Switch Theme:

Ork rumours - First post updated 20th June  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in pk
Yellin' Yoof on a Scooter





Badlands

 ergotoxin wrote:
Not impressed with the Flash Gitz at all. Snazzguns look more like a bike than a weapon, the pose is very boring and the price is horrible. It makes me sad that Central/East Europe gamers are slowly getting outpriced by GW. :(

'Orkanaut has an aweful design as well and the Big Guns look like a Trukk cut in half but will probably be priced more. Hopefully at least the Mega Nobz will be worthy all the teeth they are going to cost.

By the way, what about the Gretchin rumours? Are they still credible at all? I love the current models.


Totally agree with you. Both new boxes are over priced and not that amazing at all compared to the last time we had Ork new models in 2009.

Every one of the 2009 release was well done. they were great for mixing up and kit-bashing.

And im surprised that there are so many who were hungry for ork models for such a long time that no matter what GW ork release is and no matter how expensive. They will justify it for them selves so they can feel good buying it with out any remorse.

how is this new flahsgit kit is not the same price as the nobz set?

since when do we pay for points on TT rather than plastic?

We are the buyer we have the right to raise this as an issue, Rather than defending GW. None of us gets a cheque from them.



"Orkses iz neva beaten in battle. If we win we win, if we die we die so it don't count as beat. If we runs for it we die neither, so we can always come back for anuvver go see!"  
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




West Midlands (UK)

 Musibatkhan wrote:


since when do we pay for points on TT rather than plastic?



Never. Neither.



   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




 Zweischneid wrote:
 Musibatkhan wrote:


since when do we pay for points on TT rather than plastic?



Never. Neither.




Lol, exalted for common sense
   
Made in se
Waaagh! Warbiker





Sweden

 Musibatkhan wrote:
 ergotoxin wrote:
Not impressed with the Flash Gitz at all. Snazzguns look more like a bike than a weapon, the pose is very boring and the price is horrible. It makes me sad that Central/East Europe gamers are slowly getting outpriced by GW. :(

'Orkanaut has an aweful design as well and the Big Guns look like a Trukk cut in half but will probably be priced more. Hopefully at least the Mega Nobz will be worthy all the teeth they are going to cost.

By the way, what about the Gretchin rumours? Are they still credible at all? I love the current models.


Totally agree with you. Both new boxes are over priced and not that amazing at all compared to the last time we had Ork new models in 2009.

Every one of the 2009 release was well done. they were great for mixing up and kit-bashing.

And im surprised that there are so many who were hungry for ork models for such a long time that no matter what GW ork release is and no matter how expensive. They will justify it for them selves so they can feel good buying it with out any remorse.

how is this new flahsgit kit is not the same price as the nobz set?


since when do we pay for points on TT rather than plastic?

We are the buyer we have the right to raise this as an issue, Rather than defending GW. None of us gets a cheque from them.





About 100% more parts?

 
   
Made in ca
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy





Holy stealth rumour mongering in Zweischneid's sig. Are there any solid rumours that Ghaz is getting the primarch treatment other than some whispers and wishlisting? I'd like the big man to get some well deserved buffs, but this would be unprecedented.

However, if the new warboss model is indeed a new character, and Badrukk gets moved into the HQ section we have two brand new named warbosses to fill in for Ghaz.
   
Made in us
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis




On the Internet

 Musibatkhan wrote:
they were great for mixing up and kit-bashing.

The designer for the Gitz designed the old ones too. And he specifically designed their bodies the way he did for kitbashing with the Nobz kits, so I don't see how these are really worse, or less kit-bashable than the older stuff.
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




UK

 Toburk wrote:
Holy stealth rumour mongering in Zweischneid's sig. Are there any solid rumours that Ghaz is getting the primarch treatment other than some whispers and wishlisting? I'd like the big man to get some well deserved buffs, but this would be unprecedented.

However, if the new warboss model is indeed a new character, and Badrukk gets moved into the HQ section we have two brand new named warbosses to fill in for Ghaz.


As far as I saw there were no rumoured stat/rules changes just Ghaz being moved into the Lord of War slot

of course this will be further annoyance to TO who want to ban LoW, but if this is true will face banning Ghaz a previously playable non-controversial character or having a ban with a specific exception for him (and who knows maybe we'll see Primarchs and others migrate to this slot too)

 
   
Made in gb
Stabbin' Skarboy





crewe

Why would ghazghkull be a lord of war?

How many kans can a killa kan kill if a killa kan can kill kans?  
   
Made in us
Nasty Nob




Cary, NC

 ClockworkZion wrote:
 Musibatkhan wrote:
they were great for mixing up and kit-bashing.

The designer for the Gitz designed the old ones too. And he specifically designed their bodies the way he did for kitbashing with the Nobz kits, so I don't see how these are really worse, or less kit-bashable than the older stuff.



While obviously they will work, the old Nobs did not use a torso/neck/head bits assembly of three parts. These nobs use three separate parts.

Maybe there's a good solid reason for it, that I can't see from studying the sprues, but it certainly seems like you could have made the torsos the same way as the Nob torsos, which would render them fully compatible without additional neck bits. It's not a deal-breaker, or a game-changer, but it's an added fiddly annoyance that seems, on the face of it, unnecessary. This is particularly surprising because of the otherwise excellent quality and quantity of stuff on those sprues.


It also means, for those people buying bits on the internet, that you need to plan on buying Gits torsos and necks, for conversions, so plan ahead.

 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




I could see them doing that, but not without a stat change and likely a new model
   
Made in gb
Regular Dakkanaut






I personally love the new flash gitz I would happily pay that price for the contents and I'm an Eldar player, dire avengers nuff said.
   
Made in us
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon




USA, Maine

Totally agree with you. Both new boxes are over priced and not that amazing at all compared to the last time we had Ork new models in 2009.

Every one of the 2009 release was well done. they were great for mixing up and kit-bashing.

And im surprised that there are so many who were hungry for ork models for such a long time that no matter what GW ork release is and no matter how expensive. They will justify it for them selves so they can feel good buying it with out any remorse.

how is this new flahsgit kit is not the same price as the nobz set?

since when do we pay for points on TT rather than plastic?

We are the buyer we have the right to raise this as an issue, Rather than defending GW. None of us gets a cheque from them.


You have no requirement to not buy the models. If they aren't worth it for you, don't use the models. Either ignore the unit entry or kit bash something.

The Flashgitz aren't priced like Nobz because the Nob kit is criminally underpriced currently. The most likely reason for the low price is likely because when released, the kit was competing against AOBR nob sets and they needed to make them competitive. The nobs are currently not priced like any other specialty/elite 5 man set. They are cheaper than any of the others by almost 50% - 100%.

As far as performance, I used the new flashgitz rules today in a battlewagon. Over the course of a 5 turn game, they did well. They killed 3 obliterators (though the oblits survived two full turns of fire without more than 1 wound until I managed an AP2 roll) then 9 Chaos Marines marked with burgle went down in one turn. In the final turn they killed another 3. So not bad. Spending three turns on oblits diminished their effectiveness, but they paid for themselves and their wagon while suffering no wounds of their own. I still much prefer the old git finder rules, but thy are a STEAL at 22 points each in a wagon.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/06/08 21:21:16


Painted armies:

Orks: 11000 points
Marines: 9500 points
Khorne Marines: 2500 points
Khorne Demons: 1500 points 
   
Made in us
Hellacious Havoc




Oklahoma

Has there been any hint at all that Kans will be moved to elites?

[4000 pts] Black Legion
[3300 pts] Thousand Sons
[2000 pts] World Eaters
[2000 pts] Dark Eldar
[2700 pts] Iron Hands

 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut





Has there been any hint at all that Kans will be moved to elites?


Nope, but we have seen a Kan with two ranged weapons

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/06/08 21:46:36


 
   
Made in us
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis




On the Internet

Da Butcha wrote:
 ClockworkZion wrote:
 Musibatkhan wrote:
they were great for mixing up and kit-bashing.

The designer for the Gitz designed the old ones too. And he specifically designed their bodies the way he did for kitbashing with the Nobz kits, so I don't see how these are really worse, or less kit-bashable than the older stuff.



While obviously they will work, the old Nobs did not use a torso/neck/head bits assembly of three parts. These nobs use three separate parts.

Maybe there's a good solid reason for it, that I can't see from studying the sprues, but it certainly seems like you could have made the torsos the same way as the Nob torsos, which would render them fully compatible without additional neck bits. It's not a deal-breaker, or a game-changer, but it's an added fiddly annoyance that seems, on the face of it, unnecessary. This is particularly surprising because of the otherwise excellent quality and quantity of stuff on those sprues.


It also means, for those people buying bits on the internet, that you need to plan on buying Gits torsos and necks, for conversions, so plan ahead.

Swappable Necks means that even two Orks with the same torso front could have different accessory bits (like necklaces and/or collars). Unneeded? Sure. But it's a nice option.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
DO IT TO IT wrote:
Has there been any hint at all that Kans will be moved to elites?

I'd expect the M/Gorkanaught or the Deff Dread to be an Elite instead. I don't see Kans moving unless they go Fast so they could be the Ork version of the Sentinel.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/06/08 21:57:01


 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





California

I hope we can still Deff dredd as troops and they move the kans to fast or elite. Be nice to take 1-3 deff dredds as one choice .Right heavy support is full

Also the white dwarf doesn't say what slot the Morkanaught takes from what I can find.

In imperial armor 8 dredd mob list the kans are a fast choice so hoping they do that.

- Neva trust a Deff Skull , gitz just wanna take yur lootz
- Only good Deff Skull iz a Ded one !  
   
Made in au
Regular Dakkanaut





 Dakkafang Dreggrim wrote:
I hope we can still Deff dredd as troops and they move the kans to fast or elite. Be nice to take 1-3 deff dredds as one choice .Right heavy support is full

Also the white dwarf doesn't say what slot the Morkanaught takes from what I can find.


Heavy support as indicated by the icon
   
Made in gb
Devastating Dark Reaper




People don't like the Flash Gitz?? Am I looking at the same models? They got more Gubbinz than you can shake a squig at!
   
Made in ca
Regular Dakkanaut




PapaSoul wrote:
People don't like the Flash Gitz?? Am I looking at the same models? They got more Gubbinz than you can shake a squig at!


Some people just don't like anything GW does.. I for one, love them. Buying 2 boxes to start.. next weekend can't come soon enough!


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Dakkafang Dreggrim wrote:
I hope we can still Deff dredd as troops and they move the kans to fast or elite. Be nice to take 1-3 deff dredds as one choice .Right heavy support is full

Also the white dwarf doesn't say what slot the Morkanaught takes from what I can find.

In imperial armor 8 dredd mob list the kans are a fast choice so hoping they do that.


What they might do is, keep the current load out killa kans as heavy support, and the 2 shooting wpn variant, as fast attack. (My hope)

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/06/09 00:55:44


 
   
Made in gb
Nasty Nob






Rubs wrote:
What they might do is, keep the current load out killa kans as heavy support, and the 2 shooting wpn variant, as fast attack. (My hope)

Wouldn't it make more sense the other way around? Close combat is more of a FA thing and shooting is more HS.

   
Made in us
Waaagh! Warbiker





Maryland, US

 Perfect Organism wrote:
Rubs wrote:
What they might do is, keep the current load out killa kans as heavy support, and the 2 shooting wpn variant, as fast attack. (My hope)

Wouldn't it make more sense the other way around? Close combat is more of a FA thing and shooting is more HS.


Has GW ever done that? Place a given model in 2 different FOC sections depending on the weapons?

My P&M blog: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/588540.page

DR:70SGMB++I+Pw40k10#--D+A++/hWD390R+T(Pic)DM+

Da Fast and Da Furious! about 5000pts (25% painted)
2000pts (50% painted) 
   
Made in au
Regular Dakkanaut





Unit type doesn't bother me so much since you can now open multiple FOC's.

2 troops 1 HQ is not a hard investment to open up 3 more slots of Elite, Fast and Heavy.

We've got the cheapest troop unit? 10 grots & runtherd @39 points right?
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut






 nflagey wrote:
 Perfect Organism wrote:
Rubs wrote:
What they might do is, keep the current load out killa kans as heavy support, and the 2 shooting wpn variant, as fast attack. (My hope)

Wouldn't it make more sense the other way around? Close combat is more of a FA thing and shooting is more HS.


Has GW ever done that? Place a given model in 2 different FOC sections depending on the weapons?


Centurions. Dev Cents are HS, Assault Cents are elite.
   
Made in gb
Nasty Nob






 nflagey wrote:
 Perfect Organism wrote:
Rubs wrote:
What they might do is, keep the current load out killa kans as heavy support, and the 2 shooting wpn variant, as fast attack. (My hope)

Wouldn't it make more sense the other way around? Close combat is more of a FA thing and shooting is more HS.


Has GW ever done that? Place a given model in 2 different FOC sections depending on the weapons?

Chaos Daemons have the Hellflayer in Fast Attack and the Seeker Chariot in Heavy Support, both made from the same kit.

They might want to re-name one of the killa kan units to something else, but that's not much effort.

   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




 streamdragon wrote:
 nflagey wrote:
 Perfect Organism wrote:
Rubs wrote:
What they might do is, keep the current load out killa kans as heavy support, and the 2 shooting wpn variant, as fast attack. (My hope)

Wouldn't it make more sense the other way around? Close combat is more of a FA thing and shooting is more HS.


Has GW ever done that? Place a given model in 2 different FOC sections depending on the weapons?


Centurions. Dev Cents are HS, Assault Cents are elite.


Regardless, Killa Kans won't go to fast attack, they aren't exactly speedy.
   
Made in au
Regular Dakkanaut





If only you had a traktor kannon in reverse polarity to push units forward
   
Made in gb
Nasty Nob






Leerjawise wrote:
Regardless, Killa Kans won't go to fast attack, they aren't exactly speedy.

Well, neither are Armoured Sentinels, but they qualify as 'Fast Attack' somehow.

It does seem pretty unlikely though. If anything, they seem more suited to a Troops choice than Fast Attack or Elite.

   
Made in ca
Regular Dakkanaut




You used to be able to take Carnifex as Elite if points were low enough I believe.
   
Made in gb
Regular Dakkanaut




If lootas are moved to heavy then it has 7 viable options. Something has to move. Following ia8 there is precedent for kanz in fa. If they moved dreads to elites or still poss as troops or more than 1 per slot that'd help as well. Wagons being dedicated transports for many options will further ease things. Hres hoping!
   
Made in us
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis




On the Internet

 Perfect Organism wrote:
Rubs wrote:
What they might do is, keep the current load out killa kans as heavy support, and the 2 shooting wpn variant, as fast attack. (My hope)

Wouldn't it make more sense the other way around? Close combat is more of a FA thing and shooting is more HS.

There are a lot of shooty FA things too. Namely vehicles. CC FA seems to be more Infantry models and the like.
   
 
Forum Index » News & Rumors
Go to: