Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/15 16:56:24
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Mesopotamia. The Kingdom Where we Secretly Reign.
|
Kilkrazy wrote:These things go in cycles.
All of this has happened before, and will happen again.
|
Drink deeply and lustily from the foamy draught of evil.
W: 1.756 Quadrillion L: 0 D: 2
Haters gon' hate. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/15 16:57:14
Subject: Re:Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Depends, red pill or blue pill?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/15 18:48:42
Subject: Re:Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
rubiksnoob wrote:Depends, red pill or blue pill?
If I knew I had to go through a whole other life, I'd kill myself right now!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/15 20:30:28
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Guarding Guardian
|
warpcrafter wrote:Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:Isamov? Nooooooooooooooooooooooo! Dull, plodding and pedantic. Same for Arthur C Clarke. Alfred Bester is all you need.
Kilkrazy wrote:"There's top class modern SF being published in books."
Could you give some me examples please. I'm always on the lookout for something half decent. Cheers.
The Night's Dawn series by Peter F. Hamilton. Classic space opera. Would make an excellent series of movies, but there would have to be six of them. And they would be rated NC-17. Lots of sex.
I'd second this... awesome trilogy
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/15 22:25:27
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
no love for Abnett or any 40k books :( ?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/15 23:24:28
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
Deader then that cat I just sat on. But honestly..I don't think so, but if you're into something new, try to find " A roadside Picnic" by Arkady and Boris Strugatsky. If you liked the movie Stalker, or the game S.T.A.L.K.E.R, they are both loosly based upon this novel.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/15 23:25:51
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member. -Groucho Marx
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/15 23:30:59
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
daedalus-templarius wrote:no love for Abnett or any 40k books :( ? Was never a fan of Abnett, but the Horus Heresy books were enjoyable. Honestly though, the 40k books really aren't any great shakes. They're good reads, don't get me wrong, but not really top-notch science fiction.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/15 23:31:41
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 02:11:58
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
KamikazeCanuck wrote:Maybe, maybe not. What we expect from special effects and sets is a lot greater than it was then when Star Trek kicked off in the 60s. Sci Fi has always been a niche but now is getting more and more expensive to produce. Star ships ain't as cheap as they used to be!
The glut of crappy, third tier sci-fi productions we got in the late 90s and early 00s was the result of sci-fi getting a lot cheaper to produce, as computer effects became more available.
With the DVD market opening up in the 00s you actually have a pretty good situation for nerd TV like sci-fi and fantasy, because while the ratings aren't as good as you'll get for a police procedural of a similar quality, you sell a whole lot of DVD series.
The issue right now is that it seems the focus is more towards fantasy shows, and to some extent superhero shows (before BSG the last big budget nerd shows was Heroes).
At some point sci-fi will come back. There's too many nerds out there wanting to buy the DVD series of a sci-fi show for it not to come back.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/16 02:13:01
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 02:36:58
Subject: Re:Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
Atlanta
|
I'm just now watching all of the old Sci Fi series for the first time. It's pretty sad to find out that there's nothing new being made these days.
I'm halfway through watching Babylon 5 for the first time an just watched all of Firefly/Serenity for the first time earlier this year.
Firefly was Ok, but I get tired of Joss Whedonisms. I really like B5, though, it's pretty engaging.
I'm much more of a book/movie person than TV person.
I usually don't even watch TV series until they are finished or at least have 4+ seasons, because I was burnt one too many times by cancellations.
I have never seen any of the Stargate series or Battle Star Galactica
Would you recommend them?
Would you recommend Stargate even though I thought the original movie wasn't that great? Is the series better? I would find that hard to believe when your substituting Kurt Russell for Macgyver.
|
I'm kind of a big deal... people know me... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 03:06:28
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
sebster wrote:KamikazeCanuck wrote:Maybe, maybe not. What we expect from special effects and sets is a lot greater than it was then when Star Trek kicked off in the 60s. Sci Fi has always been a niche but now is getting more and more expensive to produce. Star ships ain't as cheap as they used to be!
The glut of crappy, third tier sci-fi productions we got in the late 90s and early 00s was the result of sci-fi getting a lot cheaper to produce, as computer effects became more available.
With the DVD market opening up in the 00s you actually have a pretty good situation for nerd TV like sci-fi and fantasy, because while the ratings aren't as good as you'll get for a police procedural of a similar quality, you sell a whole lot of DVD series.
The issue right now is that it seems the focus is more towards fantasy shows, and to some extent superhero shows (before BSG the last big budget nerd shows was Heroes).
At some point sci-fi will come back. There's too many nerds out there wanting to buy the DVD series of a sci-fi show for it not to come back.
I agree. Sci-Fi now tends to mean things like Heroes and sanctuary. More fantasy and comic book logic than sci-Fi. I hope you're right about the DVD market having an effect but I fear piracy may cut into how lucrative that market is. Automatically Appended Next Post: NagothDaCleaver wrote:I'm just now watching all of the old Sci Fi series for the first time. It's pretty sad to find out that there's nothing new being made these days.
I'm halfway through watching Babylon 5 for the first time an just watched all of Firefly/Serenity for the first time earlier this year.
Firefly was Ok, but I get tired of Joss Whedonisms. I really like B5, though, it's pretty engaging.
I'm much more of a book/movie person than TV person.
I usually don't even watch TV series until they are finished or at least have 4+ seasons, because I was burnt one too many times by cancellations.
I have never seen any of the Stargate series or Battle Star Galactica
Would you recommend them?
Would you recommend Stargate even though I thought the original movie wasn't that great? Is the series better? I would find that hard to believe when your substituting Kurt Russell for Macgyver.
BSG is my favorite show but I really liked firefly and haven't made it past episode 5 of Babylon 5 so ymmv.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/16 03:08:11
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 03:10:58
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
Atlanta
|
KamikazeCanuck wrote:
BSG is my favorite show but I really liked firefly and haven't made it past episode 5 of Babylon 5 so ymmv.
B5 takes a good while to get rolling. Half way through the first season it begins to pick up. The second and thirds seasons are leagues better.
|
I'm kind of a big deal... people know me... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 03:33:37
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Agreed with B5. Unlike most other TV shows, B5 had a pre-planned story arc. The first few episodes (indeed the first season) is all about the "signs and portents" of things to come. I didn't really enjoy the first half of season 1, but now that I'm on to season two, I am hooked.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 03:43:05
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke, Roger Zelazny, John Campbell, Murray Leinster, Theordore Sturgeon, Frank Herbert all dead and the list goes on and on. Do any of the writers today compare in the least to the people who built the genre? A few, maybe, but overall I'd say "yes" sadly, SF as far as real ideas is dead.
|
"I hate movies where the men wear shorter skirts than the women." -- Mystery Science Theater 3000
"Elements of the past and the future combining to create something not quite as good as either." -- The Mighty Boosh
Check out Cinematic Titanic, the new movie riffing project from Joel Hodgson and the original cast of MST3K.
See my latest eBay auctions at this link.
"We are building a fighting force of extraordinary magnitude. You have our gratitude!" - Kentucky Fried Movie |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 05:11:00
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Veteran Knight Baron in a Crusader
Behind you
|
Metro 2033, by some russian guy, retranslated into english.
The game is NOTHING compared to the book.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 05:46:26
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
KamikazeCanuck wrote:I agree. Sci-Fi now tends to mean things like Heroes and sanctuary. More fantasy and comic book logic than sci-Fi. I hope you're right about the DVD market having an effect but I fear piracy may cut into how lucrative that market is.
Yeah, piracy may be a big issue with my argument above, I'll grant that.
If that's the case, then us nerds have no-one to blame but ourselves.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 06:19:18
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
Damn you Karma!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 08:16:33
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Beast of Nurgle
|
I believe that sci-fi like starship troopers and BSG are often scoffed at by hipsters and 12-year-olds, preferring either(but, most likely) james cameron explosions everywhere, or a god awful interpretation of a graphic novel or videogame/comic(see resident evil).
|
Noh hwan eez loyal!
Everyhwan eez heretic! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 09:43:24
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
I think that Sci-Fi on television is slowly being replaced by Sci-Fi in Video Games. Just see all the games to resurface. Mass Effect 3, Starcraft II - Legacy of the Swarm, Space Marine, Aliens: Colonial Marines, Prey 2, Star Wars: The Old Republic, Dark Millennium, Fear 3... And that's just famous sci-fi...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/16 09:43:49
For Emperor and Imperium!!!!
None shall stand against the Crusade of the Righteous!!!
Kanluwen wrote: "I like the Tau. I just don't like people misconstruing things to say that it means that they're somehow a huge galactic threat. They're not. They're a threat to the Imperium of Man like sharks are a threat to the US Army."
"Pain is temporary, honor is forever"
Emperor of Mankind:
"The day I have a sit-down with a pansy elf, magic mushroom, or commie frog is the day I put a bolt shell in my head."
in your name it shall be done"
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/2SSSR2
Viersche wrote:
Abadabadoobaddon wrote:
the Emperor might be the greatest psyker that ever lived, but he doesn't have the specialized training that a Grey Knight has. Also he doesn't have a Grey Knight's unshakable faith in the Emperor.
The Emperor doesn't have a GKs unshakable faith in the Emperor which is....basically himself?
Ronin wrote:
"Brother Coa (and the OP Tadashi) is like, the biggest IoM fanboy I can think of here. It's like he IS from the Imperium, sent back in time and across dimensions."
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 11:52:06
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Pious Warrior Priest
|
Yeah, there is pretty much no sci-fi on at the moment.
I'm sad about the loss of stargate universe, the second season was really good, but the bad start of the first season crippled it's ratings.
It had the advantage of being a properly realistic show, with people from the present day earth.. BSG was good but there wasn't that direct connection since the characters weren't from our world... plus I lost interest in the show when they dragged out the trial of Gaius Baltar (the most annoying character in the show) across 12 episodes of season 3. Finished watching it, but that middle-to-end stretch of the third series really wrecked it as a whole.
As far as I'm aware, there will be 3 new sci-fi shows coming soon.
1. BSG - Blood and Chrome. Prequel to BSG with a young adama as the main character. Hopefully less of a fail than Caprica was.
2 + 3: A pair of sci-fi shows that Steven Spielberg is making.. one is based in a post-alien-invasion earth (where humanity lost), and the other is set in dinosaur times, a bunch of people get sent back in time and stuck there. Looking forward to both of those.
Fantasy genre is going very strong at the moment too... if you aren't already watching Game of Thrones, you should be... it really is that good.
It's "hard" fantasy in the same way that BSG is hard sci-fi. Any fans of that show will love it.
Would you recommend Stargate even though I thought the original movie wasn't that great? Is the series better? I would find that hard to believe when your substituting Kurt Russell for Macgyver.
Yes, they're good. I'm not a fan of the movie either, the concept of it was amazing, but it somehow got turned into a poor movie. The pilot episode of SG1 is much better. Don't except Macgyver to be your typical movie action hero.. his character is the humorous one, whereas Tealc is the token total badass character. The series is really lighthearted and amusing sci-fi that doesn't take itself too seriously while still offering great entertainment and doing a lot of really cool stuff... if you watch sci-fi to see the writers using sci-fi as a metaphor for dealing with moral issues or philosophical questions or whatever (e.g. pretty much every TNG episode) then you won't like it.. stargate is all about big explosions, exploration, alien worlds, massive space battles between colossal fleets of starships, the entire US airforce dogfighting with an invading alien fleet over the skies of antartica etc. Another big plus point is that it uses modern military tech and is set in the present day.. it really keeps things grounded, most other sci-fi is set in a distant future that we can't quite relate to no matter how well it's done.
It's a very visual show, light on dialogue, heavy on action and humour. Kind of a "beer and pretzels" show, pure entertainment, heavily upbeat. Atlantis follows the same formula and takes it even further. Universe is the total polar opposite of the other 2 series.
|
This message was edited 7 times. Last update was at 2011/05/16 12:23:04
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 14:26:12
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
rubiksnoob wrote:daedalus-templarius wrote:no love for Abnett or any 40k books :( ?
Was never a fan of Abnett, but the Horus Heresy books were enjoyable. Honestly though, the 40k books really aren't any great shakes.
They're good reads, don't get me wrong, but not really top-notch science fiction.
I'm not saying its the best sci-fi ever, but I do find most of the 40k books I've gotten to be pretty enjoyable. (Goto is still atrociously bad)
Significantly more enjoyable than some other slower and more plodding sci-fi books I've read.
Surprised you don't like Abnett, he is usually people's favorite. Him and Graham are by far my favorites.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 16:39:58
Subject: Re:Is TV Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
@scarlettsquig
I forgot about Blood & Chrome. All is not lost then.
Haven't heard about these Speilberg shows but they sound interesting.
I thought Game of Thrones was some historical thing like The Tudors.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 20:14:17
Subject: Is TV Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Not exactly set in space but there's V and The Event that are sci fi or at least about aliens. I prefer the original V though. At least they had laser guns and cool (well, 80's cool) sunglasses.
I liked SGU the most out of all the Stargate shows. I guess it seemed the least silly out of all of em.
I think the problem is, Joe Sixpack doesn't like nerdy sci fi, just us nerds like it, and there aren't enough of us to justify the kinda cash it takes to make something worth watching.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 20:16:12
Subject: Is TV Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
Necros wrote:Not exactly set in space but there's V and The Event that are sci fi or at least about aliens. I prefer the original V though. At least they had laser guns and cool (well, 80's cool) sunglasses.
I liked SGU the most out of all the Stargate shows. I guess it seemed the least silly out of all of em.
I think the problem is, Joe Sixpack doesn't like nerdy sci fi, just us nerds like it, and there aren't enough of us to justify the kinda cash it takes to make something worth watching.
Cancelled, Cancelled and Cancelled.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 20:24:24
Subject: Is TV Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Doesn't surprise me at all.
All they have left to kill is Chuck and I'll officially have nothing to watch.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 20:42:20
Subject: Re:Is TV Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
I think I'm already there. I won't miss V and Event though. While I was watching them I was always thinking to myself "why am I watching this?". I liked SG:U and it was getting better. Rush made that show I think.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 21:00:55
Subject: Is TV Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Daemonic Dreadnought
|
Good scifi requires good writing, and good scifi is hard to come by. The real problem is good writing goes somewhere, which means the series will end after 4 or 5 seasons tops.
Babylon 5: Writing was for 5 seasons, show ended in 5 seasons.
Farscape: Writing was for 5 seasons, show ended in 4 seasons despite getting better ratings than any other show the scifi channel. Concluded with a miniseries instead of a 5th season.
Firefly: Writing was for a set number of seasons, probably 3 to 6. Show got the axed in season 1, concluded several seasons worth of writing within a single feature length movie.
Battlestar Galatica: Writing was for 4-5 seasons, producers decided to go with 4.
Bad Scifi has bad writing with no end to the story. It follows the Dragon Ball Z template. Storylines may last 1 or 2 seasons with every storyline ending in the good guys discovering some new power to defeat a bad guy. Next season starts a new story line with a new bad guy that is even more powerful than the last bad guy, good guys discover some new power to defeat the bad guy. Rinse and repeat until you reach supersaiyan 10, or end up with 10 seasons of stargate + stargate universe.
Good scifi comes and goes, bad scifi is cursed with eternal life.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2011/05/16 21:02:52
Chaos isn’t a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail, and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some are given a chance to climb, but refuse. They cling to the realm, or love, or the gods…illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is, but they’ll never know this. Not until it’s too late.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/16 21:10:58
Subject: Is TV Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
schadenfreude wrote:
Good scifi comes and goes, bad scifi is cursed with eternal life.
Isn't it us that is cursed with bad scifi's eternal life?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/17 05:00:30
Subject: Is Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
Stu H wrote:warpcrafter wrote:Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:Isamov? Nooooooooooooooooooooooo! Dull, plodding and pedantic. Same for Arthur C Clarke. Alfred Bester is all you need.
Kilkrazy wrote:"There's top class modern SF being published in books."
Could you give some me examples please. I'm always on the lookout for something half decent. Cheers.
The Night's Dawn series by Peter F. Hamilton. Classic space opera. Would make an excellent series of movies, but there would have to be six of them. And they would be rated NC-17. Lots of sex.
I'd second this... awesome trilogy
I'm glad you posted that, I was starting to think that I was the only one with knowledge of Joshua "Lagrange" Calvert. Perhaps HBO should pick it up after they get done with Game of Thrones. (I tried reading those books, but I got tired of getting invested in characters just to see them get killed off. I was starting to really worry for Arya Stark. If she would have gotten killed off, I would have been howling for George R. R. Martin's head on a pike.)
|
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/17 06:11:16
Subject: Is TV Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
Necros wrote:Doesn't surprise me at all.
All they have left to kill is Chuck and I'll officially have nothing to watch.
It's been given 12 episodes in this series to wrap things up and then that's it.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/17 19:23:43
Subject: Re:Is TV Sci-Fi dead?
|
 |
Long-Range Land Speeder Pilot
|
You're running into a 'good ol days' problem, where you're comparing something like 'all of the 1990s' to 'right this minute'. There are always dry spells if you're looking for a really specific format, it doesn't always mean that the've stopped forever. Especially since effects keep getting cheaper and easier to do. Just yesterday I saw a trailer for Falling Skies on TNT, which looks like a 'humans surviving alien invasion' show like V was, so there's still new shows getting made.
|
|
 |
 |
|