any loyalist), AS... and still with GK themselves.
|
2270 (1725 painted)
1978 (180 painted)
329 (280ish)
705 (0)
193 (0)
165 (0)
:assassins: 855 (540) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 08:58:32
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Confirmed by GW Digital Exclusive
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Vain wrote: Azazelx wrote:I imagine with the new emphasis on smaller "DLC" type expansions - and with the amount of additional background and such fleshed out in the FFG RPG books, that Deathwatch could be their own standalone supplement, with tacticals, devastators, techmarines, psykers - the lot.
Oh, you mean C: SM?
It could happen as you say, but I will be incredibly saddened if there are no Sternguard style Marines occupying an Elite slot in the upcoming =][= codex.
Why, when for Deathwatch you just add the Inquisitor and some henchmen to a Marine army made up heavily of Sternguard. Deathwatch are primarily a variant chapter of marines, with additional wargear.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 09:10:33
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Confirmed by GW Digital Exclusive
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
Down Under
|
MajorWesJanson wrote:Why, when for Deathwatch you just add the Inquisitor and some henchmen to a Marine army made up heavily of Sternguard. Deathwatch are primarily a variant chapter of marines, with additional wargear.
So that you can run a Guard army with =][= support including said Deathwatch Marines?
|
Glory is fleeting. Obscurity is forever.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 15:07:27
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Bathing in elitist French expats fumes
|
Tried it in the past. Not as hot as it sounds on paper.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 15:46:48
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Confirmed by GW Digital Exclusive
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
Kerrathyr wrote:
According to replies by GW digital edition, Codex =][= will not affect Grey Knights, but it will "just" let us use Inquisition forces into any imperial army; and there will be no new models (yet?). So what I get is: GK codex stays the same, but you can use inquisitors and their forces, maybe reorganized, with IG, SM (any loyalist), AS... and still with GK themselves.
I'm looking forward to the next GK codex, as it is most likely that it will not include Inquisitors any longer. Not that I do not like having Inquisitors in the codex, but with an Inquisition supplement it stands as an opportunity to remove Inquisitors from the book and add more GK units in their place.
Jefffar wrote:
It does make me wonder what will happen with Wolves and Blood Angels. Will they turn be independant Imperium Codexes or are they joining the Black Templars as an add on to Space Marines. Right now I say they will stay Independant, but I could see GW making a mint off of having 1 SM codex and then a supplement aimed at each of the most famous chapters.
I'd venture to guess that SW and BA will continue on with stand-alone codexes, since they were not included in the new SM codex.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/01 15:49:02
DQ:70+S++G+M-B+I+Pw40k93+ID++A+/eWD156R++T(T)DM++
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 15:47:47
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
BA at least just got a digital update which supports that idea. Automatically Appended Next Post: I won't be surprised if SW get a digiupdate soon.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/01 15:48:10
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:16:14
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
pretre wrote:BA at least just got a digital update which supports that idea.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
I won't be surprised if SW get a digiupdate soon.
Did the BA actually get an 'update'? I was under the impression that it was just a digital version of the current dex with no amendments? I'm sure I read a comment somewhere on how it's the same as they didn't want to invalidate the existing dex (which is still widely available) - unlike the situation with Sister where it was impossible to get a dex officially ptior to the digital release. I don't really understand why they released the BA dex digitally if I'm honest.
D
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:17:58
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Supposedly, there are a couple rules changes. We have to wait for it to hit 'shelves' though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:18:11
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
So 6th edition has 2 product lines?
A general publications one, available everywhere and digital 'codices' and 'updates' to download for some?
We know of:
- Sisters of Battle, returned as digitial Adepta Sororita "Full" codex
- Inquisition may show up again as digi-dex.
- Blood Angels may gain an digital 'update'.
- none of those seem to have a model release alongside....
- Tyranids, IG, Orks have rumor threads and are unlikely to be limited to digital; I'd guess standard release plus Models.
- GW loves DLC now.
Maybe their aim has shifted? No more focusing on Minis? Make money from DLC and recycled material plus hobby content delivered by fans? Go for regions, like the video game industry did?
Would enjoy new products. But the rumor mill is filled with: "play our existinggames with our existing minis differently and pay for it" , "did we tell you about 3rd company of chapter xyz?", " buy the same content we gave you in the good old days in printed books, but this time piecemeal as DLC" etc etc...
Really Sad.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:21:15
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
Home Base: Prosper, TX (Dallas)
|
Codex BA isn't getting an update. All they are doing is putting in the current errata from their FAQ and/or the rulebook. It's the exact same codex otherwise. Just like all the other books they've released in Digital being the same as the released codex.
|
Best Painted (2015 Adepticon 40k Champs)
They Shall Know Fear - Adepticon 40k TT Champion (2012 & 2013) & 40k TT Best Sport (2014), 40k TT Best Tactician (2015 & 2016) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:22:33
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
1hadhq wrote:So 6th edition has 2 product lines?
A general publications one, available everywhere and digital 'codices' and 'updates' to download for some?
Available to everyone, just not in every language.
- Inquisition may show up again as digi-dex.
- Blood Angels may gain an digital 'update'.
These have both been confirmed.
Maybe their aim has shifted? No more focusing on Minis? Make money from DLC and recycled material plus hobby content delivered by fans? Go for regions, like the video game industry did?
Except they are still putting out tons of minis. They just figured out that they can release supplements as well and make money off them. In fact, they are putting out more minis than they did before, I would bet.
Would enjoy new products. But the rumor mill is filled with: "play our existinggames with our existing minis differently and pay for it" , "did we tell you about 3rd company of chapter xyz?", " buy the same content we gave you in the good old days in printed books, but this time piecemeal as DLC" etc etc...Really Sad.
Supplements are getting hardcopies. GW Digital said digidexes may get hardcopies if they sell well enough.
I think you just like saying DLC.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:39:24
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
So each Ordo is getting their own Warlord table.
|
BlaxicanX wrote:A young business man named Tom Kirby, who was a pupil of mine until he turned greedy, helped the capitalists hunt down and destroy the wargamers. He betrayed and murdered Games Workshop.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:40:41
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:41:33
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
Games Workshop: Digital Editions
Hey Everyone,
Thanks for helping us reach 6,000 likes today.
As a reward, we're going to let you see the names of the Warlord Traits from one of the three tables in Codex: Inquisition.
And you get to pick which one!
Which would you like to see guys?
Xenos, Hereticus or Malleus?
Comment below to let us know, and tomorrow, we'll post up the winning table.
- Eddie
|
BlaxicanX wrote:A young business man named Tom Kirby, who was a pupil of mine until he turned greedy, helped the capitalists hunt down and destroy the wargamers. He betrayed and murdered Games Workshop.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:42:11
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Cool, thanks!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:44:55
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
Man, I hope it's Hereticus!
D
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:45:17
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Go post!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:49:33
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
It would be good if there was a line in there about making Sternguard Troops to form a proper Deathwatch force.
3 Distinct Warlord tables is pretty cool.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 18:59:14
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
pretre wrote: 1hadhq wrote:So 6th edition has 2 product lines?
A general publications one, available everywhere and digital 'codices' and 'updates' to download for some?
Available to everyone, just not in every language.
Every where and every one is the same thing?
Am pretty sure you don't get digital publications in a brick and mortar store. Excludes the FLGS from these releases.
As I said, the product line is split.
Consider the fact they supply the Apoc material and BL in multiple languages.
Compare this to additional material like supplements and digi-dexes they limit to a single one and zero minis to support those releases.
I am still favoring the ancient method of nice new minis and books which I may fork over good money to whoever offers the best services.
If I wanted bits and bytes I'd buy computer games.
So back on Topic: when will they support any digitial release with minis?
Inquisitional Stormtroopers for example could have fit nicely... oh wait its not available in their stores and thus their employees can't offer those to us.
Too bad. No minis = no money.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 19:04:05
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
I did.
For Xenos.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 19:04:34
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
HERETIC! RADICAL! BLASPHEMER!
Xenos does kinda need some love though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 19:10:24
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
1hadhq wrote: pretre wrote: 1hadhq wrote:So 6th edition has 2 product lines?
A general publications one, available everywhere and digital 'codices' and 'updates' to download for some?
Available to everyone, just not in every language.
Every where and every one is the same thing?
Am pretty sure you don't get digital publications in a brick and mortar store. Excludes the FLGS from these releases.
As I said, the product line is split.
Consider the fact they supply the Apoc material and BL in multiple languages.
Compare this to additional material like supplements and digi-dexes they limit to a single one and zero minis to support those releases.
I am still favoring the ancient method of nice new minis and books which I may fork over good money to whoever offers the best services.
If I wanted bits and bytes I'd buy computer games.
So back on Topic: when will they support any digitial release with minis?
Inquisitional Stormtroopers for example could have fit nicely... oh wait its not available in their stores and thus their employees can't offer those to us.
Too bad. No minis = no money.
My FLGS has wifi so I can buy a digital codex while I'm there.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 19:11:47
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
pretre wrote:
HERETIC! RADICAL! BLASPHEMER!
Xenos does kinda need some love though.
Precisely why I chose to vote Xenos.
We never actually saw the book, so what better way to see this supplement's Warlord tables than with the Ordos that never saw anything?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 19:12:42
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
1hadhq wrote:Every where and every one is the same thing?
Am pretty sure you don't get digital publications in a brick and mortar store. Excludes the FLGS from these releases.
You also don't get the entire line of direct-only products at a FLGS. So I guess we have three product lines: Stuff available in FLGS, Direct-Only and Digital.
I am still favoring the ancient method of nice new minis and books which I may fork over good money to whoever offers the best services.
They still do that, or have you missed the army release a month schedule?
If I wanted bits and bytes I'd buy computer games.
So don't buy them. These are IN ADDITION to their existing lines. No sweat if you don't want it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/01 19:17:11
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 30/10/13: Codex cover art unveiled
|
 |
Bounding Ultramarine Assault Trooper
|
I love the Deathwatch, and have all of the FFG stuff...and I already have a Deathwatch army.
Use Codex: Blood Angels. Two Assault Squads as Troops. They are Kill-teams armed for assault. Two Sternguard Squads as Elites. They are normal Kill-teams. Librarian with Jump Pack as an HQ. Sanguinary Priest with Jump Pack for flavor.
Everyone is magnitized, so I can represent 12 different Chapters in every role.
I added two Razorbacks, and I have 1,000 points of Deathwatch.
It actually says in the fluff that a particular threat may require more than one Kill-team to deal with.
So, even though I WANT the Deathwatch to be in the new Codex, it is not impossible to represent them on the table. They do well, but MSU units can be destroyed if not played well...
|
I can still remember when a box of 30 Space Marines was $30.00. Now THAT'S old school! In fact, I started playing in the Rogue Trader days...yes, I am that old. Played Warhammer Fantasy for years before Rogue Trader even came out...
6,800 Pts. Ultramarines, 1,500 Pts. Deathwatch, 1,000 Pts. Black Templars, 1,000 Pts. Blood Ravens, 1,000 Pts. Emperors Children, 2,000 Pts. Word Bearers, 3,500 Pts. Eldar (Alaitoc or Biel-tan), 2,000 Pts. Tau, 2,000 Pts. Sisters of Battle, 999 Pts. of Thousand Sons, 1,000 Points Dark Eldar, 1,000 Points Adeptus Arbites, 1,000 Points Freebooters, 1,000 Points "Last Chancers", 1,000 Points Tyranids, 1,000 Points Necrons
2,500 Pts. Brotherhood, 2,000 Pts. Undead, 2,000 Pts. Sylvan Kin Elves, 2,000 Pts. Empire of Dust, 3,000 Pts. Orcs with Goblin Allies
5 Necromunda Gangs, 10 Mordheim Warbands, and 5 Frostgrave warbands |
|
 |
 |
|