Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 13:10:28
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
CthuluIsSpy wrote: Scipio Africanus wrote:I found one, do I get a cookie?
Remember kids, this is the internet. Just like that embarrassing photo you uploaded to the ol' instagram, FAQs are on the internet forever.
Google your book and the word FAQ, and you should find what you seek.
Tried it with tau book, didn't seem to work. Salvage what we can, children of the circle of the players of the game that makes sense, find those old downloaded versions and harbour them in safety!
I found Expunged data, that's what the link gives me.
So you get nothing! Good day sir! 
It worked for me...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 13:26:34
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Stalwart Ultramarine Tactical Marine
|
insaniak wrote: ausYenLoWang wrote:ok so as above, With the new website the FAQ and errata are gone, may be temporary, may be permanent...
What to do What to do....
Carry on using the current FAQs until there is a decent reason to stop?
The fact that an FAQ is no longer being offered for download on their website doesn't mean that all those people who already have a copy of it should just burn it and forget it exists.
This could be a problem for new players or for players who don't get much gaming time. Being a new player, if you advised me of a rule that was updated in a FAQ, I would have no authoritative source to check if your faq was correct - It could be a work of fiction for all I know (yes I've seen that done before)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 13:35:44
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
One Canoptek Scarab in a Swarm
|
I have an answer for you guys I think. Take a look at the new electronic edition of a codex. Quoted from the description of the new Necron Codex iBook:
"This expanded Codex includes interactive miniatures galleries, lavish colour artwork, and updated rules to match the latest edition of Warhammer 40,000."
So, you want the updated rules? Gotta give Apple som money too! =)
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2014/04/10 13:43:48
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 13:38:57
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Does anyone have an archive of the FAQs? This is really problematic, given that I was planning on starting a Grey Knights army, and they have substantial FAQs.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 13:39:30
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
stop. just stop. if you have nothing tonsay but GW whines, stop.
|
you automatically lose points for using the trite gamer-isms: balanced, meta, Mat Ward, etc. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 13:40:48
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
So we are not meant to show our displeasure at the FAQs vanishing?
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 13:43:40
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Stalwart Ultramarine Tactical Marine
|
My suggestion is that if you don't like what we're discussing here the simply close this thread and read something else.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 13:44:25
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Minneapolis, MN
|
I can't imagine this is more than a temporary glitch. They sell a lot of product that only has 5th edition rules and no digital version (Blood Angels, Dark Eldar)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 13:56:27
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
DanielBeaver wrote:I can't imagine this is more than a temporary glitch. They sell a lot of product that only has 5th edition rules and no digital version (Blood Angels, Dark Eldar)
They're still selling models that are (rumored) to no longer be in the game in about 36 hours. 'They don't give a damn.' is a fairly reasonable assumption to make when it comes to GW.
I am genuinely curious how to play the game now though. I don't see any reason to use the FAQs anymore. Honestly I never downloaded the things because I didn't want to have to deal with keeping everything up to date, I'd just look things up on occasion. I'm going to download the bunch from a wayback link, but I think a person can be entirely reasonable about ignoring FAQs at this point.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:02:08
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
|
DanielBeaver wrote:I can't imagine this is more than a temporary glitch. They sell a lot of product that only has 5th edition rules and no digital version (Blood Angels, Dark Eldar)
The way I see it there are 4 options.
1. They're clueless, don't realise what they've deleted and how important they were.
2. it's a mistake and the faqs will be added to the site again in the coming weeks (months....years)
3. They're going to switch to Digital only rules so they don't need the faqs any more
4. They're going to release digital faqs for free or not.
Obviously some of those options are better than others...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:02:23
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Lansirill wrote: DanielBeaver wrote:I can't imagine this is more than a temporary glitch. They sell a lot of product that only has 5th edition rules and no digital version (Blood Angels, Dark Eldar)
They're still selling models that are (rumored) to no longer be in the game in about 36 hours. 'They don't give a damn.' is a fairly reasonable assumption to make when it comes to GW.
I am genuinely curious how to play the game now though. I don't see any reason to use the FAQs anymore. Honestly I never downloaded the things because I didn't want to have to deal with keeping everything up to date, I'd just look things up on occasion. I'm going to download the bunch from a wayback link, but I think a person can be entirely reasonable about ignoring FAQs at this point.
What models are they dropping from the game?
|
CSM 20,000 Pts
Daemons 4,000 (ish)
WoC over 10,000
6000+ Pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:04:29
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
so this isn't really a YMDC thread, it's more of another excuse to post a GW sucks thread?
|
you automatically lose points for using the trite gamer-isms: balanced, meta, Mat Ward, etc. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:07:19
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
Wiltshire
|
viewfinder wrote:so this isn't really a YMDC thread, it's more of another excuse to post a GW sucks thread?
The way I see it, it's a thread about the rules effects of the deletion, along with appropriate discussion?
If you don't like it, don't read it?
|
Note to the reader: my username is not arrogance. No, my name is taken from the most excellent of commanders: Lord Castellan Creed, of the Imperial Guar- I mean Astra Militarum - who has a special rule known only as "Tactical Genius"... Although nowhere near as awesome as before, it now allows some cool stuff for the Guar- Astra Militarum - player. FEAR ME AND MY TWO WARLORD TRAITS. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:07:46
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
viewfinder wrote:so this isn't really a YMDC thread, it's more of another excuse to post a GW sucks thread?
NO this is a thread based on the rules situation thats going to arise from the now lack of GW FAQ... so it belongs in YMDC.
and people have been making their call Automatically Appended Next Post: Tactical_Genius wrote: viewfinder wrote:so this isn't really a YMDC thread, it's more of another excuse to post a GW sucks thread?
The way I see it, it's a thread about the rules effects of the deletion, along with appropriate discussion?
If you don't like it, don't read it?
agreed.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/10 14:08:13
CSM 20,000 Pts
Daemons 4,000 (ish)
WoC over 10,000
6000+ Pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:17:20
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
Well the link on the site may be down, but the FAQs are still up. you just have to do a search for them.
http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m3180056a_Imperial_Guard_v1.3_APRIL13.pdf
|
DR:80+S++G++MB--IPw40k12#+D++++A++/fWD013R++T(T)DM+
"War is the greatest act of worship, and I perform it gladly for my Lord.... Praise Be"
-Invictus Potens, Black Templar Dreadnought |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:18:45
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
nope... thats the only one thats loaded, the CSM or others i have tried eldar tau and one other all come up as page errors, but even then:
ARE they considered an official FAQ if no longer on the main website etc etc?
|
CSM 20,000 Pts
Daemons 4,000 (ish)
WoC over 10,000
6000+ Pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:20:20
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
ausYenLoWang wrote:
nope... thats the only one thats loaded, the CSM or others i have tried eldar tau and one other all come up as page errors, but even then:
ARE they considered an official FAQ if no longer on the main website etc etc?
Of course they are official FAQ. They are still the latest version of the rules.
It's just that no one can access them.
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:21:08
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
|
Only if they are already in your cache.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:21:20
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
ausYenLoWang wrote:
nope... thats the only one thats loaded, the CSM or others i have tried eldar tau and one other all come up as page errors, but even then:
ARE they considered an official FAQ if no longer on the main website etc etc?
Well that's kin odf a coincidence. The one I had saved is the only one that works. And it's also obsolete in a couple days.
|
DR:80+S++G++MB--IPw40k12#+D++++A++/fWD013R++T(T)DM+
"War is the greatest act of worship, and I perform it gladly for my Lord.... Praise Be"
-Invictus Potens, Black Templar Dreadnought |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:24:25
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Icculus wrote: ausYenLoWang wrote:
nope... thats the only one thats loaded, the CSM or others i have tried eldar tau and one other all come up as page errors, but even then:
ARE they considered an official FAQ if no longer on the main website etc etc?
Well that's kin odf a coincidence. The one I had saved is the only one that works. And it's also obsolete in a couple days.
I went to guard as well. Curious.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:27:53
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
CthuluIsSpy wrote: ausYenLoWang wrote:
nope... thats the only one thats loaded, the CSM or others i have tried eldar tau and one other all come up as page errors, but even then:
ARE they considered an official FAQ if no longer on the main website etc etc?
Of course they are official FAQ. They are still the latest version of the rules.
It's just that no one can access them.
how so i ask.
they are no longer supplied by the manufacturer, so in this case they are obsolete. they WERE the latest but now the latest is NO FAQ.
dont get me wrong here its bloody daft, BUT thats how it looks
|
CSM 20,000 Pts
Daemons 4,000 (ish)
WoC over 10,000
6000+ Pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:29:36
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:35:48
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Temple Prime
|
You know if they did this 10 days ago it would have been hilarious, but now it's just mystifying. Automatically Appended Next Post: Voodoo_Chile wrote:Paladins, Nob Bikers etc are characters again.
Look Out Sir to any model you like.
Powerfield Generators work from within vehicles again.
KFF provides vehicles with a 4+ cover save.
Abaddon can now suffer Spawndom or Princehood.
Nightscythes lose Invasion Beam
There are probably dozens of straight changes that have now technically reverted.
You know what this means?
COOOOOIIIIIINNNNN TTTTOOOOOOSSSSSSSSS!!!! Automatically Appended Next Post:
Soon every group will be playing by assorted house rules and vassal games will be decided by who can win the most 4+ to decide on rules rolls.
Someone will then argue that fateweaver's reroll can be used to apply to said rule; and so begins the meta-meta-game.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/04/10 14:39:25
Midnightdeathblade wrote:Think of a daemon incursion like a fart you don't quite trust... you could either toot a little puff of air, bellow a great effluvium, or utterly sh*t your pants and cry as it floods down your leg.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:45:08
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta
|
Orks & fliers
release the flying squigs
grabbin klaws, boarding planks, and wreakin balls. Oh My
Tis the Orks of OZ  where all nobz are characters
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:51:45
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Terrifying Treeman
The Fallen Realm of Umbar
|
Well, at least the Heldrake isn't eating chilli before a game.
|
DT:90-S++G++M++B+IPw40k07+D+A+++/cWD-R+T(T)DM+
Horst wrote:This is how trolling happens. A few cheeky posts are made. Then they get more insulting. Eventually, we revert to our primal animal state, hurling feces at each other while shreeking with glee.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 14:55:02
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Stalwart Ultramarine Tactical Marine
|
ausYenLoWang wrote: viewfinder wrote:so this isn't really a YMDC thread, it's more of another excuse to post a GW sucks thread?
NO this is a thread based on the rules situation thats going to arise from the now lack of GW FAQ... so it belongs in YMDC.
and people have been making their call
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Tactical_Genius wrote: viewfinder wrote:so this isn't really a YMDC thread, it's more of another excuse to post a GW sucks thread?
The way I see it, it's a thread about the rules effects of the deletion, along with appropriate discussion?
If you don't like it, don't read it?
agreed.
Yep Agreed,
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/04/10 14:56:14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 15:26:10
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Krellnus wrote:Well, at least the Heldrake isn't eating chilli before a game.
But Codex: Missile Drones is back on.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 15:36:12
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
Well, at least my Burning Chariot didn't get any worse than it already was!
On the other hand, there goes any thought of adding in an allied Zombie horde or Noise Marines...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 15:37:31
Subject: new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta
|
Oh, no more limiting wound allocations to the range of the weapons in a unit
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/04/10 15:39:48
Subject: Re:new website NO FAQ
|
 |
Sergeant
Darlington
|
sarduka42 wrote:
My suggestion is that if you don't like what we're discussing here the simply close this thread and read something else.
ah but where would the anti-whinger whingers whinge?
|
|
|
 |
 |
|