Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hey guys, I case you didn't know, the Army Faqs was released:

http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/content/article.jsp?catId=cat440134a&categoryId=1000018§ion=&pIndex=1&aId=3400019&start=2&multiPageMode=true

So I thought I'd start a discussion thread designed to do discuss the changes GW did or didn't make.

I'll Start:
According to the Imp Guard Faq, if a model has 2 toughness values (ex: 4(5)), You only use the bracketed value. So it seems you use it for id as well. Nurgle Lords are gonna abuse this to the fullest...

Nice find!

There is a thread in News & Rumours discussing this:

http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/458374.page

Well,

A) Its not a discussion thread, its a post letting people know the faqs out that has a discussion inside it. This is a discussion thread specifically

B) Its in News and Rumors even though the rulebook is released. Dakka Disscussions is more appropriate, don't you think?

Regardless of whether that thread belongs in N&R is neither here nor there, the point is there is already an existing thread on the subject. If it needs to be moved into here, then so be it but there isn't much point in having another thread discussing the same thing as it fragments discussion and views.

And even if this wasn't redundant, it wouldn't belong in Dakka Discussions as it is a 40K topic and 40K general topics belong in the 40K general discussion forum.