Genestealer Game 3 - The Rumble in the Jungle (GAME OVER - Genestealer Victory)

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Lord-Loss**

I was trying to stop a early first day lynch, I wasnt defending there actions.

**VictorVonTzeentch**

A little touchy about being under suspicion? I know the first couple of times were, but your repeated defenses?

**Lord-Loss**

Repeated defences of who?

My actions were pro-Imperium, I was trying to make 1)A longer day 1, so more discussion, which is GOOD FOR THE IMPERIUM. 2)Stop someone getting lynched because of a joke, which is GOOD FOR THE IMPERIUM.

I rest my case

**Emperors Faithful**

BrotherStynier wrote:A little touchy about being under suspicion? I know the first couple of times were, but your repeated defenses?

Lord-Loss wrote:Repeated defences of who?

My actions were pro-Imperium, I was trying to make 1)A longer day 1, so more discussion, which is GOOD FOR THE IMPERIUM. 2)Stop someone getting lynched because of a joke, which is GOOD FOR THE IMPERIUM.

I rest my case

I agree with Lord Loss here. He hasn't actually defended their actions, he's merely stopped an early lynch. You're jumping at shadows here. How is Lord Loss acting touchy? (You're using the same logic that got me killed in our last round)

**Emperors Faithful**

BrotherStynier wrote:If you act on fact presented to you, they affect your feelings on the matter, thus you'll still be doing what you feel to be correct.

I've read over this thread, so far any "Evidence" against anyone person would be rather lacking, so far the evidence points to:

-One of us not knowing when to stop running a joke into the ground. Genestealer? Unlikely.

-One of us appearing rather blood thirsty. More than one.

-One of us pulling percentages and theories about who is loyal and who is not out of their ass. Is this what a genestealer would do? Yes. But they'd be an awfully bad genestealer. Besides I'm soon as lynch him just for that annoying marine story.

-Against me you've got my being not hostile towards everyone, my voting for Drk_O and saying that you need to trust you instincts and feelings on the first day. This is actually what the_ferret said. You're encouraging people to go on thier gut instincts. Lord Loss is encouraging people to read through the thread (which I doubt many will bother) and look at the evidence present first.

-And then theres you, who has been suspiciously protective of certain individuals.

Look at above post. And honestly the chances of a Lord Loss, Drk_O and the_ferret team make no sense as we've been at each others throats and in the spotlight. Something a genestealer would want to avoid.

**lord of the ghosts**

Emperors Faithful wrote:Great. Now the genestealers are going to read this and target dumb people. (Help! ) Or they'll target you. *points at monitor*

Serious face: LOTG's voting pattern is very 'erratic' right now. I would call it downright suspicious, but this could just be the voting pattern of a very silly (and not at all helpful) Citizen. I'm not too sure about that though.

I think Ef has unlocked the un-random-random-ness. That is why I am voting for EF. But now everyone will think I am a crazy marine. I can't tell anyone, or else I'll die. They will know.

**Emperors Faithful**

Lol Wut?

Why are you voting for me again?

**RustyKnight**

"What? 'Un-random-randomness'?"

**the_ferrett**

What I asked was a time to be set for when voting would get serious. I suggest 6 hours before dusk (eg 4 RL days time). At this moment we seem to be using votes to get people to explain themselves. Voting to actually lynch someone has yet to commence by all wording.

As for erratic voting? I've voted twice, once to Drk_O and once to RustyKnight. Please get your facts right.

**Emperors Faithful**

the_ferrett wrote:What I asked was a time to be set for when voting would get serious. I suggest 6 hours before dusk (eg 4 RL days time). At this moment we seem to be using votes to get people to explain themselves. Voting to actually lynch someone has yet to commence by all wording.

As for erratic voting? I've voted twice, once to Drk_O and once to RustyKnight. Please get your facts right.

LOTG = lord of the ghosts. I haven't called your voting erratic at all.

**Deff Dread red Edition**

"You seem a bit jumpy there Ferrett, perhaps a bit too much so."

OOC:Really just a filler post again, as once again all my questions were asked and answered.

**Gornall**

Remember that whoever has the most votes on them at the deadline is lynched automatically, so we do not have to come to a full consensus. That being said, I would argue that every vote is "serious", whether it's for pressure or to try and drop the hammer on someone. That's why I think every vote should come with a pretty good explanation of why it's being voted.

OOC:: Kinda busy IRL atm, will post a more thorough set of arguments/suspicions after I get a chance to read what happened over the weekend.

**lord of the ghosts**

I woke up. I'll rest the other side of my brain. *yawns, which sounds like a roar in his mask* This is cool. I never completely sleep. Oh, let's clear that vote there, UNvote: Emperors Faithful

**Lord-Loss**

Lord Of The Ghosts, I urge you to stop all this 'space marine' crap. Because frankly, no-one is buying it.

**Emperors Faithful**

Okay, if by the time we reach the deadline and have not elected a proabable genestealer, can we at least lynch this fella? His claim to be a Juvenille Space Marine is quite annoying.

**Drk_Oblitr8r**

EF, if we don't have a majority vote for someone by the end of the day, then we lynch the person most people voted for.

(OOC: What would happen in case of 2 or more people with the same amount of votes?)

**Emperors Faithful**

Lynch both? ^_^

I know, it was sort of a joke. This Day has sort of hit a deadend as several people (I'm looking at you, DLS and LotG) haven't responded to any questions. And these are the most suspicioius characters right now.

Maybe adding another vote will help.

Vote: Dark Lord Seanron

**lord of the ghosts**

Emperors Faithful wrote:Okay, if by the time we reach the deadline and have not elected a proabable genestealer, can we at least lynch this fella? His claim to be a Juvenille Space Marine is quite annoying.

You think a normal man can have a face like this, and survive? *takes off mask to show a skull with some meat on it. About 55% of his eye should not be showing. (

) The other eye is gone, and is now a manchine eye. When he talks, a flap of skin widens.

there is no nose to speak of left* The warp is annoying *puts mask back on*

**Deff Dread red Edition**

"So, apparently we have in our company a teenage-zombie-space marine....Perhaps your intention was to claim a position with the astrates to gain dominion over us. I would have perhaps entertained the idea of you being a space marine, were it not for the fact that you look like an abomination. Nothing so foul could serve our god-emperor. Also I keep on going back to this point but, why would a space marine be part of a mercenary company?"

**Thor665**

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:(OOC: What would happen in case of 2 or more people with the same amount of votes?)

Per the rules post at the beginning of this thread - the person who reached the number of votes that the tie is at first would be lynched. (so, two players, Player A with 3 votes and Player B with four. If someone then votes Player A so both have four and then deadline hits Player B would be lynched because he was at 4 votes first. Conversely If someone on Player B's bandwagon unvotes and drops B to 3 votes Player A would be lynched because he had been at 3 first.)

And as long as I'm here;

Ye Olde Vote Accounting

0 - n0t_u
0 - Vulkan_He'stan
0 - Mekboy
2 - lord of the ghosts (Mekboy Vulkan_He'stan)
0 - BrotherStynier
0 - Deff Dread red Edition
0 - Fifty
0 - Emperor's Faithul
0 - Rusty Knight
1 - Drk_O ( Dark Lord Seanron )
5 - the_ferrett (Gornall Drk_O Rusty Knight n0t_u ginger_nid_dude)
1 - ginger_nid_dude (Fifty )
0 - Lord-Loss
2 - Dark Lord Seanron ( Lord-Loss Emperor's Faithful)
0 - Gornall

0 - No Lynch

Not Voting: BrotherStynier Deff Dread red Edition the_ferrett lord of the ghosts

With 15 alive it is 8 to Lynch
If the deadline were to hit now - the_ferrett would be lynched
Deadline countdown

**lord of the ghosts**

Deff Dread red Edition wrote:"So, apparently we have in our company a teenage-zombie-space marine....Perhaps your intention was to claim a position with the astrates to gain dominion over us. I would have perhaps entertained the idea of you being a space marine, were it not for the fact that you look like an abomination. Nothing so foul could serve our god-emperor. Also I keep on going back to this point but, why would a space marine be part of a mercenary company?"

You think a Shadow ghost is a mercenary? ( http://www.angelsghosts.com/shadow_ghosts ) On Hackarr, the only thing we have is a tree. It gives us fruit, we give it living help. When we help a planet or ship, we kindly ask them to donate items to be recycled into equipment. This might seem like getting payed, but we need that metal. Oh, let's see you get hit in the face by xenos-beelte things. I have repayed my dept of the god-emperor of man by killing muntants, it's easy to do, they think I'm one of them.

**Deff Dread red Edition**

"Yes, yes I do think a ghost shadow is a mercenary.You are on this expedition with us, and we are all mercenaries. Therefore I would think that you are a mercenary, if you were indeed part of this,'Ghost shadows,"chapter of space marines, wouldn't you be on this planet in force? I know that the astrates is powerful, but surely one marine isn't going to be able to save us all, also aren't you only a scout, which would make you even less powerful? They sure didn't help me and my men on Havcrom 3...but I'd rather not get into that. I still find your claims silly, and in all honesty I don't believe it one bit."

**Emperors Faithful**

Could we get everyone to repost why they are voting for their particular character? Just to see if anyone's thinking of changing.

I have voted for Dark Lord Seanron becuase I find his jumping on the Drk_O bandwagon with the clear intention of an early lynch awfully suspicious. That and he hasn't aptly responded to my accusations.

**Vulkan_He'stan**

i voted lord of ghostsbecause he has been using scumy logic and hasnt answered any questions

**Gornall**

I voted the_ferret because him and DLS seemed to be trying to get a quick lynch off. From the sound of his vote post, it seemed like he thought his vote was going to cause a lynch, which I think was because someone unvoted a few posts prior and he missed it. (OOC:: ala Game 1) His idea of an "experiment" seemed like a weak cover to me.

**Emperors Faithful**

True, I've never thought about a DLS and the_ferret team up. But looking back it seems entirely possible.

Keep 'em coming.

**the_ferrett**

Except there was a tally right before my vote?

**Gornall**

A tally that showed him at L-2. This was then followed by some votes for other people and an unvote for Dark_O. Following the unvote, EF incorrectly stated that Dark_O was L-2 and then voted for Dark_O, which would have put him at L-1. You then give a speech that sounded very much like a "hammer-dropping" speech and vote for Dark_O. You speech is what makes me think that you believed (incorrectly) that your vote was a lynch.

**the_ferrett**

If that's what gets you through the.... My metaphors are really starting to blow lately.

**Gornall**

What was the point of that speech if it wasn't a "You're now lynched" speech?

OOC:: I'm just going off experience from Game 1 where a miscount led to someone trying to self-lynch, something a stealer wouldn't ever do. However, he didn't self lynch, so that provided a solid clue that he was in fact innocent.