Switch Theme:

Would my Orks be DQ'd?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





nkelsch wrote:
DarknessEternal wrote:When did "based" come to mean something other than "on a base"?

'3 colors and based' is a short descriptive term to describe a more detailed standard which has been in place for decades within wargaming. So if you are referring to the 'based' part of '3 colors and based' they don't mean a model that is silver metal, grey plastic, green stuff and black base...

Yet you still give no definition of what it does mean.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in us
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator




Falls Church, VA

DarknessEternal wrote:
nkelsch wrote:
DarknessEternal wrote:When did "based" come to mean something other than "on a base"?

'3 colors and based' is a short descriptive term to describe a more detailed standard which has been in place for decades within wargaming. So if you are referring to the 'based' part of '3 colors and based' they don't mean a model that is silver metal, grey plastic, green stuff and black base...

Yet you still give no definition of what it does mean.


It means the base has been given some scenic detail. Typically sand, flock, or paint, but it can also be resin/plastic with built in details that are painted.

IE, not a black piece of plastic with no details or paint. And since I got into this hobby almost 15 years ago, thats exactly what "basing" a model has meant. Putting them on the black plastic bases has never been the definition of "basing", it's just something you're forced to do to make them stand up.
   
Made in us
Rogue Daemonhunter fueled by Chaos






Toledo, OH

I would suggest "based" mean either fully painted with additional texture, or replaced with a scenic based.
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





I've been playing 40k since the year it came out (yes, I'm old), and I've never known anyone who thought of basing as putting some other foreign substance on a base, except perhaps paint.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in us
Rogue Daemonhunter fueled by Chaos






Toledo, OH

DarknessEternal wrote:I've been playing 40k since the year it came out (yes, I'm old), and I've never known anyone who thought of basing as putting some other foreign substance on a base, except perhaps paint.


Then you may need to get out more.

Not to be rude, but that's what I've encountered for the decade I've been in the hobby, at least in the context of "painted and based."

Putting a base on a miniature is simply "assembly."

I'm sure there are pockets that consider "basing" simply painted a blank base, but they're the minority.

For example, by your definition, a "basing kit" would be clippers and glue, not slate and rubble:

http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat470007a&prodId=prod1140127

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/08/18 21:09:56


 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






Polonius wrote:
DarknessEternal wrote:I've been playing 40k since the year it came out (yes, I'm old), and I've never known anyone who thought of basing as putting some other foreign substance on a base, except perhaps paint.


Then Iyou may need to get out more.

Not to be rude, but that's what I've encountered for the decade I've been in the hobby, at least in the context of "painted and based."

Putting a base on a miniature is simply "assembly."

I'm sure there are pockets that consider "basing" simply painted a blank base, but they're the minority.


Agreed. '3 colors and based' has always been shorthand for:

1. You must fully assemble all miniatures in your army.
2. You must paint all miniatures in your army, using at least 3 colors. (including black and
white. We permit monochromatic color schemes.)
3.You must properly base all miniatures in your army, and said bases must be finished.
(with flock, static grass, any other sort of texturing etc.)

This is the standard for entry almost every event that has appearance requirements since the original days of GW GTs and GW RTTs has used. When someone says '3 colors and based' I have never seen it mean anything else.


My Models: Ork Army: Waaagh 'Az-ard - Chibi Dungeon RPG Models! - My Workblog!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
RULE OF COOL: When converting models, there is only one rule: "The better your model looks, the less people will complain about it."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
MODELING FOR ADVANTAGE TEST: rigeld2: "Easy test - are you willing to play the model as a stock one? No? MFA." 
   
Made in us
Hunter with Harpoon Laucher




Castle Clarkenstein

DarknessEternal wrote:I've been playing 40k since the year it came out (yes, I'm old), and I've never known anyone who thought of basing as putting some other foreign substance on a base, except perhaps paint.


Been playing it just as long, and we always 'based' our models with sand or flock, even way back then. Probably because many people had played other games before 40k.

....and lo!.....The Age of Sigmar came to an end when Saint Veetock and his hamster legions smote the false Sigmar and destroyed the bubbleverse and lead the true believers back to the Old World.
 
   
Made in us
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord





Oregon, USA

Ditto.

I've always based my models, and so did everyone I played with, since the birth of 40K.

It was required (along with painted models) at my local GW.

The Viletide: Daemons of Nurgle/Deathguard: 7400 pts
Disclples of the Dragon - Ad Mech - about 2000 pts
GSC - about 2000 Pts
Rhulic Mercs - um...many...
Circle Oroboros - 300 Pts or so
Menoth - 300+ pts
 
   
Made in ca
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes




Kelowna BC

carmachu wrote:
Abstract Catalyst wrote:
How about no. I fail to see why basing models is a necessity.


Basing back in the day wasnt done, or was optional. I remember back then we never did.


truth. it really does add a lot to a model though. up until a few years ago i didn't base mine (predominantly out of laziness), but now i can't imagine not doing it.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/08/19 05:33:25


 
   
Made in au
Skillful Swordmaster






Abstract Catalyst wrote:I fail to see why people should have to do anything to such an unimportant part of the model.

Oh and sand isn't free, to get anywhere near any 'free' sand I'd have to pay £20 in petrol. Plus, taking sand is stealing, and most sand would look awful on a model base.


Yes because you have to follow every single law.....I always grab sand from the beach (50 metres from my house) And have yet to be thrown in a cell or draged before a judge, Ill wager that your not the most fun person to party with.

Damn I cant wait to the GW legal team codex comes out now there is a dex that will conquer all. 
   
Made in ca
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes




Kelowna BC

"taking sand is stealing" = "I'm really looking for excuses to be intractable and not base my models."

How is picking up dirt off the ground stealing? I'm interested in hearing what section of your criminal code "Picking up handfuls of rocks and dirt" falls under, because, man, there are some pairs of boots I've worn that should probably do some time.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/08/19 07:40:58


 
   
Made in us
Liche Priest Hierophant






For my local beach (Presque Isle in Erie) it's literally a Federal Offense to remove any material- sand, dirt, branches, beach glass- technically, it might be a felony to hold your breath as you cross the boundary of the park.

GENERATION 8: The first time you see this, copy and paste it into your sig and add 1 to the number after generation. Consider it a social experiment.

If yer an Ork, why dont ya WAAAGH!!

M.A.V.- if you liked ChromeHounds, drop by the site and give it a go. Or check out my M.A.V. Oneshots videos on YouTube! 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: