Switch Theme:

Is another space marine codex REALLY neccesary  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets






Orstraylya

I mean, space marines are way to popular, what is good about them?
Hmmm... Let's see... The space marines in general have a codex, the dark angels have a codex, the black templars have a codex and now the space wolves are getting one.

But what is so good about them? They're not overly interesting to look at, don't have much in the way of humour or interesting weapons.

What do you lot think? Do I have a point?

 
   
Made in ca
Avatar of the Bloody-Handed God





Inactive

Boss 'eadbreaka wrote:What do you lot think? Do I have a point?


Yes and No.

Yes because i agree with you
No because there are people out there with different preference.

Paused
◙▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
           ◂◂  ►  ▐ ▌  ◼  ▸▸
          ʳʷ   ᵖˡᵃʸ  ᵖᵃᵘˢᵉ  ˢᵗᵒᵖ   ᶠᶠ 
   
Made in us
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch





Pat that askala, O-H-I hate this stupid state

As much as i dont care for SM the black templars are some bad mothers. Yes the general SM is blah but other chapters have good fluff and not as similar to other SM as you think. I just saw an entire BT army today and that makes me want to start them.

Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, its just a freight train coming your way!
Thousand Sons 10000
Grey knights 3000
Sisters of battle 3000
I have 29 sucessful trades where others recommend me.
Be sure to use the Reputable traders list when successfully completing a trade found here:
Dakka's Reputable Traders List 
   
Made in us
Power-Hungry Cultist of Tzeentch




Douglassville

I tend to agree. For the most part Space Marines are not interesting to me. Especially the Ultramarines. Tigarius is not has cool as Mephiston in my opinion. The "deviant" chapters have more flavor to them than the codex marines.

4500 pts
/ 3300 pts


 
   
Made in gb
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot






Worcester, UK

Answer is simple. Marines sell the best, therefore GW can make more money pushing Marines than any other army. So all other armies get put onto the back bench in favour of marines that give GW the most profit.

If Eldar was the best selling army then this thread would have been "Is another Eldar codex really neccesary?"


Automatically Appended Next Post:
GW wants to make money above all else, so its sales tactics reflect that over the needs of the hobbyist

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/15 01:48:57


 
   
Made in us
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps






I quite like the normal codex marines... which is why I made my chapter a successor to the Ultramarines.

the deviant chapters really do need their own codexes... otherwise we end up with a mess like the chaos codex. ugh.
   
Made in us
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch





Pat that askala, O-H-I hate this stupid state

Thank you Horst good point i am worshiping tzeentch right now for CHANGE!

Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, its just a freight train coming your way!
Thousand Sons 10000
Grey knights 3000
Sisters of battle 3000
I have 29 sucessful trades where others recommend me.
Be sure to use the Reputable traders list when successfully completing a trade found here:
Dakka's Reputable Traders List 
   
Made in gb
Screaming Banshee






Cardiff, United Kingdom

I play Marines because that was the army that got shoved in my face when I first walked into a GW 10 years ago

They are, after all, the most simplistic, all round army... ideal for winning any pre-pubsecent's affections!

   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






on board Terminus Est

I hope that each Chaos cult gets it's own codex.

G

ALL HAIL SANGUINIUS! No one can beat my Wu Tang style!

http://greenblowfly.blogspot.com <- My 40k Blog! BA Tactics & Strategies!
 
   
Made in gb
Plastictrees



UK

Green Blow Fly wrote: I hope that each Chaos cult gets it's own codex.

G


That would suck, they would do half of them then end up giving up.

One BIG book will be much better.

WARBOSS TZOO wrote:Grab your club, hit her over the head, and drag her back to your cave. The classics are classic for a reason.
 
   
Made in us
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch





Pat that askala, O-H-I hate this stupid state

Im trying greenblowfly dont rush they will screw it up if they rush.

Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, its just a freight train coming your way!
Thousand Sons 10000
Grey knights 3000
Sisters of battle 3000
I have 29 sucessful trades where others recommend me.
Be sure to use the Reputable traders list when successfully completing a trade found here:
Dakka's Reputable Traders List 
   
Made in us
Hoary Long Fang with Lascannon





Kalamazoo

The SW were one of the first SM armies to get their own codex, and then waited 10 years for another one. It is time for an update.

I think if GW could get some decent codexes out quicker there would be a lot less animus for MEQs. But really you should ask why UMs get a new codex or two every edition, while everyone else gets one at most. Is it too much to ask for each new edition to have a updated army list for each race in the back like 3rd? Or an online 'dex they can patch and play with until the official release?

   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Burtucky, Michigan

Personally Im not a fan of SM in general. BUT the simple fact that the SW have had a codex for as long as Ive been playing, yea they do need one. And yes, other wise it WOULD be like the current chaos dex, which is total GARBAGE
   
Made in au
Tunneling Trygon






With Space Marines, it is rather simple. They are the 40k signature in a sense, so GW expands them to get more money due to more choices. And as said before, they are practically thrown at your face the moment you walk into a store. Same thing happen with me in 2005, and I was lucky the new 'Nids had just been released or I might be worshiping a dead guy on a throne. Instead I worship something I have never or will see. Kinda like Christians... Sorry that was wrong.

But I think they are so popular because the new people see them as something easy to paint, paint up a lot, find the background info interesting and nevere, evere leave.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/16 10:38:04


 
   
Made in de
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator






Hamburg

I tend to agree what the OP said.
Those chapters gain great attentions when a new codex for them comes out.
But after a while, it appears that the interest in those special chapters shrinks, and players prefer the SM codex.

Former moderator 40kOnline

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a "" I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."

Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss 
   
Made in us
Hellish Haemonculus






Boskydell, IL

I think that the variant chapter codices are necessary. I think BT are as different from codex marines as Eldar are from, say, Dark Eldar.

Now, if there was a Codex for Imperial Fists, a Codex: Raven Guard, and a Codex: Salamanders, then I could see your point. But when the Chapter diverges significantly enough to have several different kinds of units, and a very different play style, then I can see the logic to giving them their own codex.

Welcome to the Freakshow!

(Leadership-shenanigans for Eldar of all types.) 
   
Made in au
Tunneling Trygon






Definatley, jimsolo is right. If there was one for individual chapters we would probably not like GW anymore. And again as he said, they deserve a personal codex if there are more diffences in forces besides background.
   
Made in au
Lethal Lhamean






Honestly I dont think'd id play this game without marines..

Low model count

Good support (ie good dexs)

Sorta human.

I like eldar but their cone heads perplex me.

I like orks but I like gorka morka ork models not the current ones.

I like ig but way too many models.

Nids/necrons have no personality.

Tau I use to play but just shooting gets boring.
   
Made in us
Foolproof Falcon Pilot





Somewhere in the unknown universe.

The codex wasn't necessary, but it made GW get boatloads of $$. It's the same reason DE and crons keep getting pushed back. They simply won't make as much $$.

Manchu wrote:
Agamemnon2 wrote:
Congratulations, that was the stupidest remark the entire wargaming community has managed to produce in a long, long time.


Congratulations, your dismissive and conclusory commentary has provided nothing to this discussion or the wider community on whose behalf you arrogantly presume to speak nor does it engage in any meaningful way the remark it lamely targets. But you did manage to gain experience points toward your next level of internet tough guy.
 
   
Made in us
Jovial Plaguebearer of Nurgle







It's a game, none of it is "necessary".

If it makes money to produce multiple beakie codices, that simply means there are a lot of people who want those codices.

Shouldn't GW be satisfying their customers?

MAKE OF THIS WHAT YOU WILL, FOR YOU WILL BE MINE IN THE END NO MATTER WHAT! 
   
Made in au
Lady of the Lake






Shaman wrote:I like eldar but their cone heads perplex me.


SM keep their lunch in their shoulders, Eldar keep it in their helmets.

   
Made in us
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle






Jacksonville, NC

I agree that SM didn't need another codex; Necrons and Dark Eldar do!

Check out my P&M Blog!
Check out my YouTube channel, Heretic Wargaming USA: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLiPUI3zwSxPiHzWjFQKcNA
Latest Tourney results:
1st Place Special Mission tourney 12/15/18 (Battlereps)
2nd Place ITC tourney 08/20/18 ( Battlerep)
3rd Place ITC Tourney 06/08/18(Battlereps
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Steelcity

Marines may not *need* another codex but there are far more Blood Angel and dark angel players than necrons or dark eldar

Those two chapters have been around since the beginning. Larger fan base + seniority and much more backstory = more deserving of a codex.

Now, if you lump all the SM chapters into the same army then I suppose the answer is no.. However, thats not the case. I do think they could do FASTER Sm books and not use up huge amounts of development time considering a lot of the units are the same

Its a sad that DE and necrons dont get new books.. Perhaps more people should play them and give GW a reason

----------------key point below-----------------------

Its not the codex that is the problem its GWs inane belief that they need new models to sell a codex.. Thus its the models that are the bottleneck not the writing. Gamers would buy the codexs and then would also buy the models when they come out. All GW gains by forcing us to wait for models is to piss off their players

Jervis: "Hey Dark eldar players.. I know youve been waiting for a new codex since 4th edition. Dont worry we are working on it but we did an internal poll and the results CLEARLY stated that you players dont WANT a new codex until we have models! Because we know as gamers you dont want to use your old models with new rules that make your army playable .. you ONLY want NEW models with NEW rules. BRILLIANT"
Dark Eldar players: "?????????"

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2009/09/17 17:43:42


Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500,  
   
Made in us
Hellish Haemonculus






Boskydell, IL

I am not saying that other armies don't need Codices. They do. Necrons, Dark Eldar, Daemonhunters, all need updated codices. (Blood Angels? Maybe them too...and Witch Hunters)

Pretty much the only 'dex I dont support is Tyranids. Really, I would be tickled pink if they stopped making Tyranid codices. And models too, for that matter. And started recalling existing models. And removing them from the next edition entirely would be phenomenal...

Welcome to the Freakshow!

(Leadership-shenanigans for Eldar of all types.) 
   
Made in us
Rampaging Chaos Russ Driver





they didnt need another damn marine codex. There are plenty of armies that needed the update more


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBeivizzsPc 
   
Made in us
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge





Boston, MA

I'll just copypasta my usual response to this all-too-common question:

Marines are the face of 40k. There needs to be a consistent, appealing, distinctive, yet still familiar image to associate with the product. Marines supply this. Personally, I would love to see more love for Xenos, and I think there's been a great success with the Orks as of late. However, GW needs to keep making money to survive.

So xenos players, just remember that those Marines are paying for your alien filth to be developed

Check out my Youtube channel!
 
   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

Well get used to it. We've still got three to go in this cycle:

Blood Angels
Black Templars
Grey Knights

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in au
Revving Ravenwing Biker






Sydney, Australia

I will also copypasta Brother SRM's usual response,

"Marines are the face of 40k. There needs to be a consistent, appealing, distinctive, yet still familiar image to associate with the product. Marines supply this. Personally, I would love to see more love for Xenos, and I think there's been a great success with the Orks as of late. However, GW needs to keep making money to survive."

Seems to sum it up very well


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Grey Knights!!!

Sweet, can't wait for the new grey knight on bike models.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/18 04:14:54


 
   
Made in us
Grim Rune Priest in the Eye of the Storm





Riverside CA

Eidolon wrote:they didnt need another damn marine codex. There are plenty of armies that needed the update more

Who?
The Space Wolves did not even get a 4e book!

Space Wolf Player Since 1989
My First Impression Threads:
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/727226.page;jsessionid=3BCA26863DCC17CF82F647B2839DA6E5

I am a Furry that plays with little Toy Soldiers; if you are taking me too seriously I am not the only one with Issues.

IEGA Web Site”: http://www.meetup.com/IEGA-InlandEmpireGamersAssociation/ 
   
Made in us
Rogue Daemonhunter fueled by Chaos






Toledo, OH

The problem was the decision GW made in 4th edition to get rid of the sub-codexes coupled with making the first army out the door Black Templars. By doing that GW went from making one SM codex with three subsidiary books to needing to write and support five SM codices.

I understand the switch to complete books as having one book rely on another can cause conflict, and as we all know that with today's technology there is no way to introduce new rules or errata after a codex is sold. Oh wait....

It made some sense when they were introducing some new generic plastic SM kits with each new book (BTs were assault termies and scouts, DA were scout snipers and the whirlwind), but now there isn't much left to make in plastic. there is no reason they couldn't churn out some rules and have a shorter model release window. I mean, what are the wolves even getting in terms of models?
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: