| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/20 08:46:20
Subject: Anyone else use the "Double V lack of BLOS terrain" DE tactic?
|
 |
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer
|
Okay so I figure your thinking "what in the hell is the "Double V lack of BLOS terrain" tactic".
well its when you have a significant lack of BLOS terrain in your deployment area so you take your raider and in a V formation in front of your ravagers of venoms as to give them a cover save?
I seem to use it allot and I never see anyone else using it, so I was wondering, do any of you?
Wolf
|
Black Templars WIP 2k
Xynovyth Kadruls Kabal of the shattered soul-2500
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/20 09:45:54
Subject: Anyone else use the "Double V lack of BLOS terrain" DE tactic?
|
 |
Airborne Infiltrating Tomcat
|
Hell yeah! It's one of the best ways to use our vehicles in my opinion, it's the whole reason I don't find venom spam that useful
My friend has only loose trees, no solid area terrain or buildings and a well placed raider can deny a counter charge or give a more important unit cover, the shock prow just means you can always rely on your mobile wall being able to do something!
I remember reading a tactica by dashofpepper years ago where he mentioned tank shocking to create advantageous assaults, since that world of possibility has been opened, I've never even considered a list without at least 3 raiders
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/20 14:30:23
Subject: Anyone else use the "Double V lack of BLOS terrain" DE tactic?
|
 |
Twisted Trueborn with Blaster
|
Absolutely.
It's part of the reason I believe pure venom spam (that is, 9 venoms, 3 ravagers, beast pack and the baron) isn't the best way to play DE.
My troops are 3-4x warrior venoms (depending on points) and 2x raiders filled with either Wyches or Wracks, depending on points as well. I find that they make a potent counter-assault element as well as improve the survivability of my Venoms drastically.
Although if the cover save nerf goes through for 6th, this will be a nigh-useless tactic since DE vehicles come with a 5++ built in.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/20 17:03:48
Subject: Anyone else use the "Double V lack of BLOS terrain" DE tactic?
|
 |
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle
|
I actually make a wall with 2 raiders and use 2 more raiders to make half walls and hide everything else behind em
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/20 18:06:07
Subject: Anyone else use the "Double V lack of BLOS terrain" DE tactic?
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
|
It's a good trick, I've seen DE players resort to similar stuff when their board doesn't have the required LOS blocking stuff.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/20 22:39:58
Subject: Anyone else use the "Double V lack of BLOS terrain" DE tactic?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
of course. You want to have at least 1 combat squad in any list. A unit of wyches to tie something up if need be. Then i find it nice to have 1 of the units of warriors in a raider.
|
Dark Mechanicus and Renegade Iron Hand Dakka Blog
My Dark Mechanicus P&M Blog. Mostly Modeling as I paint very slowly. Lots of kitbashed conversions of marines and a few guard to make up a renegade Iron Hand chapter and Dark Mechanicus Allies. Bionics++ |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/21 04:52:52
Subject: Anyone else use the "Double V lack of BLOS terrain" DE tactic?
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
|
I find it depends on what you have in the raiders - if you are using the wych raiders to block LOS to the venoms with warriors you have it the wrong way round!
I would rather the venoms provide obscuremnt to the assault troops raiders!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/21 19:46:15
Subject: Anyone else use the "Double V lack of BLOS terrain" DE tactic?
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Grand ol US of A
|
Normally I run 5 x 5man warrior squads in venoms and 2 blasterborn groups in venoms. Incubi and wyches are in raiders though. I find the balance they bring can realy keep my opponent off balance. Now do I rush across either? No...unless it's tau or IG. I sit back and make my opponent respond to me, once he gets close enough my raiders (which are shielded by venoms) pounce and get 'em. If I need to move up I go along the flanks. I've never heared of this double V thing though. If anything I will use venoms to screen even ravagers since I have 7 venoms but only 3 ravagers.
|
d3m01iti0n wrote:
BT uses the Codex Astartes as toilet paper. They’re an Imp Fist successor, recruit from multiple planets, and are known to be the largest Chapter in the galaxy. They’re on a constant Crusade, keeping it real for the Emperor and not bumming around like the other guys. They hate psykers and can’t ally with them. They’re basically an entire chapter of Chaplains. CC lunatics. What every Space Marine should aspire to be, if not trapped in a Matt Ward nightmare.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|