Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/28 19:27:10
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon
|
Chrysaor686 wrote:I think that maybe, if Squats weren't actually called Squats (Because you can't deny that this name is just silly), and had less of an ultra-rogue trader feel to them, they might be able to work. Probably more as an offshoot army like the Lost and the Damned more than their own full-on army. But as they stand, they are a ridiculous caricature of fantasy mixed in the 41st Millenium. They might've fit back in the light hearted Rogue Trader and Second Edition Days, but now, the universe is just altogether too dark to make sense of the inclusion of some Space Dwarves.
In a way, I'm glad they (somehow) got consumed completely by the Tyranids. They need at least an overhaul, if not a tombstone. Personally, if GW brought back Squats as they were, name and all, I'd probably have to go on a break from GW games for a while. Even if I came back, I would absolutely refuse to play them.
I think out of all of the existing races, Dark Eldar deserve the overhaul the most. Sure there's something wrong with all of the codeces, but when is there not going to be? Dark Eldar have the potential to be awesome, but a poor model range, and a Codex that hasn't been rewritten since 3rd Edition keep them from being played by nearly anyone.
I think taking the Demiurge route is quite a nice idea. Essentially (for those who don't know) they are Space Miners in Battle Fleer Gothic who utilise massive starships for, well, mining. They are described as being largely automated with a surprisingly small crew. Not much more than has been mentioned to my knowledge...
But, Dwarfs are renowned for their inventiveness, but few numbers. So why not a largely robotic army, adapted from Mining Automatons? Handled right, it would be a fairly unique army in 40k which is of course the first design port of call (no sense just making them stumpy IG or short arsed Orks) and a chance of the designers to do something a little different, as there would be no restraint of having things vaguely anthroprmorphic.
Hey ho, we wait and we see.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/28 19:34:09
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
All over the U.S.
|
Off-topic?- Can you really go off-topic in off-topic?)-The Robotics is why I was thinking adeptus mechanicus but in some ways I like your independent robotic army idea better.
I'm still going to do the 2 homegrowns but I really like the Idea. I was working from the tangent of what I percieved would be the easiest way to get them included into the 40k story arc.
|
Officially elevated by St. God of Yams to the rank of Scholar of the Church of the Children of the Eternal Turtle Pie at 11:42:36 PM 05/01/09
If they are too stupid to live, why make them?
In the immortal words of Socrates, I drank what??!
Tau-*****points(You really don't want to know) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/28 19:45:50
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon
|
Thinking about it a little more, I quite like the idea of having a sort of but not at all Synapse range for them.
Essentially, although completely autonomous, it's when being given specialised orders by a Handler that they perform at peak efficiency. Or some such. I dunno. Just bouncing ideas around in my head. That, and it's pretty close to ripping off Warmachines only (IMHO) good idea.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/28 20:07:52
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I'll take 5:
1. Necrons - they're a rules nightmare and need cleanup, desperately.
2. Space Wolves - another rules mess, due to the dependence upon C: SM.
3. DaemonHunters - refocus back to Inquisition / Assassins / Heroes of the Imperium
4. Witch Hunters - refocus back to Sisters of Battle
5. Eldar - 100+ pt Non-Scoring KP-giving Transports are ridiculous in 5E
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 11:25:33
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
Voted DA cus they're suffering right now. As for the new race discussion that seems to be forming here i'm hoping for Hrud – if fantasy rats are cool then space rats are gonna be awesome with a side of sweeet
|
Nosebiter wrote:Codex Space Marine is renamed as Codex Counts As Because I Dont Like To Loose And Gw Hates My Army. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 14:24:18
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces
|
GW would never do a robot army when it already has Necrons.
Not that I don't think Necrons are a bit of a jumbled mess, conceptually speaking.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 14:39:49
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon
|
But Necrons aren't Robots per se.
And they don't really play like Robots in the classical sense either, as they are capable of independant thought and do not depend upon pre-programmed orders to achieve their goals.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 16:02:23
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
All over the U.S.
|
The way I see it is that if dwarves ever re-emerge it'll be either as a robot crafting supplement to the Tau or as another chapter of the Imperium. I, unfortunately don't see them as their own stand alone race because of the GW resistance to the idea in any form and it would be a fluff nightmare.
The Tau ally is not very likely as GWs current stance is that the Imperium gets the ab-humans and Tau gets the true Aliens. This is a shame because I'd love to see Doc's idea as a Tau ally.
The additional chapter of the Imperium is just as unlikely because GW has stated that they don't have the time to develop any new armies or at least won't until they finish supporting the current ones.
But this doesn't stop us from developing our own homegrown concepts. Heck, if they're good enough and generate enough of a stir at a major event you just might see something very similar in the following 2 years.
|
Officially elevated by St. God of Yams to the rank of Scholar of the Church of the Children of the Eternal Turtle Pie at 11:42:36 PM 05/01/09
If they are too stupid to live, why make them?
In the immortal words of Socrates, I drank what??!
Tau-*****points(You really don't want to know) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/30 13:55:34
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Which Army would you most like to get re-done by GW? (ignore all practicality)
Daemons 5% [ 3 ]
Chaos Marines 13% [ 8 ]
Daemonhunters 7% [ 4 ]
Dark Eldar 17% [ 10 ]
Eldar 3% [ 2 ]
Imperial Gaurd 5% [ 3 ]
Orks 3% [ 2 ]
Space Marines 0% [ 0 ]
Blood Angels 5% [ 3 ]
Black Templars 0% [ 0 ]
Dark Angels 3% [ 2 ]
Space Wolves 5% [ 3 ]
Tyranids 2% [ 1 ]
Tau 8% [ 5 ]
Witch Hunters 7% [ 4 ]
Necrons 17% [ 10 ]
It Kinda looks like GW got it rightish, there giving us what we wantish :S haha
|
2500 pts | 1500 pts | 1000 pts | 1000 pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/02 01:21:53
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces
|
Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:But Necrons aren't Robots per se.
And they don't really play like Robots in the classical sense either, as they are capable of independant thought and do not depend upon pre-programmed orders to achieve their goals.
Obviously, but gimme a break. They aren't going to do another army that close in concept, any more than they'll do an army of superhuman armored warriors that aren't SM. Or another brutish, warlike race of hulking alien savages that aren't Orks. Or a swarming communal insect army that isn't Tyranids.
It's not about whether it's technically the same. It's about whether it infringes on an archetype that they're already tapping.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/02 01:59:08
Subject: Re:Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Tough Treekin
|
I voted for everyone but, Marines/Eldar and Guard, Marines as a book works well i think, Eldar is not actually a bad list and their are many things you can do with it, and guard are due for an update soon hence the jury is still out there.
|
When you give total control to a computer, it’s only a matter of time before it pulls a Skynet on you and you’re running for your life.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/03 17:38:42
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
I want 2010 to be Year of the Xenos
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/05 04:47:20
Subject: Re:Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Twisting Tzeentch Horror
|
My vote goes to Witch Hunters, I can't stand the Battle Sister's haircuts and I think they should do the inquisitors a bit more like the Spanish Inquisition as oppossed to the Salem Witch Trials, it goes better with the gothic theme of 40K I think.
|
"Metal is like an apple, you're not supposed to eat the core."
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/05 05:16:27
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Maddening Mutant Boss of Chaos
|
I voted csm. Having just started playing during 4ed, I'm mad that I missed the cult lists and am stuck playing black legion.
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:Oh wait. His fluff, at this point, has him coming to blows with Lionel, Angryon, Magnus, and The Emprah.  One can only assume he went into the Eye of Terror because he still hadn't had a chance to punch enough Primarchs yet.
Albatross wrote:I guess we'll never know. That is, until Frazzled releases his long-awaited solo album 'Touch My Weiner'. Then we'll know.
warboss wrote:I marvel at their ability to shoot the entire foot off with a shotgun instead of pistol shooting individual toes off like most businesses would.
Mr Nobody wrote:Going to war naked always seems like a good idea until someone trips on gravel.
Ghidorah wrote: You need to quit hating and trying to control other haters hating on other people's hobbies that they are trying to control.
ShumaGorath wrote:Posting in a thread where fat nerds who play with toys make fun of fat nerds who wear costumes outdoors.
Marshal2Crusaders wrote:Good thing it wasn't attacked by the EC, or it would be the assault on Magnir's Crack. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/05 05:36:13
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Serious Squig Herder
|
How about they redo Squ-
*gunshot*
...
*falls to the floor*
|
blarg |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/05 05:39:10
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Twisting Tzeentch Horror
|
Nofasse 'Eadhunta wrote:How about they redo Squ-
*gunshot*
...
*falls to the floor*
You were about to say Squats weren't you. I agree, I think the Space Dwarf thing was a good idea that just never took off in the right direction.
|
"Metal is like an apple, you're not supposed to eat the core."
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/05 06:02:20
Subject: Re:Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
|
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/05 13:57:18
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
Dark Eldar & Space wolves need re-doing waaaaay before CSM
Oh and Squ[PURGED BY THE INQUISITION]
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/07 02:41:05
Subject: Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Serious Squig Herder
|
You were saying they should do Sq[NEVER GONNA GIVE YOU UP, NEVER GONNA LET YOU DOWN, NEVER GONNA RUN AROUND AND DESERT YOU, NEVER GONNA MAKE YOU CRY, NEVER GONNA SAY GOODBYE, NEVER GONNA TURN AROUND AND HURT YOU]?
I think that's a good idea, but they should also do Hr[NEVER GONNA GIVE YOU UP, NEVER GONNA LET YOU DOWN, NEVER GONNA RUN AROUND AND DESERT YOU, NEVER GONNA MAKE YOU CRY, NEVER GONNA SAY GOODBYE, NEVER GONNA TURN AROUND AND HURT YOU].
|
blarg |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/07 03:00:01
Subject: Re:Which Army Do You Want GW to Re-Do??
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
I think we've lost Nofassa to the evil of Rickdom
|
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! |
|
 |
 |
|