Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

jp400 wrote:

Farmer wrote:

jp400 wrote:No you just baited a flamewar with this thread. Thats the same thing as asking people to call you out.

Or maybe you've just fell for it.

Is that Rules As Intended or Rules As Written?

Farmer wrote:

jp400 wrote:

Farmer wrote:

jp400 wrote:No you just baited a flamewar with this thread. Thats the same thing as asking people to call you out.

Or maybe you've just fell for it.

Is that Rules As Intended or Rules As Written?

jp400 wrote:The topic was locked cause it was suggested that he re-post it in the Article section of the forums... Not cause of any Prejudices.

Considering the Thread was a repost after complaints that the Article system version was too hard to read...

Gwar! wrote:

jp400 wrote:The topic was locked cause it was suggested that he re-post it in the Article section of the forums... Not cause of any Prejudices.

Considering the Thread was a repost after complaints that the Article system version was too hard to read...

1: Repost
2: Make it easier to read
3: ????
4: Profit!

Seems simple.

I don't see why it should have been locked. It was helpful and much better than waiting for the official FAQ/Errata.

jp400 wrote:

Gwar! wrote:

jp400 wrote:The topic was locked cause it was suggested that he re-post it in the Article section of the forums... Not cause of any Prejudices.

Considering the Thread was a repost after complaints that the Article system version was too hard to read...

1: Repost
2: Make it easier to read
3: ????
4: Profit!

Seems simple.

And Hard to access. And non downloadable. And vulnerable to vandalism...


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Cheese Elemental wrote:I don't see why it should have been locked. It was helpful and much better than waiting for the official FAQ/Errata.

Oh crap Cheese Elemental is agreeing with me.

WHAT HAVE I DONE!

Gwar! wrote:

jp400 wrote:The topic was locked cause it was suggested that he re-post it in the Article section of the forums... Not cause of any Prejudices.

Considering the Thread was a repost after complaints that the Article system version was too hard to read...

brb
ur failed trolling skillz are slowing my comp :(

People came into his thread and started flaming Gwar because he made an FAQ, indepentant of what was actualy IN the FAQ. They then said the post was just going to turn into a flame warand the thread should be locked, then another post flaming Gwar, then the mod locked the thread instead of taking action against the people causing the disruptions.

I don't always agrea with Gwar's conclusions on how to play the game, but here I am completely.

Farmer wrote:

Gwar! wrote:

jp400 wrote:The topic was locked cause it was suggested that he re-post it in the Article section of the forums... Not cause of any Prejudices.

Considering the Thread was a repost after complaints that the Article system version was too hard to read...

brb
ur failed trolling skillz are slowing my comp :(

lol!

Aduro wrote:People came into his thread and started flaming Gwar because he made an FAQ, indepentant of what was actualy IN the FAQ. They then said the post was just going to turn into a flame warand the thread should be locked, then another post flaming Gwar, then the mod locked the thread instead of taking action against the people causing the disruptions.

I don't always agrea with Gwar's conclusions on how to play the game, but here I am completely.

tbh, the fact he comes across as so rude and arrogant puts me off. I'm sure your nice Gwar, but please lose the cockyness and the "vet coming through" attitude.

TheFirstBorn wrote:tbh, the fact he comes across as so rude and arrogant puts me off. I'm sure your nice Gwar, but please lose the cockyness and the "vet coming through" attitude.

Just waiting for the lockhammer to come.

anytime now anytime....

@Farmer: excellent way to demonstrate the correct use of an Ad Hominem attack for us.

The fact of the matter is that the Mod was wrong for disciplining the wrong poster/s.

Gwar! wrote:And Hard to access. And non downloadable. And vulnerable to vandalism...

Oh noez,someone please pass me the knife and the MCR album.

Mate, spamming this 'tiny violin' thread will just give him more ammunition to slap the back of his hand to his forehead and cry out that he's being victimised, despite being a royal pain in the ass.

So just leave him be, far better to leave him in this thread stamping his feet and screaming like a five year old.

Leave him to it, centre of his own tiny universe where he's right all of the time and FAQs are rubbish unless he writes them.

willydstyle wrote:@Farmer: excellent way to demonstrate the correct use of an Ad Hominem attack for us.

Plz get your head out your ass.

Then will speak.

MeanGreenStompa wrote:Mate, spamming this 'tiny violin' thread will just give him more ammunition to slap the back of his hand to his forehead and cry out that he's being victimised, despite being a royal pain in the ass.

So just leave him be, far better to leave him in this thread stamping his feet and screaming like a five year old.

Leave him to it, centre of his own tiny universe where he's right all of the time and FAQs are rubbish unless he writes them.

Quoted this time to stop you editing it.

Please, stop with the Personal Attacks, you just make yourself look silly.

Seriously, people shouldn't feel like they can get a thread locked by acting like a jerk. Those posters who are breaking the rules should get warnings/suspensions/bans, etc.

but MGS, ALL FAQ ARE RUBBISH!

I can't think of a SINGLE gw FAQ that doesnt completely suck. they all fail to answer any relevant questions, while "clarifying" things that are obvious to a slowed 5 year old.

the fact is, gwar is almost always right.... people who argue against this can go off and play in their little fantasy world, where the actual rules don't matter, just like GW wants... but without people who are trying to create standards for others to play the game by, 40k will become a set of annoying house rules across the country.

Gwar! wrote:
Please, stop with the Personal Attacks, you just make yourself look silly.

And making a thread saying "omg da trollz haz ruined my hardwork feel sorry for me please" isn't?.

Am done.

Horst wrote:I can't think of a SINGLE gw FAQ that doesnt completely suck. they all fail to answer any relevant questions, while "clarifying" things that are obvious to a slowed 5 year old.

Now, be nice. The ones GW told Yakface to do were good. The ones GW did themselves suck harder than a Essex Girl

Gwar! wrote:

MeanGreenStompa wrote:Mate, spamming this 'tiny violin' thread will just give him more ammunition to slap the back of his hand to his forehead and cry out that he's being victimised, despite being a royal pain in the ass.

So just leave him be, far better to leave him in this thread stamping his feet and screaming like a five year old.

Leave him to it, centre of his own tiny universe where he's right all of the time and FAQs are rubbish unless he writes them.

Quoted this time to stop you editing it.

Please, stop with the Personal Attacks, you just make yourself look silly.

The only person looking silly in this pity party of a thead is you dude.

Oh and nice try at trying to pass the buck to somebody other then yourself. Your not fooling anyone.

I should point out that I have it on high authority that Gwar is a Jew, and thus probably did WTC.

@JP: actually... it really just looks like you and farmer are trying to get the thread locked by breaking many forum rules. I think that is silly.

Gwar! wrote:

MeanGreenStompa wrote:Mate, spamming this 'tiny violin' thread will just give him more ammunition to slap the back of his hand to his forehead and cry out that he's being victimised, despite being a royal pain in the ass.

So just leave him be, far better to leave him in this thread stamping his feet and screaming like a five year old.

Leave him to it, centre of his own tiny universe where he's right all of the time and FAQs are rubbish unless he writes them.

Quoted this time to stop you editing it.

Please, stop with the Personal Attacks, you just make yourself look silly.

Not nearly so silly as you falling into hysterics over your FAQ gloatfest being locked down. I love that you were 'lying in wait' to hit the quote button btw, speaks volumes.

Orkeosaurus wrote:I should point out that I have it on high authority that Gwar is a Jew, and thus probably did WTC.

The funny thing is, I am a Jew (albeit a non-practising one)

QQ

TwT

TTwTT

'nuff said!

Gwar! wrote:

Orkeosaurus wrote:I should point out that I have it on high authority that Gwar is a Jew, and thus probably did WTC.

The funny thing is, I am a Jew

Can I have some of your banks?

MeanGreenStompa wrote:

Gwar! wrote:

MeanGreenStompa wrote:Mate, spamming this 'tiny violin' thread will just give him more ammunition to slap the back of his hand to his forehead and cry out that he's being victimised, despite being a royal pain in the ass.

So just leave him be, far better to leave him in this thread stamping his feet and screaming like a five year old.

Leave him to it, centre of his own tiny universe where he's right all of the time and FAQs are rubbish unless he writes them.

Quoted this time to stop you editing it.

Please, stop with the Personal Attacks, you just make yourself look silly.

Not nearly so silly as you falling into hysterics over your FAQ gloatfest being locked down. I love that you were 'lying in wait' to hit the quote button btw, speaks volumes.

Yes.... yes it does.

MGS you play 40k Vassal? We should get a friendly game in sometime.

willydstyle wrote:@JP: actually... it really just looks like you and farmer are trying to get the thread locked by breaking many forum rules. I think that is silly.

Ok fanboy.

Just because i don't take Gwar's opinions as god makes me "rule breaker" ?.

Or is it because you don't like hearing the truth,please proceed to make a fool out of yourself.