Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 01:43:53
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Blood-Drenched Death Company Marine
|
What do I do with my 10 pariahs?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 01:45:04
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Hug them tight and then give them a Viking funeral?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 01:47:25
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade
|
ChiliPowderKeg wrote:1.Pariahs are squatted? How?! Sure their rules were below schmeh, but their fluff was well established (in a book whose fluff was very lacking). If Pariahs aren't so, then what happens to the Pariah gene? Shouldn't Culexi be removed as well if there are no humans with the Pariah gene to supply more Pariahs after their demise?
Wow. That's Apex-level jumping to conclusions right there.
Removed as a unit choice doesn't mean retroactively wiped out of existence, it could mean several things:
- Unit Renamed
- Unit in the background, not in the codex
- Concept retconned into a new unit type
- any number of other things.
If I had to guess, I'd say that the Crypteks are going to be the new Pariahs. the Pariahs always seemed a little over-equipped for a unit to me anyway, but it may be that you can equip Crypteks to have pariah-like abilities and equipment, then either field them as a unit (using them like you did Pariahs before) or split them up, effectively having Pariahs leading Warrior units (which would be...interesting...)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 01:52:00
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Pumped! this will be good.....and bad but good mostly like any new release, can't wait to get my hands on the models...now just the waiting game for pic leaks!
|
Flesh Eaters 4,500 points
" I will constantly have those in my head telling me how lazy and ugly and whorish I am. You sir, are a true friend " - KingCracker
"Nah, I'm just way too lazy to stand up so I keep sitting and paint" - Sigur
"I think the NMM technique with metals is just MNMM. Same sound I make while eating a good pizza" - Whalemusic360 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 02:00:07
Subject: Re:Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
AgeOfEgos wrote:
Nerd Rage Level: Yellow (Heightened)
Salty tears are salty
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 02:17:40
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Nigel Stillman
|
I will follow this with interest, my brother doesn't currently play tabletop but likes the look of the necons eough to only play as them in DoW.
I might pick him up a revamped battleforce when these all ship.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 02:18:25
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Mesopotamia. The Kingdom Where we Secretly Reign.
|
Phototoxin wrote:What do I do with my 10 pariahs?
Mine are getting promoted to "Crypteks."
I said it first, folks. You remember that.
|
Drink deeply and lustily from the foamy draught of evil.
W: 1.756 Quadrillion L: 0 D: 2
Haters gon' hate. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 02:51:15
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
Immortals as troops just made my day.
Especially if they get a bigger base and troop transport...
|
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 02:58:54
Subject: Re:Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle
|
wooo! cept the transports; really?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 02:59:46
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
A garden grove on Citadel Station
|
Welcome to 5e: even the non-mech armies have to mech-up or go home.
|
ph34r's Forgeworld Phobos blog, current WIP: Iron Warriors and Skaven Tau
+From Iron Cometh Strength+ +From Strength Cometh Will+ +From Will Cometh Faith+ +From Faith Cometh Honor+ +From Honor Cometh Iron+
The Polito form is dead, insect. Are you afraid? What is it you fear? The end of your trivial existence?
When the history of my glory is written, your species shall only be a footnote to my magnificence. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 03:01:29
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
The destroyers getting jump infantry would make sense if they had the tau style jetpacks (move, shoot, move into cover in assault). The pariahs dropping out doesn't make sense given the necrons looking for blanks thing in other stories and fluff. The Fall of Damnos was pretty good, the space marines did act like a bunch of dicks thou, but would the behavior of the Damnos Necrons be typical? the Necron empire must have been huge, the tombworlds are well spread out and an entire codex fluff being changed just to represent one group because of a story just doesn't felt right.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 03:04:16
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Stubborn Temple Guard
|
This sounds a lot like how they fluffed them in the Space Marine Battles book: Fall of Damnos.
In the end though, it is still just a make more models and big tanks to sell maneuver, and GW will sacrifice any fluff for profit. Which is sad.
|
27th Member of D.O.O.M.F.A.R.T.
Resident Battletech Guru. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 03:09:28
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot
Phoenix, Arizona
|
Interesting to see all of the different rumors running around. These are very different than previous, so either they are a) true b) someone really wanted to screw with everyone Kinda sad about transports actually. It was one thing that necrons did differently, they just phase/teleport their troops everywhere instead of using using metal boxes (probably also sentiant) to get them from a to b. Mixed feelings about wbb, like that its not just FNP, sad about the 5+ (cant get everything I know). Would also make sense if they had different levels of it, or if res orbs upped it by 1 etc etc (ALSO NOT A RUMOR JUST AN OBSERVATION) No rending is probably a good thing, no wounding on 6s effects like 1 model, Wraithlords? So not really a nerf. Wish they got +1 on damage chart to vehicle penetration or something to that effect. Overall pretty happy. TBH I think at this point I would be happy with a lot of things though... also interested to see how much they retconn the fluff compare to just add more to it. Definitely happy with the idea of Lords having sentience. Finally, going to step into forbidden zone and say, you know Matt Ward is not really that bad. He is fun to make fun of because, well we all like to make fun of someone, but I like the way he made Grey Knights more grimdark, and the necron ba thing was a calculated decision which reinforces the idea that necron lords can make sentient decisions for their own benefit. Anyways my .02
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/02 03:10:53
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 03:13:08
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
They described no necrons transports in the damnos book, they were walking out of a portal in front of the monolith. Aside from the necrons with personalities and upgraded bodies, no new type of necron were described (maybe the tomb stalker, but that was it) the Admech is really not the most reliable source of information (knowledge is power, guard it well) most of their ideas on how necron tech works is guess work. Everything in the book already existed from a multi-fluff reference point (when it was written).
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 03:14:16
Subject: Re:Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Grisly Ghost Ark Driver
|
Destroyers becoming jump infantry pleases me greatly. Now Jaws doesn't auto kill a vital unit in my army, just the long fangs! Also the C'tan thing, I can see it as 'Envoy of the Gods' where it's a Necron channeling the powers of a C'tan.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/02 03:15:52
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 03:22:34
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
|
I'm hoping everything in this comes true. Except maybe the extra vehicles.
Also, maybe Pariahs are now called Cryteks? Hope so.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 03:24:46
Subject: Re:Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Deranged Necron Destroyer
|
After reading FoD it will become very clear that Pariah =/= Crypteks. The one featured in FoD was musing at one point on his rise from a lesser status to the one of Cryptek, what that could mean for the codex... only time shall tell!
|
Kilkrazy wrote:There's nothing like a good splutter of rage first thing in the morning to get you all revved up for the day.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 03:37:37
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
ph34r wrote:Welcome to 5e: even the non-mech armies have to mech-up or go home.
Except Tyranids.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:05:44
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Ship's Officer
|
My personal reactions in red: yakface wrote: Hello everyone, I have gotten my hands on some fairly solid Necron rumors. I say they are fairly solid because the source I got them from has proved reliable in the past, however the rumors themselves are indeed 2nd hand (I didn't see the codex myself), and therefore I can't personally verify any of this. That also means if you have any more questions on anything I (probably) won't be able to provide you with any more details (as I don't have them). Anyway here goes: 1) No surprise here, but Necrons are still essentially Tomb Kings in space fluff wise. A shift in fluff is now that all of the higher up necrons are intelligent while the lower level ones are still basically automatons. I guess that's roughly the same as it used to be, but apparently there is more emphasis in the sentience of the higher Necrons now (hence the named Lords). I like this, to a certain extent. It should add to some of the flavor of the army. I hope they don't go overboard though. 2) C'Tan are still in the codex...sort of. They have been moved to the Elites section and are now a single unit choice, but with variable upgrade powers you can take. I'm skeptical. To me this sounds more like a lesser Necron unit channeling C'Tan powers, only because it would be a bit odd for Necron armies to be running around with squads of super-star gods. 3) We'll be Back is no longer called that and it is NOT Feel No Pain. Basically it is a 5+ bonus save similar to Feel No Pain, but doesn't get cancelled out by double strength, AP1/2, etc. In addition, this save is made at the END of the phase after morale tests are taken. If the unit is wiped out or is falling back at the end of the phase, then the save cannot be used. So as an opponent, if you manage to wipe the unit out or make them fall back, then you prevent any Necrons from getting back up...unless the unit has something called the 'ever-living' rule, in which case it gets to attempt this save even if the unit is wiped out. This seems better, maybe. Looks like the list of restrictions/exceptions/exceptions to exceptions is much less complicated. Also, having it at the end of the phase reduces the chances of it interacting brokenly with other rules. I expect this might pan out as a nerf for lower-level necrons, but still be on par with current WBB for some of the stronger ones ('cause of ever-living). 4) Gauss Weaponry does NOT have rending. It retains the 'auto-glance' on a penetration roll of a '6' rule, but apparently otherwise has lost the 'auto-wound' on a roll of a '6' regardless of Toughness that it used to have. The Gauss Cannon is now apparently Assault 2 & AP3 (I'm assuming the Strength is still 6). The Gaus Flux Arc on the Monolith no longer automatically hits every unit within range, instead each one fires separately and can hit four different targets. Doesn't seem like much of a change, which is disappointing from a flavor standpoint. I was hoping for some neat rules to make them more than just "Glancing Bolters." The loss of the auto-wound on a 6 isn't really a big deal though, as it only mattered against T8+ creatures, since the guns were S4. Interesting changes to the more exotic weapons though. Looks like standard streamlining/power buffing for a 5th ed codex. 5) Phase out is gone. Not really surprising. This explains why WBB got nerfed a bit. 6) Destroyers now count as jump infantry and there is a new Fast Attack Jetbike unit called Tomb Blades. An interesting change. Not much else to say here though with such little info. 7) Immortals are now a Troops choice. Pariahs are gone. Flayed Ones are Elites. I wonder how Troop Immortals are going to compare to regular Warriors. It will be interesting to see if they totally eclipse them. Elite Flayed Ones is a bit of a bummer, but does keep Necrons out of the "shooty troop/stabby troop" thing that almost all other armies have. 8) There are indeed 6 named characters (although I have no more info on them). There is also a Necron Overlord and a bodyguard unit called Crypteks. Crypteks can be split off before the game to lead units of Necrons, very similar to Wolf Guard in the Space Wolves codex. Crypteks can take a bunch of different technology upgrades, so there is kind of a way now to have personalized squad leaders in a Necron army. Meh, could be intriguing. Need to hear more. 9) They army is much more mobile now in general. They have several units of jump troops, and 2 new transport vehicles. 1 transport can carry 15 necrons while another can carry 10. Jump pack units count as 2 models and jetbikes count as 5. The one that holds 10 is able to recover casualties to a unit (although can't take it beyond its starting strength). Necron vehicles besides the monolith are open-topped skimmers. However they have something called 'Quantum shielding' which gives their front & side armor +2 until the vehicle takes its first glance/pen, at which point it loses the shielding. One of these two transports (not sure which one) is apparently a personal transport for the Lord (and his retinue). I'm going to agree with some of the other posters... this is a bit disappointing. While I imagine shielded "skiffs" might turn out to be cool, I never felt like Necrons needed transports from a flavor standpoint. 10) There are six new vehicles in the codex (including the two transports mentioned above). Two of which seem to be based around this old Jes Goodwin design: http://storage.canalblog.com/29/28/731795/53057637.jpg More vehicles apparently means more money, so this isn't surprising, but I feel the same way as with the transports. Meh. 11) In general Necrons have a lot more long ranged fire support. There is also a new weapon type called Tesla weapons. These weapons, on a roll of '6' to hit automatically cause two more hits. The biggest version of the Tesla weapons has a chance of hitting all other units close to the target; both friend and foe. One of the new vehicles carries the doomsday cannon: 72" S9 AP1 Heavy 1 large blast. BS4. Interesting. Need to see more. 12) In the Elites section there is a big new walker. It has a heat ray that that is either a melta or flamer depending on what you want to do. Any unit hit by this vehicle is marked (as in: laser targeted), which means that all other necrons count as being twin-linked for shooting at the marked enemy unit that turn. Better version of the Tomb Stalker maybe? Sounds nasty. And that's it! Kind of all over the place and certainly not a full snapshot of the codex, but a lot of these things are completely opposite from many of the other rumors I've seen out there.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/05/02 04:06:44
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:08:00
Subject: Re:Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Whiteshield Conscript Trooper
|
Before we start grieving over lost models lets wait to see if these rumors turn out to be true. I'm currently an IG player but am building up some necrons in the hope there codex is good.
|
Go Go Gadget Leman Russ
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:09:18
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
Phototoxin wrote:What do I do with my 10 pariahs?
Put them on eBay NOW.
|
"I hate movies where the men wear shorter skirts than the women." -- Mystery Science Theater 3000
"Elements of the past and the future combining to create something not quite as good as either." -- The Mighty Boosh
Check out Cinematic Titanic, the new movie riffing project from Joel Hodgson and the original cast of MST3K.
See my latest eBay auctions at this link.
"We are building a fighting force of extraordinary magnitude. You have our gratitude!" - Kentucky Fried Movie |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:16:54
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I'm assuming that since destroyers are probably still in (and as jump troops), and so are warriors, that now would be a good time to buy a battleforce or two in preperation and to avoid the price hike and contents removal that is sure to follow the new codex?
|
Mandorallen turned back toward the insolently sneering baron. 'My Lord,' The great knight said distantly, 'I find thy face apelike and thy form misshapen. Thy beard, moreover, is an offence against decency, resembling more closely the scabrous fur which doth decorate the hinder portion of a mongrel dog than a proper adornment for a human face. Is it possibly that thy mother, seized by some wild lechery, did dally at some time past with a randy goat?' - Mimbrate Knight Protector Mandorallen.
Excerpt from "Seeress of Kell", Book Five of The Malloreon series by David Eddings.
My deviantART Profile - Pay No Attention To The Man Behind The Madness
"You need not fear us, unless you are a dark heart, a vile one who preys on the innocent; I promise, you can’t hide forever in the empty darkness, for we will hunt you down like the animals you are, and pull you into the very bowels of hell." Iron - Within Temptation |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:28:53
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
I would say the current battleforce will be usable.
However, I wonder if I'll still be able to run my destroyer lord with scarabs . . .
|
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:30:52
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Avatar 720 wrote:I'm assuming that since destroyers are probably still in (and as jump troops), and so are warriors, that now would be a good time to buy a battleforce or two in preperation and to avoid the price hike and contents removal that is sure to follow the new codex?
Yes. As I've been saying for weeks, if you can get one from a discounter, do so.
|
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-C.S. Lewis |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:33:09
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
Avatar 720 wrote:I'm assuming that since destroyers are probably still in (and as jump troops), and so are warriors, that now would be a good time to buy a battleforce or two in preperation and to avoid the price hike and contents removal that is sure to follow the new codex?
After the price hikes of existing product that occurred with the Orcs And Goblins release and now Tomb Kings, including the TK Battalion, the writing would appear to be on the wall with regard to pricing from GW each time an army is revised now. Instead of just the annual price hike in early June or July prices are being adjusted range by range as model army ranges are revised and packaging updated. I think you might be wise to take your own advice and sock away some existing Necron product now, especially the Battleforce with its current level of price break before any changes are made to the existing offerings.
|
"I hate movies where the men wear shorter skirts than the women." -- Mystery Science Theater 3000
"Elements of the past and the future combining to create something not quite as good as either." -- The Mighty Boosh
Check out Cinematic Titanic, the new movie riffing project from Joel Hodgson and the original cast of MST3K.
See my latest eBay auctions at this link.
"We are building a fighting force of extraordinary magnitude. You have our gratitude!" - Kentucky Fried Movie |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:36:28
Subject: Re:Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Been playing with the Nercons for a long, long time.
Anything with Ward's hands on it and it is a xeno codex, well just be prepared to cry a little. You are going to need $$$ and lots of $$$ to make your new Necron Army that might be playable (?)
If someone else is writing the Codex then your chances of having a viable army without paying through the nose has just improved dramatically.
As far as fluff?
I'm so dreading this.
|
Adam's Motto: Paint, Create, Play, but above all, have fun. -and for something silly below-
"We are the Ultramodrines, And We Shall Fear No Trolls. bear this USR with pride".
Also, how does one apply to be a member of the Ultramodrines? Are harsh trials involved, ones that would test my faith as a wargamer and resolve as a geek?
You must recite every rule of Dakka Dakka. BACKWARDS.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:38:50
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Blood Angel Chapter Master with Wings
|
I am really looking forward to seeing the mini's and design of these.
Dropping Pariah's seems like an odd choice though, considering their prominence in the DOW games. I would find it a shame to lose their fluff too....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:41:47
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
What in the world makes people think you're losing their fluff?
Pariahs, as a unit were just a 'meh' fluff thing.
They were humans with the Pariah gene, harvested, and their consciousness was stuffed into a Necrodermis body. That somehow made them 'Elite' and trusted units...which made no sense.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 04:59:02
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Answer: WARD + writing = Reconned Fluff.
|
Adam's Motto: Paint, Create, Play, but above all, have fun. -and for something silly below-
"We are the Ultramodrines, And We Shall Fear No Trolls. bear this USR with pride".
Also, how does one apply to be a member of the Ultramodrines? Are harsh trials involved, ones that would test my faith as a wargamer and resolve as a geek?
You must recite every rule of Dakka Dakka. BACKWARDS.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/02 05:04:44
Subject: Fairly Solid Necron Rumors
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Adam LongWalker wrote:Answer: WARD + writing = Reconned Fluff.
Uh, yeah...not really.
More retconning was done by Cavatore and Haines than Ward has done as of yet. And what's more, much of Ward's fluff (specifically the Grey Knights) was previously underdeveloped.
There's a disturbing amount of ire pointed towards him for changes, and I'll admit I was guilty of some of it(Dreadknight! *shakes fist in anger*)--but giving it a thorough readthrough and editing will mean a bit of a difference.
|
|
 |
 |
|