| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 15:09:44
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
The best State-Texas
|
I have Faith in Spielberg.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 15:26:01
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Manchester UK
|
Led Zeppelin IV is quite good...
|
Cheesecat wrote:
I almost always agree with Albatross, I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 16:01:16
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
I liked Terminator 4 a lot more than 3, mostly because I felt that they managed to turn the robots back into merciless hunters for the first half.
I don't remember Die Hard 4 being unbearably awful. It's been a while though.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 16:33:54
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
Road To Utopia.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 17:09:45
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Nigel Stillman
|
ineptus astartes wrote:you mean Star Wars I
IV was the first film
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 17:23:26
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Leprechaun 4: In Space.
Because all the Leprechaun films were great.
|
Prestor Jon wrote:Because children don't have any legal rights until they're adults. A minor is the responsiblity of the parent and has no legal rights except through his/her legal guardian or parent. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 17:26:23
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Kamloops, BC
|
Albatross wrote:Led Zeppelin IV is quite good...
That was hilarious.  Well played.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/08/15 17:26:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 18:58:05
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
MrDwhitey wrote:Leprechaun 4: In Space.
Because all the Leprechaun films were great.
How can you say that and not want to kill yourself?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 19:02:28
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
KingCracker wrote:How can you say that and not want to kill yourself?
Who says I don't?
|
Prestor Jon wrote:Because children don't have any legal rights until they're adults. A minor is the responsiblity of the parent and has no legal rights except through his/her legal guardian or parent. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 19:04:22
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Your still typing as of 2011/08/15 19:02:28! DO IT!! DO IT NOW!!! REDEEM YOURSELF!!!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 19:09:29
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
[DCM]
Coastal Bliss in the Shadow of Sizewell
Suffolk, where the Aliens roam.
|
I liked Critters 4 and Phantom Menace. *Screams as the hail of bricks is thrown at him*
Hehe.
The only one that stands out for me as really good is On Stranger Tides, but it was still probably the worst of the four Pirates films.
|
"That's not an Ork, its a girl.." - Last words of High General Daran Ul'tharem, battle of Ursha VII.
Two White Horses (Ipswich Town and Denver Broncos Supporter)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 19:13:58
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
The best State-Texas
|
Morathi's Darkest Sin wrote:I liked Critters 4 and Phantom Menace. *Screams as the hail of bricks is thrown at him*
Hehe.
The only one that stands out for me as really good is On Stranger Tides, but it was still probably the worst of the four Pirates films.
I liked the Phantom Menace as well. Attack of the clones on the other hand, blegh.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/15 20:44:55
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I think my Phantom Menace experience was a lot like my Crystal Skull experience. I really wanted it to be good and at some points I managed to convince myself that it was going to be ok...
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/08/15 20:46:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 01:09:27
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Like the rest of Lucas's terrible movies, I liked parts of them. I happened to like more parts of Phantom Menace then the other 2
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 01:10:58
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Any part with Darth Maul in was good. Killing him off so early sucked.
|
Prestor Jon wrote:Because children don't have any legal rights until they're adults. A minor is the responsiblity of the parent and has no legal rights except through his/her legal guardian or parent. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 01:19:09
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Not to mention HOW he was killed. That pisses me off the most. The dude, by himself takes on both Obi Wan and Gui Con, both badass Jedi on their own. KOs GuiCon effortlessly, then goes on to easily take out Obi Wan. Seriously he had them done and didnt break a sweat. Then from UNDER his feet, Obi Wan super jumps from a hole, super flips OVER Mauls head, all the while he has that look of ZOMG!!!!!!!! *BOING OING OING OING googly eyes* lets Obi Wan land behind WHILE force grapping a lightsaber.......and then lets himself get cut in half?! Really???????????? You know that was Lucas's idea, thats as lame as the fething Ewoks or the Gungans
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 01:20:43
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
It was a horrible case of Plot Induced Stupidity, which still kills any enjoyment I had from that fight prior to that point.
|
Prestor Jon wrote:Because children don't have any legal rights until they're adults. A minor is the responsiblity of the parent and has no legal rights except through his/her legal guardian or parent. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 01:38:27
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
The best State-Texas
|
MrDwhitey wrote:It was a horrible case of Plot Induced Stupidity, which still kills any enjoyment I had from that fight prior to that point.
Sith Happens.
I liked Revenge of the Sith though.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 02:50:19
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Morathi's Darkest Sin wrote:
The only one that stands out for me as really good is On Stranger Tides, but it was still probably the worst of the four Pirates films.
DIE DIE DIE. How can you say that? On Stranger Tides was awful.
Such a complete let down.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 07:45:30
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Posts with Authority
|
The Fast and the Furious franchise is pretty likable. Maybe not the second one. And the Highlander movies were... well... definitely something, hey.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 14:52:16
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Wow, lots of movies that can, at best, be described as "not awful".
Sgt_Scruffy wrote:Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home.
Thought it was good. Save the whales and all that.
Here we go! This is the only objectively great movie mentioned so far.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 15:16:47
Subject: Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Jaws 4 sucked balls.
The redeeming part of Star Trek 4:
Chekov "wer...do you keep...your nu-clee-ar..wessels?"
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2011/08/16 15:19:31
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/16 15:46:56
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
Minnesota, land of 10,000 Lakes and 10,000,000,000 Mosquitos
|
I want to say the Final Destination series, sort of. The first two movies were pretty good, and while 3 and 4 sucked ass, the fifth one wasn't bad. So while it didn't have a decent fourquel, it had a semi-decent five-quel.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/08/17 22:30:54
Subject: Re:Decent fourquels?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
lol So this thread, thats about fourquels....you add a movie franchise that has an asstastic fourquel  That made me laugh pretty good Then again I added Phantasm so I should be quiet
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/08/17 22:31:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|