Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Sidstyler wrote:

Cheese Elemental wrote:I hate it when people assume Slaanesh=porn.

And I hate it when people assume nudity=porn.

Seriously though, there's nothing pornographic about it. It's not touching itself or really doing anything, it's just posing naked. It's disturbing as all feth, I'll give you that...it's definitely not right, but it's not "porn", really.

Porn doesn't mean graphic sex. It can just a be a person not 'touching themselves' and still be pornographic. It is a very difficult thing to describe, which is why even legally the best thing a Supreme Court Justice (Potter Stewart) could do was to say that he couldn't describe it but "that i know it when I see it".

Ketara wrote:I personally wouldn't buy it. I might cock an eyebrow at those who would.

skrulnik wrote:Sid, you obviously didn't see the 360 view through the link.

It is overly anatomical for something so disturbingly unnatural.

The pics should probably not have been put on Dakka.

I can definitely see certain workplaces firing someone for opening this thread.

Links to other places are fine, you click those at your own risk.

Totally agree, dakka is not 4chan or other virtual trash orientated site.
If there is such a thing as a limit to what is unapropriate I think this ridiculous picture of a random cow with gigantic cock and boobs for balls sculpt (not even wargames orientated) IS it.
Besides what kind of news is this... "For slaanesh worshippers only" and slams a 4chan nonsense picture with no relevant info...
Poor judgement.

Ahtman wrote:

Valhallan42nd wrote:Is Luna a woman? I don't know if that's ever been established by Luna. Luna could be a dude into female anime avatars.

In all seriousness though, while an *ahem* interesting fig, you would only be able to use it at home as I doubt a store owner would want that on the table.

Modquisition on. Drop the comments about Lunahound people.
I am reviewing this thread for disciplinary items.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

LunaHound wrote:Here is the 360 view http://cgi.4chan.org/f/src/2_mb_maus_incompletecandy.swf

This actually looks vaguely Babylonian and would fit with Slaanesh theme.

deleted by modquisition as OT

ShumaGorath wrote:This forum doesn't even have mods any more does it?

Sure does, care to be test banned to reinforce belief?
The model at this time is appropriately covered. Its disturbing (I'm not opening the 4Chan to see the real deal), but guess what guys thats Rogue Trader demon style disturbing, thats how your favorite slaanesh really is. Frankly its not far off from various fertility statues I've seen in Real Life (TM).

See I don't get ladyboy goats when I'm thinking Slaanesh, I get Hellraiser Cenobytes.

Frazzled wrote:Frankly its not far off from various fertility statues I've seen in Real Life (TM).

Your looking at one in your front yard right now aren't you?

Frazzled wrote:This actually looks vaguely Babylonian

Ah finally, I was trying to get a sense of why it seemed familiar but I couldn't quite recall.

Frazzled wrote: and would fit with Slaanesh theme.

Well let us not get ahead of ourselves.

MeanGreenStompa wrote:See I don't get ladyboy goats when I'm thinking Slaanesh, I get Hellraiser Cenobytes.

I think they are similar , for example Hooves and Beast like heads :


when i see Cenobytes , they look like Dark Eldar

I've always thought there was something seductive about slannesh, and daemonettes tend to be like the Sirens of greek myth, beautiful and tempting but hideous and evil.

So I always things it's bit crude when people think that they can make a figure look more Slannesh by sticking a huge cock on it. It's crass and somewhat childish. There's talk about "prudes" and "8 year olds" on the thread. I always get a chuckle when some people think that sticking big knobs and tits on things is "adult". Adolescent I'd have thought; most people get over defacing books and desks in a similar manner by the time they leave school. I've got a fair few naked and semi-naked figures in my collection but stuff like this is just grotesque rubbish.

Im not saying naked things = slanesh .

Edit , what im trying to say is , if you take
+ + + +

And put it in the telepod : = You would get that cow thing -_-

skrulnik wrote:Sid, you obviously didn't see the 360 view through the link.

I did, in fact. I didn't look at it for very long, mind you...but I did see the 360 view.

I agree, the pics shouldn't have been put on Dakka simply because it's not work safe (especially uncensored, but I would have opted to post it as a link only with a strong warning, if I were going to post it at all), but I wouldn't go as far as calling it pornographic.

...I dunno though, knowing where it came from, and the ridiculous genitalia (wtf is up with those nipples)...I'm on the fence I guess. I don't think it's quite offensive enough to be called porn, but man is it ever wrong.

So I always things it's bit crude when people think that they can make a figure look more Slannesh by sticking a huge cock on it. It's crass and somewhat childish. There's talk about "prudes" and "8 year olds" on the thread. I always get a chuckle when some people think that sticking big knobs and tits on things is "adult". Adolescent I'd have thought; most people get over defacing books and desks in a similar manner by the time they leave school. I've got a fair few naked and semi-naked figures in my collection but stuff like this is just grotesque rubbish.

Can I be your friend?

I was getting so frustrated in this thread because of that very thing, I was the one being accused of being prudish or immature because I thought it was fething stupid to stick big dicks and tits on models and call it "fluffy". Glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks that way.


EDIT: God, that model...the leather thigh-highs, what the hell were they thinking...

Anyway, I know what you're trying to say, I too thought about the bovine-looking Slaanesh GDs when I saw that, but this is just too over-the-top I think.

Dear Lord, I used to run a Slaneshii daemons that I converted, no big deal for me. Man I stop using them since everyone that saw them started to complain because they looked too porno.

Ok, now I remember why I just delete threads and suspend people. Editing is such a pain.

I am moving this to the modeling forum for discussion, and also putting a warning in the title. Other mods can remove the thread if they feel it is appropriate.

LunaHound wrote:

Valhallan42nd wrote:Is Luna a woman? I don't know if that's ever been established by Luna. Luna could be a dude into female anime avatars.

You ask this once a month mister .

I am going to be a good little boy and refrain from the obvious jokes that could be made...

It is a strange model, well done, with a nasty subject designed to get the occasional wierdo's rocks off. I am not offended by it, and there are probably many people who can appreciate the artisticness of it.

yeah!?
I don't think it's worth the discussion it's recieved, It looks rubbish to me...

Panic...

@Sidstyler

To be fair , the first post was exactly that , it has a link and a warning.
Then people said the nudity , so i thought its a nice sculpt , worth sharing to not delete the whole thread / post

so then i censored the thing so people wouldnt have to click the 360 view one and see the nudity .

I dont want this to be something worth arguing / fighting over.
If the thread is questionable , please delete it and not take chances .

And if i broke any rules , please give me the proper punishment .

(Shudder...)

LunaHound wrote:And if i broke any rules , please give me the proper punishment .

I dunno about the rules, but like I said I'll kick your ass if this haunts me later.

Then again I exaggerate, I'm pretty sure I've seen worse than this.


Also, anyone else find it funny...considering what this thread is about, Lunahound's gender, and the fact that she's asking to be punished? Should I shut up?

NAVARRO wrote:Totally agree, dakka is not 4chan or other virtual trash orientated site.
If there is such a thing as a limit to what is unapropriate I think this ridiculous picture of a random cow with gigantic cock and boobs for balls sculpt (not even wargames orientated) IS it.
Besides what kind of news is this... "For slaanesh worshippers only" and slams a 4chan nonsense picture with no relevant info...
Poor judgement.

I would not call this "virtual trash", for reasons I've previously discussed. I know I overuse the example, but the famous World War 2 diorama "My God, why do you throw me away?" comes to mind. It was a technically flawless piece, assembled with all the modelling skill in the world, depicting German soldiers executing civilians. The many-uddered cowgirl, too, is sculpted extremely well, but is a subject few people here are comfortable with. That's fine, but I would say we should tolerate it.

On a tangent, what's it sculpted of, can anyone tell? Looks like some kind of clay to me, possibly the oven-hardened stuff Rackham used to use.

EDIT: It looks like it was too much for 4chan to bear, the link now leads to 404.

Sidstyler wrote:
Can I be your friend?

I was getting so frustrated in this thread because of that very thing, I was the one being accused of being prudish or immature because I thought it was fething stupid to stick big dicks and tits on models and call it "fluffy". Glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks that way.


EDIT: God, that model...the leather thigh-highs, what the hell were they thinking...

Anyway, I know what you're trying to say, I too thought about the bovine-looking Slaanesh GDs when I saw that, but this is just too over-the-top I think.

Here's an example of a daemonette, and obvious nudity, done well.



Found here... http://www.hfmodeling.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=3375
Immeasurably better than the thing with bloated breasts and gigantic penis.

What do you reckon is up with the lobster claw theme in Slaaneshi models?

personally I feel slaanesh is about excess. Granted some of that can be interpeted as hedonistic, but for those fluff lovers who know of the 6 gates of slaanesh's castle know that "women" is only one such excess. Money, Food,and so much more make it up as well. As to that end personally I have seen worse then that. For those of you who remember Archeons invasion event years ago I saw online a pick of a something with a deamonette riding a shot out. To me that was distasteful and pushing boundaries, BUT it was that persons right to have it. That said overall it is just a model not the real deal and much like the horrible horror movies that we see out in theaters now it is just make believe, and shouldnt be taken literally. For those who find it offensive well you have that right, but obviously luna has the right to post it(though I do question how he found it). To that end yes my post playcates to many, but personally im just neutral on the whole affair and felt like giving my two cents.

.....GAME ON

see i quite like the model, i also don't think it looks finished and belive it could do with more work.

the fact i'd hit it is not the point.

also to those talkign about slaanesh and hedonism/ waht the demons look like etc.
2 things go read the iber chaotica articles and also find that ancient vaigna deamon which pops up in one of the old inquisition war novels iirc.

Oh yes i quite accept that slaanesh isn't all about perversion and excees therough carnal desires but its still a part of Slaanesh and if people want to model aroudn it in a fairly tasteful way (i know people will disagree with me but i have very little problem with nudity and i don't see why people do, except fat people, they can burn).

If people want to go and do other aspect of slaanesh to show that other forms are possible fine go do it. Personally i'd love to see Purple suited leprachauns runnign around with pots of gold as a unit of deamonettes in a deamon army. In fact brain wave, entire Slaabesh army with units representing different aspects of excess.... OK good modellers on your starting lines GO!

My thoughts:

The model on question is undeniably well crafted, with the owner clearly putting a lot of time and effort into it. However, I personally don't like the subject much. Now I feel that it is that persons right to have, and use that model, but with discretion. Using it in front of 8 year olds as someone mentioned earlier, would be inappropriate in my eyes.

Howard A Treesong wrote:

Here's an example of a daemonette, and obvious nudity, done well.



Found here... http://www.hfmodeling.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=3375

This, I think, is far better. I've seen this before, and seems to me a far better representation of Slaanesh. Excess and hedonism isn't all about excessively proportioned anatomy, as demonstrated by Sersi in his Daemon army. I'd encourage people to look at that- in my opinion these are far better.

However I restate my opinion that there is nothing morally wrong about this model, just that it should be used with discretion.

{/ ]

And contrary to what some seem to believe the cowgirl is not entirely anatomically correct.

And I'm not talking about the extra bits here...

Is there actually anyone saying (other than jokingly) that a model can be morally wrong? Something can be in poor taste quite apart from it being morally wrong. I think the discussion was on the right track when we were talking over whether you'd field the thing or not. For myself, no. Not because it has some nudity but rather because it is quite ugly despite all of the obviously exceptional skill that went into making it. What makes it ugly, as opposed to the second model (which I would field)? As has been already said, it seems to have been designed according to an entirely adolescent gross-out aesthetic. The ridiculous penis is probably the last straw, so to speak.

On the other hand, is there any evidence that this was actually meant for gaming?

Manchu wrote:
On the other hand, is there any evidence that this was actually meant for gaming?

that is a very very good point

To sum up:

It's furry, it's in poor taste, and I never should have posted on this thread in the first place.

Burn it with fire and salt the earth.

Unsubscribing.

ShumaGorath wrote:FurAffinity? Are you kidding me?




Also I'm pretty sure posting that is against forum rules given how ludicrously nsfw it is.

I gotta agree with Shuma, if I saw that thing in at a FLGS I would definately throw up a bit in my mouth.