Switch Theme:

Monolith Power Matrix and Deep Striking  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Heroic Senior Officer





Woodbridge, VA

NecronLord3 wrote:
Gwar! wrote:
insaniak wrote:
Gwar! wrote:If the Monolith Deep Strikes onto it's own Army, all it does is Deep Strike mishap as normal.


"Instead, move any models that are in the way the minimum distance necessary to make space for the Monolith."

Deep Striking onto friendly models pushes them out of the way.
In the spirit of Lex Luthor:
WROOOOOOOOOONG!

You forgot the first part of the rule there insaniak:

"Because of the sheer mass of the monolith, it is not destroyed if there are enemy within 1" when it arrives. Instead (of being destroyed), move any models that are in the way the minimum distance necessary to make space for the Monolith."

Bold added by me. You cannot do something instead of being destroyed if you don't roll the Destroyed result.


Except your bold part does not exist and you always move the enemy units away instead of rolling mishap. Something the INATfaq also agrees with.


Actually, it does say it. It's the prerequistite set in the first sentence, the sentence that the word "Instead" refers to. So, 'instead' of what? Instead of being destroyed. I'll admit I've always played it as instead of any mishap. But now that Gwar has pointed it out, it does indeed read "Instead (of being destroyed, as referenced in the first sentence)......." and only applicable to enemy models, altho I can't recall that ever being an issue.

Don "MONDO"
www.ironfistleague.com
Northern VA/Southern MD 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: