Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

[clarify] His dislike of me has not affected his votes or the outcome of this investigation at all. He has never voted for myself, regardless of his views on my faith. Your point is moot.

Actually... I did vote for you on the first day... you had driven me to the point of exasperation and I was ready to throw you down the garbage chute.

Lord-Loss... If you want to clear your name, give your justification for your vote switching. Trying to cast doubt on me is not the way to prove yourself innocent, especially in my eyes.

EDIT:: I fail at grammar.

OOC: oops!

Gornall wrote:Actually... I did vote for you on the first day... you had driven me to the point of exasperation and I was ready to throw you down the garbage chute.

{ERROR} you are correct, however it was a quickly changed vote out of malice and not genuine suspision.

Lord-Loss wrote:Frienzed Pototaos summaries make sense. But Gornals only seem to confuse and cast suspicon were there was no suspicon.

If his summaries make sense, why did you vote for him THIS VERY DAY?!?! And I do not try to cast suspicion. I simply ask questions aloud that we should all be asking ourselves so we do not get led around by our noses by the xenos, like lambs to the slaughter. I just want people to think about why they are voting the way they are and more importantly try to determine why other people are voting in certain ways... is it in good faith or with a malicious purpose?

So far I've voted for:

Drk_Oblit
Lord Of Ghosts
Airman
Frienzed Pototao
Gornall

I unvoted Frienzed Potatoa and I no longer believe Drk_Oblit to be suspicous.

We've been through 23 pages and new evidence comes up fairly quickly. After LOG was killed, I started becoming suspicous of Airman, I then voted for him.
After three people died in one day/night, I had no suspicons and It seemed Manchu had been slowly closing in on Frienzed Potatoa. I unvoted him after reviewing my posts, looking through Gornalls posts it seemed that his 'summaries' seemed to cast suspicon.

Unvote:Gornall

I cant see to find a lead and we're all guessing here, I have some suspicons but not enough evidence to back them up.


I feel that some people aint posting enough, Gwar!, Ultrafool and Frienzed Potatao have all avoided suspicon through there lack of posting.

I am going to recount significant points on this journey up to this point. If anyone has any notion idea etc please say something. We need to work together to survive this one. Mind you this is only a part of the beginging it will take me some time to go through the rest. So don't feel threatened but also dont stay quite.

Drk_Oblit seems to make an amazing spring board to killing innocent people. I am going to take another look at possible patterns.

Gornell votes DarkLordSean -- reason was apparent character dislike
Gornell unvotes DarkLordSean -- reason is possible hasty decision

Brotherstynier insuinates against Manchu / Demogerg / Airman

Brotherstynier mentions orkeousaurus is smarter then he lets on

Airman / Orkeo go on the offensive questioning BrotherStynier

Drk_Oblitr8r begins his incomprehensible behavior more befitting a coward then a traitor or xenos

Brotherstynier hesitates with the option of going after "twitchy"

Valhallan says oblit is not the one we should fear

LoG jibberish mentinos of possible misloyalities and orkesaurus is against him

Orkesaurus votes LoG
Valhallan votes LoG
Drk Oblit votes LoG in a way that he can turn attention away from him (His reasoning is this "WAIT!!! Lord of Ghosts story seems too lazy IMO, either he's just lazy, or LoG is trying to make us think so. "

Brotherstynier again hesistates and says "Before we... execute him I purpose we continue our investigation into the others, perhaps he simply is ill like Manchu suggests. If that is the case we can always kill him when we are done."


Frenzied continues to recount the past days events speaking of any possible pattern or idea. Continuesly seeking any input or arguement because now four innocent have died and 2 more are about to occur if no real link is made.

<OOC>Have to head to work will post as I can asap. Making a note for myself here too. (Page 5). Yeah there is a possibility if people vote quickly this post may not finish.

My vote stands. If I live this night Brotherstynier will get my next vote.

<OOC> Just incase I dont get time to post even further. Btw loving this game. The only problem I have is I take physical que's from people and I cant get them here. So its hard to find a liar just in words. Great game though.

Why wait? Why not come for me out in the open right now? Afraid to show the others your claws? Don't forget you've proclaimed yourself an Inquisitorial Acolyte, something that could have been an attempt to lure out your 'master' when that failed you went for the obvious choice at the time, Manchu the Heretic. Now you go for Obltr8r with the vote, maybe thinking if the most rational was a heretic than perhaps the one who seems to have a few screws loose is the Inquisitor. Killing him in a vote would seem less obvious than killing him at night.

Gentlemen, please calm yourselves. We need to find the traitors, and we need to do it now. There must be some way of wrinkling this out, despite our lack of success so far.

We do believe we have a solid lead in drk_oblit, on this most of us can agree.

Valhallan42nd wrote:We do believe we have a solid lead in drk_oblit, on this most of us can agree.

I don't particularly agree. I think Lord-Loss's behavior when faced with scrutiny has been just as flaky as DarkO's. I'm paitently waiting for the rest of Frenzied's reasoning, as I think his detailed notes of who voted for who when will shed some light on this situation.

Remember, our only reasons for suspecting DarkO are his random behavior and backstory. I am MUCH more concerned about those who fit in well, but sentence people to death with their votes. Yes, Twitchy is annoying, but I don't think it will kill any of us. The xenos drumming up votes against us or attacking us in our sleep will.

EDIT:: More grammar fail.

Is there one person who as been a consistant final vote?

I have examined all the votes that involve the death of an innocent. Of the two votes cast, there are only four in common with both:

Lord-Loss, Drk_Oblitr8r, Gornall, and... myself.

I think you you look inside those common votes, you'll find the Genestealers. I realize that by pointing this out, I'm making myself vulnerable to finger pointing. But considering that lord-loss just tossed out a vote to Gornall, which he swiftly retracted, I think that bears further investigation.

Unless one of our genestealers doesn't vote with the others, which would still mean one of you is a genestealer as well.

There is that possibility. But considering that it took as long as it did to reach consensus (OOC:12 pages and 8 pages, respectively), and that not everyone was voting, I don't know that the genestealers had that luxury. The lack of votes may have forced their hands.

Valhallan42nd wrote:There is that possibility. But considering that it took as long as it did to reach consensus (OOC:12 pages and 8 pages, respectively), and that not everyone was voting, I don't know that the genestealers had that luxury. The lack of votes may have forced their hands.

This was my reason for witholding my vote on the 2nd day, to try and create a pattern of votes from the others to draw conclusions from to figure out who the stealers are.

Demogerg wrote:

Valhallan42nd wrote:There is that possibility. But considering that it took as long as it did to reach consensus (OOC:12 pages and 8 pages, respectively), and that not everyone was voting, I don't know that the genestealers had that luxury. The lack of votes may have forced their hands.

This was my reason for witholding my vote on the 2nd day, to try and create a pattern of votes from the others to draw conclusions from to figure out who the stealers are.

Good idea. I think we have have our suspects, then.

Valhallan42nd wrote:There is that possibility. But considering that it took as long as it did to reach consensus (OOC:12 pages and 8 pages, respectively), and that not everyone was voting, I don't know that the genestealers had that luxury. The lack of votes may have forced their hands.

The lack very well may have forced their hands, but still we should be wary and approach the situation as though only one of the 4 is one of the foul creatures.

Four? I would have hoped you'd say three, BrotherStynier. Of course, I know that you cannot remove me as a suspect.

Still I think a firm case could be made against any of the other three.

Valhallan42nd wrote:Gentlemen, please calm yourselves. We need to find the traitors, and we need to do it now. There must be some way of wrinkling this out, despite our lack of success so far.

We do believe we have a solid lead in drk_oblit, on this most of us can agree.

I disagree.

I like your logic Valhallan, even if it does implicate myself also. I do agree that while it is possible for the lack of votes to have forced the genestealer's hands (or claws), Stynier is right in pointing out that it may not be a valid assumption to think that they always voted together. They may have even been so smart as to have one of their filth vote for an innocent one day and the other one vote the next.

As for myself, I know I have made grave errors in voting. However, I have been transparent in my decisions and consistent in my reasoning. That's all I can offer in my defense.

My vote for Lord-Loss still stands for now. If we look to be at impass for the day, I will change my vote as needed to avoid inaction, but I still think in my gut that Lord-Loss is the right vote.

So, we got four suspects (That we can all agree on)


Handsome, charming and amazing Lord-Loss (Me), Gornall, Valhallan and Drk_Oblit.

Well since many people want my input on this situation I will give it to them.

Gronall: I have slight suspicions about you, you dislike
DLS and it seems to me it is a little trick that you are pulling to distract us.

Lord-Loss: high suspicions, you changing your votes constantly makes me think that you are masking yourself from what you really are.

DLS: slight

Drk_obilit8r: moderate to slight suspicions, many people are gunning for you, but something in my gut tells me you are not the culprit.

Demogerg, Valhallan42nd, Styneir : none to slight, I have nothing to hold up against you.

Gwar: moderate, seems to trusting, agree with everyone, votes to quickly.

Potato: Slight to moderate, hardly says anything, can't get any info from him.

I am comfortable voting for at least two of the four, though I still feel like I was fooled the last day by Drk_oblit.

I have no problem voting for Lord-Loss and to a lesser extent DarkO (even though he would have to have fooled me good). I know myself to be loyal and I am undecided on Valhallan.

OOC:: Valhallan... your German proverb doesn't happen to say "Payback is a female dog" does it?

I am still interested to hear the rest of Frenzied's summaries/notes. Hopefully they will help break the deadlock.

OOC: "Delight in the suffering of others is the best delight". Essentially, when we see others that we think deserve suffering suffer, we delight in it. Think Paris Hilton going to jail.

Frenzied Potato wrote:I am going to recount significant points on this journey up to this point. If anyone has any notion idea etc please say something. We need to work together to survive this one. Mind you this is only a part of the beginging it will take me some time to go through the rest. So don't feel threatened but also dont stay quite.

Drk_Oblit seems to make an amazing spring board to killing innocent people. I am going to take another look at possible patterns.

Gornell votes DarkLordSean -- reason was apparent character dislike
Gornell unvotes DarkLordSean -- reason is possible hasty decision

Brotherstynier insuinates against Manchu / Demogerg / Airman

Brotherstynier mentions orkeousaurus is smarter then he lets on

Airman / Orkeo go on the offensive questioning BrotherStynier

Drk_Oblitr8r begins his incomprehensible behavior more befitting a coward then a traitor or xenos

Brotherstynier hesitates with the option of going after "twitchy"

Valhallan says oblit is not the one we should fear

LoG jibberish mentinos of possible misloyalities and orkesaurus is against him

Orkesaurus votes LoG
Valhallan votes LoG
Drk Oblit votes LoG in a way that he can turn attention away from him (His reasoning is this "WAIT!!! Lord of Ghosts story seems too lazy IMO, either he's just lazy, or LoG is trying to make us think so. "

Brotherstynier again hesistates and says "Before we... execute him I purpose we continue our investigation into the others, perhaps he simply is ill like Manchu suggests. If that is the case we can always kill him when we are done."


Frenzied continues to recount the past days events speaking of any possible pattern or idea. Continuesly seeking any input or arguement because now four innocent have died and 2 more are about to occur if no real link is made.[/i

Continuing on with the notes...

Valhallan states DrkOblit is not the one to fear

Valhallan Votes Lord of Ghosts due to his hive fleet comment

Gornell states that both LoG and DrkOblit could be heretic scum
Brother stynier says yet again you can kill LoG at their leasure
Mekboy has suspicions of Airman (Dead innocent) and LoG (Dead innocent)
Dark Lord Sean has suspicions of DrkOblit

LordLoss Votes LoG

Dark Lord Sean Votes DrkOblit more so then LoG

Mekboy Votes DrkOblit

Lordloss Unvotes Log and Votes DrkOblit

Airman Votes DrkOblit

Brotherstynier Votes Airman by reason of over accusing of DrkOblit

Airman unvotes Drkoblit and Votes BrotherStynier

Airman Unvotes brotherstyier due to a comment about retaliation voting

Gwar votes DrkOblit

Orkesaurus does the LoG rally to death at this point...Gonna copy paste my mekboy notes to fill in this gap...


[i]My Theory / Notes / Timeline of Mekboy:

- Mekboy first doubted Airman who went out of his way to dispose the body for it scared Dark Oblit
- He voted Dark Oblit
- Airman and Gwar agree with Mekboy's Reason of voting Oblit and Airman Votes Dark Oblit
- Mekboy suggest Gornell and Brother Styner may be trying to save their fellow Genesteeler
- Airman changes his vote from Dark Oblit to Brother Styner
- Mekboy further insinuates that Brother Styner may be a genesteeler
- Airman Unvotes after be called out on a hasty vote immiediatly agreeing with Lord Loss (interesting)
- Orkeosaurus attempts a rally against the LotG
- Brother Styner unvotes Airman (maybe the genesteelers voted eachother as a show, since they both unvoted eachother)
- Orkeosarus continues the warcry against LotG

Quoting Lord Loss "LOG is becoming increasing suspicous, the way he talks....planets destroyed by indiviuals, mutations, sacrificed to the Emperor.


He's a psykers! "

- Mekboy votes Lord of Ghosts
- Mekboy unvotes Lord of GHosts and re votes Dark Oblit
- Mekboy is dead

Mind you these are my notes on Mekboy I will not divulge my other notes till I am sure.

Here is what I believed to be Mekboy's Theory (Not Mine):

Mekboy successfully identified three very good canidates of genesteelers.

- Lord - Loss called out to kill the Psyker not once did the possibility of an Imperial Psyker come into play.

- I claim to be an Inquisitor Acolyte
- Orkeosaurus first to respond
- Manchu responds
- Brother Stynier responds


DrkOblits death has the possiblity of a direct link to Brotherstynier. If indeed DrkOblit is a xenos as we all suspect his death would directly implicate Brotherstyniers lack of resolve towards DrkOblit.

My master as many of you seem directly worried about would not be the enemy now would he? Those who fear the Grand Inquisitor are the heretics themselves. You should rejoice in the fact that it is a possibilty. I can say for certain I am an a apprentice and I have not seen my master. I expect someone of his stature to be at Terra. If he was here this issue would of been resolved. I fail...but I will not give up for their is still innocent life to save.

Gornell there is a link to you as well but it is not as substantial as I currently believe it to be. Gwar you have been way too damn quite. What are you plotting? Simple pilgrim eh?

Unfortunately alot of my notes are not helpful. Just a few choice tidbits that I believe put some people in higher suspicion then others.

My vote stands against DrkOblit.

<OOC> Page 13. Sorry for wall text.

So, what is the current vote count?

I think it's going to be time for people to take sides... is DarkO the culprit, is Lord-Loss guilty, or is it another person entirely? I do agree that our focus is best placed on the four of us (I'm including myself) that have voted for both innocent lynches.

Valhallan42nd wrote:So, what is the current vote count?

I think:
4 for DarkO (Gwar!, Frenzied, Vahallan, and Lord-Loss)
3 for Lord-Loss (Gornall, DLS, and Demogerg)

Stynier and Ultrafool, where do you weigh in on this?