Switch Theme:

Should GW 'Squat' some stuff?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut



NoVA

Dosadi wrote:I think people are over reacting a bit to the rumour that the Dark Angels, Blood Angels and Black Templars lists are being worked on right now. The design process in not as linear as people believe it is. Of course these books are being worked on, they share one big thing in common; they are all Space Marines, it makes sense to develop them together with the new Ultradex as a guide. This way we will get a more consistent power level (everyone’s always crying about codex creep).
When the DA book came out, Jervis said they had developed the BA list alongside it, but DA were released because the miniature development was more complete and there was more sales potential in the “robed monkish” marines than the red “jump packish” marines. Just because they are working on all these lists simultaneously does not mean they are going to release them one after another.
I know for a fact that 2010 is going to be a very Xenos heavy year. When the Dark Eldar do eventually come out (and they will) and people see the models that have been re-designed from the ground up and realize how much work is required to develop an entirely new range of models and update rules that are right now three editions old (the second 3rd edition list released, not counting the 3.5 update ‘dex) and make it all marketable so that all their hard work is not for nothing. It’s a monumental task, and they have put in the hands of the man who basically invented “space elves”. Between his staggering skill as a conceptualist and his amazing attention to detail, symmetry and style as a sculptor, I have faith that all will be forgiven for making us wait as long as we have.
Am I a Jes Goodwin’s fanboy for saying that?
HELLZ YA! Proud of it!
They need to be sure that the army they release for the Dark Eldar will sell and sell as well as any of the other Xenos armies; which all combined are a drop in the bucket compared to how many space marines they sell.
So every time a new marine model or book or accessory comes out, just be happy that the sales generated by those items allows GW to spend time and resources developing the truly interesting armies that populate the 40k universe.


Dosadi
This.
   
Made in us
Anointed Dark Priest of Chaos






I have played had two armies that i spent a lot of time and money on "squatted" by GW (LATD and Genestealer cultists).

I refuse to ever again do a specialty army/appendix force included in any supplement or WD feature. I got bent over twice, but if I let it happen again then shame on me for being a moron.

So I can feel for the Dark Eldar players. Being in Limbo is not fun. Sadly, I am starting to feel a grave disturbance in the force on this one however...

++ Death In The Dark++ A Zone Mortalis Hobby Project Log: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/663090.page#8712701
 
   
Made in us
Wraith




O H I am in the Webway...

dienekes96 wrote:
Dosadi wrote:I think people are over reacting a bit to the rumour that the Dark Angels, Blood Angels and Black Templars lists are being worked on right now. The design process in not as linear as people believe it is. Of course these books are being worked on, they share one big thing in common; they are all Space Marines, it makes sense to develop them together with the new Ultradex as a guide. This way we will get a more consistent power level (everyone’s always crying about codex creep).
When the DA book came out, Jervis said they had developed the BA list alongside it, but DA were released because the miniature development was more complete and there was more sales potential in the “robed monkish” marines than the red “jump packish” marines. Just because they are working on all these lists simultaneously does not mean they are going to release them one after another.
I know for a fact that 2010 is going to be a very Xenos heavy year. When the Dark Eldar do eventually come out (and they will) and people see the models that have been re-designed from the ground up and realize how much work is required to develop an entirely new range of models and update rules that are right now three editions old (the second 3rd edition list released, not counting the 3.5 update ‘dex) and make it all marketable so that all their hard work is not for nothing. It’s a monumental task, and they have put in the hands of the man who basically invented “space elves”. Between his staggering skill as a conceptualist and his amazing attention to detail, symmetry and style as a sculptor, I have faith that all will be forgiven for making us wait as long as we have.
Am I a Jes Goodwin’s fanboy for saying that?
HELLZ YA! Proud of it!
They need to be sure that the army they release for the Dark Eldar will sell and sell as well as any of the other Xenos armies; which all combined are a drop in the bucket compared to how many space marines they sell.
So every time a new marine model or book or accessory comes out, just be happy that the sales generated by those items allows GW to spend time and resources developing the truly interesting armies that populate the 40k universe.


Dosadi
This.


I also agree with this. Redoing a whole army and its fluff is MUCH harder than updating 4-5 books. The parent codex is there, the babies aren't that hard to do a quick patch, unlike DE who need a complete reconstruction...

Granted I play Deathwing but I REALLY want to see Daemonhunters and Dark Eldar redone.

He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster and if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you  
   
Made in us
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer





I love this game for the 'sandbox' style of gaming.

The reason I'm so in to it is all the variations in race's and the build-your-own style list creation.

If GW drops even one race it would stunt my interest in 40k a lot.

I want MORE races and codex's, I'm really not too pissed using old 'dexs. As long as the pool of options for army creation is as large as possible, the game will always be fresh to me.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/06/12 19:56:59


Own and play
+/- 3,500 Dark Eldar (8% painted)
+/- 4,500 Tyranids (99% painted)
+/- 4,500 Necrons (82% painted)
Proxy and play
Chaos Space Marines
Demons
Orks
Space Marines
 
   
Made in gb
Implacable Skitarii





Portsmouth UK

Dark Eldar - they maybe outdated but they still have good mini options - on GW site compare DE with necrons, there is more variety and more figures to choose from.

I'm waiting to be corrected ............

(but i think i'm right) lol

but the cliff, the sea!! your lust will hold you up - Ride!! Take on the outer form of the Duke - Change! Transfrom! 
   
Made in us
Anointed Dark Priest of Chaos






athba wrote:Dark Eldar - they maybe outdated but they still have good mini options - on GW site compare DE with necrons, there is more variety and more figures to choose from.

I'm waiting to be corrected ............

(but i think i'm right) lol


The fact that Necrons are all the same like they ave been stamped out on an assembly line is intentional and part of their intended aesthetic...

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2009/06/12 20:46:14


++ Death In The Dark++ A Zone Mortalis Hobby Project Log: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/663090.page#8712701
 
   
Made in us
Infiltrating Hawwa'





Australia

CT GAMER wrote:
athba wrote:Dark Eldar - they maybe outdated but they still have good mini options - on GW site compare DE with necrons, there is more variety and more figures to choose from.

I'm waiting to be corrected ............

(but i think i'm right) lol


The fact that Necrons are all the same like they ave been stamped out on an assembly line is intentional and part of their intended aesthetic...


methinks their "intentional aesthetic" is lame.

DakkaDakka.com does not allow users to delete their accounts or content. We don't apologize for this.  
   
Made in us
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre




Missouri

Well...that's your problem? There are a lot of people who think the Tau aesthetic is lame, too, not every army is going to appeal to everyone.

 Desubot wrote:
Why isnt Slut Wars: The Sexpocalypse a real game dammit.


"It's easier to change the rules than to get good at the game." 
   
Made in us
Infiltrating Hawwa'





Australia

Sidstyler wrote:Well...that's your problem? There are a lot of people who think the Tau aesthetic is lame, too, not every army is going to appeal to everyone.


Nahhhh...I actually like the majority of the models that are out there, including Necrons.

DakkaDakka.com does not allow users to delete their accounts or content. We don't apologize for this.  
   
Made in us
Lead-Footed Trukkboy Driver





Auburn, CA

Necrons rule.

Their uniform nature is great. It's frightening to see never-ending waves of machines whose sole directive is too kill.

So long as you can pose the models in a variety of different poses then I think they're great.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/06/21 09:18:47


Waagh! Lagduf
Sons of Vulkan
Cadian Mountain Division
 
   
Made in us
Moustache-twirling Princeps





About to eat your Avatar...

As long as Eldar stay around to kick Spaz Marines asses, I will continue to use GW codices. If they get axed I will be right next to Deff dread with a backpack full of dynamite, a cigarette, and a cup of black coffee with NOTHING IN IT. "DAMMIT NO MORE COFFEE... GW MUST GO!!!".

I love this game for the 'sandbox' style of gaming.

The reason I'm so in to it is all the variations in race's and the build-your-own style list creation.

If GW drops even one race it would stunt my interest in 40k a lot.

I want MORE races and codex's, I'm really not too pissed using old 'dexs. As long as the pool of options for army creation is as large as possible, the game will always be fresh to me.


NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! PLEASE GOD NO. GW will end up making a HUGE mess of the game if they spam new armies all the time. They need to fix the ones they already have. There is sandbox, and we are not exactly there right now, way too many beach-bullies walking around. Right now were in a clean litter box (with a little %#$@ in the corner over there... it is different @%# for everyone), and if they add more armies it won't be so neat and tidily organized anymore. At least I know for a fact the 5th ed. armies are simply better, add another generation to the 3 inbred generations we have now, and oh christ were all screwed, tiny little gamers everywhere will be fielding slowed power lists and ruin the game for most of the older gamers out there.



This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2009/06/21 09:18:49



 
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: