Switch Theme:

UK Government attempts to censor porn.... Again....  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Douglas Bader






 SlaveToDorkness wrote:
Damn you Lord of Hats....now I gotta know...maybe.


Vore = sexualizing the idea of being devoured and/or devouring. Like being eaten by a giant snake. Really, I'm not sure why this is considered so horrifying to think about that it needs special warnings. On the scale from "sex through a hole in the sheet to make a baby" to "OH DEAR GOD WHAT AM I WATCHING" it barely rates a "kind of weird".

There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka





Ottawa Ontario Canada

 Goliath wrote:
you can't legally consent to bodily harm.


How does denny's remain in business then?

Do you play 30k? It'd be a lot cooler if you did.  
   
Made in us
Tzeentch Aspiring Sorcerer Riding a Disc




The darkness between the stars

 Peregrine wrote:
 SlaveToDorkness wrote:
Damn you Lord of Hats....now I gotta know...maybe.


Vore = sexualizing the idea of being devoured and/or devouring. Like being eaten by a giant snake. Really, I'm not sure why this is considered so horrifying to think about that it needs special warnings. On the scale from "sex through a hole in the sheet to make a baby" to "OH DEAR GOD WHAT AM I WATCHING" it barely rates a "kind of weird".


To be fair for a lot of normal people that would scale pretty high along with probably even moderate bdsm When it comes to fetishes in the grand scheme of things it's got nothing but I think some people don't know the worst of them

As per the ones censored. I can see a few like a certain one involving asphyxiation but stuff like female ejaculation sounds silly to limit.

2375
/ 1690
WIP (1875)
1300
760
WIP (350)
WIP (150) 
   
Made in us
Secret Force Behind the Rise of the Tau




USA

Medium of Death wrote:
 daedalus wrote:
 LordofHats wrote:

*If you don't know what this is, don't look it up. You're better off not knowing.

Seconded.


I did...




...kinda wish I hadn't.


I warned you damnit!

SlaveToDorkness wrote:Damn you Lord of Hats....now I gotta know...maybe.


Don't do it!

   
Made in us
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar





Speaking of vorarephilia... I recall seeing a recent promo for a show about a guy who's going to don a suit of body armour and cameras so he film himself being swallowed alive by a python or anaconda snake...

This gak is actually possible and is/has been done for entertainment purposes.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/12/04 04:13:37


 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut






Female ejaculation is life threatening? Sounds sexist to me...

Tier 1 is the new Tactical.

My IDF-Themed Guard Army P&M Blog:

http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/30/355940.page 
   
Made in gb
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego





Canterbury

At long long last we can finally bring back the role of Pornfinder General.

The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king,
 
   
Made in gb
Worthiest of Warlock Engineers






preston

Pornfinder General? Red, tell us more of this please!

BTW, how long is it till the next election? Because I want these conservatives out asap, before they try to ban all the porns

Free from GW's tyranny and the hobby is looking better for it
DR:90-S++G+++M++B++I+Pww205++D++A+++/sWD146R++T(T)D+
 
   
Made in gb
Regular Dakkanaut




Aberdeen Scotland

It just means the UK pron industry is doomed. All the decent stuff (and most of the UK outfits moved there ages ago) comes from eastern Europe or the USA.

Thousands of high quality pron, then theres always amateur stuff which will never die and cannot be stopped by BBFC.

I do like how the BBFC believes it has an effect though.

 
   
Made in gb
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord







He's in the same branch as the Paedofinder General if I recall correctly.

I have peered through the peep-hole of morality and parted the beaded curtain of truth. By the power invested in me, through the invocation of Mary Whitehouse and the Conservative Party I find you GUILTY of sexual perversion.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/12/04 10:27:43


   
Made in gb
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego





Canterbury

very good


The next General erec...err.... election is in 2015.

I'm sure a cross crudely drawn with ones off hand still counts as marking your mark.

The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king,
 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






Sheffield, City of University and Northern-ness

 NuggzTheNinja wrote:
Female ejaculation is life threatening? Sounds sexist to me...
The guy in charge of the BBFC has gone on record as stating that despite the evidence for it's existence, Female Ejaculation is a myth, and any that is shown in video will actually just be urination, which is banned.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Crablezworth wrote:
 Goliath wrote:
you can't legally consent to bodily harm.


How does denny's remain in business then?
Well, mind-bogglingly, as long as you call it a spectator sport, and sign the relevant waivers, it's perfectly fine to consent to bodily harm, so Denny's is good on all counts It's how boxing and the like are able to take place.

But yeah, the act of beating the gak out of each other for money is fine, but legally consenting adults hitting each other for pleasure is gross and wrong, and thus illegal.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/12/04 11:40:18


   
Made in us
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar





 Goliath wrote:
 NuggzTheNinja wrote:
Female ejaculation is life threatening? Sounds sexist to me...
The guy in charge of the BBFC has gone on record as stating that despite the evidence for it's existence, Female Ejaculation is a myth, and any that is shown in video will actually just be urination, which is banned


Women urinate through their vagina?
   
Made in gb
Courageous Space Marine Captain






Glasgow, Scotland

What is my government doing? My parents and family pay taxes for this?! Feth this, to twitter I go to complain of the government wasting time and money.

I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!

Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
 
   
Made in gb
Worthiest of Warlock Engineers






preston

 Medium of Death wrote:
He's in the same branch as the Paedofinder General if I recall correctly.

I have peered through the peep-hole of morality and parted the beaded curtain of truth. By the power invested in me, through the invocation of Mary Whitehouse and the Conservative Party I find you GUILTY of sexual perversion.


Oh boy, I best get hiding my HDD then

Free from GW's tyranny and the hobby is looking better for it
DR:90-S++G+++M++B++I+Pww205++D++A+++/sWD146R++T(T)D+
 
   
Made in gb
Bryan Ansell





Birmingham, UK

We must resist this governments attempts at censorship.

Porn represents one of our best exports perhaps only behind Benedict Cumberbund.

'Lovelies' like that in my avatar have their jobs on the line ONE1!

   
Made in gb
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle





 master of ordinance wrote:
Pornfinder General? Red, tell us more of this please!

BTW, how long is it till the next election? Because I want these conservatives out asap, before they try to ban all the porns


Unless you think we are going to get a Lib Dem or Green majority not much will change. Labour were just as bad, and if UKIP do manage to edge out the Lib Dems for the third party (I hope to god they don't) then it will get worse.

 Goliath wrote:
 NuggzTheNinja wrote:
Female ejaculation is life threatening? Sounds sexist to me...
The guy in charge of the BBFC has gone on record as stating that despite the evidence for it's existence, Female Ejaculation is a myth, and any that is shown in video will actually just be urination, which is banned.


Utterly stupid... It does have a ring of Victorian views on women and sex.

 Goliath wrote:

 Crablezworth wrote:
 Goliath wrote:
you can't legally consent to bodily harm.


How does denny's remain in business then?
Well, mind-bogglingly, as long as you call it a spectator sport, and sign the relevant waivers, it's perfectly fine to consent to bodily harm, so Denny's is good on all counts It's how boxing and the like are able to take place.

But yeah, the act of beating the gak out of each other for money is fine, but legally consenting adults hitting each other for pleasure is gross and wrong, and thus illegal.


There is some argument on this about the point of boxing not being to injure each other, that is merely an outcome, but with BDSM the pain and damage is the point. It's a dumb argument that basicly comes down to "I don't like this but I do like that". Its all the fault of operation spanner, which had a view of S&M much like the view of D&D being discussed in the theard on 80's gaming and heavy metal.

 insaniak wrote:
Sometimes, Exterminatus is the only option.
And sometimes, it's just a case of too much scotch combined with too many buttons...
 
   
Made in us
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine




My secret fortress at the base of the volcano!

 Mr. Burning wrote:


'Lovelies' like that in my avatar have their jobs on the line ONE1!



First: Which one is she? I don't recognize her (unlike the last two you've used).

Second: Certain British posters on Dakka are no longer allowed to make fun of us Americans for our stupid politicians, now that we have proof yours are just as stupid as ours.

Third: If boxing is legal because it's a spectator sport, why isn't BDSM porn? It's somebody getting beaten consensually for the purpose of other people watching. If porn isn't a spectator sport, I'd like to know what is.

Fourth: I had no idea the UK still had a domestic porn industry. I thought all the British porn stars moved to California and started working for Brazzers...

Emperor's Eagles (undergoing Chapter reorganization)
Caledonian 95th (undergoing regimental reorganization)
Thousands Sons (undergoing Warband re--- wait, are any of my 40K armies playable?) 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






Sheffield, City of University and Northern-ness

 Steve steveson wrote:
There is some argument on this about the point of boxing not being to injure each other, that is merely an outcome, but with BDSM the pain and damage is the point. It's a dumb argument that basicly comes down to "I don't like this but I do like that". Its all the fault of operation spanner, which had a view of S&M much like the view of D&D being discussed in the theard on 80's gaming and heavy metal.
The entire legal definition of assault on a person is pants on head stupid at the moment; there are definitions of different levels of assault that are just ridiculous, and dictated based on an entirely Victorian view of the world.

There is still a legal definition of assault that specifically includes the act of impeding a man in the process of escaping from a shipwreck. But somehow getting a spanking or a caning to the point of bruising is still illegal. Ridiculous.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/12/04 16:27:49


   
Made in gb
Bryan Ansell





Birmingham, UK

 Goliath wrote:
 Steve steveson wrote:
There is some argument on this about the point of boxing not being to injure each other, that is merely an outcome, but with BDSM the pain and damage is the point. It's a dumb argument that basicly comes down to "I don't like this but I do like that". Its all the fault of operation spanner, which had a view of S&M much like the view of D&D being discussed in the theard on 80's gaming and heavy metal.
The entire legal definition of assault on a person is pants on head stupid at the moment; there are definitions of different levels of assault that are just ridiculous, and dictated based on an entirely Victorian view of the world.

There is still a legal definition of assault that specifically includes the act of impeding a man in the process of escaping from a shipwreck. But somehow getting a spanking or a caning to the point of bruising is still illegal. Ridiculous.


You can be guilty of assault if a person you raise your fists to fears for their safety.




Automatically Appended Next Post:
squidhills wrote:
 Mr. Burning wrote:


'Lovelies' like that in my avatar have their jobs on the line ONE1!



First: Which one is she? I don't recognize her (unlike the last two you've used).

Second: Certain British posters on Dakka are no longer allowed to make fun of us Americans for our stupid politicians, now that we have proof yours are just as stupid as ours.

Third: If boxing is legal because it's a spectator sport, why isn't BDSM porn? It's somebody getting beaten consensually for the purpose of other people watching. If porn isn't a spectator sport, I'd like to know what is.

Fourth: I had no idea the UK still had a domestic porn industry. I thought all the British porn stars moved to California and started working for Brazzers...


Look up Isabel Ice for all her gap toothed activities - she is a keeper!.

We have a pretty good porn scene and some decent female directors.....................so I am told.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/12/04 16:49:32


 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka




Manchester UK

Dude. You know a worrying amount about porn.

 Cheesecat wrote:
 purplefood wrote:
I find myself agreeing with Albatross far too often these days...

I almost always agree with Albatross, I can't see why anyone wouldn't.


 Crazy_Carnifex wrote:

Okay, so the male version of "Cougar" is now officially "Albatross".
 
   
Made in jp
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer






Somewhere in south-central England.

 Goliath wrote:
 Steve steveson wrote:
There is some argument on this about the point of boxing not being to injure each other, that is merely an outcome, but with BDSM the pain and damage is the point. It's a dumb argument that basicly comes down to "I don't like this but I do like that". Its all the fault of operation spanner, which had a view of S&M much like the view of D&D being discussed in the theard on 80's gaming and heavy metal.
The entire legal definition of assault on a person is pants on head stupid at the moment; there are definitions of different levels of assault that are just ridiculous, and dictated based on an entirely Victorian view of the world.

There is still a legal definition of assault that specifically includes the act of impeding a man in the process of escaping from a shipwreck. But somehow getting a spanking or a caning to the point of bruising is still illegal. Ridiculous.


I disagree.

The various levels of assault seem fairly clear and well defined. There is now recognition of mental assault, which simply was not recognised in Victorian times.

I'm writing a load of fiction. My latest story starts here... This is the index of all the stories...

We're not very big on official rules. Rules lead to people looking for loopholes. What's here is about it. 
   
Made in us
Hallowed Canoness





The Void

Well... one thing we know for sure about all this...


I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long


SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ 
   
Made in gb
Courageous Space Marine Captain






Glasgow, Scotland

 KalashnikovMarine wrote:
Well... one thing we know for sure about all this...



It stings so bad...but have an exalt.

I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!

Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
 
   
Made in gb
Bryan Ansell





Birmingham, UK

 Albatross wrote:
Dude. You know a worrying amount about porn.


A healthy amount I would say. I'm a relatively normal married bloke. I just remember lots of unimportant gak....like stuff about porn.
   
Made in gb
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego





Canterbury

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/232331/hundreds-plan-face-sitting-protest-at-british-parliament-after-porn-ban/


.. there's a headline I never thought I'd see !

The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king,
 
   
Made in gb
Avatar of the Bloody-Handed God






Inside your mind, corrupting the pathways

 reds8n wrote:
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/232331/hundreds-plan-face-sitting-protest-at-british-parliament-after-porn-ban/


.. there's a headline I never thought I'd see !


Well, given how the government is going, soon you wont; the freedom of information and the press will happily be trampled under foot in the name of morals and anti-terrorism

   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Wonder how much of that metadata they're storing is porn related..
(UK Intel Department)

Proud Member of the Infidels of OIF/OEF
No longer defending the US Military or US Gov't. Just going to ""**feed into your fears**"" with Duffel Blog
Did not fight my way up on top the food chain to become a Vegan...
Warning: Stupid Allergy
Once you pull the pin, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend
DE 6700
Harlequin 2500
RIP Muhammad Ali.

Jihadin, Scorched Earth 791. Leader of the Pork Eating Crusader. Alpha


 
   
Made in fr
Trazyn's Museum Curator





on the forum. Obviously

 Goliath wrote:
 NuggzTheNinja wrote:
Female ejaculation is life threatening? Sounds sexist to me...
The guy in charge of the BBFC has gone on record as stating that despite the evidence for it's existence, Female Ejaculation is a myth, and any that is shown in video will actually just be urination, which is banned.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Crablezworth wrote:
 Goliath wrote:
you can't legally consent to bodily harm.


How does denny's remain in business then?
Well, mind-bogglingly, as long as you call it a spectator sport, and sign the relevant waivers, it's perfectly fine to consent to bodily harm, so Denny's is good on all counts It's how boxing and the like are able to take place.

But yeah, the act of beating the gak out of each other for money is fine, but legally consenting adults hitting each other for pleasure is gross and wrong, and thus illegal.


BDSM isn't a spectator sport? I mean, it has spectators, and there's a lot of physical exertion involved.

What I have
~4100
~1660

Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!

A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble

 
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar





By that definition, isn't most porn spectator sport?
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: