Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:00:24
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Slippery Scout Biker
|
Hi there,
I've just recieved a large gift from a fellow gamer in the form of a box full of about 50 tactical marines.
It got me wondering how many more till I have too many?
|
609th Cadian- (1000 Points)
Lunar Knights (3000 Points)
High Elves (4000 Points) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:02:10
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
As far as marines go I don't think you can ever have too many.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:08:01
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
|
Kit them out differently, but as a general rule 40 tacticals on the table is around as high as you should go. You can make more work, but it requires tooling the list.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:11:44
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Convert some to sternguard (I suggest 20) or use them to fill out devastator squads (there's another 10)... so you really have an additional 2 tactical squads
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:14:05
Subject: Re:How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Slippery Scout Biker
|
I could use some sternguards actually Thanks
|
609th Cadian- (1000 Points)
Lunar Knights (3000 Points)
High Elves (4000 Points) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:20:25
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
Hatfield, PA
|
Guardsman76 wrote:Hi there,
I've just recieved a large gift from a fellow gamer in the form of a box full of about 50 tactical marines.
It got me wondering how many more till I have too many?
Most generals of other armies would love to have the equivilent of 10 tactical marine squads on the table. Kit them out with special and heavy weapons and break them down into Combat squads. Now you have 10 heavy armored and well armed combat units on the table that your opponent now has to deal with. Park multiples with heavy weapons around the objectives and use your other 5 special weapon combat squads to take the other objectives. Tactical marines are capable in shooting and melee, so you can really include as many as you want. It does limit the amount of specialist troops you have access to, but so what. Tac marines are still better than most other troops in the the game...
If you need some sternguard, convert 10 to a sternguard unit and keep the rest as tacticals. It certainly won't hurt you to still have 8 combat squads on the table, giving you 8 units to hold objectives with. Your opponents will be jealous.
Skriker
|
CSM 6k points CSM 4k points
CSM 4.5k points CSM 3.5k points
 and Daemons 4k points each
Renegades 4k points
SM 4k points
SM 2.5k Points
3K 2.3k
EW, MW and LW British in Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0049/09/19 18:11:37
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
I use three or four in most games, any more beyond what you've got starts to approach too many. Convert some to use as Sternguard or Devastators.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 18:31:46
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
The most I ever put down on the table is 4 squads. But I do field 10 man Devastators, so that's a few more.
I think the most any one person really needs, unless they do a lot of apoc games, is 6 tactical squads. That's the number in a battle company, and coincidentally the number of troop picks in one FOC. You shouldn't need more then that. As someone who's collection is a reinforced battle company, I can make almost any list I am in the mood for, barring some specific examples.
If you are talking about basic guys with bolters
7 in a tac squad x 6 = 42
5 in a dev squad x2 = 10
Total bolter-brothers in a battle company is 52.
While a company only calls for 6 special weapons and 14 heavies (barring the command squad) you should have more then that just to swap out options. More then 4 of anything (except MLs, which I might say 10) is probably more then you'll need.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 18:44:52
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Unbalanced Fanatic
|
I'm going to echo what most of the people in here are saying. The most I've played on the table, outside of apoc, it 3 tac squads and 2 dev squads. Kitting them out as stern guard would work as well.
As to having too many, I don't think there is such a thing.  I put two battle companies on the table yesterday that was a lot of guys, so no need to stop at 50...
|
Finished 3rd Co Starting First Company
Arbites
DS:70+S+G+MB+IPw40k03#++D++A++/wWD280R+++T(D)DM++
Adepticon TT Headhunter 2008 1-800-INQUISITION |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 19:04:52
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dreadnought
|
Haha. I was going to suggest you can never have too many as eventually you just get to display your full Battle Company of Marines.
Two is a bit ridiculous. But, then again, I've seen some photos online of a guy who fielded the entire Ultramarines Chapter, and I think another one of a guy who was getting close to the entire Blood Angels.
I do have the entire Ultramarines Chapter somewhere from back in the day. However, in 6mm Epic Scale.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 20:19:12
Subject: Re:How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
The maximum number of tactical squads you ever want to take is four, and only if you play double FOC games. Otherwise the maximum is two. Tactical squads are garbage, they're a tax you pay to get to the good units in the codex and you never want to bring more than the absolute minimum required to fill the FOC and score objectives.
Of course the ideal number of tactical squads is zero. Take bikes as troops, or play a marine codex that has troops that don't suck.
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 20:25:31
Subject: Re:How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Peregrine wrote:The maximum number of tactical squads you ever want to take is four, and only if you play double FOC games. Otherwise the maximum is two. Tactical squads are garbage, they're a tax you pay to get to the good units in the codex and you never want to bring more than the absolute minimum required to fill the FOC and score objectives.
Of course the ideal number of tactical squads is zero. Take bikes as troops, or play a marine codex that has troops that don't suck.
I second this. Harsh..but true. They are a pre-req to the other goodies Codex SM brings
|
Easy Stable Flying base tutorial here on Dakka:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/356483.page
Check out my Tyrannofex Conversion tutorial here on Dakka:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/334523.page
Check out my Librarian holding fire tutorial here on Dakka:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/314801.page |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 20:26:56
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
I find that three is a good number, four is a bit hefty. Anything above that I've found to be just too much!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/11/19 20:27:28
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member. -Groucho Marx
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 22:20:51
Subject: Re:How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Bane Lord Tartar Sauce
|
I've found that at games under 1500 points, you generally only want 2, any more and you loose out on most other options you can bring, considering that a Tactical Squad's cost can easily get into the 200 point range with transports. In the 1500 - 1999 range, you'll generally want more scoring bodies, so a third Tac Squad might be ok, but another alternative I am fond of is 5 Sniper Scouts with Cloaks and maybe a ML as a backfield objective holder.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 22:39:08
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard
|
My SM army has 70 tacticals.
I know, according to "fluff" that I only 'require' 6 for a company (along with two assault squads and two dev units).
But I was working on a full company of tacticals - then I gave up on 40k.
|
I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.
That is not dead which can eternal lie ...
... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 22:56:01
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Jovial Junkatrukk Driver
|
Guardsman76 wrote:Hi there,
I've just recieved a large gift from a fellow gamer in the form of a box full of about 50 tactical marines.
It got me wondering how many more till I have too many?
From what ive heard 2 full tactical squads are a maximum you should take for >2k point games.
|
motyak wrote:[...] Yes, the mods are illuminati, and yakface, lego and dakka dakka itself are the 3 points of the triangle. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 23:13:34
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Renegade Inquisitor de Marche
|
There's no such thing as too many.
|
Dakka Bingo! By Ouze
"You are the best at flying things"-Kanluwen
"Further proof that Purple is a fething brilliant super villain " -KingCracker
"Purp.. Im pretty sure I have a gun than can reach you...."-Nicorex
"That's not really an apocalypse. That's just Europe."-Grakmar
"almost as good as winning free cake at the tea drinking contest for an Englishman." -Reds8n
Seal up your lips and give no words but mum.
Equip, Reload. Do violence.
Watch for Gerry. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/20 01:37:36
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Daemonhammer wrote: Guardsman76 wrote:Hi there,
I've just recieved a large gift from a fellow gamer in the form of a box full of about 50 tactical marines.
It got me wondering how many more till I have too many?
From what ive heard 2 full tactical squads are a maximum you should take for >2k point games.
I agree. I've done quite well with C: SM and one or two tactical squads and a scout squad (all combat squaded) is the most I've ever taken in sub 2K games.
Pedro may not be that great of an HQ, but 2 or 3 scoring sternguard squads and 2 tactical squads is a ton o fun.
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/20 01:42:02
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar
|
ShatteredBlade wrote:I find that three is a good number, four is a bit hefty. Anything above that I've found to be just too much!
I agree with this. 30 kitted out right should be enough. Anymore and you are probably wasting points. But they are solid all round troops choice.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/20 01:54:46
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Leutnant
Hiding in a dark alley with a sharp knife!
|
I have a full six squads painted up for my Imperial Fists, that is to say enough to fill all six "troops" slots should I feel the need to. That being said, I usually only run four at a time in my gunline or Master of the Forge builds. Even at four squads I find that when I break them down into five man units I've got a problem with traffic jams and getting everyone deployed.
TR
|
Former Kommandant, KZ Dakka
"I was Oldhammer before Oldhammer was cool!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/20 06:30:56
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
Christchurch, New Zealand
|
I have a general rule of at least 25 power armoured bodies on the field. usually two tactical squads and a combat squad, although I try to field at least three full squads when I can.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/11/20 06:32:06
Damn the haters, Full speed ahead!
The Steel Drakes 3500pts and counting! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/20 07:13:18
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Never have too many! personally I have 4-10 man squads and the options for fielding 2 dev squads with additional bodies, also just doing what was suggested earlier and converting some to Sternguard, plus having a company on your hobby room shelf always looks fantastic!
|
Flesh Eaters 4,500 points
" I will constantly have those in my head telling me how lazy and ugly and whorish I am. You sir, are a true friend " - KingCracker
"Nah, I'm just way too lazy to stand up so I keep sitting and paint" - Sigur
"I think the NMM technique with metals is just MNMM. Same sound I make while eating a good pizza" - Whalemusic360 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/20 07:42:42
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Ork and Catachan Training Center, Australia
|
How many Tac Marines do you have overall? If you had 60, that might be a good amount for planetstrike, as you have powerful soldiers all over your walls.
Or... the imperial defence network. Truly, it is yummy.
|
By bolter and honour, by blood and fire, we shall cleanse this galaxy. By Vulkan, and by the Emperor, CHARGE!
Yo Dawgs, I heard you like grimdark, so I put grimdark in yo grimdark in yo grimdark in yo universe that is obviously grimdark.
"On the Anvil of War are the strong tempered and the weak made to perish, thus are men's souls tested as metal in the forge's fire." — Primarch Vulkan |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/27 20:06:39
Subject: Re:How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
Hatfield, PA
|
Peregrine wrote:The maximum number of tactical squads you ever want to take is four, and only if you play double FOC games. Otherwise the maximum is two. Tactical squads are garbage, they're a tax you pay to get to the good units in the codex and you never want to bring more than the absolute minimum required to fill the FOC and score objectives.
Of course the ideal number of tactical squads is zero. Take bikes as troops, or play a marine codex that has troops that don't suck.
Yeah tactical squads are garbage...4s across major stats, capability in hand to hand and shooting, special and heavy weapon access, ability to hold objectives and ability to split into combat squads makes for a completely garbage unit on the table that should never be taken...EVER...  Really?? Tactical marines are the most easily used and jack of all trades troops in the entire game. They can bring some of everything to the battle and do it better than many armies' elite troops can. Yep tactical marines suck big time.
Skriker
|
CSM 6k points CSM 4k points
CSM 4.5k points CSM 3.5k points
 and Daemons 4k points each
Renegades 4k points
SM 4k points
SM 2.5k Points
3K 2.3k
EW, MW and LW British in Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/27 20:21:37
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
44 squads, or 440 marines. A Battle Company has 6/60, there are four battle companies, so that's 24 or 240. Then the 10 squads in each 6th and 7th for a total of 200. So 440.
|
I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!
Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/27 20:57:29
Subject: Re:How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I only recently discovered the addictiveness of bidding on ebay. I am now the proud owner of about 130 marines! Instead of just building a Hawklords chapter, I can now do Ultras and maybe Imperial Fists as well. I don't actually play any more as because of work travelling I can never get to the nearest club, so I see them more as painting challenges; I've never painted yellow(Imperial Fists) before and it will be interesting to see how I get on with it. In regard to my Hawklords plans, I 've bought a few bits and pieces from other manufacturers such as as alternative helmets/weapons/bodies, so it is a challenge I'm looking forward to!
In response to the OP, there is no such thing as too many, only too little time!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/27 20:58:03
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
Some Tau World
|
In 4ed i played a guy with 99 SM hardest game of 40k ever
i only had 80 Orks, i like trukks and killa kans.
i was like WOW that is so much power armor
|
all ur base are belong to da
 
all the armies i used to beat b4 6ed
 
 
  
 
  |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/27 21:08:16
Subject: Re:How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Devastating Dark Reaper
|
Skriker wrote: Peregrine wrote:
Yeah tactical squads are garbage...4s across major stats, capability in hand to hand and shooting, special and heavy weapon access, ability to hold objectives and ability to split into combat squads makes for a completely garbage unit on the table that should never be taken...EVER...  Really?? Tactical marines are the most easily used and jack of all trades troops in the entire game. They can bring some of everything to the battle and do it better than many armies' elite troops can. Yep tactical marines suck big time.
Not to mention that you only would need to kill 20 marines max to now keep your army from scoring objectives in most games. I'd figure a decent number of tact marines would do you well, especially considering that you can get 2 scoring units from a single troop choice and have them be at least resilient to small arms fire-- heck, you can push both halves into the same rhino and drop them off onto two different objective close to each other. As a primarily Xenos player, I'd kill to have troops as good as tactical marines available to me-- realistically I might take some as allies just to give me better units to take forward objectives. It's totally short-sighted to poo-poo these guys because they aren't specialist troops.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/27 21:14:43
Subject: How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Terrifying Doombull
|
You can never have enough tactical marines, I never leave home without 3 or 4 squads of them. To this date they have never failed to earn their points back. In most cases they do casue more havoc than most other things I have fielded outside of Termies and Dreads
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/27 21:47:25
Subject: Re:How Many SM tactical squads is too many??
|
 |
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
Auckland, New Zealand
|
Skriker wrote: Peregrine wrote:The maximum number of tactical squads you ever want to take is four, and only if you play double FOC games. Otherwise the maximum is two. Tactical squads are garbage, they're a tax you pay to get to the good units in the codex and you never want to bring more than the absolute minimum required to fill the FOC and score objectives.
Of course the ideal number of tactical squads is zero. Take bikes as troops, or play a marine codex that has troops that don't suck.
Yeah tactical squads are garbage...4s across major stats, capability in hand to hand and shooting, special and heavy weapon access, ability to hold objectives and ability to split into combat squads makes for a completely garbage unit on the table that should never be taken...EVER...  Really?? Tactical marines are the most easily used and jack of all trades troops in the entire game. They can bring some of everything to the battle and do it better than many armies' elite troops can. Yep tactical marines suck big time.
Skriker
4s across major stats, and a 3+ armour save, like every marine. It's equipment that differentiates them and tactical equipment is sub par. Not surprising given that the pattern for tactical marines hasn't changed since second edition.
No capability in assault, one attack a model does little, and challenges mean that points spent on the sergeant are generally wasted.
A minimum of 170 points for a flamer and missile launcher? Add more points if you want better guns, or perhaps a transport. Shooting value for points spent is not good.
Holding objectives? Like any other troops choice? Combat squads, which means you now have five man squads, or as I like to call them, poison bait.
Jack of all trades troops choice? You're confusing them with Grey Hunters or Chaos Marines (and they have their own weaknesses).
Tactical squads are good at one thing. Not dying too quickly. Toughness 4, a 3+ armour save, and ATSKNF means that a full ten man squad will take some effort to remove from the table. However if you want a unit that can take the fight to the enemy they're not the droids you're looking for.
Sixth edition hasn't changed the fact that specialists are better than generalists. Specialist shooting units outclass tactical squads at range, specialist melee units will outclass them in assault. A competent player will not allow you to assault their specialist shooters, nor shoot their specialist assault units, and because you pay for your "survivability" and your unused ability the specialist units will probably also outnumber you.
Tactical marines are a bad unit. Unfortunately they're a bad unit that you have little choice about taking. Scouts lack the marine armour and transport options. Bikes require you to take a biker Captain so have their own tax (it is a pretty awesome tax though). Space Marines are a mid tier codex, and the tactical tax is one of the reasons for that.
I still use them, when playing with a librarian, or a mass dreadnought Master of the Forge list, but I'm becoming more and more addicted to my bikes who are mobile shooting specialists.
|
 I am Blue/White Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.I'm both orderly and rational. I value control, information, and order. I love structure and hierarchy, and will actively use whatever power or knowledge I have to maintain it. At best, I am lawful and insightful; at worst, I am bureaucratic and tyrannical.

I find passive aggressive messages in people's signatures quite amusing. |
|
 |
 |
|